Allen's rule is anecogeographical rule formulated byJoel Asaph Allen in 1877,[2][3] broadly stating that animals adapted to cold climates have shorter and thicker limbs and bodilyappendages than animals adapted to warm climates. More specifically, it states that the bodysurface-area-to-volume ratio forhomeothermic animals varies with the average temperature of the habitat to which they are adapted (i.e. the ratio is low in cold climates and high in hot climates).
Allen's rule predicts thatendothermic animals with the same body volume should have differentsurface areas that will either aid or impede their heat dissipation.
Because animals living in cold climates need to conserve as much heat as possible, Allen's rule predicts that they should have evolved comparatively lowsurface area-to-volume ratios to minimize the surface area by which they dissipate heat, allowing them to retain more heat. For animals living in warm climates, Allen's rule predicts the opposite: that they should have comparatively high ratios of surface area to volume. Because animals with low surface area-to-volume ratios would overheat quickly, animals in warm climates should, according to the rule, have high surface area-to-volume ratios to maximize the surface area through which they dissipate heat.[4]
Though there are numerous exceptions, many animalpopulations appear to conform to the predictions of Allen's rule. Thepolar bear has stocky limbs and very short ears that are in accordance with the predictions of Allen's rule, so does thesnow leopard.[5] In 2007, R.L. Nudds and S.A. Oswald studied the exposed lengths ofseabirds' legs and found that the exposed leg lengths were negatively correlated withTmaxdiff (body temperature minus minimum ambient temperature), supporting the predictions of Allen's rule.[6] J.S. Alho and colleagues argued thattibia andfemur lengths are highest in populations of thecommon frog that are indigenous to the middle latitudes, consistent with the predictions of Allen's rule forectothermicorganisms.[7]Populations of the same species from differentlatitudes may also follow Allen's rule.[8]
R.L. Nudds and S.A. Oswald argued in 2007 that there is poor empirical support for Allen's rule, even if it is an "established ecological tenet".[6] They said that the support for Allen's rule mainly draws from studies of single species, since studies of multiple species are "confounded" by the scaling effects ofBergmann's rule and alternative adaptations that counter thepredictions of Allen's rule.[6]
J.S. Alho and colleagues argued in 2011 that, although Allen's rule was originally formulated forendotherms, it can also be applied toectotherms, which derive body temperature from the environment. In their view, ectotherms with lower surface area-to-volume ratios would heat up and cool down more slowly, and this resistance to temperature change might be adaptive in "thermally heterogeneous environments". Alho said that there has been a renewed interest in Allen's rule due to global warming and the "microevolutionary changes" that are predicted by the rule.[7]
Marked differences in limb lengths have been observed when different portions of a given human population reside at different altitudes. Environments at higher altitudes generally experience lower ambient temperatures. InPeru, individuals who lived at higher elevations tended to have shorter limbs, whereas those from the same population who inhabited the more low-lying coastal areas generally had longer limbs and larger trunks.[9]
Katzmarzyk and Leonard similarly noted that human populations appear to follow the predictions of Allen's rule.[10]:494 There is a negative association betweenbody mass index and mean annual temperature for indigenous human populations,[10]:490 meaning that people who originate from colder regions have a heavier build for their height and people who originate from warmer regions have a lighter build for their height. Relative sitting height is also negatively correlated with temperature forindigenous humanpopulations,[10]:487–88 meaning that people who originate from colder regions have proportionally shorter legs for their height and people who originate from warmer regions have proportionally longer legs for their height.[10]
In 1968, A.T. Steegman investigated the assumption that Allen's rule caused the structural configuration of the face of human populations adapted to polar climate. Steegman did an experiment that involved the survival of rats in the cold. Steegman said that the rats with narrownasal passages, broader faces, shorter tails and shorter legs survived the best in the cold. Steegman said that the experimental results had similarities with the Arctic Mongoloids, particularly theEskimo andAleut, because these have similarmorphological features in accordance with Allen's rule: a narrow nasal passage, relatively large heads, long to round heads, large jaws, relatively large bodies, and short limbs.[11]
Allen's rule may have also resulted in wide noses and alveolar and/or maxillary prognathism being more common in human populations in warmer regions, and the opposite in colder regions.[12]
A contributing factor to Allen's rule invertebrates may be that the growth ofcartilage is at least partly dependent on temperature. Temperature can directly affect the growth ofcartilage, providing aproximate biological explanation for this rule. Experimenters raisedmice either at 7 degrees, 21 degrees or 27 degrees Celsius and then measured their tails and ears. They found that the tails and ears were significantly shorter in the mice raised in the cold in comparison to the mice raised at warmer temperatures, even though their overall body weights were the same. They also found that the mice raised in the cold had less blood flow in theirextremities. When they triedgrowing bone samples at different temperatures, the researchers found that the samples grown in warmer temperatures had significantly more growth of cartilage than those grown in colder temperatures.[13][14]
| Rules |
|  |
|---|---|---|
| Related |
| |