Deaton was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He attendedHawick High School[5] and thenFettes College as a foundation scholar, working at Portmeirion hotel in summer 1964. He earned hisB.A.,M.A. andPh.D. degrees at theUniversity of Cambridge, the last with a 1975 thesis entitledModels of Consumer Demand and Their Application to the United Kingdom under the supervision ofRichard Stone. At Cambridge, he was later a fellow atFitzwilliam College and a research officer working withRichard Stone andTerry Barker in the Department of Applied Economics.[6]
In 1976 Deaton took up a post at theUniversity of Bristol as Professor of Econometrics. During this period, he completed a significant portion of his most influential work. In 1978, he became the first ever recipient of theFrisch Medal, an award given by theEconometric Society every two years to an applied paper published within the past five years inEconometrica. In 1980, his paper[7] on how demand for various consumption goods depends on prices and income was published inThe American Economic Review. This paper has since been hailed as one of the twenty most influential articles published in the journal in its first hundred years.[8]
In 2015, Deaton won that year'sNobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. Deaton was "delighted" and described himself as "someone who's concerned with the poor of the world and how people behave, and what gives them a good life." TheRoyal Swedish Academy of Sciences said that economic policy intended to reduce poverty could only be designed once individuals' consumption choices were understood, saying, "More than anyone else, Angus Deaton has enhanced this understanding. By linking detailed individual choices and aggregate outcomes, his research has helped transform the fields of microeconomics, macroeconomics, and development economics".[12] Deaton is also the author of "Letters from America", a popular semi-annual feature in theRoyal Economic Society Newsletter.[13]
In 2024, Deaton wrote about having changed his mind on a large part of the mainstream economics he had previously supported,[14] concluding that economists' mistakes showed how "Economists could benefit by greater engagement with the ideas of philosophers, historians, and sociologists, just as Adam Smith once did".[15]
Deaton's first work to become known wasAlmost Ideal Demand System (AIDS), which he developed withJohn Muellbauer and published inThe American Economic Review (AER) in 1980.[16] As a consumer demand model, it provides a first-order approximation to any demand system that satisfies theaxioms of order, aggregates over consumers without invoking parallel linear Engel curves, is consistent with budget constraints, and is simple to estimate.
According to a review by the American Economic Review, the paper "introduces a practical system of demand equations that are consistent with preference maximization and have sufficient flexibility to support full welfare analysis of policies that have an impact on consumers."[17] The paper was listed as one of the top 20 published works in the AER in the first 100 years of the journal.[17]
In 2015,Anne Case and Angus Deaton published the paper "Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century" in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. In the article, Case and Deaton highlight the rising all-causemortality rate among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans in the past decade, a recent trend that was unique among "rich" countries.[18] Case and Deaton found that the rising mortality rates were only occurring for white non-Hispanics and that less-educated white non-Hispanics were at the greatest risk. Further, they discovered that the increasing mortality rates among white non-Hispanics could be classified as "deaths of despair", most notably drug and alcohol poisonings, suicide, and chronic liver diseases and cirrhosis."[18] Finally, they noted that rising mortality rates were accompanied by risingmorbidity rates, particularly "[s]elf-reported declines in health, mental health, and ability to conduct activities of daily living, and increases in chronic pain and inability to work".[18] To explain their findings, Case and Deaton point to the rising availability and abuse of opioids:
The increased availability of opioid prescriptions for pain that began in the late 1990s has been widely noted, as has the associated mortality. The CDC estimates that for each prescription painkiller death in 2008, there were 10 treatment admissions for abuse, 32 emergency department visits for misuse or abuse, 130 people who were abusers or dependent, and 825 nonmedical users ...[A]ddictions are hard to treat and pain is hard to control, so those currently in midlife may be a "lost generation" whose future is less bright than those who preceded them.[18]
As a follow-up to their previous work, Case and Deaton received funding from theNational Institute on Aging through theNational Bureau of Economic Research to release a larger study that was published in 2017 entitledMortality and Morbidity in the 21st Century.[19][20][21] In extending their research, they found that the mortality rates for educated white non-Hispanics have begun to decrease again, although the rates for uneducated white non-Hispanics have continued to climb; at the same time, rates for Hispanics and blacks continued to decrease, regardless of educational attainment. Additionally, they found that contemporaneous resources had no effect on mortality rates and that, instead, worsening labor market opportunities for uneducated white non-Hispanics have pushed forward severalcumulative disadvantages for middle-aged people, such as worsened marriage and child outcomes, and overall health.[19]
2011—AwardedBBVA Foundation Frontiers of Knowledge Award of Economics, Finance and Management for his fundamental contributions to the theory of consumption and savings, and the measurement of economic wellbeing.[26]
In June 2024, 16Nobel Prize in Economics laureates, including Deaton, signed an open letter arguing thatDonald Trump’s fiscal and trade policies coupled with efforts to limit theFederal Reserve's independence would reignite inflation in the United States.[32][33][34]
Previously widowed, Deaton has two children, born in 1970 and 1971.[35] He is married toAnne Case, the Alexander Stewart 1886 Professor of Economics and Public Affairs at Princeton University'sPrinceton School of Public and International Affairs. The couple enjoy the opera and trout fishing.[9] He has declined to comment on whether he supports independence for his native Scotland but said that he has a “strong personal and historical attachment to theUnion".[36]
Deaton, Angus (1997).The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank.ISBN0801852544.
Deaton, Angus; Zaidi, Salman. (2002). Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis. New York: World Bank Press.ISBN0821349902.
Deaton, Angus; Kozel, Valerie, eds. (2005).The Great Indian Poverty Debate. New Delhi: Macmillan India Ltd.ISBN9781403926449.
Deaton, Angus (2013).The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.ISBN9780691153544.
Case, Anne; Deaton, Angus (2020).Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism. Princeton University Press.ISBN978-0691190785.
Deaton, Angus (2023).Economics in America: An Immigrant Economist Explores the Land of Inequality. Princeton University Press.ISBN978-0691247625.
^Rothwell, Jonathan; Diego-Rosell, Pablo (2 November 2016). "Explaining Nationalist Political Views: The Case of Donald Trump". Rochester, NY.SSRN2822059.
^Picchi, Aimee (25 June 2024)."16 Nobel Prize-winning economists warn that Trump's economic plans could reignite inflation".www.cbsnews.com.Archived from the original on 9 July 2024. Retrieved12 July 2024.Trump's policies could prove to be inflationary, other economists also warned, such as his proposal to create a 10% across-the-board tariff on all imports to deporting immigrants. The tariff plan would add $1,700 in annual costs for the typical U.S. household, essentially acting as an inflationary tax, according to experts at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
