 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Allomorph" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(April 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Inlinguistics, anallomorph is a variantphonetic form of amorpheme, or in other words, a unit of meaning that varies in sound and spelling without changing the meaning.[1] The termallomorph describes the realization of phonological variations for a specific morpheme.[1] The different allomorphs that a morpheme can become are governed bymorphophonemic rules. These phonological rules determine what phonetic form, or specificpronunciation, a morpheme will take based on the phonological or morphological context in which it appears.[2]
English has several morphemes that vary in sound but not in meaning, such as past tense morphemes, plural morphemes, and negative morphemes.
For example, an English past tense morpheme is-ed, which occurs in several allomorphs depending on its phonological environment by assimilating the voicing of the previous segment or theinsertion of aschwa after analveolar stop.[1] A possible set of assimilations is:
The "other than" restrictions above are typical for allomorphy. If the allomorphy conditions are ordered from most restrictive (in this case, after an alveolar stop) to least restrictive, the first matching case usually has precedence. Thus, the above conditions could be rewritten as follows:
The[-t] allomorph does not appear after stem-final/t/ although the latter is voiceless, which is then explained by[-əd] appearing in that environment, together with the fact that the environments are ordered (that is, listed in order of priority). Likewise, the[-d] allomorph does not appear after stem-final[d] because the earlier clause for the/-əd/ allomorph has priority. The/-d/ allomorph does not appear after stem-final voiceless phoneme because the preceding clause for the[-t] comes first.
Irregular past tense forms, such as "broke" or "was/were," can be seen as still more specific cases since they are confined to certain lexical items, such as the verb "break," which take priority over the general cases listed above.[1]
The plural morpheme for regular nouns in English is typically realized by adding an-s or-es to the end of the noun. However, the plural morpheme actually has three different allomorphs: [-s], [-z], and [-əz]. The specific pronunciation that a plural morpheme takes on is determined by a set of morphological rules such as the following:[2]
In English, the negative prefixin- has three allomorphs: [ɪn-], [ɪŋ-], and [ɪm-]. The phonetic form that the negative morpheme /ɪn-/ uses is determined by a set of morphological rules; for example:[3]
TheSami languages have atrochaic pattern of alternatingstressed and unstressed syllables. The vowels and consonants that are allowed in an unstressedsyllable differ from those that are allowed in a stressed syllable. Consequently, every suffix and inflectional ending has two forms, and the form that is used depends on the stress pattern of the word to which it is attached. For example,Northern Sami has thecausative verb suffix -hit/-ahttit in which-hit is selected when it would be the third syllable (and the preceding verb has two syllables), and-ahttit is selected when it would be the third and the fourth syllables (and the preceding verb has three syllables):
The same applies to inflectional patterns in the Sami languages as well, which are divided into even stems and odd stems.[4][5]
Allomorphy can also exist in stems orroots, as inClassical Sanskrit:[1]
| Singular | Plural | |
|---|---|---|
| Nominative | /vaːk/ | /vaːt͡ʃ-as/ |
| Genitive | /vaːt͡ʃ-as/ | /vaːt͡ʃ-aːm/ |
| Instrumental | /vaːt͡ʃ-aː/ | /vaːɡ-bʱis/ |
| Locative | /vaːt͡ʃ-i/ | /vaːk-ʂi/ |
There are three allomorphs of the stem,/vaːk/,/vaːt͡ʃ/, and/vaːɡ/, which are conditioned by the particular case-marking suffixes.
The form of the stem/vaːk/, found in the nominative singular and locative plural, is the etymological form of the morpheme. Pre-Indic palatalization ofvelars resulted in the variant form/vaːt͡ʃ/, which was initially phonologically conditioned. The conditioning can still be seen in the locative singular form, for which the/t͡ʃ/ is followed by the high front vowel/i/.
However, the subsequent merging of/e/ and/o/ into/a/ made the alternation unpredictable on phonetic grounds in the genitive case (both singular and plural) as well as the nominative plural and the instrumental singular. Thus, allomorphy was no longer directly relatable to phonological processes.
Phonological conditioning also accounts for the/vaːɡ/ form in the instrumental plural, in which the/ɡ/ assimilates in voicing to the following/bʱ/.[1]
The term was originally used to describe variations in chemical structure. It was first applied to language (in writing) in 1948, by Fatih Şat and Sibel Merve in Language XXIV.[6]
Authority control databases: National |
|---|