The nominees for the 93rd Academy Awards were announced on March 15, 2021, by actressPriyanka Chopra and singerNick Jonas during alive global stream originating fromLondon.[16]Mank led all nominees with ten nominations. The winners were announced during the awards ceremony on April 25.[17] Chinese filmmakerChloé Zhao became the firstwoman of color to win Best Director and the second woman overall afterKathryn Bigelow, who won at the2010 ceremony for directingThe Hurt Locker.[18] In addition, the nomination forEmerald Fennell in the same category meant that this also marked the first time two women directors had both been nominated for the Oscar for Best Director in the same year.[19]
At age 83, Best Actor winnerAnthony Hopkins was the oldest performer ever to win a competitive acting Oscar.[20] Best Actress winnerFrances McDormand became the seventh person to win a third acting Oscar, the third to win three leading performance Oscars, and the second to win Best Actress three times.[21] As a producer ofNomadland, she also was the first person in history to win Oscars for both acting and producing for the same film.[22]
Best Supporting Actress winnerYuh-jung Youn became the first Korean performer and second Asian woman to win an acting Oscar afterMiyoshi Umeki, who won the same category for her role in 1957'sSayonara.[23] With his nominations in Best Supporting Actor and Best Original Song forOne Night in Miami...,Leslie Odom Jr. was the fourth consecutive person to earn acting and songwriting nominations for the same film.[b]
Tyler Perry – for his active engagement with philanthropy and charitable endeavors in recent years, including efforts to address homelessness and economic difficulties faced by members of the African-American community.[26]
In April 2017, the Academy scheduled the 93rd ceremony for February 28, 2021.[29] However, due to the impacts stemming from theCOVID-19 pandemic on bothcinema andtelevision, the AMPAS Board of Governors later decided to move the date for the 2021 gala by two months to April 25.[30] The annual Academy Governors Awards and corresponding nominees luncheon were canceled due to COVID-19 safety concerns.[31] This marked the first time since the60th ceremony held in 1988 that the awards were held in April.[32] It also was the first time since the53rd ceremony in 1981 that the ceremony was postponed from its original date.[33]
In December 2020, the Academy hired television producer Jesse Collins, film producerStacey Sher, and Oscar-winning directorSteven Soderbergh to oversee production of the telecast. "The upcoming Oscars is the perfect occasion for innovation and for re-envisioning the possibilities for the awards show. This is a dream team who will respond directly to these times. The Academy is excited to work with them to deliver an event that reflects the worldwide love of movies and how they connect us and entertain us when we need them the most," remarked Academy president David Rubin and CEODawn Hudson.[34]
The tagline for the ceremony, "Bring Your Movie Love", was intended to reflect "our global appreciation for the power of film to foster connection, to educate, and to inspire us to tell our own stories."[35] In tandem with the theme, the Academy hired seven artists to create custom posters for the event inspired by the question, "What do movies mean to you?"[36] Another aspect of the telecast's production was to produce the ceremony as if it were a film, including promoting the presenters as a "cast",[37][38] being filmed at the traditional cinematicframe rate of24 frames per-second as opposed to 30, and using a cinematicaspect ratio rather than the standard16:9 aspect ratio used by most television programming.[39]
As a result of concerns stemming from the pandemic, AMPAS announced that the main ceremony would be held for the first time atUnion Station inDowntown Los Angeles with portions of the festivities taking place at theDolby Theatre in Hollywood, the ceremony's usual venue.[40] To satisfy health and safety protocols, the Academy limited the number of people attending the gala to primarily nominees and presenters.[38][41] Attendees were asked to submit travel plans to Oscar organizers prior to arriving in Los Angeles and undergo multipleCOVID-19 tests and isolation ten days prior to the event.[42] Guests were also asked to wear face masks whenever the broadcast paused for commercial breaks.[43] In consideration of overseas nominees unable to attend the ceremony, producers set up satellite "hubs" such as atBFI Southbank in London where they could participate in the gala.[44][45] Additionally, the five Best Original Song nominees were performed in previously recorded segments that were shown during the red carpet pre-show. Four of the songs were performed atop the Dolby Family Terrace of theAcademy Museum of Motion Pictures; "Husavik" fromEurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga was performed on location in the song'snamesake town in Iceland.[3]
