Alex (Malcolm McDowell), the central character, is a charismatic,[5] anti-social delinquent whose interests includeclassical music (especially that ofBeethoven), committing rape, theft, and "ultra-violence". He leads a small gang of thugs, Pete (Michael Tarn), Georgie (James Marcus), and Dim (Warren Clarke), whom he calls hisdroogs (from theRussian wordдруг, which is "friend", "buddy"). The film chronicles the horrific crime spree of his gang, his capture, and attempted rehabilitation via an experimental psychological conditioning technique (the "Ludovico Technique") promoted by the Minister of the Interior (Anthony Sharp). Alex narrates most of the film inNadsat, a fractured adolescent slang composed ofSlavic languages (especially Russian), English, andCockney rhyming slang.
The film premiered in New York City on 19 December 1971 and was released in the United Kingdom on 13 January 1972. The film was met with polarised reviews from critics and was controversial due to its depictions of graphic violence. After it was cited as having inspiredcopycat acts of violence, the film was withdrawn from British cinemas at Kubrick's behest, and it was also banned in several other countries. In the years following, the film underwent a critical re-evaluation and earned acult following. It received several awards and nominations, with four nominations at the44th Academy Awards, includingBest Picture.
In theBritish Film Institute's 2012Sight & Sound polls of the world's greatest films,A Clockwork Orange was ranked 75th in the directors' poll and 235th in the critics' poll. In 2020, the film was selected for preservation in the United StatesNational Film Registry by theLibrary of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".
Human furniture from the Korova milk bar, where the "milk-plus" was served
In a futuristic Britain,Alex DeLarge is leader of a gang of "droogs": Georgie, Dim, and Pete. They engage in an intoxicated evening of "ultra-violence", which includes beating a vagrant and fighting a rival gang. They beat writer Frank Alexander to the point of crippling him, and Alex rapes Alexander's wife while singing "Singin' in the Rain". The next day Alex's probation officer, P. R. Deltoid, cautions him.
Alex's droogs are not content with petty crime and want more equality and high-yield thefts, but Alex asserts his authority by attacking them. Alex invades the home of a wealthy "cat-lady" and bludgeons her with a phallic sculpture while his droogs remain outside. On hearing sirens, Alex tries to flee, but Dim smashes a bottle in his face and leaves him to be arrested. The woman dies of her injuries, and Alex is sentenced to 14 years in prison for murder.
Two years into the sentence, Alex accepts an offer to be a test subject for the Minister of the Interior's newLudovico technique, an experimentalaversion therapy for rehabilitating criminals within two weeks. Alex is strapped to a chair, his eyes clamped open, and injected with drugs. He is forced to watch films of sex and violence, some accompanied by his favourite composer,Ludwig van Beethoven. Alex is nauseated and, fearing he will be sick upon hearing Beethoven, begs for an end to the treatment.
The Minister demonstrates Alex's rehabilitation to officials. Alex is unable to fight back against an actor who taunts and attacks him, and becomes ill upon attempting to grope a topless woman. The prison chaplain complains that Alex has been robbed of his free will; the Minister asserts that the Ludovico technique will cut crime and alleviate crowding in prisons, allowing more space forpolitical prisoners.
Released from prison, Alex finds his possessions have been sold to provide compensation for his victims and his parents have let out his room. A vagrant whom Alex attacked years earlier attacks him with his friends. Alex is saved by two policemen whom he is shocked to find are his former droogs Dim and Georgie. They beat and nearly drown him before abandoning him. Alex collapses on the doorstep of a nearby home.
Alex wakes to find himself in the home of Mr Alexander, who now uses a wheelchair. Alexander does not recognise Alex from the previous attack but knows of him and the Ludovico technique from the newspapers. He prepares to present Alex to his colleagues as a political weapon. Alex breaks into "Singin' in the Rain" while bathing, and Alexander realises it was he who assaulted his wife and him. Alexander drugs Alex and locks him in a bedroom, then playsBeethoven's Ninth Symphony loudly from the floor below. Unable to withstand the pain, Alex attempts suicide by jumping from the window.
Alex awakes in hospital with multiple injuries. During psychological tests, he finds he no longer has aversions to violence and sex. The Minister arrives and apologises, saying the government has had Mr Alexander institutionalised. He offers to take care of Alex and get him a job in return for his co-operation with his election campaign and public relations counter-offensive. The Minister brings in a stereo system playing Beethoven's Ninth. Alex contemplates violence and has thoughts of having sex with a woman in front of an approving crowd, thinking, "I was cured, all right!"
The film's central moral question is the definition of "goodness" and whether it makes sense to use aversion therapy to stop immoral behaviour.[7] Kubrick, writing inSaturday Review, described the film: "A social satire dealing with the question of whether behavioural psychology and psychological conditioning are dangerous new weapons for a totalitarian government to use to impose vast controls on its citizens and turn them into little more than robots."[8] Similarly, on the production's call sheet, Kubrick wrote: "It is a story of the dubious redemption of a teenage delinquent by condition-reflex therapy. It is, at the same time, a running lecture on free-will."
After aversion therapy, Alex behaves like a good member of society, though not through choice. His goodness is involuntary; he has become the titular clockwork orange—organic on the outside, mechanical on the inside. After Alex has undergone the Ludovico technique, the chaplain criticises his new attitude as false, arguing that true goodnessmust come from within. This leads to the theme of abusing liberties—personal, governmental, civil—by Alex, with two conflicting political forces, the Government and the Dissidents, both manipulating Alex purely for their own political ends.[9] The story portrays the "conservative" and "leftist" parties as equally worthy of criticism. The writer Frank Alexander, a victim of Alex and his gang, wants revenge against Alex and sees him as a means of definitively turning the populace against the incumbent government and its new regime. He fears the new government and, in a telephone conversation, he says: "Recruiting brutal young roughs into the police; proposing debilitating and will-sapping techniques of conditioning. Oh, we've seen it all before in other countries; the thin end of the wedge! Before we know where we are, we shall have the full apparatus oftotalitarianism."
On the other side, the Minister of the Interior (the Government) jails Mr Alexander (the Dissident Intellectual) on the excuse of his endangering Alex (the People), rather than the government's totalitarian regime (described by Mr Alexander). It is unclear whether he has been harmed; however, the Minister tells Alex that the writer has been denied the ability to write and produce "subversive" material that is critical of the incumbent government and meant to provoke political unrest.
The film critiques thebehaviourism or "behavioural psychology" propounded by psychologistsJohn B. Watson andB. F. Skinner. Burgess disapproved of behaviourism, calling Skinner's bookBeyond Freedom and Dignity (1971) "one of the most dangerous books ever written". Although behaviourism's limitations were conceded by its principal founder, Watson, Skinner argued thatbehaviour modification—specifically,operant conditioning (learned behaviours via systematic reward-and-punishment techniques) rather than the"classical" Watsonian conditioning—is the key to an ideal society. The film's Ludovico technique is widely perceived as a parody ofaversion therapy, which is a form of operant conditioning.[10]
Author Paul Duncan said: "Alex is the narrator so we see everything from his point of view, including his mental images. The implication is that all of the images, both real and imagined, are part of Alex's fantasies."[11]
Psychiatrist Aaron Stern, the former head of the MPAA rating board, believed that Alex represents man in his natural state, the unconscious mind. Alex becomes "civilised" after receiving his Ludovico "cure" and the sickness in the aftermath Stern considered to be the "neurosis imposed by society".[12]
Kubrick told film critics Philip Strick andPenelope Houston: "Alex makes no attempt to deceive himself or the audience as to his total corruption or wickedness. He is the very personification of evil. On the other hand, he has winning qualities: his total candour, his wit, his intelligence, and his energy; these are attractive qualities and ones, I might add, which he shares withRichard III."[13]
The society depicted in the film was perceived by some as communist (asMichel Ciment pointed out in an interview with Kubrick) due to its slight ties to Russian culture. The teenage slang has a heavily Russian influence, as in the novel; Burgess explains the slang as being, in part, intended to draw a reader into the world of the book's characters and to prevent the book from becoming outdated. There is some evidence to suggest that the society is a socialist one, or perhaps a society evolving from a failed socialism into an authoritarian society. In the novel, streets have paintings of working men in the style of Russian socialist art, and the film shows a mural of socialist artwork with obscenities drawn on it. As Malcolm McDowell points out on the DVD commentary, Alex's residence was shot on failed municipal architecture and the name "Municipal Flat Block 18A, Linear North" alludes to socialist-style housing.[14][15]
When the new right-wing government takes power, the atmosphere is evidently more authoritarian than the anarchist air of the film's first half. Kubrick's response to Ciment's question remained ambiguous as to what kind of society it is. Kubrick asserted that the film held comparisons between both ends of the political spectrum and that there is little difference between the two. Kubrick stated: "The Minister, played by Anthony Sharp, is clearly a figure of the Right. The writer, Patrick Magee, is a lunatic of the Left... They differ only in their dogma. Their means and ends are hardly distinguishable."[14]
Kubrick's film is relatively faithful to the Burgess novel, omitting only the final, positive chapter, in which Alex matures and outgrows sociopathy. While the film ends with Alex being offered an open-ended government job, implying he remains a sociopath at heart, the novel ends with Alex's positive change in character. This plot discrepancy occurred because Kubrick based his screenplay on the novel's American edition, in which the final chapter had been deleted on the insistence of its American publisher.[16] He claimed not to have read the complete, original version of the novel until he had almost finished writing the screenplay, and that he never considered using it.[citation needed] The introduction to the 1996 edition ofA Clockwork Orange says that Kubrick found the end of the original edition too blandly optimistic and unrealistic.
Critic Randy Rasmussen has argued that the government in the film is in a shambolic state of desperation, whereas the government in the novel is quite strong and self-confident. The former reflects Kubrick's preoccupation with the theme of acts of self-interest masked as simply following procedure.[17]
In the film, Alex has a pet snake. There is no mention of this in the novel.[18]
In the novel, F. Alexander recognises Alex through several careless references to the previous attack (such as his wife then claiming they did not have a telephone). In the film, Alex is recognised when singing the song 'Singing in the Rain' in the bath, which he had hauntingly done while attacking F. Alexander's wife. The song does not appear at all in the book, as it was an improvisation by actor Malcolm McDowell when Kubrick asked him if he could dance on the fifth day of filming the scene, after complaining that the rape scene was too "stiff". McDowell picked 'Singing in the Rain' because it was the only song he "sort of knew half the lyrics to".[19][20][21]
Anthony Burgess sold the film rights of his novel forUS$500 (equivalent to $5,200 in 2024), shortly after its publication in 1962.[22] Originally, the film was projected to star the rock bandthe Rolling Stones, with the band's lead singerMick Jagger expressing interest in playing the lead role of Alex, and British filmmakerKen Russell attached to direct.[22] According to film historianWilliam K. Everson while hosting a 1972Camera Three interview with Burgess and McDowell[23] and the International Anthony Burgess Foundation,[24] both the Rolling Stones andthe Beatles were alternatively considered to play Alex and his droogs at various times throughout the 1960s, before Kubrick got involved on the project. According to225 Magazine,screenplay writerTerry Southern had written a first script for the film with specifically the Beatles in mind for the main cast, before the film's executive producerSi Litvinoff sent a letter to its prospective directorJohn Schlesinger in February 1968, attaching a petition signed by Jagger as well as all four Beatles requesting Alex to be played by Jagger and the film's soundtrack to be composed by the Beatles.[25] However, this never came to fruition due to problems with theBritish Board of Film Classification (BBFC), and the rights ultimately fell to Kubrick.[22]
McDowell was chosen for the role of Alex after Kubrick saw him in the filmif.... (1968). When asking why he was picked for the role, Kubrick told him: "You can exude intelligence on the screen."[26] He also helped Kubrick on the uniform of Alex's gang, when he showed Kubrick the cricket whites he had. Kubrick asked him to put thebox (jockstrap) not under but on top of the costume.[27][28]
The cinematic adaptation ofA Clockwork Orange (1962) was not initially planned. Terry Southern gave Kubrick a copy of the novel, but, as he was developing aNapoleon Bonaparte-related project, Kubrick put it aside. Kubrick's wife, in an interview, said she had given Kubrick the novel after having read it. Kubrick said: "I was excited by everything about it: the plot, the ideas, the characters, and, of course, the language. The story functions, of course, on several levels: political, sociological, philosophical, and, what's most important, on a dreamlike psychological-symbolic level." Kubrick wrote a screenplay faithful to the novel, saying: "I think whatever Burgess had to say about the story was said in the book, but I did invent a few useful narrative ideas and reshape some of the scenes."[29] Kubrick based the script on the shortened US edition of the book, which omitted the final chapter.[22]
Thamesmead South Housing Estate where Alex knocks his rebellious droogs into the lake
Kubrick was a perfectionist who researched meticulously, with thousands of photographs taken of potential locations, and many scene takes. He was so meticulous that McDowell stated: "If Kubrick hadn't been a film director he'd have been a General Chief of Staff of the US Forces. No matter what it is—even if it's a question of buying a shampoo it goes through him. He just likes total control."[30] Technically, to achieve and convey the fantastic, dream-like quality of the story, he filmed with extreme wide-angle lenses such as the Kinoptik Tegea 9.8 mm for 35 mmArriflex cameras.[31][32]
Filming took place between September 1970 and April 1971.
During the filming of the Ludovico technique scene, McDowell scratched a cornea[33] and was temporarily blinded. The doctor standing next to him in the scene, dropping saline solution into Alex's forced-open eyes, was a real physician present to prevent the actor's eyes from drying. McDowell also cracked some ribs filming the humiliation stage show.[34] A uniquespecial effect technique was used when Alex jumps out of the window in a suicide attempt, showing the camera approaching the ground from Alex's point of view. This effect was achieved by dropping aNewman-Sinclair clockwork camera in a box, lens-first, from the third storey of theCorus Hotel. To Kubrick's surprise, the camera survived six takes.[35]
Alex is fanatical aboutLudwig van Beethoven in general and hisNinth Symphony in particular, and the soundtrack includes an electronic version specially arranged byWendy Carlos of the Scherzo and other parts of the Symphony. The soundtrack contains more music byRossini than by Beethoven. The fast-motion sex scene with the two girls, the slow-motion fight between Alex and his Droogs, the fight with Billy Boy's gang, the drive to the writer's home ("playing 'hogs of the road'"), the invasion of the Cat Lady's home, and the scene in which Alex looks into the river and contemplates suicide before being approached by the beggar are all accompanied by Rossini'sWilliam Tell Overture orThe Thieving Magpie Overture.[37][38]
On release,A Clockwork Orange was met with mixed reviews.[22]Vincent Canby ofThe New York Times praised the film: "McDowell is splendid as tomorrow's child, but it is always Mr. Kubrick's picture, which is even technically more interesting than2001. Among other devices, Mr. Kubrick constantly uses what I assume to be a wide-angle lens to distort space relationships within scenes, so that the disconnection between lives, and between people and environment, becomes an actual, literal fact."[39] The following year, after the film won theNew York Film Critics Award, he called it "a brilliant and dangerous work, but it is dangerous in a way that brilliant things sometimes are".[40] The film also had notable detractors. Film criticStanley Kauffmann commented, "Inexplicably, the script leaves out Burgess' reference to the title".[41]Roger Ebert gaveA Clockwork Orange two stars out of four, calling it an "ideological mess".[42] In herNew Yorker review titled "Stanley Strangelove",Pauline Kael called it pornographic because of how it dehumanised Alex's victims while highlighting the sufferings of the protagonist. Kael noted the Billyboy's gang extended stripping of the woman they intended to rape, claiming it was offered for titillation.[43]
