Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Antipope Dioscorus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Deacon of the Alexandrian and the Roman church, antipope in 530


Dioscorus
Church
Elected22 September 530
Papacy began22 September 530
Papacy ended14 October 530
PredecessorRoman claimant :Antipapal claimant :
SuccessorRoman claimant :
  • Boniface II
Antipapal claimant :
Opposed to
Other post(s)
Personal details
Died14 October 530

Dioscorus (died 14 October 530) was adeacon of theAlexandrian and theRoman church from 506. In a disputed election following the death ofPope Felix IV, the majority of electors picked him to be pope, in spite of Pope Felix's wishes thatBoniface II should succeed him. However, Dioscorus died less than a month after the election, allowing Boniface to be consecrated pope and Dioscorus to be branded anantipope.

Deaconry

[edit]

Originally a deacon of theChurch of Alexandria, Dioscorus was forced to flee as an opponent ofMiaphysitism, arriving in Rome around 506 during theLaurentian schism. There, he was adopted into the ranks of the Roman clergy, and soon acquired considerable influence in the Church of Rome. Jeffrey Richards credits him with persuading kingTheodoric the Great to recognizeSymmachus as the rightful pope.[1] Later, underPope Hormisdas, he served as papalapocrisiarius, or legate, to the court of EmperorJustinian I at Constantinople, ending theAcacian schism, and was instrumental in persuading Hormisdas to rejectTheopaschism.[2] During the pontificate ofFelix IV he became the recognized head of the pro-Byzantine party.[3]

Papal selection

[edit]

Pope Felix IV wished Boniface to succeed him, partially to avoid the riots that had occurred on his own accession. Further, Richards describes him as being part of the pro-Gothic party of clergy, bishops and aristocrats, and his "principal concern, however, was to ensure that the pro-Gothic party remained in control of the papacy."[4] During the sixth century a tradition had evolved where popes would informallynominate their successors, but Felix went even further and issued apraeceptum formally nominating Boniface, and on his sickbed gave hispallium to him, on the condition that should Felix recover Boniface would return it. However, theSenate was outraged that it had been preempted from the process, and issued an edict forbidding anyone from accepting the nomination or discussing it during Pope Felix's life, on pain of exile and confiscation of property. Richards notes that the clergy did not voice a similar outrage, "perhaps because the majority of the clergy agreed on this occasion with the senate in censuring the action of Pope Felix".[5]

When the election was held in theLateran palace on 22 September 530 following the death of Felix, a majority of the electors voted for Dioscorus; Richards concludes at least 60 of the Roman priests supported Dioscorus, based on their subsequent act of submission.[6] Boniface's supporters retreated to theBasilica Julia, where they elected Boniface. Dioscorus was later recognized as pope by the East. Although his prospects for his consecration looked dark, the dispute was resolved when Dioscorus died three weeks later on 14 October.[7] The pro-Byzantine faction was left leaderless; Felix's wishes were acceded to with his chosen candidate becoming Boniface II.[7]

Legacy

[edit]

According to theLiber Pontificalis, Boniface forced the clergy who had nominated Dioscorus to sign a retraction and condemn his memory. This document was later destroyed, although theLiber Pontificalis contains contradictory accounts: in one passage, PopeAgapetus I burned the document in front of an audience at the beginning of his tenure, while in another, it was Boniface himself who burned the document.[8]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Richards 1979, p. 76.
  2. ^Richards 1979, pp. 107f, 123.
  3. ^Haendler 2006.
  4. ^Richards 1979, p. 122.
  5. ^Richards 1979, p. 123.
  6. ^Richards 1979, p. 124.
  7. ^abOestereich 1909.
  8. ^Davis 1989, pp. 50–51.

Sources

[edit]

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in thepublic domainOestereich, Thomas (1909). "Dioscorus". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.).Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 5. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Schwaiger, Georg (2008). "Die Rechtmäßigkeit der Päpste Dioskur (530) und Konstantin II. (767–768)" [The Legality of Popes Dioskur (530) and Constantine II (767-768)]. In Fleckenstein, Gisela (ed.).Kirchengeschichte: alte und neue Wege : Festschrift für Christoph Weber [Church history: old and new ways: Festschrift for Christoph Weber] (in German). Frankfurt am Main: Lang. pp. 17–24.ISBN 9783631577127.OCLC 644559753.
Late Antiquity
Early Middle Ages
High Middle Ages
Late Middle Ages /
Western Schism
Avignon
Pisa
Modern era
Palmarian
Apostles of Infinite Love
Conclavist/post-Sedevacantist
Links to related articles
History
Timeline
Ecclesiastical
Legal
Early Church
Great Church
Middle Ages
Modern era
Theology
Bible
Tradition
Catechism
General
Ecclesiology
Sacraments
Mariology
Philosophy
Saints
Organisation
Hierarchy
Canon law
Laity
Precedence
By country
Holy See
(List of popes)
Vatican City
Polity (Holy orders)
Consecrated life
Particular churches
sui iuris
Catholic liturgy
Culture
Media
Religious orders,
institutes,societies
Associations
of the faithful
Charities
General
Early Church
(30–325/476)
Origins and
Apostolic Age (30–100)
Ante-Nicene period (100–325)
Late antiquity
(313–476)
Great Church
(180–451)
Roman
state church

(380–451)
Early Middle Ages
High Middle Ages
Late Middle Ages
19th century
20th century
21st century
Portals:
International
National
People
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antipope_Dioscorus&oldid=1251150713"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp