Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Anglo-Spanish War (1585–1604)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
War between the kingdoms of Spain and England
For other conflicts, seeAnglo-Spanish Wars (disambiguation).

Anglo-Spanish War
Part of theEighty Years' War and theAnglo-Spanish Wars

English ships and the Spanish Armada, 8 August 1588, unknown artist
Date1585–1604 (19 years)
Location
ResultTreaty of London
Territorial
changes
Status quo ante bellum[1]
Belligerents
 Scotland (1603)
Commanders and leaders
Strength
Unknown

England 183,492 (total that served overseas, 1586-1603)[2]

  • 72,742 soldiers on the continent
  • 37,000 soldiers inIreland
  • 40,000 navy sailors
  • 33,750 privateers
Casualties and losses
UnknownEngland 70,260 dead or missing (1586–1603)[3]
Caribbean and South America
Atlantic
European waters
Low Countries
Ten years
1599-1604
France
Ireland
Part ofa series on the
Wars ofTudorEngland
Flag of the Commonwealth

TheAnglo-Spanish War (1585–1604) was an intermittent conflict betweenHabsburg Spain and theKingdom of England that was never formally declared.[4] It began with England's military expedition in 1585 to what was then theSpanish Netherlands under the command ofRobert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, in support of theDutch rebellion against Spanish Habsburg rule.

In large-scale campaigns, the English repelled theSpanish Armada in 1588, while Spain repelled theEnglish Armada in 1589. The war included much Englishprivateering against Spanish ships, and several widely separated battles. The war dragged on towards the end of the sixteenth century; England and Spain intervenedin France in the 1590s and inIreland from 1601. Thecampaign in the Netherlands saw a Spanish veteran force defeated by the Anglo-Dutch at theBattle of Nieuwpoort in 1600. This was followed a year later by the costly three-yearSiege of Ostend, which Spain eventually seized.

The war was brought to an end in August 1604 with theTreaty of London between the new kings:Philip III of Spain andJames I of England. In the treaty, England and Spain restored thestatus quo ante bellum, agreed to cease their military interventions in the Netherlands and Ireland respectively, and resumed trade; the English ended their high seas privateering and the Spanish recognized James as king.[5][6]

Causes

[edit]

In the 1560s,Philip II of Spain was faced with increasing religious disturbances asProtestantism gained adherents in his domains in theLow Countries. As a defender of theCatholic Church, he sought to suppress the rising Protestant movement in his territories, which eventually exploded intoopen rebellion in 1566. Meanwhile, relations with the regime ofElizabeth I of England continued to deteriorate, following her restoration of royal supremacy over theChurch of England through theAct of Supremacy in 1559; this had been first instituted by her fatherHenry VIII and rescinded by her sisterMary I, Philip's wife. The Act was considered by Catholics as a usurpation of papal authority. Calls by leading English Protestants to support the Protestant Dutch rebels against Philip increased tensions further as did the Catholic-Protestant disturbances inFrance, which saw both sides supporting the opposing French factions.

Complicating matters were commercial disputes. The activities of English sailors, begun by SirJohn Hawkins in 1562, gained the tacit support of Elizabeth, even though the Spanish government complained that Hawkins's trade with their colonies in theWest Indies constitutedsmuggling. A slaving expedition led by Hawkins and SirFrancis Drake was surprised by the Spanish in September 1568, and several ships were captured or sunk at theBattle of San Juan de Ulúa nearVeracruz inNew Spain. This engagement soured Anglo-Spanish relations, and in the following year the English detained several treasure ships sent by the Spanish to supply their army in the Netherlands. Drake and Hawkins intensified theirprivateering as a way to break the Spanishmonopoly on Atlantic trade. Francis Drake went on a privateering voyage during which he eventuallycircumnavigated the globe between 1577 and 1580; Spanish colonial ports were plundered and a number of ships were captured, including the treasure galleonNuestra Señora de la Concepción. When news of his exploits reached Europe, Elizabeth's relations with Philip continued to deteriorate.

Soon after thePortuguese succession crisis of 1580, English support was provided toAntónio, Prior of Crato, who then foughtin his struggle with Philip II for thePortuguese throne. Philip in return began to support theCatholic rebellion in Ireland against Elizabeth's religious reforms. Both Philip's and Elizabeth's attempts to support opposing factions were defeated.

In 1584, Philip signed theTreaty of Joinville with theCatholic League of France to defeat theHuguenot forces in theFrench Wars of Religion. In theSpanish Netherlands, England had secretly supported the side of the Dutch ProtestantUnited Provinces, who werefighting for independence from Spain. In 1584, thePrince of Orange had been assassinated, leaving a sense of alarm as well as a political vacuum. The following year was a further blow to the Dutch with thecapture of Antwerp by Spanish forces led byAlexander Farnese, the Duke of Parma. The Dutch rebels sought help from England, which Elizabeth agreed to as she feared that a Spanish reconquest there would threaten England.[7] TheTreaty of Nonsuch was signed as a result: Elizabeth agreed to provide the Dutch with men, horses, and subsidies, but she declined overall sovereignty. In return the Dutch handed over threeCautionary Towns, which were garrisoned by English troops. Philip took this to be an open declaration of war against his rule in the Netherlands.

War

[edit]

The Anglo-Spanish War broke out in 1585, following the seizure ofEnglish merchant ships in Spanish harbors. In response the Englishprivy council immediately authoriseda campaign against the Spanish fishing industry inNewfoundland and off theGrand Banks.[8] The campaign was a huge success, and subsequently led to England's first sustained activity in the Americas.[9] In August, England joined theEighty Years' War on the side of the Dutch ProtestantUnited Provinces, which had declared their independence from Spain. In that same year, the English established their first New World settlement, the short livedRoanoke Colony established byRalph Lane.

