Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Anne Conway (philosopher)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
English philosopher

Anne Conway
Perspective View with a Woman Reading a Letter bySamuel van Hoogstraten. This painting is often thought to depict Anne Conway, though that attribution has been disputed.[1]
Born
Anne Finch

(1631-12-14)14 December 1631
London, England
Died23 February 1679(1679-02-23) (aged 47)
Resting placeHoly Trinity Church,Arrow, Warwickshire[1]
OccupationPhilosopher
Spouse
(after 1651)
ChildrenHeneage Edward Conway
Parent(s)Sir Heneage Finch
Elizabeth Cradock
RelativesJohn Finch (brother)
Philosophical work
Era
Region
Main interestsMetaphysics,Monism

Anne Conway (also known asViscountess Conway;néeFinch; 14 December 1631 – 23 February 1679[2]) was an Englishphilosopher of the seventeenth century, whose work was in the tradition of theCambridge Platonists. Conway's thought is a deeply original form ofrationalist philosophy. Conway rejected Cartesiansubstance dualism and instead, argued that nature is constituted by one substance. Against the mechanists, she argued that matter is not passive, but has self-motion, perception, and life.[3]

Life

[edit]

Anne Finch was born toSir Heneage Finch (who had held the posts of theRecorder of London andSpeaker of the House of Commons underCharles I) and his second wife, Elizabeth (daughter of William Cradock of Staffordshire). Her father died the week before her birth. She was the youngest child.[4] Anne grew up in the house now known asKensington Palace, which her family owned at the time.[4] In her younger years, she was educated by tutors. She studiedLatin, and later learnedGreek andHebrew. Her half-brother,John Finch, encouraged her interests inphilosophy andtheology. He introduced Anne to one of his tutors atChrist's College, Cambridge, the PlatonistHenry More. This led to a lifelong correspondence and close friendship between Henry and Anne. In their correspondence, the pair discussedRené Descartes' philosophy. Eventually, Anne grew from More's informal pupil to hisintellectual equal. When speaking about her, More said that he had "scarce ever met with any Person, Man or Woman, of better Natural parts than Lady Conway" (quoted in Richard Ward'sThe Life of Henry More (1710) p. 193), and that "in the knowledge of things as well Natural and Divine, you have not only out-gone all of your own Sex, but even of that other also."[5]

In 1651, she marriedEdward Conway, later 1stEarl of Conway. Her husband was also interested in philosophy and had been tutored by More. Anne and Edward established their place of residence at Anne's home at Kensington Palace. In the year following her marriage, More dedicated his bookAntidote against Atheism to Anne. In 1658, she gave birth to her only child, Heneage Edward Conway, who died ofsmallpox just two years later.[6] Anne also contracted the illness, but managed to survive the disease.[7]

Anne Conway contactedElizabeth Foxcroft likely through More, and when Foxcroft's husband went to India in 1666, she moved in with Conway and became her companion andamanuensis. They shared similar interests and Foxcroft lived at Ragley Hall until 1672.[8] Conway became interested in theLurianic Kabbalah, and then inQuakerism. She exchanged letters with important Quaker leaders and met several of them in person. In England at that time, Quakers were generally disliked and feared, and suffered persecution and even imprisonment. Some scholars cite the parallels that she identified between Quaker beliefs and the Kabbalah as an influential factor in Conway's conversion to Quakerism.[9]

Conway's life was marked by the recurrence of severemigraines from the age of twelve, when she suffered a period of fever. This meant that she was often incapacitated by pain, and she spent much time under medical supervision and searching for a cure, at one point even having herjugular veins opened. The extreme pain she experienced led her to pursue her philosophical studies from the comfort of her own home, and some scholars cite Conway's identification of her physical suffering with the hardships faced by Quakers as another reason for her conversion to Quakerism.[10] She received medical advice from Dr.Thomas Willis and many others.[11] The Conways also consulted the Swiss royal physician of the time,Theodore Turquet de Mayerne, and the natural philosopherRobert Boyle.[7] Additionally, Conway consultedWilliam Harvey, who was a physician and researcher of how blood circulated in the human body. Some scholars believe that in 1665, John Finch attempted to cure his sister by operating on her head. In 1666, the Conways famously persuadedValentine Greatrakes, a renounced Irish healer, to attempt to cure her.[12] Even though Conway was famously treated by many of the great physicians of her time, none of the treatments proved to be successful.[13] She died in 1679 at the age of forty-seven.

Philosophical Work

[edit]

The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy

[edit]

InThe Principles, written around 1677, Conway develops a unique theory of substance monism and vitalism.[14] In contrast with theCartesian idea that bodies consist of dead matter, Conway argues that all matter has vitality and self-knowledge. She also repudiatesdualist theories of therelationship between the body and spirit.,[15] claiming instead that the world consists of only one substance. A notable element of her philosophy is her emphasis on the relationship between three levels of being, which she defines as God, Christ, and "Creatures" (all life on Earth).[16] She distinguishes between these levels of being through their capacity for change, or perfectibility. Within the category of "Creatures," Conway proposes that all life is interconnected because it essentially consists of the same substance.[17]

The Principles was originally published in English and translated into Latin asPrincipia philosophiae antiquissimae et recentissimae in 1690. The English original was lost, but an English retranslation of the Latin appeared in 1692.[18]

Correspondence

[edit]

Throughout her life, Conway exchanged numerous letters withHenry More,Francis Mercury van Helmont, and other major thinkers of her time. In these letters, she discussed numerous philosophical and theological concepts and occasionally wrote about personal matters, like the death of her son.

Conway also wrote around a dozen letters to her father-in-law,Lord Conway, and received around a dozen letters from her brother,John Finch.[7] These correspondences concerned philosophy, social issues, and their personal lives. In 1930,Marjorie Hope Nicolson published Conway's correspondence along with bibliographical details about her.[19] In 1992, Sarah Hutton published a revised, augmented edition of Nicolson'sConway Letters.[7] Nicolson's version focuses primarily on Conway's relationships with friends and family, including an analysis of her relationship with Henry More.[20]

Historical Impact

[edit]

Conway's work was an influence onGottfried Leibniz, andHugh Trevor-Roper called her "England's greatest female philosopher."[21][22]

Bibliography

[edit]
  • The principles of the most ancient and modern philosophy (London: n. publ., 1692) 168 pp. in 12°. – originally printed in Latin:Principia philosophiae antiquissimae et recentissimae de Deo, Christo & Creatura, Amsterdam: M. Brown 1690.
  • Letters. The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More and their friends, 1642–1684, ed. M. H. Nicolson (London 1930) 517 pp.
  • The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More and their friends, 1642–1684, Rev. ed. S. Hutton (Oxford 1992).
  • Collaborations withFranciscus Mercurius van Helmont (1614–1698)
    • A Cabbalistical Dialogue (1682) (inChristian Knorr von Rosenroth,Kabbala denudata, 1677–1684)
    • Two Hundred Quiries moderately propounded concerning the Doctrine of the Revolution of Humane Souls (1684).

References

[edit]
  1. ^ab"Conway (1631-1679)".Project Vox. Retrieved2 March 2022.
  2. ^Hutton, Sarah (2009)."Death".Anne Conway : a woman philosopher. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 215.ISBN 9780521109819.OCLC 909355784.
  3. ^Team, Project Vox."Conway (1631-1679)".Project Vox. Retrieved22 November 2024.
  4. ^abHutton, Sarah (March 2021). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.)."Lady Anne Conway" (Spring 2021 ed.).
  5. ^Broad, Jacqueline (2002).Women philosophers of the seventeenth century. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. p. 67.ISBN 0-511-04237-X.OCLC 56208440.
  6. ^Hutton, Sarah (2004).Anne Conway : A Woman Philosopher. Cambridge University Press. p. 32.ISBN 9780521835473.OCLC 76904888.
  7. ^abcdProject Vox team. (2019). “Anne Conway, Viscountess Conway and Killultagh.” Project Vox. Duke University Libraries.https://projectvox.org/conway-1631-1679/
  8. ^Matthew, H. C. G.; Harrison, B., eds. (23 September 2004)."The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography".Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/53695. Retrieved21 August 2023. (Subscription,Wikipedia Library access orUK public library membership required.)
  9. ^Team, Project Vox."Conway (1631-1679)".Project Vox. Retrieved28 February 2025.
  10. ^Team, Project Vox."Conway (1631-1679)".Project Vox. Retrieved28 February 2025.
  11. ^White, Carol Wayne (29 May 2008).The Legacy of Anne Conway (1631-1679): Reverberations from a Mystical Naturalism. SUNY Press. p. 6.ISBN 978-0-7914-7465-5.
  12. ^Team, Project Vox."Conway (1631-1679)".Project Vox. Retrieved12 February 2025.
  13. ^Owen, Gilbert Roy (1937)."The Famous Case of Lady Anne Conway".Annals of Medical History.9 (6):567–571.PMC 7942846.PMID 33943893.[page needed]
  14. ^Team, Project Vox."Conway (1631-1679)".Project Vox. Retrieved28 February 2025.
  15. ^Broad, Jacqueline (13 August 2007).Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century, pg. 66–67. Cambridge University Press.ISBN 9780521039178.
  16. ^Hutton, Sarah (2021),"Lady Anne Conway", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved28 February 2025
  17. ^Team, Project Vox."Conway (1631-1679)".Project Vox. Retrieved28 February 2025.
  18. ^Derksen, Louise D."20th WCP: Anne Conway's Critique of Cartesian Dualism".www.bu.edu. Retrieved20 January 2018.
  19. ^G. C. Moore Smith. The Review of English Studies 7, no. 27 (1931): 349–56.http://www.jstor.org/stable/507935.
  20. ^Duran, Jane. “ANNE CONWAY.” In Eight Women Philosophers: Theory, Politics, and Feminism, 49–76. University of Illinois Press, 2006.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt1xcn4h.7.
  21. ^Trevor-Roper, Hugh.One Hundred Letters from Hugh Trevor-Roper, Oxford 2014, 73
  22. ^Israel, Jonathan I.Spinoza, Life and Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2023, 1127-28

