A Christian Reflection on the New Age refers to a six-year study by theRoman Catholic Church on theNew Age movement.[1][2][3][4] The study, published in 2003, is highly critical of the New Age movement and follows the 1989 documentAspects of Christian meditation, in which theVatican warned Catholics against mixingChristian meditation with Eastern approaches to spirituality.
The document's title isJesus Christ, the bearer of the Water of Life.[2][5][6] The document discusses the encounter between Jesus and theSamaritan woman at the well, which it characterizes as "a paradigm for our engagement with truth".[2][7]
The document considers the New Age based on "weak thought" and emphasizes the differences between Catholic thought and the New Age.[2][5][8][9] According to the review of the document inThe Tablet, "there is never any doubt in the document that New Age is incompatible with and hostile to the core beliefs of Christianity."[6]
Expressing general agreement with the views expressed by the document, Richard Land, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of theSouthern Baptist Convention, said that there would be widespread agreement among Baptists that New Age ideas are contrary to Christian tradition and doctrine.[8]
The document was prepared in response to the need expressed byCatholic bishops to have a clear directive about where New Age practices stand with respect toRoman Catholic doctrine.[4][10] In response to the requests, the document addresses and provides Christian guidance on New Age phenomena that involveyoga,meditation,feng shui andcrystal healing and was published in 2003 as a 90-page booklet titledA Christian reflection on the New Age.[1][3][4]
The document was presented at a February 2003 Vatican conference onA Christian Reflection on the New Age.[11] MonsignorMichael Fitzgerald stated at the conference that the "Church avoids any concept that is close to those of the New Age".[12][13] CardinalPaul Poupard, head of thePontifical Council for Culture, said that the "New Age is a misleading answer to the oldest hopes of man."[12][14][15] Poupard, the Vatican's minister of culture, also warned that the New Age was based on "weak thinking".[3]
The document presents a highly critical view of the New Age movement and considers it as incompatible with and hostile to the core beliefs of Christianity.[6][8] The document states that upon close examination it becomes clear that there is little in the New Age that is new, and that for Christians, the "New Age began 2000 years ago, with Christ". The document also criticizes the New Age movement, stating it is attempting to blur the distinction between good and evil.
By posing the question:Christ or Aquarius? the document states that the New Age often suggests an alternative vision of reality or an alternative way of improving one's current situation by magic. The document criticizes the view that theAge of Aquarius will replace the Christian Age. Referring to theGospel of Luke (16:13) that "No servant can be the slave of two masters", it states that Christians have only to think of the difference between thewise men from the East andKing Herod to recognize the powerful effects of choice for or against Christ.
The Jesuit magazineAmerica commented that the Vatican directive was relevant to Catholic women inreligious institutes because there are clear differences between Catholic teachings and the New Age that can become blurred within spiritual practices.[5]
The document was also discussed at June 2004 Vatican conference attended by representatives of theepiscopal conferences of 22 countries, as well as members of theRoman Curia.[16][17] Following the conference, Alessandro Pennesi, a professor at thePontifical Lateran University reiterated the Vatican warnings and stated that he agreed with the sentiment that the New Age is based on "ethical relativism" and that it is not possible to "isolate some elements of New Age religiosity as acceptable to Christians, while rejecting others."[9]
The document has 6 main sections, as well as an appendix, and glossary of New Age terms.[2] The main sections are:
The document identifies three allegedly key 'New Age' initiatives that it finds objectionable:Esalen Institute in California, theFindhorn Foundation in Scotland andMonte Verità in Switzerland. It also mentions the Open Center and theOmega Institute in New York.[2]
The document states that the yearbooks at Monte Verità make it clear that there is an intention to create an "integrated world religion", and that it is fascinating to see the list of people who have gathered over the years at Monte Verità.[2]