The Queen throughFrancis Walsingham ordered Sir Francis Drake to lead an expedition to attack theSpanish New World in a kind ofpreemptive strike. Drake sailed in October to the West Indies. In January 1586 hecaptured and sacked Santo Domingo, and in the following month did thesame at Cartagena de Indias. In May Drake sailed northto raid St. Augustine inFlorida, and when he arrived in England in July he became a national hero. In Spain, however, the news was a disaster, and further buoyed the idea of a Spanish invasion of England by King Philip.[10]Thomas Cavendish meanwhile set out with three ships on 21 July 1586 toraid Spanish settlements in South America. Cavendish raided three Spanish settlements and captured or burned thirteen ships. Among these was a rich 600-ton treasure galleon,Santa Ana, the biggest treasure haul that ever fell into English hands. Cavendish circumnavigated the globe returning to England on 9 September 1588.[11]

Dutch Revolt (1585–1587)

[edit]
Siege of Grave in 1586

Robert Dudley, The Earl of Leicester was sent to the United Provinces in 1585 with a dignitary party and took the offered governorship of the United Provinces. This, however, was met with fury from Elizabeth, who had expressed no desire for any sovereignty over the Dutch. An English mercenary army had been present since the beginning of the war and was then under the command of veteran SirJohn Norreys. They combined forces but were undermanned and under-financed, and faced one of the most powerful armies in Europe led by the famedAlexander Farnese, Duke of Parma.[12]

During thesiege of Grave the following year, Dudley attempted its relief, but the Dutch garrison commander Hadewij van Hemert surrendered the town to the Spanish. Dudley was furious on hearing of Grave's sudden loss and had van Hemert executed, which shocked the Dutch.[13] The English force then had some successes,taking Axel in July andDoesburg the following month. Dudley's poor diplomacy with the Dutch, however, made matters worse. His political base weakened and so too did the military situation.[14] OutsideZutphen an English forcewas defeated and notable poetPhilip Sidney mortally wounded, which was a huge blow to English morale. Zutphen itself andDeventer were betrayed by CatholicturncoatsWilliam Stanley andRowland York, which further damaged Leicester's reputation. FinallySluis with a largely English garrisonwas besieged and taken by the Duke of Parma in June 1587, after the Dutch refused to help in the relief. This resulted in mutual recriminations between Leicester and the States.[15]

Leicester soon realised how dire his situation was and asked to be recalled. He resigned his post as governor – his tenure had been a military and political failure, and as a result, he was financially ruined.[16] After Leicester's departure, the Dutch elected the Prince of Orange's son CountMaurice of Nassau as thestadtholder and governor. At the same timePeregrine Bertie took over English forces in the Netherlands.

Spanish Armada

[edit]
Main articles:Spanish Armada andSpanish Armada in Ireland

On 8 February 1587, theexecution ofMary, Queen of Scots outraged Catholics in Europe. In retaliation for the execution of Mary, Philip vowed to invade England to place a Catholic monarch on its throne. In April 1587 Philip's preparations suffered a setback when Francis Drakeburned 37 Spanish ships in the harbour ofCádiz, and as a result the invasion of England had to be postponed for over a year.

On 29 July, Philip obtained Papal authority to overthrow Elizabeth, who had been excommunicated byPope Pius V, and place whomever he chose on the throne of England. He assembled a fleet of about 130 ships, containing 8,050 sailors, 18,973 soldiers, and 2,088 rowers. To finance this endeavour,Pope Sixtus V had permitted Philip to collect crusade taxes. Sixtus had promised a further subsidy to the Spanish should they reach English soil.[17]

On 28 May 1588, the Armada, under the command of theDuke of Medina Sidonia, set sail for the Netherlands, where it was to pick up additional troops for the invasion of England. As the armada sailed through the English Channel, the English navy, led byCharles Howard, and Francis Drake, fought a battle of attrition with the Spanish fromPlymouth toPortland and then to theSolent, preventing them from securing any English harbours.[18] The Spanish were forced to withdraw toCalais. While the Spanish were at anchor there in a crescent-shaped defensive formation, the English used fireships to break the formation and scatter the Spanish ships. In the subsequentBattle of Gravelines the English navy attacked the Armada and forced it to sail northward in more dangerous stormy waters on the long way home. As they sailed aroundScotland, the Armada suffered severe damage and loss of life from stormy weather. As they approached the West coast of Ireland more damaging stormy conditions forced ships ashore while others were wrecked. Disease took a heavy toll as the fleet finally limped back to port.[19]

Philip's invasion plans had miscarried partly because of unfortunate weather and his own mismanagement, and partly because the opportunistic defensive naval efforts of the English and their Dutch allies prevailed. The failure of the Armada provided valuable seafaring experience for English oceanic mariners. While the English were able to persist in their privateering against the Spanish and continue sending troops to assist Philip II's enemies in the Netherlands andFrance, these efforts brought few tangible rewards.[20] One of the most important effects of the event was that the Armada's failure was seen as a sign that God supported the Protestant Reformation in England. One of the medals struck to celebrate the English victory bore theLatin/Hebrew inscriptionFlavitיהוה et dissipati sunt (literally: "Yahweh blew and they were scattered"; traditionally translated more freely as: "He blew with His winds, and they were scattered").

English Armada

[edit]
Main article:English Armada
Map of the English Armada campaigns

An English counter armada under the command of Sir Francis Drake and SirJohn Norris was prepared in 1589 with three tasks:

Because this mission was floated as ajoint stock company, Drake had investors to satisfy, so, rather than adhere to the Queen's orders,[citation needed] he bypassed Santander in favor of seeking plunder, booty and financial rewards. He started by making a surprise landing atCoruña on 4 May where the lower town was captured and plundered, and a number of merchant ships were seized. Norris then won a modest victory over a Spanish relief militia force at Puente del Burgo. When the English pressed the attack on the citadel, however, they were repulsed with heavy casualties. In addition, a number of English ships were captured by Spanish naval forces.

Two-weeks later, having failed to capture Coruña, the English departed and sailed towardsLisbon, landing on 26 May, but owing to poor organisation (they had very few siege guns), lack of co-ordination and starvation, the invading force also failed to take Lisbon. The expected uprising by the Portuguese loyal to Crato never materialized. With Portuguese and Spanish reinforcements arriving, the English were forced to retreat; they sailed north – tossing the dead overboard by the hundred along the way – where Drake sacked and burnedVigo. Young William Fenner, who had come from England with 17 supply ships commanded by Captain Cross, was separated from the fleet after a storm and found himself heading toward thearchipelago ofMadeira, ultimately anchoring inPorto Santo where, the next day, seven more English vessels joined him. They took the island and resupplied themselves over the next two days. Unable to find the rest of the fleet, they set sail for England.[22] Drake attempted to sail towards theAzores, but could nottack against the prevailing wind. In the face of increasing sickness and deaths, he abandoned the venture and limped back to Plymouth with Captain Diego de Aramburu's flotilla ofzabras harassing him nearly the entire way.[23][24]

None of the objectives were achieved[25][26][27][28] and the opportunity to strike a decisive blow against the weakened Spanish navy was lost. The expedition depleted the financial resources of England's treasury, which had been carefully restored during the long reign of Elizabeth I. Its failure was so impactful that even today England scarcely acknowledges it ever happened.[25] Through this lost opportunity, Philip was able to revive his navy the very next year, sending 37 ships with 6,420 men toBrittany where they established abase of operations on theBlavet river. The English and Dutch ultimately failed to disrupt the various fleets of the Indies despite the great number of military personnel mobilized every year. Thus, Spain remained the predominant power in Europe for several decades.[29]

Dutch Revolt (1588–1598)

[edit]
Further information:Ten Years (Eighty Years' War)
Sir Francis Vere, commander of Elizabeth's forces in the Low Countries between 1589 and 1604

Soon after the defeat of theArmada, the Duke of Parma's force stood down from the invasion. In the autumn Parma moved his force North towardsBergen op Zoom and then attempted tobesiege the English-held town with a substantial force. The English in aruse however managed to repel the Spanish and forced Parma's retreat with heavy losses which boosted both Dutch and English morale.[30] The following year Bertie, under orders from Elizabeth I, left for France with a force to help the Protestants in their fight against theCatholic League. SirFrancis Vere assumed command of English forces thereafter – a position he retained during fifteen campaigns, with almost unbroken success.[31]

In 1590 an Anglo-Dutch force under Maurice and Vere respectively launched a campaign with the aim of takingBreda. In a remarkable feat, a small assault force hid in a peatbarge before asuccessful surprise assault that captured the city. With Spanish forces in France supporting the Catholic League as well as in the Low Countries, Maurice was able to take advantage, and thus started a gradual reconquest of the Netherlands, which became known by the Dutch as the "Ten Glorious Years". Soon after Breda the Anglo-Dutchretook Zutphen andDeventer which restored English prestige after their earlier betrayals. After defeating the Spanish under the Duke of Parmaat Knodsenberg in 1591 a new confidence in the army took shape. English troops by this time composed nearly half of the Dutch army. The reconquest continued withHulst,Nijmegen,Geertruidenberg,Steenwijk, andCoevorden all being taken within the next two years.[31] In 1593 a Spanish attempt led byFrancisco Verdugo to recapture Coevordenended in failure when the Anglo-Dutch under Maurice and Vere relieved the place during the spring of 1594. Finally, thecapture of Groningen in the summer of 1594 resulted in the Spanish army being forced out of the northern provinces which led to the complete restoration of the seven provinces.[32]

After these successes, Elizabeth could view the high confidence in the army and renewed the treaty with the States in 1595. English troops having been given high praise by the Dutch were kept at around 4,000 men. They were to be paid for by the States and the Queen would also be repaid on the Crown's expenses in instalments until a conclusion of peace was made.

In 1595, Maurice's campaign was resumed to retake the cities of theTwente region from the Spanish. This was delayed afterHuy was besieged in March but Maurice was unable to preventits fall. When Maurice did go on the offensive an attempt totake Grol in July ended in failure when a Spanish force under 90-year-old veteranCristóbal de Mondragón relieved the city. Maurice then tried to make an attempt on the city ofRheinberg in September but Mondragon defeated this move at theBattle of the Lippe. Maurice was then forced to cancel further planned offensives as the bulk of his English and Scots troops were withdrawn to take part in the attack on Cadiz. Under their new commander, theArchduke of Austria, the Spanish took advantage of this lull andrecaptured Hulst the following year which led to a prolonged stalemate in the campaign and delayed the reconquest.[30]

By 1597, Spanish bankruptcy and the war in France gave the Anglo-Dutch an advantage. At theBattle of Turnhout a Spanish force was surprised and routed; Vere and theEarl of Leicester particularly distinguished themselves. With the Spanish distracted by thesiege of Amiens in France, Maurice launched an offensive in the summer. This time bothRhienberg andGroenlo were taken by the Dutch. This was followed by the capture ofBredevoort,Enschede,Ootsmarsum,Oldenzaal, and finallyLingen by the end of the year. The offensive's success meant that most of the seven northern provinces of the Netherlands had been recaptured by the Dutch Republic and a significant barrier had been created along the Rhine river.[33]

Naval war and privateering

[edit]
The Last Fight of the Revenge, off Flores, in the Azores, 1591

In November, 1588, Philip II ordered the construction of 21 new galleons, all of them large.[34] 12 of them were built inCantabrian ports and stood out due to their number and the names they received; they were known as "the twelve apostles".[35] In addition, 6 were made in Portugal, 2 inGibraltar and 1 inVinaroz; all of them entered service in a very short space of time. Philip then established anaval base in Brittany which threatened England and allowed for a sophisticated convoy system and improved intelligence network which frustrated English naval attempts on the Spanish treasure fleet during the 1590s. This was best demonstrated by the repulse of the squadron that was led by Effingham in 1591 near the Azores, who had intended to ambush the treasure fleet. It was in this battle that the Spanishcaptured the English flagship,Revenge, after a stubborn resistance by its captain, SirRichard Grenville. Throughout the 1590s, enormous convoy escorts enabled the Spanish to ship three times as much silver as in the previous decade.[citation needed]

English merchant privateers or corsairs known as Elizabeth's "Sea Dogs" enjoyed more qualified success, however.[36] In the three years after the Spanish Armada was defeated, more than 300 prizes were taken from the Spanish with a declared total value of well over £400,000.[37] English courtiers provided money for their own expeditions as well as others, and even Elizabeth herself would make investments. TheEarl of Cumberland made a number of expeditions and a few did yield profit – his first being theAzores Voyage in 1589. Others failed however due to bad weather and his 1591 voyage ended in defeat withSpanish galleys off Berlengas. Cumberland with Sir Walter Raleigh andMartin Frobisher combined financial strength and force that led to the most successful English naval expedition of the war. OffFlores island in 1592, the English fleetcaptured a large Portuguese carrack, theMadre de Deus, and outwitted a Spanish fleet led byAlonso de Bazán. The expedition's reward equalled nearly half the size of the Kingdom of England's royal annual revenue and yielded Elizabeth a 20-fold return on her investment.[38] These riches gave the English an excited enthusiasm to engage in this opulent commerce.[39] Raleigh himself in 1595 went onan expedition to explore theOrinoco river in an attempt to find the mythical city ofEl Dorado; in the process the English plundered the Spanish settlement ofTrinidad. Raleigh would, however, exaggerate the wealth found there upon his return to England. Supporting Raleigh with his expedition was another led byAmyas Preston andGeorge Somers known as thePreston Somers expedition to South America, notable for a daring overland assault that saw the capture ofCaracas.

