TheShatt al-Arab (Arabic:شط العرب,lit. 'River of theArabs';Persian:اروندرود,romanized: Arvand Rud,lit. 'Swift River'[5]) is ariver about 200 kilometres (120 mi) in length that is formed at theconfluence of theEuphrates and Tigris rivers in the town ofal-Qurnah in theBasra Governorate ofsouthern Iraq. The southern end of the river constitutes theIran–Iraq border down to itsmouth, where it discharges into thePersian Gulf. The Shatt al-Arab varies in width from about 232 metres (761 ft) atBasra to 800 metres (2,600 ft) at its mouth. It is thought that the waterway formed relatively recently in geological time, with theTigris andEuphrates originally emptying into the Persian Gulf via a channel further to the west.Kuwait'sBubiyan Island is part of the Shatt al-Arab delta.[1]
TheKarun, atributary which joins the waterway from the Iranian side, deposits large amounts ofsilt into the river; this necessitates continuousdredging to keep it navigable.[6]
The area used to hold the largestdate palm forest in the world. In the mid-1970s, the region included 17–18 million date palms: an estimated one-fifth of the world's 90 million palm trees. However, by 2002, more than 14 million of the palms had been wiped out by the combined factors of war, salt and pests; this count includes around 9 million palms in Iraq and 5 million in Iran. Many of the remaining 3–4 million trees are in poor health.[7]
The Shatt al-Arab is formed by the confluence of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers atAl-Qurnah, and flows into thePersian Gulf south of the city ofAl-Faw. It receives theKarun atKhorramshahr.
3,000 years ago, the Persian Gulf was larger and the Shatt al-Arab had not then formed.
Dispute over the river occurred during theOttoman-Safavid era, prior to the establishment of an independent Iraq in the 20th century. In the early 16th century, the IranianSafavids gained most of what is present-day Iraq, including Shatt al-Arab. They later lost these territories to the expandingOttomans following thePeace of Amasya (1555).[8]
In the early 17th century, the Safavids under king (shah)Abbas I (r. 1588–1629) once again regained Shatt al-Arab. Control of the river was at last permanently ceded to the Ottomans with theTreaty of Zuhab in 1639. Control of the waterway was also temporarily lost by the Safavids to the Ottomansin this treaty.[9] In general, the Treaty of Zuhab roughly re-established the common borders of the Ottomans and Safavid Empires the way they had been in 1555. However, the treaty never demarcated a precise and fixed boundary regarding the frontier in the south.
Later,Nader Shah (r. 1736–1747) succeeded in restoring Iranian control over Shatt al-Arab for a time. With theTreaty of Kerden (1746), however, the Zuhab boundaries were restored, ceding the river to the Turks once again.[10][11] TheFirst Treaty of Erzurum (1823) concluded between Ottoman Turkey andQajar Iran, resulted in the same.[12][13]
TheSecond Treaty of Erzurum was signed by Ottoman Turkey and Qajar Iran in 1847 after protracted negotiations, which includedBritish andRussian delegates. Even afterwards, backtracking and disagreements continued, until British Foreign Secretary,Lord Palmerston, was moved to comment in 1851 that "the boundary line betweenTurkey andPersia can never be finally settled except by an arbitrary decision on the part of Great Britain and Russia". Aprotocol between the Ottomans and the Persians was signed inIstanbul in 1913, which declared that the Ottoman-Persian frontier run along thethalweg, butWorld War I canceled all plans.
Coat of arms of the Kingdom of Iraq 1932–1959 depicting the Shatt and the forest
During theMandate of Iraq (1920–1932), the British advisors in Iraq were able to keep the waterway binational under thethalweg principle that worked in Europe: the dividing line was a line drawn between the deepest points along the stream bed. In 1937, Iran and Iraq signed a treaty that settled the dispute over control of the Shatt al-Arab.[14] The 1937 treaty recognized the Iranian-Iraqi border as along the low-water mark on the eastern side of the Shatt al-Arab except atAbadan andKhorramshahr where the frontier ran along thethalweg (the deep water line) which gave Iraq control of almost the entire waterway; provided that all ships using the Shatt al-Arab fly the Iraqi flag and have an Iraqi pilot, and required Iran to pay tolls to Iraq whenever its ships used the Shatt al-Arab.[15] ShahReza Shah of Iran together with his close friend PresidentMustafa Kemal Atatürk of Turkey had been promoting theSaadabad pact intended to protect the neutrality of Muslim nations if the world should be plunged into war again. In return for the Shatt al-Arab treaty, Iraq joined the Saadabad pact and Iranian-Iraqi relations were friendly for decades afterward.[15] The Saadabad pact ultimately brought together Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan in an alliance intended to protect their neutrality. In 1955, both Iran and Iraq were founding members of theBaghdad Pact alliance.[16]
The Shatt al-Arab and the forest were depicted in the middle of the coat of arms of theKingdom of Iraq, from 1932 to 1959.
Arab ferryman on the Shatt al-Arab 1958Evening atmosphere on the Shatt al-Arab
Under ShahMohammad Reza Pahlavi in the late 1960s, Iran developed a strong military and took a more assertive stance in the Near East.[14] In April 1969, Iran abrogated the 1937 treaty over the Shatt al-Arab and Iranian ships stopped paying tolls to Iraq when they used the Shatt al-Arab.[17] The Shah argued that the 1937 treaty was unfair to Iran because almost all river borders around the world ran along thethalweg, and because most of the ships that used the Shatt al-Arab were Iranian.[18] Iraq threatened war over the Iranian move, but on 24 April 1969, an Iranian tanker escorted by Iranian warships (Joint Operation Arvand) sailed down the Shatt al-Arab, and Iraq—being the militarily weaker state—did nothing.[15] The Iranian abrogation of the 1937 treaty marked the beginning of a period of acute Iraqi-Iranian tension that was to last until the Algiers Accords of 1975.[15]
AllUnited Nations attempts to intervene and mediate the dispute were rebuffed.Baathist Iraq claimed the frontier agreed to in 1937 was still the legitimate frontier. In response, Iran in the early 1970s became the main patron of Iraqi Kurdish groups fighting for independence from Iraq. In 1974 with the open encouragement and support of Iran, the Iraqi Kurdishpeshmerga rebelled against Iraq, and instead of waging a guerrilla war, thepeshmerga fought a conventional war against Iraq, leading to very intense fighting.[19] In the winter of 1974–75, Iran and Iraq almost went to war over Iran's support of the Kurds in Iraq (see1974–75 Shatt al-Arab conflict).[15] However, given Iran's greater military strength and population, the Iraqis decided against war, and chose to make concessions to Tehran to end the Kurdish rebellion.[15] In March 1975, Vice President Saddam Hussein of Iraq and the Shah signed theAlgiers Accord in which Iraq recognized a series of straight lines closely approximating thethalweg (deepest channel) of the waterway, as the official border, in exchange for which Iran ended its support of the Iraqi Kurds.[20] The Algiers Accord was seen as a national humiliation in Iraq, causing much bitterness over what was seen as Iranian bullying.[15] However, the Algiers Accord saw Iran cease supporting thepeshmerga as the Iranians closed the frontier, causing the Kurdish rebellion to promptly collapse.[21] The British journalist Patrick Brogan wrote that "the Iraqis celebrated their victory in the usual manner, by executing as many of the rebels as they could lay their hands on".[21]
In 1980, President Saddam Hussein of Iraqabrogated the 1975 treaty and Iraq invaded Iran. The main thrust of the military movement on the ground was across the waterway which was the stage for most of the military battles between the two armies. The waterway was Iraq's only outlet to the Persian Gulf, and thus, its shipping lanes were greatly affected by continuous Iranian attacks.[20]
WhenAl-Faw peninsula was captured by the Iranians in 1986, Iraq's shipping activities virtually came to a halt and had to be diverted to other Arab ports such as Kuwait and evenAqaba,Jordan. On 17 April 1988,Operation Ramadan Mubarak Materialized which saw Al-Faw peninsula recaptured after three days of fighting.[22] After retaking Al-Faw, the Iraqis began a sustained drive to clear the Iranians out of all of southern Iraq.[23] In May 1988, the Iraqis expelled the Iranians from Salamchech and tookMajnun Island.[22] During the fighting in the spring of 1988, the Iranians showed all the signs of collapsing morale.[24] Brogan reported:
Reports from the front, both at Faw [Fao] and outside Basra, indicated that the Iranian resistance was surprisingly weak. The army that had shown such courage andélan early in the war now broke in a rout, and fled before the Arabs.[24]
During the 1988 battles, the Iranians seemed tired and worn out by the nearly eight years of the war, and "put up very little resistance" to the Iraqi offensives.[25] After theIran–Iraq War, both sides agreed to once again treat the Algiers Accord as binding.
Conflicting territorial claims and disputes over navigation rights between Iran and Iraq were among the main factors for the beginning of theIran–Iraq War that lasted from 1980 to 1988, when the pre-1980status quo was restored. The Iranian cities and major ports ofAbadan andKhorramshahr and the Iraqi cities and major ports ofBasra andAl-Faw are situated along this river.[20]
During the2003 invasion of Iraq, the waterway was a key military target for thecoalition forces. Since it is the only outlet to the Persian Gulf, its capture was important in delivering humanitarian aid to the rest of the country,[20] and stopping the flow of operations trying to break the naval blockade against Iraq.[citation needed] The BritishRoyal Marines staged an amphibious assault to capture the key oil installations and shipping docks located atUmm Qasr on theal-Faw peninsula at the onset of the conflict.
Following the end of the war, the UK was given responsibility, subsequently mandated byUnited Nations Security Council Resolution 1723, to patrol the waterway and the area of thePersian Gulf surrounding the river mouth. They were tasked until 2007 to make sure that ships in the area were not being used to transport munitions into Iraq. British forces also trained Iraqi naval units to take over the responsibility of guarding their waterways after theCoalition Forces left Iraq in December 2011.
On two separate occasions, Iranian forces operating on the Shatt al-Arab captured BritishRoyal Navy sailors who they claim trespassed into their territory:
In 2004, several British servicemen were held fortwo days after purportedly straying into the Iranian side of the waterway. After being initially threatened with prosecution, they were released after high-level conversations betweenBritish Foreign SecretaryJack Straw and Iranian Foreign MinisterKamal Kharrazi. The initial hardline approach came down to power struggles within the Iranian government. The British marines' weapons and boats were confiscated.
In 2007, aseizure of fifteen more British personnel became a major diplomatic crisis between the two nations. It was resolved after thirteen days when the Iranians unexpectedly released the captives under an "amnesty".
^"Shatt al Arab".Oxford Public International Law. Retrieved23 April 2022.The Shatt al Arab river (or Arvand Rud in Persian) is the confluence of the Euphrates and the Tigris (Tigris and Euphrates Rivers), which starts in the Iraqi town of Al-Qornah and after circa 120 miles flows into the Persian Gulf.
Dougherty, Beth K.; Ghareeb, Edmund A. (2013).Historical Dictionary of Iraq (2 ed.). Scarecrow Press.ISBN978-0810879423.
Kia, Mehrdad (2017).The Ottoman Empire: A Historical Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO.ISBN978-1610693899.
Mikaberidze, Alexander (2015).Historical Dictionary of Georgia (2 ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.ISBN978-1442241466.
Potts, D. T. (2004). "SHATT AL-ARAB".Encyclopaedia Iranica.
Shaw, Stanford (1991). "Iranian Relations with the Ottoman Empire in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries". In Avery, Peter; Hambly, Gavin; Melville, Charles (eds.).The Cambridge History of Iran (Vol. 7). Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0857451842.
.svg)
