Thearchitecture ofBosnia and Herzegovina is largely influenced by four major periods, when political and social changes determined the creation of distinct cultural and architectural habits of the region.
Themedieval period in Bosnia lasted until the invasion ofOttoman Empire. The social organization of Bosnia of that time developed into a system known asZadruga. In Zadruga, the community was organized such that a few families with common interests would live closely together in housing clusters. The leaders of the community were selected according to their age and high ethical standards. The Zadruga system was primarily found a ruralagrarian communities that is greatly dependent on natural resources. As the community grew, segments of families would collectively move to another area forming a new cluster or a village. The continuing links between these related clusters stimulated both trade and economy. Individual families lived together in houses known as Dinaric houses. These were simple structures build of natural materials (usually timber andwickerwork). Interior space was organized around thehearth in a central room with separate private quarters for men and women.
Even though militaryfortresses in Bosnia and Herzegovina date from the era ofRoman rule, most of them were built between the 12th and 15th century. The structures were built out of rough cut stone on hills overlooking a river, route or town. Today there are around 300 of them but most of them are in ruins. The most beautiful and well preserved are:Sarajevo,Srebrenik,Blagaj,Jajce,Travnik,Tešanj,Počitelj,Doboj,Vranduk,Bobovac,Stolac,Maglaj,Gradačac,Ljubuški,Sokol,Ključ,Bihać,Bosanska Krupa,Oštrovica,Velika Kladuša,Višegrad, andZvornik. The court inKraljeva Sutjeska was even richly engraved in Gothic style. An example of medieval Gothic and Romanesque tower is the Tower of St. Luke located inJajce, created in the 15th century.
.jpg)
In the late 15th century, theOttoman Empire came to theBalkans. They addressed the need to develop urban areas and cities, bringing imperialIslamic architecture to the region, partly mixed with local customs (one of them being the use ofsquinches instead of triangularpendentives found in Turkey).[1] From this emerged the basic form and organization of urban areas which are still distinctive today.Dušan Grabrijan, an architectural theoretician, defined the primary organization of typical Bosnian cities. He recognized that cities had five authentic components defined by a set of "unwritten laws": surrounding hills defined the form of the city, the main road is the spine, "Čarsija" is the heart, vegetation are lungs, river is the spirit.[2]Juraj Neidhardt, another theoretician, described a typical Bosnian city in one of his books as follows:[3]
What is the charm of the Orient that starts inSarajevo and that Westerners can't resist? Here there are no planned actions that would come from rational thinking, it is all a matter of improvisation, the result of ad hoc ideas and temporary needs. Here you cannot find a clear axis and absolute symmetry. Here you can't even find construction systems being built properly. Here everything displays the need to please humans. Composition, in the West, thought and built according to logic and plan, here becomes an agglomeration of parts, every time a result of different needs and every time improvised differently; but always in relation to the senses.
The fact that people used river as a main element of urban life led to construction ofStari Most in 1566 inMostar inHerzegovina. At the time it was built it was the longest single span arch stone bridge in the world.[4] Its meaning had however rather more profound power. It symbolized the connection between eastern and western civilization.[5] In addition tourban planning, architecture of Bosnia has emerged with a bit clearer architectural vocabulary. Architecture however was organized around a set of unwritten architectural laws including:human scale, unobstructed views,geometry, open and flexible spaces, simple furniture, spatial links to nature and use of local materials and traditional building techniques. In addition design philosophy favored heterogeneity of materials. In other words, each material had a particular intrinsic function given to it by social perception of the people involved in the architectural process. Juraj Neidhardt described this perception as follows:[6]
The point is that Bosnian man has his style. He makes his pottery, space, city, according to himself, in human scale, he is not a mystic, but a realist and that is the source of all this realistic architecture, which is at the same time comfortable, humble and democratic. All roofs and doors of these houses are almost the same, we could call them homes for anyone, all of them [houses] in the human scale, all almost grown out of the land, all the decoration brought from their construction and structure - architecture built of the natural and the local.
Hence foundations were built out of stone, ground floor out ofclay, unburntbrick and wooden ties, first floor out of wooden frame and roof almost always out of wood.[7] Organizationally, a typical Bosnian residence from the 17th century consisted of five main elements: a fence that faced and defined the street and clearly differentiated private from public, a courtyard usually built of pebble or flat stone pattern for easier maintenance, an outdoor fountain (Šadrvan) for hygienic purposes, a lower level "semi-public" private space called theHajat where the family would gather, and theDivanhan, an upper-level semi-private/private space used for relaxation and enjoyment.
In 1878Bosnia and Herzegovina fell underAustro-Hungarian rule which in 40 years had an immense influence in future urban planning and architecture. Some of the changes introduced by Austrian influence included introduction of new building code regulations such as required building permits, life safety and fire protection requirements, regulated wall thickness and building heights. Some changes in urban planning involved classification of street types and consequent building regulations, requirement for harmonious design with immediate surroundings and compliance with overall regulation plan. There were also changes in a general design philosophy. Stylistically, Bosnia was to be assimilated into the European mainstream (hence the use ofhistoricist architectural styles), save for the appearance of the Orientalist style (alsoPseudo-Moorish style). The aim was to promote Bosnian national identity while avoiding its association with either theOttoman Empire or the growingpan-Slavic movement by creating an "Islamic architecture of European fantasy".[8]
The new architectural languages added to diversity of already complex urban composition in Bosnian cities. These and other changes caused certain other consequences in Bosnia. For example, building life safety was improved however local building contractors and architects become obsolete due to new regulations and construction methods. This caused immigration of skilled labor from Central Europe that further doubled and diversified the population of Bosnia and Herzegovina which in the turn stimulated the economy.
Finally, cities began changing their character. The majority of projects during the time of Austrian influence dealt with administrative building designs. The post office inSarajevo for example follows distinct formal characteristics of design like clarity of form, symmetry, and proportion while the interior followed the same doctrine. TheNational and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Sarajevo is an example of Orientalist architectural language using Moorish-Mamluk decoration and pointed arches while still integrating other formal elements into the design.
During its reign, the Austro-Hungarian authorities sought to impose and build architecture of European styles in Bosnia and Herzegovina and thus to show the meaning of their mission in the occupied country. Initially, it offered historic styles that built the most representative buildings of the second half of the 19th century in Vienna. In Bosnia, too much was built in foreign building styles, primarilyhistoricism, and too little appreciated, respected, and used the vernacular Bosnian methods of building.
.jpg)
Confronted with the multinational population structure in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the government realized that it was necessary to have a political ear when choosing one of the historical styles. For construction in areas where the Bosniak population was predominant, architects used theMoorish Revival style.
This style drew its inspiration from theMoorish andMudéjar architecture ofSpain as well asMamluk architecture ofEgypt andSyria, as exemplified byMostar Gymnasium. This included application of ornamentations and other "Moorish" design strategies neither of which had much to do with prior architectural direction of indigenous Bosnian architecture.
.jpg)
.jpeg)
The Bosnian style can be compared withScandinavianNational Romanticism.[10] The Bosnian Style was championed by a younger generation of architects, like Czech architectJosip Pospišil, Slovene architectRudolf Tönnies, and Austrian architectErnst Lichtblau, who all studied at the Art Academy in Vienna withKarl von Hasenauer andOtto Wagner. The style was, however, named by Sarajevo's senior architect,Josip Vancaš, for whom many of these younger architects worked.
The Bosnian Style architects wanted to retrieve the vernacular architectural elements proper of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as opposed to the imported scripts of both historicist and Moorish Revival styles. The Bosnian Style may be "best understood as within the tradition ofnational romanticism", although its designers were not from within the nation they aimed to represent. Yet, Bosnian Style architects also made reference to historical rather than contemporary sources, and mainly to the Islamic component of the vernacular Bosnian architecture, thus resulting in "the substitution of onehistoricist collage for another" (Gunzburger-Makas and Damljanovic-Conley).[11]
.jpg)
.jpg)
Bosnia and Herzegovina joined theKingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes in 1918, whose official architecture became more and more dictated by an increasingly concentrated national authority which sought to establish a unified state identity.[12]
Bosnia and Herzegovina remained at the margin ofinterwar architectural modernism in Yugoslavia.[13][14] Dušan Smiljanić and Helen Baldasar, who taught at the Technical High School in Sarajevo since 1924, were among the first to bring modernist ideas to Sarajevo in the 1920s. Later, D. Smiljanić became a municipal architect in a short time, and until 1939 he had his own architectural firm. Helen Baldasar designed buildings that represent the first built buildings of modern architecture in Sarajevo: the Bembaša Baths, the Red Cross Society building, and the Bratinska-Rašidagić building.
Several residential units were built in 1933–1941 in Crni Vrh by various architects from around the country. The Crni Vrh estate was built on a hill overlooking the urbanised centre, facing south and among greenery. The estate is protected since 2012, despite various status of conservation.[15]
After having studied inPrague, the brothersMuhamed and Reuf Kadić were active in Sarajevo in those years. Based on the achievements ofcubism and neoplasticism, strove to create a free and pure geometric architectural form. Their work was dominated by the ideas of healthy functionalism, advocating the synthesis of content and form, especially in the culture of housing.Reuf Kadić's main work, 1939 House Kopčić, reinterprets traditional elements (courtyard, facade erkers, eaves, hipped roof) in line with new modern conceptions. They also designed theMekteb residential building at the corner of Ferhadija and Ćemaluša.[16]In 1940 theirPension Fund Building was opened,[17] exhibiting "reduced forms geometrically 'clean' surfaces and volumes".[18][19]
Within the limits imposed by the socio-economic conditions, theVakuf institution had become a powerful investor, and thanks to these architects, Vakuf buildings are usually utilitarian and constructivist in concept:
Juraj Neidhardt came to Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1937 fromLe Corbusier's studio, and together with the theorist of architectureDušan Grabrijan he worked on the synthesis of the universal and the local. His most notable achievements were the Philosophy Faculty Building (1955–59), the Institute of Physics and Chemistry (1959–1964) and the urban planning for the Marindvor Center.[20]
Other works:
.jpg)
.jpg)
At the end ofWorld War II Bosnia and Herzegovina became a republic in theSocialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Immediately following theSecond World War, Yugoslavia's brief association with theEastern Bloc ushered in a short period ofsocialist realism.[21]
This came to an abrupt end with the 1948Tito–Stalin Split. In the following years, modernist architecture came to symbolize the nation's break from the USSR (a notion that later diminished with growing acceptability of modernism in the Eastern Bloc).[21][22]
With 1950s decentralization and liberalization policies, architecture became increasingly fractured along ethnic lines. Architects increasingly focused on building with reference to the architectural heritage of their individual socialist republics in the form ofcritical regionalism.[23] A notable example of this shift is Juraj Neidhardt and Dušan Grabrijan's seminal 1957 publicationArchitecture of Bosnia and the way into modernity (Croatian:Arhitektura Bosne i Put U Suvremeno) which sought to understand modernism through the lens of Bosnia's Ottoman heritage.[24][25] Growing distinction of individual ethnic architectural identities within Yugoslavia was exacerbated with the 1972 decentralization of the formerly centralized historical preservation authority, providing individual regions further opportunity to critically analyze their own cultural narratives.[12]
In the late 1950s and early 1960sBrutalism began to garner a following within Yugoslavia, particularly among younger architects.[26]
The Yugoslav break from Soviet socialist realism combined with efforts to commemorate World War II, which together led to the creation of an immense quantity of abstract sculptural war memorials, known today asspomenik.[27]
Political currents in Yugoslavia favoredindustrialization that required an emphasis on development of public housing to serve migration of population from rural to urban areas. To overcome cultural conflicts anti-historicism with modern architectural vocabulary became a prevalent design strategy for the majority of architectural projects. Hence homogeneity of materials replaced traditional heterogeneity and concrete became a material of choice for construction. Such practices, however, caused several problems. Industrialization caused pollution of cities but more importantly it caused flight from rural areas that further caused discrepancies in production, which damaged the economy. There was insufficiency ofinfrastructure, electricity, water and central heating to sustain new public housing development due to poor planning while residential skyscrapers inappropriately intermingled with existing architectural context. Poor construction methods and lack of quality due to lack of resources caused unhealthy living environments. All these issues led to diminishing cultural identity of Bosnia and Herzegovina while draining its natural and human resources.
On the other hand, there were few architectural projects that attempted to address issues of cultural diversity. Residential House "Dino" in Sarajevo built in 1987 by Amir Vuk and Mirko Marić was one of those attempts. It is the duplex residential house where one follows the oriental architectural vocabulary while the other has rather western European philosophy of the façade organization while they share a common entrance. Another example is theHoliday Inn Hotel built in 1983 and the"Unis" Twin Towers built in Sarajevo in 1986 and designed byIvan Štraus. Among the people of the city, the twin towers are commonly calledMomo (Serbian name) andUzeir (Bosniak name). There is no consensus among the people of the city which tower carried the Serbian or Bosnian name. This ambiguity of the names accentuated the cultural unity as its primary architectural quality.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_building%2c_Sarajevo.jpg)
During theBosnian War from 1992–1995, over 2000 civil and religious buildings of historical value were destroyed. Among those were theFerhadija mosque ofBanja Luka (built in 1578) and theStari Most inMostar (built in 1566), both destroyed in 1993. They have been rebuilt true to the original techniques and styles.
In the years following theBosnian War, there has been a construction boom inSarajevo. It is among the cities with the most construction in South-East Europe. The UNIS Twin Towers, designed by architect Ivan Straus, were almost totally destroyed in the war, but have been renovated completely. In the Hrasno residential area, the Bosnian company Bosmal has constructed the "Bosmal City Center", one of the tallest twin towers in the Balkans at 120 meters each.
The new owners of theHoliday Inn Hotel in Sarajevo, also designed by architect Ivan Straus, announced that as of 2005[update] they will start construction on a new 22 story tower. The so-called 'intelligent' tower is expected to cost about 50 million euros.
The Unis Twin Towers have been renovated completely. On the site of the former Oslobodjenje Towers, the Avaz towers have now been constructed as new headquarters forAvaz, the popularBosniannewspaper company. It's located in Marin Dvor,Sarajevo's business district which has recently been totally renovated with the plans for the Unitic 3 and Grand Media Center. The new tower went under construction in 2006 and was completed in 2008. The Avaz Twist Tower holds the record for being theBalkan'stallest tower. It is made up of a twisting glassfacade and is 142 meters tall with a 30-meter antenna reaching a total height of 172 meters.
Most of the Olympic venues were destroyed but reconstruction has not yet taken place.[29]
The Bosnian Parliament building (from architect Juraj Neidhart) is under re-construction, and the Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Sarajevo's Marin Dvor area is totally renovated.
In Sarajevo'sIlidža suburb many construction projects which could be considered large by evenEU standards have been started. Examples include a project to build acable car to connect to the nearby mountainsIgman andBjelašnica; a sport complex with swimming pools worth 30 million euro; and the 'Gardens of Riverina' - city within the city which will cost more than 1 billion euro over a ten-year period.
Recently, one section of the future European motorway corridor 5C was constructed and opened for traffic near Sarajevo. Soon the Federal government will start construction on a new 40 km long motorway section from Sarajevo toZenica. The construction of the whole 330 km of 5C was planned to be started in spring 2006, and worth approximately 3 billion euros.
Bjelašnica and Igman Olympic Mountains are under plans to be privatized and reconstructed.
.jpg)
.jpg)
Cultural preservation is under way in Bosnia and Herzegovina which can be seen with the most recent reconstruction of Stari Most in Mostar and many other structures of cultural and historical significance which were damaged or destroyed in the recent war. Many other projects, unfortunately, are still stifled by political disputes and lack of funds, due largely to corruption.
The doctrine that is generally followed in preservation was summarized by Italo C. Angle:[30]
#The preservation of the city image, which includes preservation of specificity created by the overall relations between the natural and the constructed, colors, scents, sounds, forms, movements, overlapping of historical specificities, and the like;
- The preservation of the city form, conducted through preservation of the built values of individual buildings and wholes;
- and the preservation of the city structure, conducted through the preservation of the urban pattern and preservation of the specific distribution of meanings in the city.