Further reading

[edit]
  • Broad, Jacqueline.Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • Brown, Stuart. "Leibniz and Henry More’s Cabbalistic Circle", in S. Hutton (ed.)Henry More (1614–1687): Tercentenary Studies, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.(Challenges the view that Conway influenced Leibniz.)
  • Duran, Jane. "Anne Viscountess Conway: a Seventeenth-Century Rationalist".Hypatia: a Journal of Feminist Philosophy. 4 (1989): 64–79.
  • Frankel, Lois. "Anne Finch, Viscountess Conway," Mary Ellen Waithe, ed.,A History of Women Philosophers, Vol. 3, Kluwer, 1991, pp. 41–58.
  • Gabbey, Alan. "Anne Conway et Henry More: lettres sur Descartes" (Archives de Philosophie 40, pp. 379–404)
  • Head, Jonathan (2021).The Philosophy of Anne Conway: God, Creation and the Nature of Time. London: Bloomsbury.ISBN 978-1-350-13452-2.
  • Hutton, Sarah. "Conway, Anne (c.1630–79)", 1998, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-DA021-1.Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, .
  • Hutton, Sarah, "Lady Anne Conway",The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
  • Hutton, Sarah.Anne Conway, a Woman Philosopher. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • Hutton, Sarah (1970–1980). "Conway, Anne".Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Vol. 20. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 171–172.ISBN 978-0-684-10114-9.
  • King, Peter J.One Hundred Philosophers (New York: Barron's, 2004)ISBN 0-7641-2791-8
  • Lascano, Marcy P. "Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World";Philosophy Compass 8.4 (2013):327-336.
  • Merchant, Carolyn, "The Vitalism of Anne Conway: its Impact on Leibniz's Concept of the Monad" (Journal of the History of Philosophy 17, 1979, pp. 255–269) (Argues that Conway influenced Leibniz by showing parallels betweenLeibniz and Conway.)
  • Mercer, Christia. "Platonism in Early Modern Natural Philosophy: The Case of Leibniz and Conway", inNeoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature, James Wilberding and Christoph Horn, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 103–26.
  • Bernet, Claus (2004). "Anne Conway (philosopher)". In Bautz, Traugott (ed.).Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (BBKL) (in German). Vol. 23. Nordhausen: Bautz. cols. 232–239.ISBN 3-88309-155-3.
  • White,Carol Wayne.The Legacy of Anne Conway (1631–1679): Reverberations from a Mystical Naturalism (State University of New York Press, 2009)

External links

[edit]
Ancient
Academics
Old
Skeptics
Middle
New
Middle Platonists
Neoplatonists
Academy
Medieval
Modern
Renaissance
Florentine Academy
Cambridge
Contemporary
Analytic
Continental
Individuals
Groups
Testimonies
By region
Other
International
National
Academics
People
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anne_Conway_(philosopher)&oldid=1322139440"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp