Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Appeal to accomplishment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Informal fallacy
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Appeal to accomplishment" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(March 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Appeal to accomplishment is alogical fallacy wherein Person A challenges a thesis put forward by Person B because Person B has not accomplished similar feats (or as many feats) as Person C or Person A.[1]

The reverse, appealing to the fact that no one has the proper experience in question and thus cannot prove something is impossible, is a version of anargument from silence.

Appeal to accomplishment is a form ofappeal to authority, which is a well-knownlogical fallacy. Some consider that it can be used in a cogent form when all sides of a discussion agree on the reliability of the authority in the given context.[2][3]

Examples

[edit]
  • "How dare you criticize the prime minister? What do you know about running an entire country?"
  • "I'll take your opinions on music seriously when you've released a record that went platinum."
  • "Get back to me when you've built up a multi-billion dollar empire of your own. Until then, shut up."
  • "If you think you know so much about making a video game, make one yourself!"
  • "If you think you know so much about making a Street Mod car, make one yourself!"
  • "Who are you to criticize a professional athlete? Have you ever played in a professional sports league?"

References

[edit]
  1. ^Bennett, Bo."Appeal to Accomplishment".Logically Fallacious.
  2. ^Lewiński, Marcin (2008)."Comments on 'Black box arguments'".Argumentation.22 (3):447–451.doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9095-x.
  3. ^Emermen, Frans (2010).Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. p. 203.ISBN 978-9027211194.
Commonfallacies (list)
Formal
Inpropositional logic
Inquantificational logic
Syllogistic fallacy
Informal
Equivocation
Question-begging
Correlative-based
Illicit transference
Secundum quid
Faulty generalization
Ambiguity
Questionable cause
Appeals
Consequences
Emotion
Genetic fallacy
Ad hominem
Otherfallacies
of relevance
Arguments
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Appeal_to_accomplishment&oldid=1264913967"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp