Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Achilles number

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Numbers with special prime factorization
Demonstration, withCuisenaire rods, of the number 72 being powerful

AnAchilles number is a number that ispowerful but not aperfect power.[1] A positive integern is a powerful number if, for everyprime factorp ofn,p2 is also adivisor. In other words, every prime factor appears at least squared in the factorization. All Achilles numbers are powerful. However, not all powerful numbers are Achilles numbers: only those that cannot be represented asmk, wherem andk are positive integers greater than 1.

Achilles numbers were named byHenry Bottomley afterAchilles, a hero of theTrojan War, who was also powerful but imperfect.Strong Achilles numbers are Achilles numbers whoseEuler totients are also Achilles numbers; the smallest are 500 and 864.[2]

Sequence of Achilles numbers

[edit]

A numbern =p1a1p2a2pkak ispowerful ifmin(a1,a2, …,ak) ≥ 2. If in additiongcd(a1,a2, …,ak) = 1 the number is an Achilles number.

The Achilles numbers up to 5000 are:

72, 108, 200, 288, 392, 432, 500, 648, 675, 800, 864, 968, 972, 1125, 1152, 1323, 1352, 1372, 1568, 1800, 1944, 2000, 2312, 2592, 2700, 2888, 3087, 3200, 3267, 3456, 3528, 3872, 3888, 4000, 4232, 4500, 4563, 4608, 5000 (sequenceA052486 in theOEIS).

The smallest pair of consecutive Achilles numbers is:[3]

5425069447 = 73 × 412 × 972
5425069448 = 23 × 260412

Examples

[edit]

As an example, 108 is a powerful number. Itsprime factorization is 22 · 33, and thus its prime factors are 2 and 3. Both 22 = 4 and 32 = 9 are divisors of 108. However, 108 cannot be represented asmk, wherem andk are positive integers greater than 1, so 108 is an Achilles number.

The integer 360 is not an Achilles number because it is not powerful. One of its prime factors is 5 but 360 is not divisible by 52 = 25.

Finally, 784 is not an Achilles number. It is a powerful number, because not only are 2 and 7 its only prime factors, but also 22 = 4 and 72 = 49 are divisors of it. It is a perfect power:

784=2472=(22)272=(227)2=282.{\displaystyle 784=2^{4}\cdot 7^{2}=(2^{2})^{2}\cdot 7^{2}=(2^{2}\cdot 7)^{2}=28^{2}.\,}

So it is not an Achilles number.

The integer 500 = 22 × 53 is a strong Achilles number as its Euler totient of 200 = 23 × 52 is also an Achilles number.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Weisstein, Eric W."Achilles Number".MathWorld.
  2. ^"Problem 302 - Project Euler".projecteuler.net.
  3. ^"Problem 53. Powerful numbers revisited".www.primepuzzles.net. Retrieved2024-08-28.
Divisibility-based sets of integers
Overview
Divisibility of 60
Factorization forms
Constrained divisor sums
With many divisors
Aliquot sequence-related
Base-dependent
Other sets
Classes ofnatural numbers
Powers and related numbers
Of the forma × 2b ± 1
Other polynomial numbers
Recursively defined numbers
Possessing a specific set of other numbers
Expressible via specific sums
2-dimensional
centered
non-centered
3-dimensional
centered
non-centered
pyramidal
4-dimensional
non-centered
Combinatorial numbers
Divisor functions
Prime omega functions
Euler's totient function
Aliquot sequences
Primorial
Otherprime factor ordivisor related numbers
Numeral system-dependent numbers
Arithmetic functions
anddynamics
Digit sum
Digit product
Coding-related
Other
P-adic numbers-related
Digit-composition related
Digit-permutation related
Divisor-related
Other
Generated via asieve
Sorting related
Graphemics related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Achilles_number&oldid=1261305035"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp