| American Needle v. NFL | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued January 13, 2010 Decided May 24, 2010 | |
| Full case name | American Needle, Inc., Petitioner v. National Football League, et al. |
| Docket no. | 08-661 |
| Citations | 560U.S.183 (more) 130 S. Ct. 2201; 176L. Ed. 2d 947; 94U.S.P.Q.2d 1673 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 538F.3d736, 88 U.S.P.Q.2d 1358 (7th Cir. 2008) |
| Holding | |
| The National Football League's licensing of intellectual property in this case constitutes concerted action that is capable of violating Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Stevens, joined byunanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Sherman Antitrust Act | |
American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, 560 U.S. 183 (2010), was aUnited States Supreme Court case regarding the ability of teams in theNational Football League to conspire for purposes of a violation of §1 of theSherman Antitrust Act.
The alleged conspiracy involved the formation of the National Football League Properties (NFLP), an entity responsible for licensing NFLintellectual property (IP) and formed in 1963. Before that date the NFL teams marketed their IP rights individually. Proceeds from NFLP activity were evenly distributed among the teams.[1]
Between 1963 and 2000, the NFLP granted nonexclusive licenses to various suppliers permitting the manufacture and resale of apparel bearing team insignias. The petitioner in this case, American Needle, Inc., was one of those license holders. In December 2000, the teams voted to authorize the NFLP to begin granting exclusive licenses. The NFLP granted a 10-year exclusive license to Reebok to manufacture and sell trademarked headwear bearing team insignia of all 32 teams. At that point, the NFLP did not renew American Needle's nonexclusive license.
In a unanimous decision, the Court held that NFL teams are distinct economic actors with separate economic interests that are capable of conspiring under §1 of the Sherman Act.[2]
 | This article related to a case of theSupreme Court of the United States of theRoberts Court is astub. You can help Wikipedia byadding missing information. |