This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(September 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Inelectromagnetics, an antenna'sgain is a key performance parameter which combines theantenna'sdirectivity andradiation efficiency. The termpower gain has been deprecated by IEEE.^[1] In a transmitting antenna, the gain describes how well the antenna converts input power intoradio waves headed in a specified direction. In a receiving antenna, the gain describes how well the antenna converts radio waves arriving from a specified direction into electrical power. When no direction is specified, gain is understood to refer to the peak value of the gain, the gain in the direction of the antenna'smain lobe. A plot of the gain as a function of direction is called the antenna pattern orradiation pattern. It is not to be confused with directivity, which doesnot take an antenna's radiation efficiency into account.

Gain or 'absolute gain' is defined as "The ratio of the radiation intensity in a given direction to the radiation intensity that would be produced if the power accepted by the antenna were isotropically radiated".^[1] Usually this ratio is expressed indecibels with respect to anisotropic radiator (dBi). An alternative definition compares the received power to the power received by a losslesshalf-wave dipole antenna, in which case the units are written asdBd. Since a lossless dipole antenna has a gain of 2.15 dBi, the relation between these units is${\displaystyle \mathrm{G}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}(\mathrm{d}\mathrm{B}\mathrm{d})\approx \mathrm{G}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}(\mathrm{d}\mathrm{B}\mathrm{i})-2.15}$. For a given frequency, the antenna'seffective area is proportional to the gain. An antenna'seffective length is proportional to thesquare root of the antenna's gain for a particular frequency andradiation resistance. Due toreciprocity, the gain of any antenna when receiving is equal to its gain when transmitting.

Gain is a unitless measure that multiplies an antenna'sradiation efficiency${\displaystyle \eta }$ anddirectivityD:^[1][2][3]

${\displaystyle G=\eta D}$

Theradiation efficiency${\displaystyle \eta }$ of an antenna is "The ratio of the total power radiated by an antenna to the net power accepted by the antenna from the connected transmitter."^[1]

${\displaystyle \eta =\frac{P_R}{P_O}}$

A transmitting antenna is supplied with power by atransmission line connecting the antenna to aradio transmitter. Thepower accepted by the antenna${\displaystyle P_O}$ is the power supplied to the antenna's terminals. Losses prior to the antenna terminals are accounted for by separate impedance mismatch factors which are therefore not included in the calculation of radiation efficiency.

Published numbers for antenna gain are almost always expressed indecibels (dB), alogarithmic scale. From the gain factor G, one finds the gain in decibels as:

${\displaystyle G_{\text{dBi}}=10{\log }_{10}\left(G\right).}$

Therefore, an antenna with a peak power gain of 5 would be said to have a gain of 7 dBi. dBi is used rather than just dB to emphasize that this is the gain according to the basic definition, in which the antenna is compared to an isotropic radiator.

When actual measurements of an antenna's gain are made by a laboratory, the field strength of the test antenna is measured when supplied with, say, 1watt of transmitter power, at a certain distance. That field strength is compared to the field strength found using a so-calledreference antenna at the same distance receiving the same power in order to determine the gain of the antenna under test. That ratio would be equal toG if the reference antenna were an isotropic radiator (irad).

However a true isotropic radiator cannot be built, so in practice a different antenna is used. This will often be a half-wave dipole, a very well understood and repeatable antenna that can be easily built for any frequency. The directive gain of a half-wave dipole with respect to the isotropic radiator is known to be 1.64 and it can be made nearly 100% efficient. Since the gain has been measured with respect to this reference antenna, the difference in the gain of the test antenna is often compared to that of the dipole. The gain relative to a dipole is thus often quoted and is denoted using dBd instead of dBi to avoid confusion. Therefore, in terms of the true gain (relative to an isotropic radiator)G, this figure for the gain is given by:

${\displaystyle G_{\text{dBd}}\approx 10{\log }_{10}\left(\frac{G}{1.64}\right).}$

For instance, the above antenna with a gainG = 5 would have a gain with respect to a dipole of 5/1.64 ≈ 3.05, or in decibels one would call this 10 log(3.05) ≈ 4.84 dBd. In general:

${\displaystyle G_{\text{dBd}}\approx G_{\text{dBi}}-2.15\text{dB}}$

Both dBi and dBd are in common use. When an antenna's maximum gain is specified in decibels (for instance, by a manufacturer) one must be certain as to whether this means the gain relative to an isotropic radiator or with respect to a dipole. If it specifies dBi or dBd then there is no ambiguity, but if only dB is specified then the fine print must be consulted. Either figure can be easily converted into the other using the above relationship.

When considering an antenna's directional pattern, gain with respect to a dipole doesnot imply a comparison of that antenna's gain in each direction to a dipole's gain in that direction. Rather, it is a comparison between the antenna's gain in each direction to thepeak gain of the dipole (1.64). In any direction, therefore, such numbers are 2.15 dB smaller than the gain expressed in dBi.

Partial gain is calculated as power gain, but for a particularpolarization. It is defined as the part of theradiation intensity${\displaystyle U}$ corresponding to a given polarization, divided by the total radiation intensity of an isotropic antenna.^[2]

The partial gains in the${\displaystyle \theta }$ and${\displaystyle \varphi }$ components are expressed as

${\displaystyle G_{\theta }=4\pi \left(\frac{U_{\theta }}{P_{\text{in}}}\right)}$

and

${\displaystyle G_{\varphi }=4\pi \left(\frac{U_{\varphi }}{P_{\text{in}}}\right)}$,

where${\displaystyle U_{\theta }}$ and${\displaystyle U_{\varphi }}$ represent the radiation intensity in a given direction contained in their respective${\displaystyle E}$ field component.

As a result of this definition, we can conclude that the total gain of an antenna is the sum of partial gains for any two orthogonal polarizations.

${\displaystyle G=G_{\theta }+G_{\varphi }}$

Suppose a lossless antenna has a radiation pattern given by:

${\displaystyle U=B_0{\sin }^3(\theta ).}$

Let us find the gain of such an antenna. First we find the peak radiation intensity of this antenna:

${\displaystyle U_{\text{max}}=B_0}$

The total radiated power can be found by integrating over all directions:

Since the antenna is specified as being lossless the radiation efficiency is 1. The maximum gain is then equal to:

Expressed relative to the gain of a half-wave dipole we would find:

${\displaystyle G_{\text{dBd}}=10{\log }_{10}\left(\frac{1.698}{1.64}\right)=0.15\text{dBd}}$.

As an example, consider an antenna that radiates an electromagnetic wave whose electrical field has an amplitude${\displaystyle E_{\theta }}$ at a distance${\displaystyle r.}$ That amplitude is given by:

${\displaystyle E_{\theta }=\frac{AI}{r}}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle I}$ is the current (in Amps) fed to the antenna and
• ${\displaystyle A}$ is a characteristic constant (in Ohm) of each antenna.

For a large distance${\displaystyle r.}$ The radiated wave can be considered locally as aplane wave. The intensity of an electromagnetic plane wave is:

${\displaystyle \frac{P}{S}=\frac{c_{\circ }{\epsilon }_{\circ }}{2}{E_{\theta }}^2=\frac{1}{2}\frac{{E_{\theta }}^2}{Z_{\circ }}}$

where

${\displaystyle Z_{\circ }=\sqrt{\frac{{\mu }_{\circ }}{{\epsilon }_{\circ }}}=376.730313461\mathsf{\Omega }}$ is a universal constant calledvacuum impedance.

and

${\displaystyle {\left(\frac{P}{S}\right)}_{\mathsf{a}\mathsf{n}\mathsf{t}}=\frac{1}{2Z_{\circ }}\frac{A^2{I}^2}{r^2}}$

If the resistive part of the series impedance of the antenna is${\displaystyle R_s,}$ the power fed to the antenna is${\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{R}_s{I}^2.}$ The intensity of an isotropic antenna is the power so fed divided by the surface of the sphere of radiusr:

${\displaystyle {\left(\frac{P}{S}\right)}_{\mathsf{i}\mathsf{s}\mathsf{o}}=\frac{\frac{1}{2}{R}_s{I}^2}{4\pi r^2}}$

The directive gain is:

${\displaystyle G=\frac{\left[\frac{1}{2Z_{\circ }}\frac{A^2{I}^2}{r^2}\right]}{\left[\frac{\frac{1}{2}{R}_s{I}^2}{4\pi r^2}\right]}\approx \frac{A^2}{30R_s}}$

For the commonly utilizedhalf-wave dipole, the particular formulation works out to the following, including itsdecibel equivalency, expressed asdBi (decibels referenced to isotropic radiator):

(In most cases73.130, is adequate)

(Likewise,1.64 and2.15 dBi are usually the cited values)

Sometimes, the half-wave dipole is taken as a reference instead of the isotropic radiator. The gain is then given indBd (decibels over dipole):

0 dBd = 2.15 dBi

Realized gain differs from gain in that it is "reduced by its impedance mismatch factor." This mismatch induces losses above the dissipative losses described above; therefore, realized gain will always be less than gain. Gain may be expressed asabsolute gain if further clarification is required to differentiate it from realized gain.^[1]

Total radiated power (TRP) is the sum of all RF power radiated by the antenna when the source power is included in the measurement. TRP is expressed in watts or the corresponding logarithmic expressions, often dBm or dBW.^[4]

When testing mobile devices, TRP can be measured while in close proximity of power-absorbing losses such as the body and hand of the user.^[5]

The TRP can be used to determine body loss (BoL). The body loss is considered as the ratio of TRP measured in the presence of losses and TRP measured while in free space.

• Antenna
• Antenna boresight
• Antenna effective area
• Antenna measurement
• Cardioid

• Antenna Theory (3rd edition), by C. Balanis, Wiley, 2005,ISBN 0-471-66782-X
• Antenna for all applications (3rd edition), by John D. Kraus, Ronald J. Marhefka, 2002,ISBN 0-07-232103-2

 This article incorporatespublic domain material fromFederal Standard 1037C.General Services Administration. Archived fromthe original on January 22, 2022. (in support ofMIL-STD-188).

• Antennas (radio)
• Telecommunications engineering
• Engineering ratios

• CS1 maint: location missing publisher
• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata
• Use mdy dates from September 2021
• Use American English from March 2019
• All Wikipedia articles written in American English
• Articles lacking in-text citations from September 2009
• All articles lacking in-text citations
• Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the Federal Standard 1037C
• Wikipedia articles incorporating text from MIL-STD-188