InGreek mythology,Ate (Ancient Greek:Ἄτη,romanized: Átē,lit. 'Delusion, Recklessness, Folly, Ruin')[1] is thepersonification of moral blindness and error. She could blind the mind of both gods and men leading them astray. Ate was banished from Olympus by Zeus for blinding him toHera's trickery denyingHeracles his birthright.Homer calls Ate the daughter of Zeus, whileHesiod has Ate as the daughter ofEris (Strife).[2]
Like all the children ofEris (Strife), Ate is a personified abstraction, allegorizing the meaning of her name, and represents one of the many harms which might be thought to result from discord and strife.[3] The meaning of her name, the Greek wordatē (ἄτη), is difficult to define.[4]Atē is averbal noun of the verbaáō (ἀάω).[5] According toThe Cambridge Greek Lexicon,aáō means to "lead astray", "befuddle", "blind", or "delude",[6] whileἄτη can mean: (1) the state of "delusion, infatuation (inflicted on a person's mind by a god, esp Zeus)", (2) "reckless behavior ... recklessness, folly", and (3) "ruin, calamity, harm".[7] As informed by the meanings and usage of the unpersonifiedatē, personified Ate can apparently represent any part (or all?) of the causal sequence: (1) a blinding or clouding of the mind—causing (2) ill-considered and reckless actions—causing (3) the ruin such actions entail.[8] She is thought of as being the instigator of delusion and its resulting destruction.[9]
Beyond being a mere personification, Ate has little actual identity.[10] In theIliad,Agamemnon, the leader of Greek expedition against Troy, tells the story of Ate's deception of Zeus, and her subsequent banishment from Olympus, an etiological myth supposedly explaining how Ate entered the world of men.[11] As told by Agamemnon, Hera tricked Zeus into swearing an oath that resulted in Zeus' son Heracles losing the birthright Zeus had intended for him. Zeus blamed Ate for clouding his mind causing him not to see Hera's deception. In great anger Zeus grabbed Ate by the hair and flung her fromMount Olympus, and thereby Ate came to inhabit the "fields of men".[12] According to the mythographerApollodorus, when Ate was thrown down by Zeus, Ate landed inPhrygia at a place called "the hill of the Phrygian Ate", where the city ofTroy was founded.[13] TheHellenistic poetLycophron, in hisAlexandra, also mentions the place calling it "the high Hill of Doom [Ate]".[14]
Homer'sIliad calls Ate the eldest daughter ofZeus, with no mother mentioned.[15] However,Hesiod'sTheogony has Ate as one of the several children ofEris (Strife), with no father mentioned. Her siblings include (among several others) her brothersHorkos (Oath), and theMachai (Wars), and sistersLimos (Famine), andDysnomia (Lawlessness).[16]Aeschylus, in his tragedyAgamemnon, has the Chorus callPeitho "the unendurable child of scheming Ruin [Ate]".[17]
Ate is closely associated with Zeus. In theIliad, Ate is called the "eldest" daughter of Zeus, an apparent indication of her power and her importance to Zeus.[18] Ate (or the impersonalatē) is often referred to as the agent (or instrument) of Zeus' divine retribution.[19] In theIliad, Zeus is begged to send Ate so that the denier of "Prayers ... may fall and pay full recompense."[20] Although Agamemnon blames Ate for blinding him (which led to his dishonoring Achilles), he also says that it was Zeus (via Ate?) who robbed him of his senses.[21] According to Hesiod, Zeus never sends war, nor famine, nor "calamity [atē]" to those who honor Justice,[22] whileSolon says that "Zeus sends [atē] to punish" men.[23]
Ate also appears as an agent of Zeus' justice inAeschylus's tragic trilogy theOresteia. InAgamemnon, the first play of the trilogy, Ate is linked withHelen of Troy, and Agamemnon's wifeClytemnestra, both of whom act as agents of Zeus' retribution. Helen, who plays an instrumental role in Zeus' punishment of Troy, is likened to a "priest" of Ate, while Clytemnestra, who, by killing Agamemnon, is the direct instrument of Zeus' punishment, says that she did so with the aid of "Ruin [Ate]". In theLibation Bearers, the second play of theOresteia,Aeschylus describes Zeus as one who sends Ate to avenge "reckless human violence!"[24]
In Homer,atē is something inflicted by the gods; it causes delusion, then folly, then disaster.[26] Ate, as the personification of atē, receives its fullest development inHomer'sIliad, his epic poem about theTrojan War.[27] However, to what extent Homer may have considered Ate to be an actual divinity as opposed to a mere allegory is unclear.[28] The references to the goddess in theIliad revolve aroundAgamemnon's folly in having robbedAchilles, the Greeks greatest warrior, of his war prize, the slaveBriseis, and Achilles' subsequent refusal to fight, which brought the Greeks to the brink of defeat. While the concept ofatē is a central theme in theIliad,[29] occurring many times, Ate, as the personification ofatē, is explicitly found in just two speeches, one in Book 9, and the other in Book 19.[30]
During the embassy to Achilles in Book 9, Achilles' old tutorPhoenix, trying to persuadeAchilles to accept Agamemnon's offer of reparations, and return to battle, tells the following parable in which the "fleet of foot" Ate ("Blindness") outruns "halting"Prayers:[31]
For Prayers there are as well, the daughters of great Zeus, halting and wrinkled and of eyes askance, and they are ever mindful to follow in the steps of Blindness. But Blindness is strong and fleet of foot, so she far outruns them all, and goes before them over all the earth making men to fall, and Prayers follow after, seeking to heal the hurt. Now him who will respect the daughters of Zeus, when they draw near, him they greatly benefit, and hear him when he prays; but if a man denies them and stubbornly refuses, then they go and beg Zeus, son of Cronos, that Blindness may follow that man so that he may fall and pay full recompense.
— Homer,Iliad9.502–512; translation by A.T. Murray, revised by William F. Wyatt
In this allegory, Ate appears twice. First Ate causes damage to human beings. Then Prayers follow after Ate to repair her damage. But if the repair offered by Prayers is rejected (in this case if Achilles rejects Agamemnon's appeal) then Ate appears again as the punishment for such rejections. Ate both runs in front of Prayers, and when Prayers are refused, Ate also follows close behind.[32] These two appearances can also be seen as examples of the Homeric Ate's dual role, as both cause and effect. Here Ate is both the cause of the original offense (Agamemnon's insult to Achilles), and the disastrous consequences which would (and will) follow from Achilles' refusal of Agamemnon's attempt to make amends.[33]
In Book 19,Agamemnon attempts to excuse himself for having taken Briseis from Achilles, by blaming the "accursed" Ate (among others) for blinding his mind:[34]
It is not I who am at fault, but Zeus and Fate and Erinys, that walks in darkness, since in the place of assembly they cast on my mind fierce blindness [atē] on that day when on my own authority I took from Achilles his prize. But what could I do? It is a god that brings all things to their end. Eldest daughter of Zeus is Ate who blinds all— accursed one; delicate are her feet, for it is not the ground that she touches, but she walks over the heads of men, bringing men to harm, and this one or that she ensnares.
— Homer,Iliad19.86–94; translation by A.T. Murray, revised by William F. Wyatt
Phoenix's speech in Book 9 and Agamemnon's in Book 19 reveal different aspects of Ate's nature. The first emphasizes Ate's strength and speed, and her use by Zeus to punish (in this case, those who disregard Prayers). The second describes Ate's soft feet, walking not on the ground, but above the "heads of men", where, apparently unnoticed, she brings "men to harm".[35]
To further excuse his conduct,[36] Agamemnon tells the story—as an illustration of Ate's great power[37]—of how:
[Ate] once even blinded Zeus, though men say that he is the greatest among men and gods;
— Homer,Iliad19.95–96; translation by A.T. Murray, revised by William F. Wyatt
According to Agamemnon, whenAlcmene was about to give birth to Zeus's sonHeracles, Zeus, in his great pride, boasted that on that day would be born a man, of Zeus's blood, who would be king of theArgives. But Hera tricked Zeus into swearing an unbreakable oath such that whatever man, of Zeus's blood, born that day would be king. Then Hera delayed the birth of Heracles, and causedEurystheus, the great-grandson of Zeus, to be born prematurely, and thus Heracles lost the birthright Zeus had intended for him. Zeus (like Agamemnon) blamed Ate for blinding him to Hera's trickery.[38] As punishment, an enraged Zeus:
seized Ate by her bright-tressed head,[39] angered in his mind, and swore a mighty oath that never again to Olympus and the starry heaven should Ate come, who blinds all. So said he, and whirling her in his hand flung her from the starry heaven, and quickly she came to the tilled fields of men. At thought of her would he ever groan when he saw his dear son in disgraceful toil at Eurystheus’ tasks.
— Homer,Iliad19.126–133; translation by A.T. Murray, revised by William F. Wyatt
Hesiod presented Ate as one of the several offspring of Eris, all of whom were personifications representing some of the many harms which can arise out of discord and strife.[40] Hesiod particular associates Ate with her sisterDysnomia (Lawlessness). While listing the children of Eris, he lists both on the same line (230) of hisTheogony and says they are "much like one another".[41]
In a passage in hisWorks and Days (213–285), Hesiod describes various relationships between several personifications, including Ate. The passage, which discusses the superiority ofDike (Justice) overHybris, also mentionsEirene (Peace), who attends those who "heed" Dike (228), and Ate's brotherHorkos (Oath), who "runs along side crooked judgements" (219).[42] In particular Hesiod associates Ate with "war", which might refer to Ate's brothers, theMachai (Wars), and her sisterLimos (Famine) as all being punishments for those who "foster" Hybris:[43]
give heed to Justice [Dike] and do not foster Outrageousness [Hybris] ... [since for those who do] far-seeing Zeus never marks out painful war; nor does famine [limos] attend straight-judging men, nor calamity [atē], but they share out in festivities the fruits of the labors they care for.[44]
Among the tragic poets, the use ofatē and (thus) Ate is somewhat different than it is in theIliad.[45] In both Homer and tragedy,atē can be used to mean the original delusion as well as the resulting destruction. However, while Homer was more focused on the former,[46] tragedy became more focused on the latter. In tragedy,atē came to be less associated with internal damage: a damaged mind, and more with external damage: ruin, disaster, destruction.[47] Here, Ate can be seen as an avenger of evil actions and a just punisher of evil actors, similar toNemesis and theErinyes (Furies).[48]
Ate was particularly prominent in the plays ofAeschylus,[49] and less so in the later tragedians such as Euripides, where the idea ofDike (Justice) becomes more fully developed.[50] Personified Ate appears several times in Aeschylus' tragedyAgamemnon, where she is called "scheming", and made the mother of an "unendurable child", the "miserable"Peitho (Temptation).[51] Aeschylus also associates Ate with divine retribution: Zeus' punishment inflicted onTroy forParis's abduction ofHelen. In a long speech about Helen,[52] the Chorus likens her to a lion cub raised as a loved and loving pet which ends up savagely killing those who raised it, the cub (and by extension Helen) being reared, by divine intent, as a "priest" of Ate.[53] The Chorus goes on to describe Ate as:
the deity with whom none can war or fight, the unholy arrogance of Ruin [Ate], black for the house
In the final scene of the play,Clytemnestra, with bloody sword and clothes, emerges from the palace to reveal that she has killed her husband Agamemnon, in retribution for his having killed their daughterIphigenia.[54] She describes her act as the "Justice" [Dike] due for the killing of Iphigenia, and that she was aided by "Ruin" [Ate] and "Fury" [Eryns].[55]
In Aeschylus'sLibation Bearers, Ate is explicitly said to be the agent of Zeus' justice:
Zeus, Zeus,[56] who sends up from below avenging ruin [Ate] soon or late, against audacious, reckless human violence!
Ate also occurs twice in Aeschylus'Persians. At the beginning of the play, the Chorus of Persian elders voice their foreboding on their war with Greece:
But what mortal man can escape the guileful deception of a god? ... For Ruin [Ate] begins by fawning on a man in a friendly way and leads him astray into her net, from which it is impossible for a mortal to escape and flee.
Ate here represents both cause and effect. She begins by deceiving and misleading mortals, and ends by the mortals being caught inher inescapable net.[57] While, at the end of the play, Aeschylus returns to his typical focus of Ate as disastrous consequence, having the Chorus lament their devastating defeat: "What an evil eye Ruin [Ate] has cast upon us!"[58]
At the end of the battle in Aeschylus'sSeven Against Thebes, Ate's "trophy" stands at the gate of Thebes where both ofOrestes' sons have died killing each other in battle, representing the final victory of the "powers of destruction" over the cursed House ofLaius.[59]
There are several other references to Ate in ancient Greek sources. A fragment attributed to one of the two lyric poets of early sixth-century Lesbos:Sappho orAlcaeus, refers to Ate as "insatiable".[60] A fragment of the fifth-century BC philosopherEmpedocles refers to the "meadow of Ate", which probably signifies the mortal world.[61] The fifth-century BC Greek epic poetPanyassis associated Ate (along withHybris, the personification of insolence) with excessive drinking. According to Panyassis, the first round of wine, is for theGraces (the goddesses of beauty),Horae (the goddesses of good order), andDionysus (the god of wine), while the second round, is forAphrodite (goddess of love), and Dionysus again. But the third round is when "Hybris and Ate take their unlovely turn", bringing "good hospitality to a bad end".[62]
In his third-century BC epic poem theArgonautica, about the adventures ofJason and theArgonauts,Apollonius of Rhodes hasHera say that "even the gods are sometimes visited by Ate".[63] InNonnus's fifth-century AD epic poemDionysiaca, in order to gratify Hera, Ate persuades the boyAmpelus whomDionysus passionately loves, to impress Dionysus by riding on a bull from which Ampelus subsequently falls and breaks his neck.[64] InQuintus Smyrnaeus's in his third-century ADPosthomerica, associates Ate with the punishment of insolence:
Lesser men should beware of insulting their kings either face-to-face or behind their backs: the result is terrible wrath. Justice does exist: Ruin [Ate], who brings mortals misery upon misery, punishes an insolent tongue.
And Caesar's spirit, raging for revenge, With Ate by his side come hot from hell, Shall in these confines with a monarch's voice Cry "Havoc!" and let slip the dogs of war,[65]
Come, talk not of her. You shall find her the infernal Ate in good apparel.[66]
So too, inKing John, Shakespeare refers toQueen Eleanor as "An Ate stirring him[John] to blood and strife",[67] and, inLove's Labour's Lost, Birone jeers "Pompey is moved. More Ates, more Ates! stir them on, stir them on!"[68]
^Sommerstein 2013, p. 1: "The overwhelming impression one gets after exposure to the recent literature onatē is that, firstly, it is an extremely hard concept for the modern mind to understand and, secondly, no two scholars agree on what it meant.".
^Yamagata, p. 21; Hard,p. 31; Rose and Dietrich,s.v. Ate; Dräger,s.v. Ate. Padel, in discussing Homer's use ofatē (p. 174), calls this sequence the "atē-sequence" and "Homer's damage-chain": "In most but not all Homeric contexts, atē and aaō seem to mark inner, prior 'damage' done to the mind, which then causes a terrible outward act. Call it the X-act. it is a mistake, a crime, with consequences: further outward 'damage.' Damage in the world. Atē belongs in a causal chain. Damage, X-act, damage. This chain is the word's main point"; and when discussing Ate as personified by Homer, Padel notes (p. 181) that Ate can represent either the first place or last place in this sequence (or both at once, as she does in theIliad's "allegory of the Prayers", see below). Sommerstein 2013, p. 3 has a somewhat more expanded view, seeing thisatē-sequence as a "process ... starting with a divine initiative and finishing with a human catastrophe, whose beginning, middle and end can all be calledatē", and that this "whole process" can be thought of "as a single instance ofatē".
^Coray, pp. 50–51 on 86b–138, 57 on 94, 72 on 128–130; Padel,p. 182; Davies, p. 2.
^Hard,p. 31;Homer,Iliad19.95–133. It is unknown to what extent this story was part of the existing mythology of Heracles, or was anad hoc Homeric invention, see Coray, p. 59 on 95–133.
^Coray, p. 56 on 91 πρέσβα; Padel,p. 182;Homer,Iliad19.90. Murray and Padel translate Homer'sπρέσβα here as 'eldest'. According to Coray, the wordπρέσβα "means 'venerable', perhaps in rank and dignity in the case of goddesses", while noting that "the meaning 'eldest' ... may be heard here as well".
^Whether to capitalizeatē or its translation, to indicate personification or not, is an editorial choice made "according to the degree of prsonification suggested by the phrase." (West 1978, p. 210 on 213 Δικης). So "occurs" here means the capitalization of the word by the editor/translator being cited, while at the same time understanding that, according to Padel,p. 181: "orthography makes no difference to how she [Ate] operates". For discussions of the use of both Ate, and the much more frequently occurringatē (particularly as used in Homer and Greek tragedy), see: Dodds, pp. 2–8, 37–41; Doyle 1984; Padel,pp. 167–196 (Chapters 16, 17, 18),pp. 249–259 (Appendix); Sommerstein 2013.
^Dodds,p. 5, describes the instances of the personification ofatē in theIliad as "transparent pieces of allegory". Cairns, pp. 24–25, calls Ate anad hoc Homeric invention, and says that it is only for the purposes of the argument Homer is presenting that "Atē is actually a goddess". Coray, p. 59 on 95–133, says that it is an open question "whether Ate is a Homeric creation". Padel,p. 169, notes that such modern distinctions between, for example "concrete and metaphorical", may have little meaning for Homer, and,p. 181, that "Homer personifiesatē twice. Here, according to conventions of scholarship and poetry which imitates Greek, we start calling her Ate. But orthography makes no difference to how she operates".
^For discussions of Ate (andatē) in Homer see: Padel,pp. 167–187 (Chapters 16, 17); Cairns 2012.
^Padel,p. 181; Rose and Dietrich,s.v. Ate; Dräger,s.v. Ate. For a discussion of the so-called "Parable of the Prayers", see: Held 1987, Yamagata 2005.
^Padel, pp.174,181, which sees Ate here as part what Padel calls "Homers damage-chain": mental damage, causing a bad act, causing damage in the world, with Ate occupying both the front and back of this causal chain.
^Hard,p. 31; Gantz, p. 10;Homer,Iliad19.95–124. For a description of the parallel structure between the preceding section of theIliad and this section, showing the links Agamemnon is trying to make between himself and Zeus, see Coray, p. 51 on 86b–138.
^According to Coray, p. 72 on 126–127 'shining hair', such language implying "carefully coiffed hair, gleaming with the oil used to care for it, is a mark of a refined appearance ... and is part of Ate’s alluring look".
^West 1966, p. 232 on 230 Δυσνομίην τ’ Ἄτην τε;Hesiod,Theogony230. The phrase "much like one another" might apply toall the previously listed children of Eris, however according to Doyle,p. 25, the usual interpretation is that the phrase applies just to Dysnomia and Ate.
^Although Most's Greek text chooses not to capitalizelimos oratē here, West 1978, p. 106 ls. 230–231, does.
^For discussion of tragic usage see Doyle 1984; Padel, pp.188–196 (Chapter 18),249–259 (Appendix); Sommerstein 2013.
^Sommerstein 2013, p. 4, which notes that, although Homer ismore focused on the beginning of theatē-process, "the end is always kept in mind: a mental aberration which does not have catastrophic consequences is not calledatē".
Apollonius of Rhodes,The Voyage of Argo: The Argonautica, translated with an introduction by E. V. Rieu, Penguin Books, 1969.
Cairns, Douglas, Cairns, F. (ed.),"Atê in the Homeric poems", The University of Edinburgh Research Explorer. Original print publication:Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, vol. 15, pp. 1–52, Oxbow Books, 2012.ISBN978-0-905-20555-7.
The Cambridge Greek Lexicon, edited by J. Diggleet al, Cambridge University Press, 2021ISBN978-0-521-82680-8.
Coray, Marina,Homer's Iliad: The Basel Commentary. Book XIX, edited by Anton Bierl, Joachim Latacz, S. Douglas Olson, translated by Benjamin W. Millis, Sara Strack, De Guyter, 2016.ISBN978-1-5015-1224-7.
Davies, Malcom, "Agamemnon's Apology and the Unity of the Iliad",The Classical Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 1 (1995), pp. 1–8.JSTOR639711.
Hard, Robin,The Routledge Handbook of Greek Mythology: Based on H.J. Rose's "Handbook of Greek Mythology", Psychology Press, 2004,ISBN9780415186360.Google Books.
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh. "The Guilt of Agamemnon."The Classical Quarterly, Nov., 1962, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Nov., 1962), pp. 187–199.JSTOR637867.
Lycophron,Alexandra (orCassandra) inCallimachus and Lycophron with an English translation by A. W. Mair; Aratus, with an English translation by G. R. Mair, London: W. Heinemann, New York: G. P. Putnam 1921.Internet Archive.
Otis, Brooks,Cosmos & Tragedy : An Essay on the Meaning of Aeschylus, edited by Christian Kopff, the University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1981.ISBN0-8078-1465-2.Internet Archive.
Padel, Ruth,Whom Gods Destroy, Elements of Greek and Tragic Madness, Princeton University Press, 1995.ISBN0-691-03360-9.Internet Archive.
Sommerstein, Alan H. (2013), "Ate in Aeschylus" inTragedy and Archaic Greek Thought, D.L. Cairns ed., Swansea, Classical Press of Wales, 2013.ISBN978-1-905-12557-9. pp. 1–15.
Yamagata, Naoko, "Disaster revisited: Ate and the Litai in Homer'sIliad ", inPersonification in the Greek World: From Antiquity to Byzantium, edited by Emma Stafford and Judith Herrin, Ashgate, 2005. pp. 21–28.ISBN978-0-7546-5031-7.