In a retrospective review in his reference bookHalliwell's Film and Video Guide,Leslie Halliwell described it as "a repulsive film in which intellectuals have found acres of social and political meaning; the average judgement is likely to remain that it is pretentious and nasty rubbish for sick minds who do not mind jazzed-up images and incoherent sound."[44]
John Simon noted that the novel's most ambitious effects were based on language and the alienating effect of the narrator's Nadsat slang, making it a poor choice for a film. Concurring with some of Kael's criticisms about the depiction of Alex's victims, Simon noted that the character of Mr Alexander, who was young and likeable in the novel, was played byPatrick Magee, "a very quirky and middle-aged actor who specialises in being repellent". Simon comments further that "Kubrick over-directs the basically excessive Magee until his eyes erupt like missiles from their silos and his face turns every shade of a Technicolor sunset".[45]
Over the years,A Clockwork Orange gained a status as acult classic. ForThe Guardian,Philip French stated that the film's controversial reputation likely stemmed from the fact that it was released during a time when fear of teenage delinquency was high.[46] Adam Nayman ofThe Ringer wrote that the film's themes of delinquency, corrupt power structures and dehumanisation are relevant in today's society.[47] Simon Braund ofEmpire praised the "dazzling visual style" and McDowell's "simply astonishing" portrayal of Alex.[48] Roger Ebert softened on the film years after first viewing it, declaring on his programAt the Movies in 1987 that while he still thought the film had "all head and no heart", he felt Kubrick's detachments from the violence more so than he did in the first viewing.[49]
Onreview aggregator websiteRotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 86% based on 84 reviews. The website's critical consensus reads: "Disturbing and thought-provoking,A Clockwork Orange is a cold, dystopian nightmare with a very dark sense of humor".[50]Metacritic gives the film a score of 77 out of 100, based on reviews by 21 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[51]
The film was a box-office success, grossing $41 million in the United States and about $73 million overseas for a worldwide total of $114 million on a budget of $1.3 million.[4]
The film was also successful in the United Kingdom, playing for over a year at theWarner West End in London. After two years of release, the film had earned Warner Bros. rentals of $2.5 million in the United Kingdom and was the number three film for 1973 behindLive and Let Die andThe Godfather.[1]
The film was the most popular film of 1972 in France with 7,611,745 admissions.[52]
The film was re-released in North America in 1973 and earned $1.5 million in rentals.[53]
Burgess had mixed reception about the film adaptation of his novel, publicly saying he lovedMalcolm McDowell andMichael Bates, and the use of music. He praised it as so "brilliant" that it might be dangerous. He was concerned that it lacked the novel'sredemptive final chapter, an absence he blamed upon his American publisher and not Kubrick. All US editions of the novel prior to 1986 omit the final chapter. Kubrick called the missing chapter "an extra chapter" and claimed that he had not read the original version until he had virtually finished the screenplay, and that he had never seriously considered using it.[54] In Kubrick's opinion – as in the opinion of other readers, including the original American editor – the final chapter was unconvincing and inconsistent with the book.[55]
Burgess reports in his autobiographyYou've Had Your Time (1990) that he and Kubrick at first enjoyed a good relationship, each holding similar philosophical and political views and each very interested in literature, cinema, music, and Napoleon Bonaparte. Burgess's novelNapoleon Symphony (1974) was dedicated to Kubrick. Their relationship soured when Kubrick left Burgess to defend the film from accusations of glorifying violence. Alapsed Catholic, Burgess tried many times to explain the Christian moral points of the story to outraged Christian organisations and to defend it against newspaper accusations that it supported fascist dogma. He also went to receive awards given to Kubrick on his behalf. He was in no way involved in the production of the film. The only profit he made directly from the film was the initial $500 that had been given to him for the rights to the adaptation.[citation needed]
Burgess's own stage adaptation of the novel,A Clockwork Orange: A Play with Music (1984), contains a direct reference to Kubrick. In the final moment of the play Alex joins in a song with the other characters. In the script's stage directions it states that while this happens: "A man bearded like Stanley Kubrick comes on playing, in exquisite counterpoint, 'Singin' in the Rain' on the trumpet. He is kicked off the stage."[56][57]
In the United States,A Clockwork Orange was given anX rating in its original release in 1972. Later, Kubrick replaced approximately 30 seconds of sexually explicit footage from two scenes with less explicit action to obtain anR rating re-release later in 1972.[72][22][73]
Because of the explicit sex and violence, TheNational Catholic Office for Motion Pictures rated itC ("condemned"), a rating which recommended againstRoman Catholics seeing the film. In 1982, the office abolished the "condemned" rating. Subsequently, films deemed to have unacceptable levels of sex and violence by theConference of Bishops are ratedO, "morally offensive".[74]
Although it was passed uncut for UK cinemas in December 1971, British authorities considered thesexual violence in the film to be extreme. In March 1972, during the trial of a 14-year-old boy accused of the manslaughter of a classmate, the prosecutor referred toA Clockwork Orange, suggesting that the film had a macabre relevance to the case.[75] The film was linked to the murder of an elderly vagrant by a 16-year-old boy inBletchley, Buckinghamshire, who pleaded guilty after telling police that friends had told him of the film "and the beating up of an old boy like this one". Roger Gray, for the defence, told the court that "the link between this crime and sensational literature, particularlyA Clockwork Orange, is established beyond reasonable doubt".[76] The press also blamed the film for a rape in which the attackers sang "Singin' in the Rain" as "Singin' in the Rape".[77]Christiane Kubrick, the director's wife, has said that the family received threats and had protesters outside their home.[78]
The film was withdrawn from British release in 1973 by Warner Bros at the request of Kubrick.[79] In response to allegations that the film was responsible for copycat violence, Kubrick stated:
To try and fasten any responsibility on art as the cause of life seems to me to put the case the wrong way around. Art consists of reshaping life, but it does not create life, nor cause life. Furthermore, to attribute powerful suggestive qualities to a film is at odds with the scientifically accepted view that, even after deep hypnosis in a posthypnotic state, people cannot be made to do things which are at odds with their natures.[80]
TheScala Cinema Club went intoreceivership in 1993 after losing a legal battle following an unauthorised screening of the film.[81] In the same year,Channel 4 broadcastForbidden Fruit, a 27-minute documentary about the withdrawal of the film in Britain.[82] It contains footage fromA Clockwork Orange. It was difficult to seeA Clockwork Orange in the United Kingdom for 27 years. It was only after Kubrick died in 1999 that the film was re-released theatrically, on VHS, and on DVD. On 4 July 2001, the uncut version premiered onSky TV'sSky Box Office, where it ran until mid-September.
In Ireland, the film was banned on 10 April 1973. Warner Bros. decided against appealing the decision. Eventually, the film was passed uncut for cinema on 13 December 1999 and released on 17 March 2000.[83][84][85] The re-release poster, a replica of the original British version, was rejected due to the words "ultra-violence" and "rape" in the tagline. Head censor Sheamus Smith explained his rejection toThe Irish Times: "I believe that the use of those words in the context of advertising would be offensive and inappropriate."[86]
In Singapore, the film was banned for over 30 years, before an attempt at release was made in 2006. However, the submission for anM18 rating was rejected, and the ban was not lifted.[87] The ban was later lifted and the film was shown uncut (with anR21 rating) on 28 October 2011, as part of the Perspectives Film Festival.[88][89]
In South Africa, it was banned under theapartheid regime for 13 years, then in 1984 was released with one cut and only made available to people over the age of 21.[90] It was banned in South Korea[87] and in the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Nova Scotia.[91] TheMaritime Film Classification Board also reversed the ban eventually. Both jurisdictions now grant anR rating to the film.
In Brazil, the film was banned under themilitary dictatorship until 1978, when the film was released in a version with black dots covering the genitals and breasts of the actors in the nude scenes.[92]
In Spain, the film debuted at the 1975Valladolid International Film Festival under thedictatorship ofFrancisco Franco. It was expected to be screened in theUniversity of Valladolid but, due to student protests, the university had been closed for two months. The final screenings were in the commercial festival venues, with long queues of expectant students. After the festival, the film went into the arthouse circuit and later in commercial cinemas successfully.[93]
In Malta, a ban on the film was lifted in 2000, when it was shown in local cinemas for the first time.[94] The film was brought up during the compilation of evidence on the rape and murder of Paulina Dembska, which took place on 2 January 2022 inSliema, for the accused attacker compared himself to Alex during police interrogation.[95][96]
In the US, the film has been widely available on home video since 1980 and was re-released several times onVHS. It was first released onDVD in the US on 29 June 1999.
In the UK, the film was eventually released by Warner Home Video on 13 November 2000 (on both VHS and DVD), individually and as part ofThe Stanley Kubrick Collection DVD set.[97] Due to negative comments from fans, Warner Bros re-released the film, its image digitally restored and its soundtrack remastered. A limited-edition collector's set with a soundtrack disc, film poster, booklet, and filmstrip followed, and was discontinued. In 2005, a British re-release, packaged as an "Iconic Film" in a limited-edition slipcase was published, identical to the remastered DVD set, except for different package cover art. In 2006, Warner Bros announced the September publication of a two-disc special edition featuring a Malcolm McDowell commentary, and the releases of other two-disc sets of Stanley Kubrick films. Several British retailers had set the release date as 6 November 2006. The release was delayed and re-announced for the 2007 Holiday Season.
AnHD DVD,Blu-ray, and DVD version was re-released on 23 October 2007, alongside four other Kubrick classics, with 1080p video transfers and remixed Dolby TrueHD 5.1 (for HD DVD) and uncompressed 5.1 PCM (for Blu-ray) audio tracks.[98] Unlike the previous version, the DVD re-release edition is anamorphically enhanced. The Blu-ray was reissued for the 40th anniversary of the film's release, identical to the previously released Blu-ray, plus a Digibook and theStanley Kubrick: A Life in Pictures documentary as a bonus feature.[98]
In 2021, a 4K restoration was completed with Kubrick's former assistantLeon Vitali working closely with Warner Bros.[99] It was released in the US on 21 September 2021 and 4 October 2021 in the UK.
A Clockwork Orange remains an influential work in cinema and other media. The film isfrequently referenced in popular culture, which Adam Chandler ofThe Atlantic attributes to Kubrick's "genre-less" directing techniques that brought novel innovation in filming, music, and production that had not been seen at the time of the film's original release.[101]
In theBritish Film Institute's 2012Sight & Sound polls of the world's greatest films,A Clockwork Orange was ranked 75th in the directors' poll and 235th in the critics' poll.[108] In 2010,Time magazine placed it 9th on their list of the Top 10 Ridiculously Violent Movies.[109] In 2008,Empire ranked it 37th on their list of "The 500 Greatest Movies of All Time", and in 2013,Empire ranked it 11th on their list of "The 100 Best British Films Ever".[110] In 2010,The Guardian ranked the film 6th in its list of 25 greatestarthouse films.[111] The Spanish directorLuis Buñuel praised the film highly. He once said: "A Clockwork Orange is my current favourite. I was predisposed against the film. After seeing it, I realised it is only a movie about what the modern world really means".[13] In 2024, Far Out Magazine named Alex one of the "10 most accurate moviepsychopaths according to theFBI".[112]
A Clockwork Orange was added to the United States'National Film Registry in 2020 as a work considered to be "culturally, historically or aesthetically" significant.[113]
^Canby, Vincent (9 January 1972)."Orange - Disorienting But Human Comedy".The New York Times.Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved4 February 2017.Stanley Kubrick's ninth film, 'A Clockwork Orange,' which has just won the New York Film Critics Award as the best film of 1971, is a brilliant and dangerous work, but it is dangerous in a way that brilliant things sometimes are. ...
^Dwyer, Michael (4 March 2000). "Kubrick film arrives – minus its poster".The Irish Times.
^abDavis, Laura (16 August 2009)."Gratuitous Gore and Sex".Tonight. New Zealand: Tonight & Independent Online.Archived from the original on 28 October 2022. Retrieved25 April 2023.
.png)
.jpg)
