Aclear-channel station is a North AmericanAMradio station that has the highest level of protection frominterference from other stations, particularly from nighttimeskywave signals. This classification exists to ensure the viability of cross-country or cross-continent radio service enforced through a series of treaties and statutory laws. Known as Class A stations since the 1983 adoption of theRegional Agreement for the Medium Frequency Broadcasting Service in Region 2 (Rio Agreement), they are occasionally still referred to by their former classifications of Class I-A (the highest classification), Class I-B (the next highest class), or Class I-N (for stations in Alaska too far away to cause interference to the primary clear-channel stations in the lower 48 states). The term "clear-channel" is used most often in the context of North America and the Caribbean, where the concept originated.
Since 1941, these stations have been required to maintain atransmitter power output of at least 10,000watts to retain their status. Nearly all such stations in the United States, Canada and The Bahamas broadcast with 50,000 watts, with several clear-channel stations in Mexico going as high as 150,000 watts, andXEW inMexico City having formerly operated with 250,000 watts for over 80 years before moving the transmitter and reducing to 100,000 watts in 2016. Cuba was originally included in the plan and had several stations given clear-channel status, but stopped participating after theCuban Revolution of 1959.
Sixtymedium wave frequencies were set aside in 1941 under theNorth American Regional Broadcasting Agreement (NARBA) for use by usually only one, although in some cases two or three, AM stations, covering a wide nighttime area viaskywavepropagation. These frequencies were known as the "clear channels", and the stations on them are thus clear-channel stations. NARBA set aside 37 Class I-A frequencies and 27 Class I-B frequencies. The Class I-N stations in Alaska shared those same frequencies. Where only one station was assigned to a clear channel, the treaty provides that it must operate with anominal power of 50kilowatts or more. These were for the most part Class I-A. Stations on the other clear channels, with two or more stations, must use between 10 kW and 50 kW, and most often use adirectional antenna so as not to interfere with each other. In addition to the frequencies, the treaty also specified the specific locations where stations on Class I-B channels could be built.
Some of the original NARBA signatories, including the United States, Canada and Mexico, have implemented bilateral agreements that supersede NARBA's terms, eliminating among other things the distinction between the two kinds of clear channel: the original "I-A" and "I-B" classes, and the newer, U.S.-only "I-N" class, which are now all included inclass A. Classes "I-A" and "I-B" still mandate a minimum efficiency of 362.10 mV/m/kW at 1 km, whereas Class "I-N" is permitted to use the lower Class B minimum efficiency of 281.63 mV/m/kW at 1 km. There exist exceptions, where a former Class B station was elevated to Class A, yet it maintained its previous antenna system, or made only minor changes thereto.
Clear-channel stations, unlike other AM stations in North America, have protection from interference to their nighttime skywavesecondary service area. Other stations are entitled, at most, to protection from nighttime interference in theirprimary service area—that which is covered by theirgroundwave signal.
Many stations beyond those listed in the treaty have been assigned to operate on a clear channel (and some had been long before NARBA came into effect in 1941). In most cases, those stations operate during the daytime only, so as not to interfere with the primary stations on those channels. Since the early 1980s, many such stations have been permitted to operate at night with such low power as to be deemed not to interfere; these stations are still considered "daytimers" and are not entitled to any protection from interference with their nighttime signals. Another group of stations, formerly known as class II stations, were licensed to operate on the former "I-B" clear channels with significant power at night, provided that they use directional antenna systems to minimize radiation towards the primary stations.[citation needed]
Daytimers (also known as daytime-only stations) areAM radio stations that are limited to broadcasting during the daytime only, as their signals would interfere with clear-channel and other radio stations at night, when solar radiation is reduced, and medium-frequency radio signals can propagate much farther. Such stations are allowed three manners of operation after sunset; to sign off the air completely until sunrise, reduce power (sometimes dramatically, to only a few watts), or switch to a nighttime-only frequency (such as the Detroit area'sWNZK, which broadcasts on 690 during the day, and on 680 at night). Theirbroadcast class is Class D. A great number of these stations use FM translators to continue their broadcasts overnight, and some also broadcast on the internet and have separate streams that air when the station's over-the-air signal has signed off.
Daytime-only stations first originated in the late 1920s shortly after General Order 40 was imposed. One of the first to do so was WKEN inKenmore, New York (nowWUFO). WKEN proposed the concept to avoid the then-common practice of having to share one frequency between multiple stations; under General Order 40, WKEN would have had to share its frequency withWKBW, and the daytime-only proposal allowed both stations their own frequency.[1] WUFO remains a daytime-only station to the present day, albeit with a 24/7 FM translator introduced in mid-2017.
As of 2013, daytimers exist only in the United States and Mexico. The last Canadian daytime station,CKOT, signed off on February 17 of that year after converting to the FM band. There were 61 daytimers in Mexico in 2015.[2]
The following two tables show all of the class-A stations in North America.
First is the Canada, Mexico, and contiguous United States table, for the former class I-A and class I-B stations.General Order 40 allocations are in bold.
Second is the Alaska table, for the former class I-N stations.
Under the most recent treaty, Mexican Class A stations that previously operated with 50 kW or less (but a minimum of 10 kW nights) may increase power to 100 kW days while retaining their 10 kW night operation. This created some anomalies where stations licensed for 10 kW during all hours could increase power to 100 kW days and 10 kW nights, unless a directional antenna system was installed for nights, in which case the maximum night power was 50 kW. Additionally, one Class B station that had been operating non-directionally with 100 kW days and 50 kW nights was required to reduce power to 50 kW during all hours.
| Freq. (kHz) | Call sign | City of license | State / province | Country | Fate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 540 | CBT | Grand Falls-Windsor | Newfoundland |  | Moved to FM on December 31, 2022. |
| 850 | XETQ-AM | Ixhuatlancillo | Veracruz |  | Migrated to FM asXHTQ-FM in 2013. At its height XETQ was authorized for 100 kW day/50 kW night. In the 1990s it lowered its power to 10 kW day/1 kW night. |
| 1070 | CBA | Moncton | New Brunswick | | Moved to FM in April 2008. Canada has not withdrawn the international notification for CBA. |
| 1190 | WOWO | Fort Wayne | Indiana |  | Downgraded to class B in 1998 by reducing night power to 9.8 kilowatts with a three tower directional antenna; Inner City Broadcasting purchased WOWO so that its station in New York, WLIB, could remain on air 24 hours a day. WOWO was later purchased by Pathfinder Communications, the current owners. |
| 1190 | XEWK | Guadalajara | Jalisco | | Migrated to FM. The AM station was turned off in 2021. |
| 1510 | KGA | Spokane | Washington | | Downgraded to class B in 2011 to make room for co-channel sister stationKSFN,Piedmont, California, reducing night power to 15 kW[5] |
| 1550 | XERUV-AM | Xalapa | Veracruz | | A bad permit renewal, made in 2005, required this station to shut down in June 2016. When the university applied to resume operation on AM, it was denied, and the station moved to FM and launchedXHRUV-FM on a frequency of 90.5 MHz on June 1, 2016. |
In the early days of radio, regulators had difficulty reducing interference between stations. There were two major limitations: a lack of good frequency control during the 1920s, resulting in heterodyne tones that were encountered far beyond the range of understandable audio, and no directional antennas or skywave-suppressing vertical antennas until the early 1930s. The problem was much more severe at night, when skywave signals expanded station signal coverage to hundreds of kilometers. However, with most stations located at urban locations, quality skywave service was considered to be important for providing nighttime reception to the extensive rural regions.
For the U.S., a form of clear channels first appeared in 1923 when theCommerce Department started moving stations which had previously shared three[6] (initially two)[7] frequencies (two for entertainment stations, one for "weather and crop reports") onto a band of frequencies from 550 to 1350 kHz,[8] which was later extended to 1500 kHz, with 550 to 1070 kHz reserved for higher powered "Class B" stations. Many of the Class B frequencies were assigned to a single station, although a few were used on both the East and West coasts, which were considered far enough apart to limit interference.[9] Class B stations with transmitters located in population centers were limited to 1,000 watts,[10] although stations that operated transmitters at remote sites were permitted to use up to 5,000 watts.
Problems intensified in the summer of 1926, when a successful challenge was made to the government's authority, under theRadio Act of 1912, to assign station transmitting frequencies and powers.[11] This led to unrestricted expansion of the number of stations to 732, and increased the number of stations operating on same frequency. Moreover, previously stations had been assigned to transmitting frequencies of multiples of 10 kHz, which largely eliminated heterodynes from adjacent frequencies. However, during the lapse in regulation, some stations relocated to non-standard "split frequencies", increasing heterodyne interference.[12]
TheFederal Radio Commission (FRC) was formed in March 1927, and one of its key tasks was to reorganize the chaotic broadcast band. A May 1927 reallocation began the process, in part by eliminating "split frequency" operations.[13] A December 1, 1927 report on the FRC's ongoing work reviewed operations on 600 to 1000 kHz, which divided these frequencies into ones that were considered "clear" and "unclear".[14] Its 1928 implementation ofGeneral Order 32 was only partially successful in reducing the number of stations. On November 11, 1928, the FRC implementedGeneral Order 40, which classifiedAM band frequencies as Local, Regional or Clear. Under restrictions imposed by theDavis Amendment, eight clear channels were assigned to each of five U.S. regions. This classification also reserved a small number of frequencies for use by Canada. The maximum power for clear channel stations was gradually increased to 50,000 watts: additionally there were some short-lived experiments with 250–500 kilowatt "super-power" operations, most prominently byWLW in Cincinnati, Ohio
The Federal Radio Commission was replaced by theFederal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1934. There was debate inWashington, D.C., and in the U.S. broadcasting industry, over whether continuation of the clear-channel system was justifiable. The licensees of clear-channel stations argued that, without their special status, many rural areas would receive no radio service at all. Rural broadcasters pointed out that most of the clear-channel stations were licensed to serve large cities on the two coasts, which made little sense for a service that was meant to provide radio to the vast rural areas in the middle of the country. On June 13, 1938, the U.S. Senate adopted resolution 294, sponsored byBurton K. Wheeler (D-Montana), which stated that it was the "sense of the Senate... that the Federal Communications Commission should not adopt or promulgate rules to permit or otherwise allow any station operating on a frequency in the standard broadcast band (550 to 1600 kilocycles) to operate on a regular or other basis with power in excess of 50 kilowatts".[15] However, the clear-channel licensees argued that a 50,000 watt limit in the U.S. should be lifted. They pointed to successful experiments made byWLW inCincinnati beforeWorld War II, and in later years successful implementation by state broadcasters in Europe and the Middle East, as evidence that this would work and improve the service received by most Americans. Other broadcasters, particularly in the western states, argued to the contrary; that if the special status of the clear-channel stations was eliminated, they would be able to build facilities to provide local service to those rural "dark areas".
The clear channel standards were continued by the March 1941 adoption of theNorth American Regional Broadcasting Agreement, during which most stations shifted frequencies, in order to increase the number of Canadian clear channel assignments, as well as provide clear channels to Mexico and the Bahamas. Because FM and TV stations did not yet exist, the FCC's main intent for the clear-channel assignments was to provide reliable radio service to the thousands of Americans who lived in the vast rural areas of the United States.[16] As a result, these stations usually reached large portions of North America at night. Radio fans (and staff at those stations) often affectionately call such stations "flamethrowers" or "blowtorches" because of their high power, and boast about their reach by a combined state and provincial count of their coverage area. One of the most outspoken of the small-town broadcasters,Ed Craney of KGIR inButte, Montana, went so far as to apply to move his station, then on the 1370 kHz regional channel, to a class I-A signal on 660 kHz, asking the FCC to downgrade theNBC New Yorkflagship,WEAF, to make way for the Butte station.[17] The FCC denied Craney's petition.
