Critics have defined art rock as a "rejection" of rock music intended solely for the purpose of popular entertainment ordancing.[3][7] The term was closely associated with a specific period beginning in 1966–67, which became influential to the development ofprogressive rock.[8]
CriticJohn Rockwell described the term art rock as referring to wide-ranging and eclectic tendencies in rock music.[9] In the rock music of the 1970s, the application of the "art" descriptor by music critics and journalists was taken derogatorily, understood by musicians and fans as meaning that it was "aggressively avant-garde" or "pretentiously progressive".[10] "Art rock" is often used synonymously withprogressive rock.[11][9][1][3] Historically, the term has been used to describe at least two related, but distinct, types of rock music.[12] The first is progressive rock, while the second usage refers to groups who rejectedpsychedelia and thehippie counterculture in favour of amodernist, avant-garde approach defined bythe Velvet Underground.[12] EssayistEllen Willis compared these two types:
From the early sixties ... there was a counter-tradition in rock and roll that had much more in common with high art—in particular avant-garde art—than the ballyhooed art-rock synthesis [progressive rock]; it involved more or less consciously using the basic formal canons of rock and roll as material (much as pop artists used mass art in general) and refining, elaborating, playing off that material to produce ... rockand-roll art. While art rock was implicitly based on the claim that rock and roll was or could be as worthy as more established art forms, rock-and-roll art came out of an obsessive commitment to the language of rock and roll and an equally obsessive disdain for those who rejected that language or wanted it watered down, made easier ... the new wave has inherited the counter-tradition.[13]
Art rock has been described as emphasizingRomantic and autonomous traditions, in distinction to the aesthetic of the everyday and the disposable embodied byart pop.[14] Larry Starr and Christopher Waterman'sAmerican Popular Music defines art rock as a "form of rock music that blended elements of rock and European classical music", citing the English progressive rock bandsKing Crimson,Emerson, Lake & Palmer, andPink Floyd as examples.[15] Common characteristics include album-oriented music divided into compositions rather than songs, with usually complicated and long instrumental sections and symphonic orchestration.[3] Its music was traditionally used within the context ofconcept records, and its lyrical themes tended to be "imaginative" and politically oriented.[3] Art rock has also been noted for frequently intertwining with "serious music".[16][17]
Art rock has been described as "more challenging, noisy and unconventional" and "less classically influenced", with more of an emphasis onavant-garde music, depending on what was consideredavant-garde at the time of the term's use.[1] Similarities between it and progressive rock are that they both describe a mostly British attempt to elevate rock music to new levels of artistic credibility,[1] and became the instrumental analogue to concept albums androck operas, which were typically more vocal oriented.[18]
Art rock can also refer to either classically driven rock, or to a progressive rock-folk fusion.[3] Bruce Eder's essayThe Early History of Art-Rock/Prog Rock states that"'progressive rock,' also sometimes known as 'art rock,' or 'classical rock'" is music in which the "bands [are] playing suites, not songs; borrowingriffs from Bach, Beethoven, and Wagner instead ofChuck Berry andBo Diddley; and using language closer toWilliam Blake orT. S. Eliot than toCarl Perkins orWillie Dixon."[19]
In the academic perspective of music critics, such as those forThe New York Times,high art and pop music increasingly engaged with each other throughout the second half of the 20th century.[20] The first usage of the term "art rock", according toMerriam-Webster Online Dictionary, was in 1968.[4] As pop music's dominant formattransitioned from singles to albums,[nb 1] many rock bands created works that aspired to make grand artistic statements, where art rock would flourish.[22] As it progressed in the late 1960s – in tandem with the development of progressive rock – art rock acquired notoriety alongside experimental rock.[23]
The earliest figure of art rock has been assumed to be record producer and songwriterPhil Spector, who became known as anauteur for hisWall of Sound productions that aspired to a "classical grandiosity".[24] According to biographerRichard Williams, "[Spector] created a new concept: the producer as the overall director of the creative process, from beginning to end. He took control of everything, he picked the artists, wrote or chose the material, supervised the arrangements, told the singers how to phrase, masterminded all phases of the recording process with the most painful attention to detail, and released the result on his own label."[25] Williams also says that Spector transformed rock music from a performing art into an art that could only exist in the recording studio, which "paved the way for art rock".[26]
The Beach Boys' leaderBrian Wilson is also cited as one of the first examples of the auteur music producer.[27][nb 2] Like Spector, Wilson was known as a reclusive studio obsessive who laboriously produced fantastical soundscapes through his mastery of recording technology.[29] BiographerPeter Ames Carlin wrote that Wilson was the forerunner of "a new kind of art-rock that would combine the transcendent possibilities of art with the mainstream accessibility of pop music".[30] Drawing from the influence of Wilson's work and the work ofthe Beatles' producerGeorge Martin, music producers after the mid-1960s began to view the recording studio as a musical instrument used to aid the process of composition.[27] CriticStephen Holden says that mid-1960s recordings by the Beatles, Spector and Wilson are often identified as marking the start of art pop, which preceded the "bombastic, classically inflected" art rock that started in the late 1960s.[22]
Many of the top British groups during the 1960s and 1970s – including members of the Beatles,the Rolling Stones,the Kinks,the Who,10cc,the Move,the Yardbirds and Pink Floyd – came to music viaart school.[31][32] This institution differed from its US counterpart in terms of having a less industry-applicable syllabus and in its focus on furthering eccentric talent.[33] By the mid-1960s, several of these acts espoused an approach based on art and originality, where previously they had been absorbed solely in authentic interpretation of US-derived musical styles, such asrock 'n' roll andR&B.[34]
According to journalistRichard Goldstein, many popular musicians from California (like Wilson) desired to be acknowledged as artists, and struggled with this aspiration. Goldstein says that the line between violating musical conventions and making "truly popular music" caused those who lacked self-confidence (in contrast toBob Dylan and the Beatles) to be "doomed to a respectful rejection, and a few albums with disappointing sales usually meant silence. ... They yearned for fame, as only needy people can, but they also wanted to make art, and when both of those impulses couldn't be achieved they recoiled in a ball of frantic confusion."[35]
Author Matthew Bannister traces "the more self-conscious, camp aesthetic of art rock" to pop artistAndy Warhol and the Velvet Underground, who emulated Warhol's art/pop synthesis.[36] Accordingly, "Warhol took Spector's combination of the disembodiment, 'distance' and refinement of high culture with the 'immediacy' of mass cultural forms like rock and roll several stages further ... But Warhol's aesthetic was more thoroughly worked out than Spector's, which represented a transitional phase between old-fashioned auteurism and the thoroughly postmodern, detached tenets of pop art. ... Warhol's approach reverberates throughout art rock, most obviously in his stance of distance and disengagement."[37]
In 1965,Bob Dylan shifted from the folk music of theAmerican folk revival movement, which he had spearheaded inGreenwich Village, towards that of contemporaryrock music, a style described by the press as "folk rock". This event was met withcontroversy, though marked the beginning of a sequence of influential albums later dubbed the "Electric Trilogy":Bringing It All Back Home (March 1965),Highway 61 Revisited (August 1965), and laterBlonde on Blonde (June 1966).[38] Writing in 1972, Nat Freedland ofBillboard magazine, stated "during the golden period of the mid '60s, Bob Dylan and the Beatles led the way to an expansion of rock into an area of art songs with a beat".[39]
The December 1965 release of the Beatles'Rubber Soul has been regarded as signifying a watershed for the form of the pop album.[40][41] The album garnered recognition for the Beatles as artists from the American mainstream press due to the use of unconventional studio techniques and instruments which were not popular in rock music at the time.[42][43] Writing in 1968,Gene Sculatti ofJazz & Pop recognisedRubber Soul as "the definitive 'rock as art' album" and "the necessary prototype" that major artists such as the Rolling Stones (withAftermath) and the Beach Boys had felt compelled to follow.[44]
Academic Michael Johnson associates "the first documented moments of ascension in rock music" to the Beach Boys'Pet Sounds. Released in May 1966,Pet Sounds came from Wilson's desire to make a "complete statement", as he believed the Beatles had previously done withRubber Soul.[45][nb 3] In 1978, biographerDavid Leaf wrote that the album heralded art rock,[47] while according toThe New York Observer, "Pet Sounds proved that a pop group could make an album-length piece comparable with the greatest long-form works ofBernstein,Copland,Ives, andRodgers and Hammerstein."[48]Pet Sounds is also noted as the first rockconcept album.[49][50][nb 4] In 1971,Cue magazine described the Beach Boys as having been "among the vanguard" with regard to art rock, among many other aspects relating to the counterculture, over the period up to late 1967.[51]
The period when rock music became most closely aligned with the contemporaryart world began in 1966 and continued until the mid-1970s.[52] Jacqueline Edmondson's 2013 encyclopaediaMusic in American Life states that, although it was preceded by earlier examples,Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention's debut albumFreak Out! (June 1966) came to be seen as "the first successful incorporation of art music in a pop context". With Los Angeles as his base since the early 1960s, Zappa was able to work in an environment where student radicalism was closely aligned with an active avant-garde scene, a setting that placed the city ahead of other countercultural centres at the time and would continue to inform his music.[20] Writer and pianist Michael Campbell comments that the album "contains a long noncategorical list of Zappa's influences, from classical avant-garde composers to obscure folk musicians".[11]
By August, the Beatles'Revolver furthered the rock album-as-art perspective[53] and continued pop music's evolution.[54] Led by the art-rock single "Eleanor Rigby",[55] it expanded the genre's scope in terms of the range of musical styles, which included Indian, avant-garde and classical, and the lyrical content of the album,[56] and also in its departure from previous notions of melody and structure in pop songwriting.[57] According toRolling Stone, "Revolver signaled that in popular music, anything – any theme, any musical idea – could now be realized."[58] As withRubber Soul, the album inspired many of the progressive rock artists of the 1970s,[59] and each of its songs has been recognised as anticipating a new subgenre or style.[60]
Clash Music names the Velvet Underground's debut March 1967 albumThe Velvet Underground & Nico "the original art-rock record".[61][nb 5] Bannister writes of the Velvet Underground: "no other band exerted the same grip on the minds of 1970s/1980s art/alternative rock artists, writers and audiences."[63] Their influence would recur from the 1970s onwards to various worldwideindie scenes,[63][nb 6] and in 2006,The Velvet Underground & Nico was inducted into theLibrary of Congress'National Recording Registry, who commented: "For decades [it] has cast a huge shadow over nearly every sub-variety ofavant-garde rock, from 70s art-rock tono-wave,new-wave, andpunk."[64] However, when the Velvet Underground first appeared in the mid-1960s, they faced rejection and were commonly dismissed as a "fag" band.[65] In 1982, musicianBrian Eno famously stated that whileThe Velvet Underground & Nico initially sold just 30,000 copies, "everyone who bought one of those 30,000 copies started a band."[66]
The Beatles'Paul McCartney deemedPet Sounds "the record of the time", and in May 1967, the band responded with their own album:Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band,[67][nb 7] which was influenced by the Beach Boys'Pet Sounds and Frank Zappa'sFreak Out![68]AllMusic states that the first wave of art rock musicians were inspired bySgt. Pepper's and believed that for rock music to grow artistically, they should incorporate elements ofEuropean and classical music to the genre.[1][nb 8] Many British groups flowered in the album's wake; those who are listed inMusic in American Life includethe Moody Blues,the Strawbs,Genesis, and "most notably", Pink Floyd.[70][nb 9] This has been used, among other connections, to suggest a cohesion between acts described as art rock in the 1960s. The band's bassist,Roger Waters later stated that bothSgt. Pepper andPet Sounds "completely changed everything about records" for him.[72]
In 1970, Pink Floyd releasedAtom Heart Mother, with the 23-minute title track taking up the entire first side of the LP. This experiment with collaboratorRon Geesin yielded the longest unbroken Pink Floyd song on record, a suite divided into six parts, which required the band at times to utilise a choir and brass section on tour. The album was a commercial success, giving the band to its first number one record in the UK. It signalled a shift in their music from the psychedelic forays of their late '60s albums and into a period of renewed creativity in the form of longer and more progressive rock music.