Many of the expeditions were financed by famed London merchants, the most notable of these beingJohn Watts. An expedition Watts financed toPortuguese Brazil led byJames Lancaster saw thecapture and plunder ofRecife andOlinda – which was highly profitable for both.[40] In response to English privateering against their merchantmen, the Spanish monarchy struck back with theDunkirkers devastating English shipping and fishing in the largely undefended seas around England.

By far the most successful English privateer wasChristopher Newport, who was backed financially by Watts.[41] Newport set out in 1590 to raid the Spanish West Indies and inthe ensuing fight saw the defeat of an armed Spanish convoy but Newport lost his right arm in the process. Despite this Newport continued the ventures – theblockade of Western Cuba in 1591 was the most successful English privateering venture made during the war, and then followed that withanother successful expedition to Hispaniola and theBay of Honduras the following year.[42] Both Drake and Hawkins died of disease on the later 1595–96 expedition againstPuerto Rico,Panama, and other targets in theSpanish Main, a severe setback in which the English suffered heavy losses in soldiers and ships despite a number of minor military victories.

The battle of Bay of Cádiz in 1596

In August 1595, a Spanish naval force fromBrittany led byCarlos de Amésquitalanded in Cornwall, raiding and burningPenzance and several nearby villages.

During the summer of 1596, an Anglo-Dutch expedition under Elizabeth's young favourite,the Earl of Essex,sacked Cádiz, causing significant loss to the Spanish fleet, leaving the city in ruins and delaying a projected descent on England. The allies were unable to capture the treasure, as the Spanish commander had time in order to torch the treasure ships in port, sending the treasure to the bottom of the harbour, from where it was later recovered. Despite its failure to capture the treasure fleet, the sack of Cádiz was celebrated as a national triumph comparable to the victory over the Spanish Armada, and for a time Essex's prestige rivalled Elizabeth's own.[43]

Instead of controlling and taxing its subjects, the English crown competed with them for private profit; it failed to succeed at this, as the great naval expeditions were on the whole unprofitable.[44] The last of the great English naval expeditions took place in 1597, led by the Earl of Essex, known as theIslands Voyage. The objective was to destroy the Spanish fleet and intercept a treasure fleet in the Azores. Neither was achieved and the expedition ended in costly failure, and Essex on his return was scolded by the Queen for not protecting the English coast.

While the war became a great drain on the English treasury, it proved to be profitable for a number of English privateers. In its final years, English privateering continued despite the strengthening of Spanish navy convoys – Cumberland's last expedition in 1598 to the Caribbean led to thecapture of San Juan, and had succeeded where Drake had failed. Newport struck atTobasco in 1599 whileWilliam Parker successfullyraided Portobello in 1601.[45] In 1603 Christopher Cleevestruck at Santiago de Cuba and in the last raid of the war Newportplundered Puerto Caballos.[46]

In order to break the Spanish and Portuguese monopoly in Far East trade, a group of investors including the likes of Cumberland and Lancaster established theEast India Company (EIC) in 1600, which was granted a charter by Queen Elizabeth.[47] Lancaster commanded the first EIC voyage the following year aboardRed Dragon and three other ships. The voyage was a financial and military success - a number of ships were captured, the most notable being the rich 1,000 ton Portuguese carrackSao Thome in theMalacca Straits in October 1602. In addition, two "factories" (trading posts) were established – one atBantam onJava and another in theSpice Islands before leaving for the successful voyage home in 1603.[48]

By the end of the war, English privateering had devastated the Spanish private merchant marine.[49] Spanish prizes though were taken at an attritional rate; nearly 1,000 were captured by the war's end, and there was on average a declared value of approximately £100,000–£200,000 for every year of the war.[50] In addition, for every Spanish prize brought back, another was either burned or scuttled, and the presence of so many English corsairs deterred some Spanish merchantmen from putting to sea.[51] This resulted in much Spanish and Portuguese commerce being carried on Dutch and English ships, which in itself created competition.[37] Nevertheless, throughout the war Spain's importanttreasure fleets were kept safe by their convoy system.[1]

Dutch Revolt (1598–1604)

[edit]
Further information:Eighty Years' War, 1599–1609
Battle of Nieuwpoort in 1600 bySebastiaen Vrancx

In 1598, the Spanish underFrancisco Mendoza retook Rheinberg and Meurs in a campaign known as theSpanish winter of 1598–99. Mendoza then attempted to takeBommelerwaard island but the Dutch and English under Maurice thwarted the attempt and defeated himat Zaltbommel. Mendoza retreated from the area and the defeat resulted in chaos in the Spanish army – mutinies took place and many deserted. The following year the Dutch senate led byJohan van Oldenbarneveldt saw the chaos in the Spanish army and decided the time was ripe for a focal point of the war to be concentrated in Catholic Flanders. Despite a bitter dispute between Maurice and van Oldenbarneveldt, the Dutch and a sizeable contingent of the English Army under Francis Vere reluctantly agreed. They usedOstend (still in Dutch hands) as a base to invade Flanders. Their aim was to conquer the privateer stronghold city ofDunkirk. In 1600 they advanced toward Dunkirk and the Anglo-Dutch inflicted a rare defeat in a pitched battle on thetercio-led Spanish army at theBattle of Nieuwpoort in which the English played a major part.[52] Dunkirk was never attempted however as disputes in the Dutch command meant that taking Spanish-occupied cities in the rest of the Republic took priority. Maurice's force thus withdrew leaving Vere to command Ostend in the face of an imminent Spanish siege.[53]

With thesiege of Ostend underway, Maurice then went on the offensive on the Rhine frontier in the summer of 1600.Rheinberg and Meurs were thus retaken from the Spanish yet again, althoughan attempt on s'Hertogenbosch failed during the winter months. At Ostend in January 1602 after being reinforced, Vere faced a huge Spanish frontal assault organised by the Archduke Albert and in bitter fighting this was repelled with heavy losses. Vere left the city soon after and joined Maurice in the field, while Albert, who drew much criticism from army commanders for his tactics, was replaced by the talentedAmbrogio Spinola. The siege dragged on for another two years as the Spanish attempted to take Ostend's strongpoints in a costlywar of attrition. Around the same time Maurice continued his campaign,Grave was retaken but Vere was severely wounded during the siege. An attempt by the Dutch and English to relieve Ostend took place in mid-1604 but the inland of port ofSluis was besieged and captured instead. Soon afterwards the Ostend garrison finally surrendered, after a siege of nearly four years and costing thousands of lives; for the Spanish, it was apyrrhic victory.[54][55]

France

[edit]
Siege of Amiens in 1597

Normandy added a new front in the war and the threat of another invasion attempt across the channel. In 1590, the Spanish landed a considerable force inBrittany to assist theFrench Catholic League, expelling the English andHuguenot forces from much of the area. Henry IV's conversion to Catholicism in 1593 won him widespread French support for his claim to the throne, particularly in Paris (where he was crowned the following year), a city that he hadunsuccessfully besieged in 1590. In 1594 Anglo-French forces were able to end Spanish hopes of using the large port ofBrest as a launching point for an invasion of England bycapturing Fort Crozon.

TheFrench Wars of Religion turned increasingly against the hardliners of the French Catholic League. With the signing of theTriple Alliance in 1596 between France, England, and the Dutch, Elizabeth sent a further 2,000 troops to France after theSpanish took Calais. In September 1597 Anglo-French forces under Henryretook Amiens, just six months after the Spanish took the city, bringing to a halt a string of Spanish victories. In fact, the first tentative talks on peace between the French and Spanish crowns had already begun before the battle and the League hardliners were already losing popular support throughout France to a resurgent Henry after his conversion to Roman Catholicism which was bolstered by his military successes. In addition, Spanish finances were at breaking point because of fighting wars in France, the Netherlands, and against England. Therefore, a deeply ill Philip decided to end his support for the League and to finally recognize the legitimacy of Henry's accession to the French throne. Without Spanish support, the last League hardliners were quickly defeated. In May 1598, the two kings signed thePeace of Vervins ending the last of thereligious civil wars and the Spanish intervention with it.[56]

Ireland: Spanish armadas (1596–1602)

[edit]
Further information:Nine Years' War (Ireland)

By 1594, theNine Years' War in Ireland had begun, whenUlster lordsHugh O'Neill andRed Hugh O'Donnell rose up against English rule with fitful Spanish support, mirroring the English support of the Dutch rebellion. English forces attempted to contain the rebels in Ireland at great cost in men, general suffering, and finance. The Spanish saw the war in Ireland as an opportunity - a new front, which hoped to draw English troops away from the fighting in the United Provinces. Since the conflict in Ireland had started Spain had sent weapons and finance to support the rebels. Ireland thus would eventually become the focus of further Spanish armada attempts.[57]

Second Spanish Armada

[edit]
Further information:Second Spanish Armada

In 1596 following the English raid on Cadiz, Philip II sought revenge and sent hissecond Spanish Armada to Ireland in October to support the Irish rebels. The fleet consisted of 140 ships and 20,000 men - nearly as strong as the 1588 Armada. Disaster struck however, only a few days after leaving El Ferrol offCape Finisterre a strong storm swept away the fleet causing enormous losses. Forty ships including five large galleons (also known as the Apostles), were either sunk, scuttled or captured with the rest limping back into El Ferrol. In addition, 5,000 men were either killed, drowned or had died of disease. Along with the Cádiz raid, the failure of this armada meant that Spain was forced to declarebankruptcy that year.[58]

Third Spanish Armada

[edit]
Further information:Third Spanish Armada

An undeterred Philip demanded another armada to be sent to Ireland. In October 1597 and despite concerns raised to the king regarding numbers, thethird Spanish Armada of 140 ships and 14,000 men was sent anyway. This time it was hoped to intercept Essex's returning fleet from theAzores Voyage and destroy it, and so senior Spanish commanders decided an attack on England or Wales was chosen instead of Ireland.[59] As the Armada neared the Cornish coast, another storm dispersed the fleet causing some loss. A small number however did achieve landfall in Cornwall and West Wales, but were either forced to retreat or were captured. The armada as a whole was forced to turn back due to the strong Easterly winds; failing even to catch any of Essex's returning fleet.

Charles Howard meanwhile managed to organise a fleet sortie and was able to capture a number of Spanish ships – the rest were too far ahead and managed to get back to port.[60] Elizabeth awarded Howard, but was furious with Essex, accusing him of making England defenceless whilst he had been away. In Spain, the costly failure of yet another armada with the further loss of 28 ships sunk or captured and 2,000 men caused anger in Philip's court, largely at the ill preparedness of the operation.[61] Philip II died in 1598, and his successorPhilip III continued the war but with less enthusiasm.

Fourth Spanish Armada

[edit]
Further information:Fourth Spanish Armada
Map of the siege of Kinsale in 1601

The Spanish navy would take some years before it was back up to some strength and it wasn't until 1601 that the Spanish sent theirfourth and final armada to support the rebels in Ireland. This was the smallest armada sent of the war - 33 ships with 4,500 men led by veteransJuan del Águila andPedro de Zubiaur. Only half the fleet arrived because of a storm that scattered it but this time the Spanish achieved landfall. The Spanish entered the town ofKinsale and a few weeks later were reinforced by more troops to bring the total to 3,500 troops there. The following month the rest of the force managed to land further West nearBaltimore andCastlehaven, but was far from any Irish rebel forces.[62]

A month later, an English force consisting of 12,000 men led by theEarl of Mountjoy besieged the Spanish in Kinsale. The Spanish were also cut off from the sea by a blockading English fleet led by AdmiralRichard Leveson, who in Decembercrippled the Spanish ships that lay in Castlehaven.[63] In time, the Irish rebels arrived at Kinsale with 7,000 men including 200 Spanish veterans to surround the English besiegers at Kinsale, the latter suffering heavily from disease and desertion. A lack of communication with the rebels however led to a resounding English victory at theBattle of Kinsale on Christmas Eve 1601. The Spanish in the town seeing no hope of relief eventually accepted terms of surrender. The other garrisons around Baltimore and Castlehaven also surrendered as part of the terms. This left the Irish rebels in a serious disadvantage, and the defeat weakened Spanish resolve in the war against England.[64]

End of the war and treaty

[edit]
Further information:Treaty of London (1604)
TheSomerset House Conference between diplomats of England (right) and Spain (left) (painting)

By 1598, the Spanish court was dominated by theDuke of Lerma whose general policy was one of disengagement. England and the Dutch Republic too were war-weary and both sides felt the need for peace.[65] In peace negotiations atBoulogne in 1600, Spanish demands were ultimately rejected by the English and Dutch. Nevertheless, diplomatic routes remained open between theArchduke of Austria and his wifeInfanta Isabella (Philip's sister) who differed in their policies to Philip's. Philip wanted to preserve the hegemony of the Spanish empire, whilst the Archduke and Isabella sought peace and friendly relations.[66] Following the defeat in Ireland, the Duke of Lerma put pressure on Philip III to try extricate Spain from the war, and so a cut back in foreign expenditure was necessary.[64]

In 1602, the English navy underRichard Leveson conducted a blockade of Spain, the first of its kind.[67] Off Portugal, they sailed intoSesimbra bay where a fleet of eight Spanish galleys underFederico Spinola (brother of Ambrogio) andÁlvaro de Bazán were present.[68] Spinola had already established his base at Sluis in Flanders and was gathering more with an intent on a potential strike against England. In June 1602 Levesondefeated the Spanish which resulted in two galleys sunk and the capture of a rich Portuguese carrack.[69] Months later in the English channel Spinola's fleet gathered more galleys and sailed through the English channel once more butwas defeated again by an Anglo-Dutch naval squadron off the Dover straits. Spinola's remaining galleys eventually reached Sluis.[70] The result of this action forced the Spanish to cease further naval operations against England for the remainder of the war.[69] Spain's priority was no longer an invasion of England, but thefall of Ostend.[70]

After the death of Elizabeth in 1603,James I, became the new king of England. He was the Protestant son and successor to the Catholic Mary, Queen of Scots, whose execution had been a proximate cause of the war. James regarded himself as the peacemaker of Europe, and the ultimate aim of his idealistic foreign policy was the reunion of Christendom.[71] James sought an end to the long and draining conflict, which Philip III also wanted. James ordered an end to further privateering in June 1603, and in return Philip sent a Spanish-Flemish Commission headed byJuan de Tassis to London to explore the possibilities of ending the war.

Following an end to privateering many former Elizabethan Sea Dogs either joined the Dutch cause or soughtemployment in the Barbary States attacking European merchant shipping.[72]Antonio de Oquendo in August 1604defeated and captured an English galleon off Cadiz, but by this time they were then in the service of theBarbary States, whose corsairs were plundering shipping lanes and villages around theGulf of Cádiz.[73]

After nearly a year of negotiations, peace was signed between the nations on 28 August 1604, place atSomerset House inWestminster. The sieges of Ostend andSluis were allowed to continue until the end of those respective campaigns.[74]

Aftermath

[edit]

The treaty restored thestatus quo ante bellum; the terms were favourable both to Spain and England.[1][75] For Spain the treaty secured her position as the leading power in the world.[76][77] Spain's upgrading of the convoy system had allowed it to defend its treasure fleets and retain itsNew World colonies. English support for the Dutch rebellion against the Spanish king, the original cause of the war, ceased. The Spanish could then concentrate their efforts in the Netherlands.[75][78] A complete abandonment of the Dutch cause, however, was not promised in the treaty.[78] The English-held cautionary towns in Holland on the other hand were not surrendered despite Spanish demands.[79] The sieges ofSluis andOstend were allowed to continue until the end of those respective campaigns.[80] By 1609, after decades of costly war,Spain and theDutch Republic agreed to theTwelve Years’ Truce, which effectively treated the Dutch Republic as a sovereign power without granting formal recognition; hostilities resumed in 1621 and ended only in 1648, when Spain retained theSouthern Netherlands and formally recognized Dutch independence in thePeace of Münster.[81][82][83][84]

For England the treaty was regarded by the crown as a diplomatic success as well as an economic necessity.[85] At the same time, the treaty was highly unpopular with the English public, many of whom considered it a humiliating peace.[86][87][88] Many felt that James had abandoned England's ally, the Netherlands, in order to appease the Spanish crown and this damaged James's popularity.[85] The treaty, however, included provisions seen as protecting Protestant interests, and James and his ministers refused the Spanish demand for Catholic toleration in England.[78] After the Irish defeat at Kinsale in 1602, theTreaty of Mellifont was concluded the following year between James I and the Irish rebels. In the subsequent London treaty Spain pledged not to support the rebels.[79]

The treaty was well received in Spain.[89][90] Large public celebrations were held atValladolid, the Spanish capital,[91][92] where the treaty was ratified in June 1605, in the presence of a large English ambassadorial delegation led by Lord Admiral Charles Howard.[89] Nevertheless, some members of theCatholic clergy criticized Philip III's willingness to sign a treaty with a "heretical power".[93]

The provisions of the treaty authorised merchants and warships of both nations to operate from each other's respective ports. English trade with the Spanish Netherlands (notably the city ofAntwerp) and the Iberian peninsula was resumed.[78] Spanish warships and privateers were able to use English ports as naval bases to attack Dutch shipping[94] or to ferry troops to Flanders.[95]

The war had diverted Tudor colonial efforts,[96] but the English who had invested in privateering expeditions during the war yielded substantial profits that financed new ventures.[50] As a result, theLondon Company was able to establish a settlement inVirginia in 1607.[97] The success of the first East India Company voyage was significant for the growth of England (and laterGreat Britain) as a colonial power.[98] With the establishment of 'Factories' the company had successfully and profitably breached the Spanish and Portuguese monopoly.[99][100] While the incipient illegal trade with the Spanish colonies was brought to an end, there was deadlock over English demands for the right to trade in the East and West Indies, which Spain adamantly opposed. Eventually the complications resulted in the treaty avoiding any mention of the matter.[78]

For Spain there was hope that England would eventually secure tolerance for Catholics but theGunpowder Plot in 1605 destroyed any possibility of this.[101] The resulting anti-Catholic backlash following the discovery of the plot put to rest Protestant fears that a peace with Spain would ultimately mean an invasion byJesuits and Catholic sympathisers, as the Elizabethanrecusancy laws were rigidly enforced by Parliament.[102]

England and Spain remained at peaceuntil 1625.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^abcMorgan, Hiram (September–October 2006).Teaching the Armada: An Introduction to the Anglo-Spanish War, 1585–1604. Vol. 14. History Ireland. p. 43.
  2. ^Charles Carlton, "This Seat of Mars: War and the British Isles, 1485-1746", Yale University Press, November 2011. Page 53-55. This excludes an additional 48,066 men who served in the armies of the Dutch Republic (as they were in Dutch rather than English service), and also does not count the approximately 306,000 (mostly militia) who saw some kind of domestic military service in the same time.
  3. ^Carlton, p. 54; this excludes 18,025 who died in the service of the Dutch, which would increase the figure to 88,285.
  4. ^Rowse, A.L. (1955).The Expansion of Elizabethan England.Palgrave Macmillan. p. 241.ISBN 978-1403908131.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  5. ^Davenport, Frances Gardiner; &Paullin, Charles Oscar.European Treaties Bearing on the History of the United States and Its Dependencies, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2004,ISBN 978-1-58477-422-8
  6. ^O'Connor, Thomas (2016).Irish Voices from the Spanish Inquisition Migrants, Converts and Brokers in Early Modern Iberia. Palgrave Macmillan.ISBN 9781137465900.
  7. ^Tracey, pp. 157–158
  8. ^Bicheno, p. 180
  9. ^Karen Ordahl Kupperman,The Jamestown Project
  10. ^Konstam, pp. 76–77
  11. ^Stephen, Leslie, ed. (1887).Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 9. Macmillan. pp. 358–363. Retrieved25 October 2020.
  12. ^Hammer 2003, pp. 125–127
  13. ^Wilson 1981 pp. 282–284
  14. ^t' Hart pp. 21–22
  15. ^Wilson 1981, pp. 291–294
  16. ^Wilson 1981, pp. 294–295
  17. ^Pollen, John Hungerford (1907)."Spanish Armada" . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.).Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. New York: Robert Appleton Company. "Pope Sixtus V agreed to renew the excommunication of the Queen, and to grant a large subsidy to the Armada, but, knowing the slowness of Spain, would give nothing till the expedition should actually land in England. In this way, he was saved his million crowns, and spared the reproach of having taken futile proceedings against the heretic queen."
  18. ^Hanson p. 379
  19. ^Parker & Martin p. 215
  20. ^Richard Holmes 2001, p. 858: "The 1588 campaign was a major English propaganda victory, but in strategic terms, it was essentially indecisive."
  21. ^"Events at Calais, the 'fireships' and the Battle of Gravelines – the Spanish Armada".BBC Bitesize.
  22. ^Wernham, R.B. (1988).The Expedition of Sir John Norris and Sir Francis Drake to Spain and Portugal, 1589. Aldershot, UK: Temple Smith for the Navy Records Society. p. 240.ISBN 0566055783.
  23. ^Gonzalez-Arnao Conde-Luque, Mariano (1995).Derrota y muerte de Sir Francis Drake, a Coruña 1589 – Portobelo 1596 (in Spanish). Xunta de Galicia, Servicio Central de Publicacións. p. 94.ISBN 978-8445314630.
  24. ^R. B. Wernham, "Queen Elizabeth and the Portugal Expedition of 1589: Part II",English Historical Review 66/259 (April 1951), pp. 204–214
  25. ^abGorrochategui Santos, Luis (2018).English Armada: The Greatest Naval Disaster in English History. New York: Bloomsbury. pp. 245–246.ISBN 978-1350016996.
  26. ^R. O. Bucholz, Newton Key.Early modern England 1485–1714: a narrative history (John Wiley and Sons, 2009).ISBN 978-1405162753 p. 145
  27. ^John HampdenFrancis Drake, privateer: contemporary narratives and documents (Taylor & Francis, 1972).ISBN 978-0817357030 p. 254
  28. ^Fernández Duro, Cesáreo (1972).Armada Española desde la unión de los Reinos de Castilla y Aragón(PDF) (in Spanish). Vol. III. Museo Naval de Madrid, Instituto de Historia y Cultura Naval. p. 51.
  29. ^J. H. Elliott.La Europa dividida (1559–1598) (in Spanish) (Editorial Critica, 2002).ISBN 978-8484326694 p. 333
  30. ^abDavies, Charles Maurice (1851).The History of Holland and the Dutch nation: from the beginning of the tenth century to the end of the eighteenth. G. Willis. pp. 225–28.
  31. ^abKnight, Charles Raleigh (1905).Historical records of The Buffs, East Kent Regiment (3rd Foot) formerly designated the Holland Regiment and Prince George of Denmark's Regiment. Vol I. London, Gale & Polden,pp. 36–40
  32. ^Hadfield & Hammond p. 49
  33. ^Motley, John Lothrop.History of the United Netherlands: from the Death of William the Silent to the Twelve Years' Truce – 1609. Vol. 3. p. 422.
  34. ^Casaban Banaclocha, Jose L. (2017).The Twelve Apostles: Design, Construction, and Function of Late 16th-Century Spanish Galleons (Thesis). Texas A & M University. p. 45.hdl:1969.1/173235.
  35. ^Monson, William (1902).The naval tracts of Sir William Monson(PDF). Vol. IV, bk. III. London: Printed for the Navy Records Society. pp. 73–74.
  36. ^Andrews pp. 124–125
  37. ^abBicheno, p. 320
  38. ^Andrews p. 73
  39. ^McCulloch, John Ramsay (1833).A Treatise on the Principles, Practice, & History of Commerce. Baldwin and Cradock. p. 120.
  40. ^Andrews p. 77
  41. ^Bicheno, pp. 316–318
  42. ^Andrews pp. 167 & 186
  43. ^David Starkey,Elizabeth (Channel 4, 1999), Episode 4, "Gloriana".
  44. ^Andrews p. 30
  45. ^Andrews pp. 177
  46. ^Bradley p. 131
  47. ^Hart, Jonathan (2008).Empires and Colonies Empires and Colonies. Polity. pp. 68–69.ISBN 978-0745626130.