After 1941, several clear-channel stations applied for power increases to between 500 and 750 kW;[18][19] with dissemination of national defense information cited as one reason this would be in the public interest. In October 1941 the FCC's engineering department presented a report on a complete reorganization of the clear-channel service; the report considered the possibility of "some 25 superpower stations of 500,000 watts or more, strategically located to provide maximum service" (asBroadcasting described it), and suggested that stations would have to be relocated away from the east and west coasts in such a scenario, as coastal stations waste energy over the oceans. One complication the FCC considered was the 1938Wheeler resolution suggestion that stations be limited to 50 kW.[20]
One station,KOB inAlbuquerque, New Mexico, fought a long legal battle against the FCC and New York'sWABC for the right to move from a regional channel to a clear channel, 770 kHz, arguing that the New York signal was so weak in the mountain west that it served no one there. KOB eventually won the argument in the late 1960s; it and several other western stations were allowed to move to eastern clear channels. (Western clear channels, such as680 in San Francisco, had been "duplicated" in the eastern states for many years.)
These new Class II-A assignments began what would later be called "the breakdown of the clear channels".
| Initial Thirteen Class II-A Allocations by the FCC in 1961 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Freq. | Class I-A station | Proposed Allocation | Class II-A Assignment |
| 670 | WMAQ Chicago, Illinois | Idaho | KBOI Boise, Idaho |
| 720 | WGN Chicago, Illinois | Nevada or Idaho | KDWN Las Vegas, Nevada (deleted March 22, 2024) |
| 750 | WSB Atlanta, Georgia | KFQD Anchorage, Alaska | KFQD Anchorage, Alaska (from 730 kHz.) |
| 760 | WJR Detroit, Michigan | KFMB San Diego, California | KFMB San Diego, California (from 540 kHz.) |
| 780 | WBBM Chicago, Illinois | Nevada | KKOH Reno, Nevada |
| 880 | WCBS New York, New York | North Dakota, South Dakota or Nebraska | KRVN Lexington, Nebraska |
| 890 | WLS Chicago, Illinois | Utah | KDXU Saint George, Utah |
| 1020 | KDKA Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | New Mexico | KCKN Roswell, New Mexico |
| 1030 | WBZ Boston, Massachusetts | Wyoming | KTWO Casper, Wyoming |
| 1100 | KYW Cleveland, Ohio | Colorado | KNZZ Grand Junction, Colorado |
| 1120 | KMOX Saint Louis, Missouri | California or Oregon | KPNW Eugene, Oregon |
| 1180 | WHAM Rochester, New York | Montana. | KOFI Kalispell, Montana |
| 1210 | WCAU Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | Kansas, Nebraska or Oklahoma | KGYN Guymon, Oklahoma |
The class I-A station owners' proposal to increase power fifteen-fold was not immediately quashed, but the new II-A stations would make it effectively impossible for stations on the duplicated channels to do so, and the owners eventually lost interest. That proposal was finally taken off the FCC's docket in the late 1970s.[citation needed]
On May 29, 1980, the FCC voted to limit the protection for all clear-channel stations to a 750-mile (1,207 km) radius around thetransmitter. Stations on those frequencies outside the area of protection were no longer required to sign off or power down after sundown.[21]
In 1987 the FCC changed its rules to prohibit applications for new "class-D" stations. (Class-D stations have night power between zero and 250 watts, and frequently operate on clear channels.) However, any existing station could voluntarily relinquish nighttime authority, thereby becoming a class-D, and several have done so since the rule change.
A half-dozen other applications ranging from 500,000 to 750,000 watts now are pending
Already pending before the Commission were the applications of WLW, Cincinnati, for 650,000 watts, WOAI, San Antonio, seeking 750,000 watts, KSL, Salt Lake City, for 500,000 watts, and WSM, Nashville asking 500,000-watt operation. Similarly the application of WHO, Des Moines, for an increase to 500,000 watts is reported to be about ready for filing.
Download coordinates as:
| History |
|
|---|---|
| Pioneers |
|
| Transmission media | |
| Network topology and switching | |
| Multiplexing | |
| Concepts | |
| Types of network | |
| Notable networks | |
| Locations | |