English bandRoxy Music reinvented the sound of art rock, emphasising artistic expression and experimental sounds to push boundaries within pop music. Notably, their use of synthesizers and visual aesthetics, inspired later genres, includingsynth-pop andnew wave.[73]
Enthusiasm for usage of the term in music criticism and journalism waned in the mid-1970s.[11] From then to the 1990s, art rock was infused within various popular music genres.[3]Encyclopædia Britannica states that its genre's tendencies were continued by some British and Americanhard rock andpop rock artists, and thatBrian Eno's late 1970s and early 1980s collaborations withDavid Bowie andTalking Heads are exemplary of "the successful infusion of art rock tendencies into other popular music genres".[3] Bowie and Eno collaborated on a series of consecutive albums called the "Berlin Trilogy", characterised as an "art rock trifecta" byConsequence of Sound, who noted that at the time of their release, "The experimental records weren't connecting with audiences on the scale Bowie was used to... New Wave had exploded, and a generation of Bowie descendants had taken the stage."[74]
The then-emergingpost-punk and new wave movements were described as art rock, as bands incorporated experimental and avant-garde elements that were hallmarks of art rock. This new form of art rock music was later labelled "art punk".Television's landmark debut albumMarquee Moon released in 1977 became an influential contemporary art rock album, withPitchfork later stating "[Television] harnessed the energy you associate withpunk, even as they crossed it with art-rock and the poetic urges of frontmanTom Verlaine".[75][verification needed][76] Additionally, Television had initially worked with art rock musician Brian Eno though due to internal conflicts did not hire him to produce their debut album.[77]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(August 2025)
During the 1980s, bands such asTalk Talk developed a new style of art rock music that differed from the 1970s style.[78] At the time, many of the original art rock artists of the 1970s had abandoned their experimental sound. Writing in 1981, journalist Roy Trakin stated: "Of course, these stalwarts can still fillMadison Square Garden and sell a great many records, as they always have, but their days of adventurous risk-taking and musical innovation are long gone – replaced by the smug satisfaction of commercial success."[79]
During the 1990s into the turn of the century,alternative rock bands such asRadiohead andArcade Fire aimed to create studio-focused albums which merged the sounds of the original art rock era with that of contemporaneousalternative music influences, this sound was indebted to the sound of classic art rock bands like Pink Floyd and David Bowie, with Arcade Fire's 2022 albumWe being described as "an old-fashioned, 1970s-style art-rock album."[80][81]
^The Beatles,the Beach Boys,Phil Spector, andFrank Zappa all indicated a direction that transformed long-playing records into a creative format while variously reciprocating each others' creative developments throughout the 1960s.[21]
^For an early example of the rock album format being used to make a cohesive artistic statement, author Scott Schinder refers to the albumThe Beach Boys Today! (1965) and its "suite-like structure", consisting of one side of uptempo songs and the other ofballads.[28]
^In March 1966, Wilson calledPet Sounds "a more conscious, arty production ... it's like I'm right in the golden age of what it's all about. ... The folk thing has been important. I think it has opened up a whole new intellectual bag for the kids. They're making "thinking" records now. That's really what it is."[46]
^Carys Wyn Jones observes thatPet Sounds, the Beatles'Revolver (1966) andSgt. Pepper, andthe Who'sTommy (1969) are variously cited as "the first concept album", usually for their "uniform excellence rather than some lyrical theme or underlying musical motif".[8]
^In late 1966, the Velvet Underground's principal songwriterLou Reed praised Spector, crowning his "You've Lost That Lovin' Feelin'" (1964) "the best record ever made". In addition, he wrote: "There is no God and Brian Wilson is his son."[62]
^Bannister adds thatindie rock musicians would be significantly influenced by the "pop" offshoots of psychedelia that includes the later Beatles, the later Beach Boys,the Byrds, early Pink Floyd, andLove.[12]
^It is frequently cited for itsPet Sounds influence, as McCartney explains: "If records had a director within a band, I sort of directedPepper ... and my influence was basically thePet Sounds album."[67] The interplay between the Beach Boys and the Beatles' creative work thus inextricably links the two albums together.[67]
^In theEncyclopedia of Popular Music,Colin Larkin wrote ofSgt. Pepper: "[It] turned out to be no mere pop album but a cultural icon, embracing the constituent elements of the 60s' youth culture: pop art, garish fashion, drugs, instant mysticism and freedom from parental control."[69]
^Pink Floyd recorded their 1967 debut albumPiper at the Gates of Dawn next door to theSgt. Pepper's sessions at London'sEMI Studios; critics have shown support for the idea that thePiper track "Pow R. Toc H." was inspired byPepper's "Lovely Rita", whose sessions Pink Floyd were witness to.[71]
Greene, Doyle (2016).Rock, Counterculture and the Avant-Garde, 1966–1970: How the Beatles, Frank Zappa and the Velvet Underground Defined an Era. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.ISBN978-1-4766-6214-5.
Lindberg, Ulf; Guomundsson, Gestur; Michelsen, Morten; Weisethaunet, Hans (2005).Rock Criticism from the Beginning: Amusers, Bruisers, and Cool-Headed Cruisers. New York, NY: Peter Lang.ISBN978-0-8204-7490-8.
MacDonald, Ian (1998).Revolution in the Head: The Beatles' Records and the Sixties. London: Pimlico.ISBN978-0-7126-6697-8.
Schinder, Scott (2007)."The Beach Boys". In Schinder, Scott; Schwartz, Andy (eds.).Icons of Rock: An Encyclopedia of the Legends Who Changed Music Forever. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.ISBN978-0313338458.