  48. ^Andrews 1984, p. 264.
  49. ^Andrews p. 226
  50. ^abHornsby & Hermann (2005, p. 17)
  51. ^Bradley pp. 109–110
  52. ^Borman pp. 224–225
  53. ^Knightp. 49
  54. ^Edmundson pp. 102–103
  55. ^Watson & Thomson, Robert & William (1792).The History of the Reign of Philip III. King of Spain Authors. p. 154.
  56. ^Ireland, William Henry (1824).Memoirs of Henry the Great, and of the Court of France During His Reign. Vol. 2. Harding, Triphook & Lepard. p. 266.
  57. ^Tenace, Edward (2003). "A Strategy of Reaction: The Armadas of 1596 and 1597 and the Spanish Struggle for European Hegemony".English Historical Review. Oxford Journals.118 (478):867–868.doi:10.1093/ehr/118.478.855.
  58. ^Tenace 2003, pp. 867–868.
  59. ^Wernham 1994, pp. 184–189.
  60. ^Tenace 2003, p. 874.
  61. ^Hammer 2003, pp. 309–310.
  62. ^Ekin 2014, pp. 198–99.
  63. ^Glasgow, Tom (1966).The Elizabethan Navy in Ireland 1558- 1603. Military History Society of Ireland. p. 302.
  64. ^abPendrill 2002, p. 122.
  65. ^MacCaffrey 1994, pp. 226–30, 439.
  66. ^McCoog pp. 222–223
  67. ^Wernham 1994, pp. 393–94.
  68. ^Duerloo pp. 137–138
  69. ^abWernham pp.  400–401
  70. ^abBeri, Emiliano (2018)."Spinola, Federico".Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani (in Italian). Vol. 93. Treccani. Retrieved13 October 2021.
  71. ^W. B. Patterson,King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  72. ^Konstam 2000, p. 5.
  73. ^Estrada y Arnáiz, Rafael (1943).El almirante don Antonio de Oquendo (in Spanish). Espasa-Calpe. p. 32.
  74. ^Rowse 1973, p. 413.
  75. ^abAllen pp. 142–143
  76. ^Douglas R. BurgessThe Pirates' Pact: The Secret Alliances Between History's Most Notorious Buccaneers and Colonial America. McGraw-Hill Professional, 2008, p. 29.ISBN 0-07-147476-5
  77. ^Channing, Edward:A history of the United States. Octagon Books, 1977, v. 1, p. 158.ISBN 0-374-91414-1
  78. ^abcdeHammer 2003, p. 234–35.
  79. ^abFritze, Ronald H; Robison, William B (1996).Historical Dictionary of Stuart England, 1603–1689. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 310.ISBN 978-0313283918.
  80. ^Rowse, A.L. (1973).The Expansion of Elizabethan England. Cardinal Books. p. 413.ISBN 978-0351180644.
  81. ^Goodman p. 15
  82. ^Anderson p. 4
  83. ^Israel (1995), pp. 399–405
  84. ^Phelan, John Leddy (1967).The Kingdom of Quito in the Seventeenth Century: Bureaucratic Politics in the Spanish Empire. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 88.[permanent dead link]
  85. ^abSmout, T. C. (2005).Anglo-Scottish Relations from 1603 to 1900. OUP/British Academy. pp. 17–18.ISBN 978-0197263303.
  86. ^Smout, T. C. (2005).Anglo-Scottish Relations from 1603 to 1900. OUP/British Academy. p. 17.ISBN 978-0197263303.
  87. ^Lothrop Motley, John (1867).History of the United Netherlands: From the Death of William the Silent to the Twelve Year's Truce – 1609, Vol. 4. p. 223.
  88. ^Moseley, C. W. R. D. (2007).English Renaissance Drama: A Very Brief Introduction to Theatre and Theatres in Shakespeare's Time. Humanities. p. 90.ISBN 978-1847601834.
  89. ^abPericot Garcia, Luis (1970).La Casa de Austria (siglos XVI y XVII) por La Ullon Cisneros y E. Camps Cazeria (in Spanish). Instituto Gallach de Librería y Ediciones. p. 179.
  90. ^Feros, Antonio (2002).El Duque de Lerma: realeza y privanza en la España de Felipe III (in Spanish). Marcial Pons Historia. p. 305.ISBN 978-8495379399.
  91. ^Otero Novas, José Manuel (2001).Fundamentalismos enmascarados (in Spanish). Editorial Ariel. p. 153.ISBN 978-8434412248.
  92. ^Herrero García, Miguel (1966).Biblioteca románica hispánica: Estudios y ensayos (in Spanish). Gredos. p. 474.
  93. ^Ortiz, Antonio Domínguez (1971).The Golden Age of Spain, 1516–1659 Volume 1 of The History of Spain. Basic Books. p. 87.ISBN 978-0046526900.
  94. ^Sanz Camañes, Porfirio (2002).Diplomacia hispano-inglesa en el siglo XVII: razón de estado y relaciones de poder durante la Guerra de los Treinta Años, 1618–1648 (in Spanish). Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. p. 108.ISBN 978-8484271550.
  95. ^Rodríguez Hernández, Antonio José (2015).Breve historia de los Tercios de Flandes (in Spanish). Ediciones Nowtilus. p. 144.ISBN 978-8499676586.
  96. ^Billings p. 3
  97. ^Encyclopedia Britannica. Vol. I. Encyclopedia Britannica Company. 1973. p. 499.
  98. ^Hart 2008, pp. 68–69.
  99. ^Chaudhuri, K. N (1965).The English East India Company: The Study of an Early Joint-stock Company 1600–1640. Taylor & Francis. p. 3.ISBN 978-0415190763.
  100. ^Wernham pp. 333–334
  101. ^Allen p. 155
  102. ^Reed, Richard Burton (1970).Sir Robert Cecil and the Diplomacy of the Anglo-Spanish Peace, 1603–1604. University of Wisconsin-Madison. pp. 228–229.

Further reading

[edit]
Timeline–immersed
Territories
Europe
Americas (Spanish America)
North America
Central America
South America
Asia and Oceania (Spanish East Indies)
Africa
Antarctica
Administration
Organization
Law
Titles and positions
Administrative subdivisions
Viceroyalties
Captaincies General
Governorates
Audiencias
Economy
Currencies
Trade
Military
Armies
Strategists
Mariners
Conquistadors
Notable battles
Old World
Won
Lost
New World
Won
Lost
Spanish conquests
Other civil topics
Cartography
Cartographers
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Spanish_War_(1585–1604)&oldid=1322102325"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp