Althouse has said that she ispro-choice and opposes overrulingRoe v. Wade,[4] but has said that she "do[es] in fact thinkabortion is wrong. I think most Americans agree with me and think it's wrong, but not the role of government to police."[5][6]
Althouse voted forGeorge W. Bush in 2004 andBarack Obama in 2008.[7] In January 2009, remarking about Obama, she wrote: "He really is a solid, normal person who remained grounded in the middle of all this craziness. And I like to think that, now that he's President, with his steely nerve, his intelligence, and his groundedness, he'll do the job that must be done. The trickery is over."[8]
In 2009, Althouse announced her engagement to Laurence Meade, a commenter she had met through the blog. The story attracted coverage in the blogosphere and inThe New York Times.[7] Althouse and Meade were married in August 2009.[9] It is Althouse's second marriage; she has two adult sons from her first marriage toRichard Cohen.[7]
The Use of Conspiracy Theory to Establish In Personam Jurisdiction: a Due Process Analysis, 52 Fordham L. Rev. 234 (1983)
How to Build a Separate Sphere: Federal Courts and State Power, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 1485 (1987)
The Misguided Search for State Interest in Abstention Cases: Observations on the Occasion of Pennzoil v. Texaco, 63 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1051 (1988)
When to Believe a Legal Fiction: Federal Interests and the Eleventh Amendment, 40 Hastings L.J. 1123 (1989)
The Humble and the Treasonous: Judge-Made Jurisdiction Law, 40 Case W. Res. L.Rev. 1035 (1990).
Standing, in Fluffy Slippers, 77 Va. L. Rev. 1177 (1991)
Saying What Rights Are – In and Out of Context, 1991 Wis. L. Rev. 929 (1991)
Tapping the State Court Resource, 44 Vand. L. Rev. 953 (1991)
Beyond King Solomon's Harlots: Women in Evidence, 65 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1265 (1992)
Thelma & Louisa and the Law: Do Rape Shield Rules Matter? 25 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 757 (1992)
Variations on a Theory of Normative Federalism: a Supreme Court Dialogue, 42 Duke L.J. 979 (1993)
Who's to Blame for Law Reviews?, 70 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 81 (1994)
The Lying Woman, The Devious Prostitute, and Other Stories from the Evidence Casebook, 88 Nw. U. L. Rev. 914 (1994).
Time For the Federal Courts to Enforce the Guarantee Clause? A Response to Professor Chemerinsky, 65 U. Colo. L. Rev. 881 (1994)
Federalism, Untamed, 47 Vand. L. Rev. 1207 (1994)
Late Night Confessions in the Hart & Wechsler Hotel, 47 Vand. L. Rev. 993 (1994)
Federal Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Federal Rights: Can Congress Bring Back the Warren Era? 20 Law & Social Inquiry 1067 (1995).
Enforcing Federalism after United States v. Lopez, 38 Arizona L. Rev. 793 (1996)
The Alden Trilogy: Still Searching for a Way to Enforce Federalism, 31 Rutgers L.J. 631 (2000)
On Dignity and Deference: The Supreme Court's New Federalism, 68 U. Cin. L. Rev. 245 (2000)
Inside the Federalism Case, 574 Annals of the Am. Acad. 132 (2001)
Why Talking about States Rights Cannot Avoid the Need for Normative Federalism Analysis, 51 Duke L. J. 363 (2001)
Electoral College Reform: Deja Vu, 95 Nw. U. L. Rev. 993 (2001)
The Authoritative Lawsaying Power of the State Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court: Conflicts of Judicial Orthodoxy in the Bush-Gore Litigation, 61 Md. L. Rev. 508 (2002)
The Vigor of the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine in Times of Terror, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 1231 (2004)
Vanguard States, Laggard States: Federalism and Constitutional Rights, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1745 (2004)
Chief Justice Rehnquist and the Search for Judicially Enforceable Federalism, 10 Tex. Rev. of L & Pol. 275 (2006)
^Ernest Young,Institutional Settlement in a Globalizing Judicial System, 54 Duke L. J. 1143, 1149 n.18 and accompanying text (2005).
'^See, e.g., Ann Althouse,Stepping Out of Professor Fallon's Puzzle Box: A Response to 'If Roe Were Overruled: Abortion and the Constitution in a Post-Roe World, 51 St. Louis U. L. Rev. __ (2007).