Anaccretion disk is a structure (often acircumstellar disk) formed by diffuse material[a] inorbital motion around a massivecentral body. The central body is most frequently astar.Friction, uneven irradiance,magnetohydrodynamic effects, and other forces induce instabilities causing orbiting material in the disk to spiral inward toward the central body. Gravitational and frictional forces compress and raise the temperature of the material, causing the emission ofelectromagnetic radiation. The frequency range of that radiation depends on the central object's mass. Accretion disks of young stars andprotostars radiate in theinfrared; those aroundneutron stars andblack holes in theX-ray part of thespectrum. The study of oscillation modes in accretion disks is referred to asdiskoseismology.[1][2]
Accretion disks are a ubiquitous phenomenon in astrophysics;active galactic nuclei,protoplanetary disks, andgamma ray bursts all involve accretion disks. These disks very often give rise toastrophysical jets coming from the vicinity of the central object. Jets are an efficient way for the star-disk system to shedangular momentum without losing too muchmass.
The most prominent accretion disks are those ofactive galactic nuclei and ofquasars, which are thought to be massive black holes at the center of galaxies. As matter enters the accretion disc, it follows a trajectory called atendex line, which describes an inward spiral. This is because particles rub and bounce against each other in a turbulent flow, causing frictional heating which radiates energy away, reducing the particles' angular momentum, allowing the particle to drift inward, driving the inward spiral. The loss of angular momentum manifests as a reduction in velocity; at a slower velocity, the particle must adopt a lower orbit. As the particle falls to this lower orbit, a portion of itsgravitational potential energy is converted to increased velocity and the particle gains speed. Thus, the particle has lost energy even though it is now travelling faster than before; however, it has lost angular momentum. As a particle orbits closer and closer, its velocity increases; as velocity increases frictional heating increases as more and more of the particle's potential energy (relative to the black hole) is radiated away; the accretion disk of a black hole is hot enough to emitX-rays just outside theevent horizon. The largeluminosity of quasars is believed to be a result of gas being accreted by supermassive black holes.[3] Elliptical accretion disks formed at tidal disruption of stars can be typical in galactic nuclei and quasars.[4] The accretion process can convert about 10 percent to over 40 percent of the mass of an object into energy as compared to around 0.7 percent fornuclear fusion processes.[5] In closebinary systems the more massive primary component evolves faster and has already become awhite dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole, when the less massive companion reaches the giant state and exceeds itsRoche lobe. A gas flow then develops from the companion star to the primary. Angular momentum conservation prevents a straight flow from one star to the other and an accretion disk forms instead.
Accretion disks surroundingT Tauri stars orHerbig stars are calledprotoplanetary disks because they are thought to be the progenitors ofplanetary systems. The accreted gas in this case comes from themolecular cloud out of which the star has formed rather than a companion star.
In the 1940s, models were first derived from basic physical principles.[6] In order to agree with observations, those models had to invoke a yet unknown mechanism for angular momentum redistribution. If matter is to fall inward it must lose not only gravitational energy but also loseangular momentum. Since the total angular momentum of the disk is conserved, the angular momentum loss of the mass falling into the center has to be compensated by an angular momentum gain of the mass far from the center. In other words, angular momentum should betransported outward for matter to accrete. According to theRayleigh stability criterion,
where represents theangular velocity of a fluid element and its distance to the rotation center,an accretion disk is expected to be alaminar flow. This prevents the existence of ahydrodynamic mechanism for angular momentum transport.
On one hand, it was clear that viscous stresses would eventually cause the matter toward the center to heat up and radiate away some of its gravitational energy. On the other hand,viscosity itself was not enough to explain the transport of angular momentum to the exterior parts of the disk.Turbulence-enhanced viscosity was the mechanism thought to be responsible for such angular-momentum redistribution, although the origin of the turbulence itself was not well understood. The conventional-model (discussed below) introduces an adjustable parameter describing the effective increase of viscosity due to turbulenteddies within the disk.[7][8] In 1991, with the rediscovery of themagnetorotational instability (MRI), S. A. Balbus, and J. F. Hawley established that a weakly magnetized disk accreting around a heavy, compact central object would be highly unstable, providing a direct mechanism for angular-momentum redistribution.[9]
Shakura andSunyaev (1973)[7] proposed turbulence in the gas as the source of an increased viscosity. Assuming subsonic turbulence and the disk height as an upper limit for the size of the eddies, the disk viscosity can be estimated as where is thesound speed, is the scale height of the disk, and is a free parameter between zero (no accretion) and approximately one. In a turbulent medium, where is the velocity of turbulent cells relative to the mean gas motion, and is the size of the largest turbulent cells, which is estimated as and, where is the Keplerian orbital angular velocity, is the radial distance from the central object of mass.[10] By using the equation ofhydrostatic equilibrium, combined with conservation ofangular momentum and assuming that the disk is thin, the equations of disk structure may be solved in terms of the parameter. Many of the observables depend only weakly on, so this theory is predictive even though it has a free parameter.
UsingKramers' opacity law it is found that
where and are the mid-plane temperature and density respectively. is the accretion rate, in units of, is the mass of the central accreting object in units of a solar mass,, is the radius of a point in the disk, in units of, and, where is the radius where angular momentum stops being transported inward.
The Shakura–Sunyaev α-disk model is both thermally and viscously unstable. An alternative model, known as the-disk, which is stable in both senses assumes that the viscosity is proportional to the gas pressure.[11][12] In the standard Shakura–Sunyaev model, viscosity is assumed to be proportional to the total pressure since.
The Shakura–Sunyaev model assumes that the disk is in local thermal equilibrium, and can radiate its heat efficiently. In this case, the disk radiates away the viscous heat, cools, and becomes geometrically thin. However, this assumption may break down. In the radiatively inefficient case, the disk may "puff up" into atorus or some other three-dimensional solution like an Advection Dominated Accretion Flow (ADAF). The ADAF solutions usually require that the accretion rate is smaller than a few percent of theEddington limit. Another extreme is the case ofSaturn's rings, where the disk is so gas-poor that its angular momentum transport is dominated by solid body collisions and disk-moon gravitational interactions. The model is in agreement with recent astrophysical measurements usinggravitational lensing.[13][14][15][16]
Balbus and Hawley (1991)[9] proposed a mechanism which involves magnetic fields to generate the angular momentum transport. A simple system displaying this mechanism is a gas disk in the presence of a weak axial magnetic field. Two radially neighboring fluid elements will behave as two mass points connected by a massless spring, the spring tension playing the role of the magnetic tension. In a Keplerian disk the inner fluid element would be orbiting more rapidly than the outer, causing the spring to stretch. The inner fluid element is then forced by the spring to slow down, reduce correspondingly its angular momentum causing it to move to a lower orbit. The outer fluid element being pulled forward will speed up, increasing its angular momentum and move to a larger radius orbit. The spring tension will increase as the two fluid elements move further apart and the process runs away.[17]
It can be shown that in the presence of such a spring-like tension the Rayleigh stability criterion is replaced by
Most astrophysical disks do not meet this criterion and are therefore prone to this magnetorotational instability. The magnetic fields present in astrophysical objects (required for the instability to occur) are believed to be generated viadynamo action.[18]
Accretion disks are usually assumed to be threaded by the external magnetic fields present in theinterstellar medium. These fields are typically weak (about few micro-Gauss), but they can get anchored to the matter in the disk, because of its highelectrical conductivity, and carried inward toward the centralstar. This process can concentrate themagnetic flux around the centre of the disk giving rise to very strong magnetic fields. Formation of powerfulastrophysical jets along the rotation axis of accretion disks requires a large scalepoloidal magnetic field in the inner regions of the disk.[19]
Such magnetic fields may be advected inward from the interstellar medium or generated by a magnetic dynamo within the disk. Magnetic fields strengths at least of order 100 Gauss seem necessary for the magneto-centrifugal mechanism to launch powerful jets. There are problems, however, in carrying external magnetic flux inward toward the central star of the disk.[20] High electric conductivity dictates that the magnetic field is frozen into the matter which is being accreted onto the central object with a slow velocity. However, the plasma is not a perfect electric conductor, so there is always some degree of dissipation. The magnetic field diffuses away faster than the rate at which it is being carried inward by accretion of matter.[21] A simple solution is assuming aviscosity much larger than themagnetic diffusivity in the disk. However, numerical simulations and theoretical models show that the viscosity and magnetic diffusivity have almost the same order of magnitude in magneto-rotationally turbulent disks.[22] Some other factors may possibly affect the advection/diffusion rate: reduced turbulent magnetic diffusion on the surface layers; reduction of theShakura–Sunyaev viscosity by magnetic fields;[23] and the generation of large scale fields by small scale MHD turbulence –a large scale dynamo. In fact, a combination of different mechanisms might be responsible for efficiently carrying the external field inward toward the central parts of the disk where the jet is launched. Magnetic buoyancy, turbulent pumping and turbulent diamagnetism exemplify such physical phenomena invoked to explain such efficient concentration of external fields.[24]
When the accretion rate issub-Eddington and the opacity very high, the standard thin accretion disk is formed. It is geometrically thin in the vertical direction (has a disk-like shape), and is made of a relatively cold gas, with a negligible radiation pressure. The gas goes down on very tight spirals, resembling almost circular, almost free (Keplerian) orbits. Thin disks are relatively luminous and they have thermal electromagnetic spectra, i.e. not much different from that of a sum of black bodies. Radiative cooling is very efficient in thin disks. The classic 1974 work by Shakura and Sunyaev on thin accretion disks is one of the most often quoted papers in modern astrophysics. Thin disks were independently worked out by Lynden-Bell, Pringle, and Rees. Pringle contributed in the past thirty years many key results to accretion disk theory, and wrote the classic 1981 review that for many years was the main source of information about accretion disks, and is still very useful today.
A fully general relativistic treatment, as needed for the inner part of the disk when the central object is ablack hole, has been provided by Page and Thorne,[25] and used for producing simulated optical images by Luminet[26] and Marck,[27] in which, although such a system is intrinsically symmetric its image is not, because the relativistic rotation speed needed for centrifugal equilibrium in the very strong gravitational field near the black hole produces a strong Doppler redshift on the receding side (taken here to be on the right) whereas there will be a strong blueshift on the approaching side. Due to light bending, the disk appears distorted but is nowhere hidden by the black hole.
When the accretion rate is sub-Eddington and the opacity very low, an ADAF (advection dominated accretion flow) is formed. This type of accretion disk was predicted in 1977 by Ichimaru. Although Ichimaru's paper was largely ignored, some elements of the ADAF model were present in the influential 1982 ion-tori paper by Rees, Phinney, Begelman, and Blandford.ADAFs started to be intensely studied by many authors only after their rediscovery in the early 1990s by Popham and Narayan in numerical models of accretion disk boundary layers.[28][29]Self-similar solutions for advection-dominated accretion were found by Narayan and Yi, and independently by Abramowicz, Chen, Kato, Lasota (who coined the name ADAF), and Regev.[30][31] Most important contributions to astrophysical applications of ADAFs have been made by Narayan and his collaborators. ADAFs are cooled by advection (heat captured in matter) rather than by radiation. They are very radiatively inefficient, geometrically extended, similar in shape to a sphere (or a "corona") rather than a disk, and very hot (close to the virial temperature). Because of their low efficiency, ADAFs are much less luminous than the Shakura–Sunyaev thin disks. ADAFs emit a power-law, non-thermal radiation, often with a strong Compton component.
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
The theory of highlysuper-Eddington black hole accretion,M≫MEdd, was developed in the 1980s by Abramowicz, Jaroszynski,Paczyński, Sikora, and others in terms of "Polish doughnuts" (the name was coined by Rees). Polish doughnuts are low viscosity, optically thick, radiation pressure supported accretion disks cooled byadvection. They are radiatively very inefficient. Polish doughnuts resemble in shape a fat torus (a doughnut) with two narrow funnels along the rotation axis. The funnels collimate the radiation into beams with highly super-Eddington luminosities.
Slim disks (name coined by Kolakowska) have only moderate super-Eddington accretion rates,M≥MEdd, rather disk-like shapes, and almost thermal spectra. They are cooled by advection, and are radiatively ineffective. They were introduced by Abramowicz, Lasota, Czerny, and Szuszkiewicz in 1988.
The opposite of an accretion disk is an excretion disk where instead of material accreting from a disk on to a central object, material is excreted from the center outward onto the disk. Excretion disks are formed when stars merge.[33]
| Formation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evolution | |||||||
| Classification |
| ||||||
| Nucleosynthesis | |||||||
| Structure | |||||||
| Properties | |||||||
| Star systems | |||||||
| Earth-centric observations | |||||||
| Lists | |||||||
| Related | |||||||
Authority control databases: National |
|---|
