TheTrumpeting Place inscription, a stone (2.43×1 m) withHebrew writing"To the Trumpeting Place" uncovered during archaeological excavations byBenjamin Mazar at the southern foot of theTemple Mount once marked the place where a priest stood to blow a trumpet ushering in theSabbath in the Herodian period.
Several kinds ofarchaeological remnants of the Jerusalem Temple exist. Those for what is customarily calledSolomon's Temple are indirect and some are challenged. There is extensive physical evidence for the temple called theSecond Temple that was built by returning exiles around 516 BCE and stood until its destruction byRome in the year 70 CE. There is limited physical evidence of Solomon's Temple, although it is still widely accepted to have existed.
The termFirst Temple is customarily used to describe the Temple of the pre-exilic period, which is thought to have been destroyed by the Babylonian conquest. It is described in the Bible as having been built by KingSolomon and is understood to have been constructed with itsHoly of Holies centered on a stone hilltop now known as theFoundation Stone which had been a traditional focus of worship in Jerusalem. Virtually all modern scholars agree that the First Temple existed on the Temple Mount by the time of the Babylonian siege, but there is disagreement among contemporary scholars as to when it was built and who built it.[1]
Because of the religious and political sensitivities involved, no archaeological excavations and only limited surface surveys of the Temple Mount have been conducted sinceCharles Warren's expedition of 1867–70.[2][3][4] As such, archaeologists continue to remain divided over the existence of the Temple.Kathleen Kenyon claimed that there was no archaeological evidence for the existence of Solomon's Temple, but this view is disputed by Ernest-Marie Laperrousaz.[5][6]Israel Finkelstein andNeil Asher Silberman argue that the first Jewish temple in Jerusalem was not built until the end of the 7th century BCE, around three hundred years after Solomon.[6] They believe the temple should not really be assigned to Solomon, who they see as little more than a small-time hill country chieftain, and argue that it was most likely built byJosiah, who governed Judah from 639 to 609 BCE.[6] However,Alan R. Millard[7] argues that this minimalist view is essentially a subjective judgement. Philip Alexander argues against the minimalist view[8] based on the detail presented in the written record.
Anostracon (excavated prior to 1981), sometimes referred to as theHouse of Yahweh ostracon, was discovered atTel Arad, dated to 6th century BCE which mentions a temple which is probably the Temple in Jerusalem.[9]
In 2006, theTemple Mount Sifting Project had recovered numerous artifacts dating from the 8th to 7th centuries BCE from soil removed in 1999 by the Islamic Religious Trust (Waqf) from theSolomon's Stables area of the Temple Mount. These include stone weights for weighing silver and a First Temple periodbulla, or seal impression, containing ancient Hebrew writing which includes the nameNetanyahu ben Yaush. Netanyahu is a name mentioned several times in the Book of Jeremiah while the name Yaush appears in theLachish letters. However, the combination of names was unknown to scholars.[10][11]
In 2007, artifacts dating to the 8th to 6th centuries BCE were described as being possibly the first physical evidence of human activity at the Temple Mount during the First Temple period. The findings included animal bones; ceramic bowl rims, bases, and body sherds; the base of a juglet used to pour oil; the handle of a small juglet; and the rim of a storage jar.[12][13]
A thumb-sizedivory pomegranate (which came to light in 1979) measuring 44 millimetres (1.7 in) in height, and bearing an ancient Hebrew inscription "Sacred donation for the priests in the House of ---h,]", was believed to have adorned a sceptre used by thehigh priest in Solomon's Temple. It was considered the most important item of biblical antiquities in theIsrael Museum's collection.[14] However, in 2004, the Israel Antiquities Authority reported the inscription to be aforgery, though the ivory pomegranate itself was dated to the 14th or 13th century BCE.[15] This was based on the report's claim that three incised letters in the inscription stopped short of an ancient break, as they would have if carved after the ancient break was made. Since then, it has been proven that one of the letters was indeed carved prior to the ancient break, and the status of the other two letters are in question. Some paleographers and others have continued to insist that the inscription is ancient, some dispute this so the authenticity of this writing is still the object of discussion.[16]
Another artifact, theJehoash Inscription, which first came to notice in 2003, contains a 15-line description of King Jehoash's ninth-century BCE restoration of the Temple. Its authenticity was called into question by a report by the Israel Antiquities Authority, which said that the surface patina contained microfossils offoraminifera. As these fossils do not dissolve in water, they cannot occur in a calcium carbonate patina, leading initial investigators to conclude that the patina must be an artificial chemical mix applied to the stone by forgers. As of late 2012, the academic community is split on whether the tablet is authentic or not. Commenting on a 2012 report by geologists arguing for the authenticity of the inscription, in October 2012,Hershel Shanks (who believes the inscription is genuine) wrote the current situation was that most Hebrew language scholars believe that the inscription is a forgery and geologists that it is genuine, and thus "Because we rely on experts, and because there is an apparently irresolvable conflict of experts in this case,BAR has taken no position with respect to the authenticity of the Jehoash Inscription."[17]
The term "Second Temple" describes the temple described in the Bible as having been built after the accession ofCyrus the Great to the throne of thePersian Empire in 559 BCE made the re-establishment of the city of Jerusalem and the rebuilding of the Temple possible.[18] The physical evidence for the existence of this Temple is extensive. Consecrated in 516 BCE[19] by theexiles returning fromBabylon underEzra andNehemiah, it is contained within a far grander edifice. This edifice of the ancient Temple Mount was expanded at least twice more, once under theHasmonean dynasty and then underHerod the Great, who turned it into one of the largest built structures in the ancient world.[19]
TheHasmonean dynasty expanded the 500 cubit square Temple platform toward the south; distinctive Hasmonean ashlars are visible in the Eastern Wall.[20]
During Temple times, entry to the Mount was limited by a complex set ofpurity laws. Those who were not of the Jewish nation were prohibited from entering the inner court of the Temple. A hewn stone measuring 60 x 90 cm. and engraved with Greek uncials was discovered in 1871 near a court on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem in which it outlined this prohibition:
ΜΗΟΕΝΑΑΛΛΟΓΕΝΗΕΙΣΠΟ
ΡΕΥΕΣΟΑΙΕΝΤΟΣΤΟΥΠΕ
ΡΙΤΟΙΕΡΟΝΤΡΥΦΑΚΤΟΥΚΑΙ
ΠΕΡΙΒΟΛΟΥΟΣΔΑΝΛΗ
ΦΘΗΕΑΥΤΩΙΑΙΤΙΟΣΕΣ
ΤΑΙΔΙΑΤΟΕΞΑΚΟΛΟΥ
ΘΕΙΝΘΑΝΑΤΟΝ
Translation: "Let no foreigner enter within the parapet and the partition which surrounds the Temple precincts. Anyone caught [violating] will be held accountable for his ensuing death." Today, the stone is preserved inIstanbul's Museum of Antiquities.
Remnants of the 1st century Stairs of Ascent, discovered by archaeologist Benjamin Mazar, to the entrance of the Temple Courtyard. Pilgrims coming to make sacrifices at the Temple would have entered and exited by this stairway.
The Warning Inscription found in 1871
A copy of the inscription found in 1871
Fragment of Second Temple Warning
Stones from theWestern Wall thrown down by Roman soldiers in 70 CE
^abcFinkelstein, Israel & Silberman, Neil Asher (2002).The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts. Simon & Schuster. pp. 128–29.ISBN0-684-86912-8.
^T. C. Mitchell (1992). "Judah Until the Fall of Jerusalem". In John Boardman; I. E. S. Edwards; E. Sollberger; N. G. L. Hammond (eds.).The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 3, Part 2: The Assyrian and Babylonian Empires and Other States of the Near East, from the Eighth to the Sixth Centuries BC. Cambridge University Press. p. 397.ISBN978-0521227179.
^"Building Remains From The Time Of The First Temple Were Exposed West Of The Temple Mount". Israel Antiquities Authority. March 13, 2008. Retrieved11 May 2015.a personal Hebrew seal made of a semi-precious stone that was apparently inlaid in a ring. The scarab-like seal is elliptical and measures c. 1.1 cm (0.4 in) x 1.4 cm (0.6 in). The surface of the seal is divided into three strips separated by a double line: in the upper strip is a chain decoration in which there are four pomegranates and in the two bottom strips is the name of the owner of the seal, engraved in ancient Hebrew script. It reads: לנתניהו בן יאש ([belonging] to Netanyahu ben Yaush). The two names are known in the treasury of biblical names: the name נתניהו (Netanyahu) is mentioned a number of times in the Bible (in the Book of Jeremiah and in Chronicles) and the name יאש (Yaush) appears in the Lachish letters. The name Yaush, like the name יאשיהו (Yoshiyahu) is, in the opinion of Professor Shmuel Ahituv, derived from the root או"ש which means "he gave a present" (based on Arabic and Ugaritic). It is customary to assume that the owners of personal seals were people that held senior governmental positions. It should nevertheless be emphasized that this combination of names – נתניהו בן יאוש (Netanyahu ben Yaush) – was unknown until now.
^abThe Archaeology of the Holy Land: From the Destruction of Solomon's Temple to the Muslim Conquest,Jodi Magness, Cambridge University Press, 2012,ISBN1139510207.
^abLeen Ritmeyer, Kathleen Ritmeyer,Jerusalem; The Temple Mount, Carta, Jerusalem, 2015,ISBN9789652208552.
^Archaeology in the Israel Museum, eds. Michal Dayagi-Mendels, Silvia Rosenberg, The Israel Museum, Jerusalem, 2010, p. 111, 112.
^Priscilla Soucek, "The Temple of Solomon in Islamic Legend and Art." InThe Temple of Solomon: Archaeological Fact and Medieval Tradition in Christian, Islamic and Jewish Art. Edited by Joseph Gutmann. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press,1976, p. 97