${\displaystyle \mathrm{B}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}=\frac{\mathrm{R}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}}}$

Incricket, a player'sbatting average is the total number ofruns they have scored divided by the number of times they have beenout, usually given to two decimal places. Since the number of runs a player scores and how often they get out are primarily measures of their own playing ability, and largely independent of their teammates, batting average is a good metric for an individual player's skill as a batter (although the practice of drawing comparisons between players on this basis is not without criticism^[1]). The number is also simple to interpret intuitively. If all the batter'sinnings were completed (i.e. they were out every innings), this is theaverage number of runs they score per innings. If they did not complete all their innings (i.e. some innings they finishednot out), this number is an estimate of the unknown average number of runs they score per innings.

Each player normally has several batting averages, with a different figure calculated for eachtype of match they play (first-class, one-day, Test matches, List A, T20, etc.), and a player's batting averages may be calculated for individual seasons or series, or at particulargrounds, or against particular opponents, or across their whole career.

Batting average has been used to gauge cricket players' relative skills since the 18th century.

Batting averages are sometimes calculated for whole teams, across a series or tournament.^[2][3]

Most players have career batting averages in the range of 20 to 40. This is also the desirable range forwicket-keepers, though some fall short and make up for it with keeping skill. Until a substantial increase in scores in the 21st century due to improved bats and smaller grounds among other factors, players who sustained an average above 50 through a career were considered exceptional, and before the development of theheavy roller in the 1870s (which allowed for a flatter, safer cricket pitch) an average of 25 was considered very good.^[4]

• All-rounders who are more prominentbowlers than batsmen typically average something between 20 and 30.
• 15 and under is typical for specialist bowlers.
• A small number of players have averaged less than 5 for a complete career, though a player with such an average is a liability unless an exceptional bowler such asAlf Valentine,B. S. Chandrasekhar orGlenn McGrath were.

Career records for batting average are usually subject to a minimum qualification of 20innings played or completed, in order to exclude batsmen who have not played enough games for their skill to be reliably assessed. Under this qualification, the highestTest batting average belongs toAustralia's SirDonald Bradman, with 99.94. Given that a career batting average over 50 is exceptional, and that only4 other players have averages over 60, this is an outstanding statistic. The fact that Bradman's average is so far above that ofany other cricketer has led several statisticians to argue that, statistically at least, he was the greatest athlete in any sport.^[5]

Disregarding this 20 innings qualification, the highest career Test batting average is 144 byKurtis Patterson, who scored 144 runs and was dismissed once in his two Test innings. He then fell out of the Australian squad due to a loss of form and injury.

Batting averages inOne Day International (ODI) andT20 International (T20I) cricket tend to be lower than in Test cricket because of the need to score runs more quickly. Consequently, batters tend to play riskier strokes and less emphasis is placed on building an innings in order to amass a high individual score. It should also be remembered, especially in relation to the ODI and T20I histograms above, that there were no ODI or T20I matches when Bradman played.

If a batter has been dismissed in every single innings, then this statistic gives exactly theaverage number of runs they score per innings.

However, for a batter with one or more innings which finishednot out, the true mean or average number of runs they score per innings is unknown as it is not known how many runs they would have scored if they could have completed all their not out innings. In this case, this statistic is anestimate of the average number of runs they score per innings. If their scores have ageometric distribution, then this statistic is themaximum likelihood estimate of their true unknown average.^[6]

Batting averages can be strongly affected by the number of not outs. For example,Phil Tufnell, who was noted for his poor batting,^[7] has an apparently respectableODI average of 15 (from 20 games), despite a highest score of only 5 not out, as he scored an overall total of 15 runs from 10 innings, but was out only once.^[8]

A batter who was not dismissed in any of the innings over which their average is being calculated does not have a batting average, asdivision by zero does not give a result.^[9]

Highest career batting averages infirst-class cricket as follows:

Rank	Batter	Matches	Innings	N.O.	Runs	Highest	Ave	First Class career
1	Don Bradman	234	338	43	28,067	452*	95.14	1927–49
2	Vijay Merchant	150	234	46	13,470	359*	71.64	1929–51
3	George Headley	103	164	22	9,921	344*	69.86	1927–54
4	Ajay Sharma	129	166	16	10,120	259*	67.46	1984–2001
5	Sarfaraz Khan	54	82	12	4,593	301*	65.61	2014–24
6	Bill Ponsford	162	235	23	13,819	437	65.18	1920–34
7	Bill Woodfull	174	245	39	13,388	284	64.99	1921–34
8	Shantanu Sugwekar	85	122	18	6,563	299*	63.10	1987–2002
9	Kamindu Mendis	56	87	7	4,920	200*	61.50	2018–25
10	K. C. Ibrahim	60	89	12	4,716	250	61.24	1938–50
Qualification for inclusion: 50 innings. Names inbold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source:ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 8 February 2025.

A batting average of above 50 is considered by many as a benchmark to distinguish between a good and a great batsman.^[10] Highest male career batting averages inTest matches as follows:

Rank	Batter	Tests	Innings	N.O.	Runs	High Score	Average	Test career
1	Don Bradman	52	80	10	6,996	334	99.94	1928–48
2	Kamindu Mendis	12	21	2	1,184	182*	62.31	2022–25
3	Adam Voges	20	31	7	1,485	269*	61.87	2015–16
4	Graeme Pollock	23	41	4	2,256	274	60.97	1963–70
5	George Headley	22	40	4	2,190	270*	60.83	1930–54
6	Herbert Sutcliffe	54	84	9	4,555	194	60.73	1924–35
7	Eddie Paynter	20	31	5	1,540	243	59.23	1931–39
8	Ken Barrington	82	131	15	6,806	256	58.67	1955–68
9	Everton Weekes	48	81	5	4,455	207	58.61	1948–58
10	Harry Brook	24	40	1	2,281	317	58.48	2022–24
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names inbold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source:ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 8 February 2025.

Highest career batting averages inOne Day International cricket as follows:

Rank	Batter	ODIs	Innings	N.O.	Runs	Highest	Ave	ODI career
1	Ryan ten Doeschate	33	32	9	1541	119	67.00	2006–11
2	Shubman Gill	55	55	8	2,775	208	59.04	2019–25
3	Virat Kohli	302	290	45	14,181	183	57.88	2008–25
4	Dawid Malan	30	30	4	1,450	140	55.76	2019–23
5	Babar Azam	128	125	15	6,106	158	55.50	2015–25
6	Michael Bevan	232	196	67	6,912	108*	53.58	1994–2004
7	AB de Villiers	228	218	39	9,577	176	53.50	2005–18
8	Jonathan Trott	68	65	10	2,819	137	51.25	2009–13
9	MS Dhoni	350	297	84	10,773	183*	50.57	2004–19
10	Ben Duckett	22	22	1	1,058	165	50.38	2016–25
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names inbold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source:ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 9 March 2025

Rank	Batsmen	T20Is	Innings	N.O.	Runs	Highest	Ave	T20I career
1	Sami Sohail	46	42	18	1,347	94*	56.12	2019–24
2	Tilak Varma	25	24	9	749	120*	49.93	2023–25
3	Virat Kohli	125	117	31	4,188	122*	48.69	2010–24
4	Mohammad Rizwan	106	93	21	3,414	104*	47.41	2015–24
5	Kendel Kadowaki-Fleming	35	35	4	1,420	114	45.80	2022–24
6	Manish Pandey	39	33	17	709	79*	44.31	2015–20
7	Muhammad Tanveer	61	57	16	1,781	88*	43.43	2019–24
8	Rinku Singh	33	24	11	546	69*	42.00	2023–25
9	Gustav McKeon	20	20	1	785	109	41.31	2022–24
10	Sabawoon Davizi	32	31	3	1,149	115*	41.03	2019–24
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names inbold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source:ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 2 February 2025.

Rank	Batter	Tests	Innings	N.O.	Runs	High Score	Average	Test career
1	Denise Annetts	10	13	3	819	193	81.90	1987–92
2	Shafali Verma	5	10	1	567	205	63.00	2021–24
3	Lorraine Hill	7	10	2	499	118*	62.37	1975–77
4	Enid Bakewell	12	22	4	1,078	124	59.88	1968–79
5	Belinda Haggett	10	15	2	762	144	58.61	1987–92
6	Ellyse Perry	14	23	7	930	213*	58.12	2008–25
7	Betty Wilson	11	16	1	862	127	57.46	1948–58
8	Smriti Mandhana	7	12	1	629	149	57.18	2014–24
9	Karen Rolton	14	22	4	1,002	209*	55.66	1995–2009
10	Debbie Hockley	19	29	4	1,301	126*	52.04	1979–96
Qualification for inclusion: 10 innings. Names inbold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source:ESPNcricinfo. Last updated: 2 February 2025

Rank	Batter	ODIs	Innings	N.O.	Runs	Highest	Ave.	ODI Career
1	Rachael Heyhoe Flint	23	20	9	643	114	58.45	1973–82
2	Lindsay Reeler	23	23	5	1,034	143*	57.44	1984–88
3	Meg Lanning	103	102	16	4,602	152*	53.51	2011–23
4	Bronwyn Calver	34	21	11	534	81*	53.40	1991–98
5	Mithali Raj	232	211	57	7,805	125*	50.68	1999–2022
6	Laura Wolvaardt	101	100	14	4,303	184*	50.03	2016–24
7	Ellyse Perry	155	128	42	4,187	112*	48.68	2007–25
8	Karen Rolton	141	132	32	4,814	154*	48.14	1995–2009
9	Wendy Watson	23	22	6	768	107*	48.00	1987–93
10	Belinda Clark	118	114	12	4,844	229*	47.49	1991–2005
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names inbold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source:ESPNcricinfo. Correct to 17 January 2025.

Rank	Batter	T20Is	Innings	N.O.	Runs	Highest	Ave.	T20I Career
1	Lucy Barnett	21	20	9	742	96	67.45	2022–24
2	Tahlia McGrath	53	41	14	1,124	91*	41.62	2021–25
3	Beth Mooney	109	103	25	3,215	117*	41.21	2016–25
4	Christina Gough	42	40	12	1,096	101*	39.14	2019–24
5	Ni Luh Dewi	26	21	7	529	78	37.78	2023–24
6	Mithali Raj	89	84	21	2,364	97*	37.52	2006–19
7	Kathryn Bryce	49	47	13	1,273	73*	37.44	2018–24
8	Ni Putu Ayu Nanda Sakarini	42	37	11	968	95*	37.23	2019–24
9	Meg Lanning	132	121	28	3,405	133*	36.61	2010–23
10	Sterre Kalis	44	44	6	1,358	126*	35.73	2018–25
Qualification for inclusion: 20 innings. Names inbold text are current players whose figures are likely to change. * denotes not out. Source:ESPNcricinfo. Correct to 7 February 2025.

Alternative measures of batting effectiveness have been developed, including:

Strike rate measures a different concept to batting average – how quickly the batsman scores (i.e. average number of runs from 100 balls) – so it does not supplant the role of batting average. It is used particularly inlimited overs matches, where the speed at which a batter scores is more important than it is infirst-class cricket. Strike rate may also be used to compare a player's ability to score runs against differing types of bowling (i.e. spin, fast bowling).

A system of player rankings was developed to produce a better indication of players' current standings than is provided by comparing their averages.

• Cricket statistics
• Batting average
• Bowling average

• Batting (cricket)
• Cricket records and statistics
• Cricket terminology

• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Use dmy dates from April 2019