The ceremony offered accommodations for those who are deaf or visually impaired; it was the first Academy Awards to be broadcast withaudio description for the visually impaired (carried viasecond audio program on the ABC telecast), which (along with its closed captioning) was sponsored byGoogle. Asign language interpreter was available in the media room. Deaf actressMarlee Matlin served as one of the award presenters, with her long-time partner Jack Jason interpreting herAmerican Sign Language to spoken English.[53][54][55]
Due to the ceremony date change, the Academy changed the eligibility deadline for feature films from December 31, 2020, to February 28, 2021. AMPAS president Rubin and CEO Hudson explained the decision to extend the eligibility period saying, "For over a century, movies have played an important role in comforting, inspiring, and entertaining us during the darkest of times. They certainly have this year. Our hope, in extending the eligibility period and our Awards date, is to provide the flexibility filmmakers need to finish and release their films without being penalized for something beyond anyone's control."[56]
The Academy also revised its release and distribution requirements by allowing for films that were released viavideo on demand orstreaming to be eligible for the awards on the condition that said films were originally scheduled to have a theatrical release and were subsequently uploaded to AMPAS's online screening service within 60 days of their public release. AMPAS also amended its theatrical exhibition qualifying rules to allow films debuting in theaters located in New York City, Chicago, the San Francisco Bay Area, Atlanta, and Miami to qualify for the awards in addition to venues in Los Angeles.[57] Moreover, a week of nightly screenings at adrive-in theater within the aforementioned cities also rendered films eligible for consideration.[58]
Furthermore, the Academy made changes to specific award categories. TheBest Sound Mixing andBest Sound Editing categories were re-combined into a single Best Sound category (which had existed from the3rd Awards in 1930 through the75th Awards in 2003) due to concerns from the Sound branch that the two categories had developed too much overlap in scope.[59] The rules forBest Original Score were changed to require that a film's score include a minimum of 60% original music, with franchise films and sequels being required to have a minimum of 80% new music.[60] Finally, preliminary voting forBest International Feature Film was also opened to all voting members of the Academy for the first time.[61]
Many viewers and television critics believedChadwick Boseman's impending win for Best Actor was a reason that producers saved the category as the last to be presented at the ceremony.
In a break with tradition, the lead acting categories were presented last after the awarding of Best Picture, with Best Actor coming last.[62] This led many viewers to believe that the ceremony's producers were anticipating Chadwick Boseman posthumously winning Best Actor, which could have been accompanied by a tribute to the actor; Boseman had been considered a strong frontrunner for the award.[63][64] When presenterJoaquin Phoenix announced that Anthony Hopkins was the winner of the category, Phoenix said that the Academy accepted the award on behalf of the latter, who was not present, and the ceremony came to an abrupt end.[64] It was later reported that Hopkins, who did not want to travel from his home in Wales, offered to appear viaZoom, but the producers declined his request.[64]
The day after the ceremony, he released an acceptance speech on Instagram, in which he thanked the Academy, said that he "really did not expect" to win, and paid tribute to Boseman.[63] The selection of Hopkins over Boseman was controversial among viewers,[65][66] though Boseman's brother reported the family did not have any hard feelings toward the Academy.[67]
In a subsequent interview with theLos Angeles Times, Soderbergh said that switching the traditional order of awards was planned before the nominations were announced, claiming "actors' speeches tend to be more dramatic than producers' speeches". He said that the possibility of Boseman's widow accepting the award "would have been such a shattering moment" and "there would be nowhere to go after that". Soderbergh also defended the decision to not allow acceptance speeches via Zoom.[68]
Many media outlets received the broadcast negatively.[14][15] On thereview aggregator websiteRotten Tomatoes, 24% of 34 critics' reviews are positive. The website's consensus reads: "The 93rd Oscars definitely delivered something different, but after a strong opening moment with Regina King, the changes to this year's ceremony cemented the importance of certain structural traditions -- and how damaging hedging your bets on the Academy's votes can be."[69] Television critic Mike Hale ofThe New York Times wrote, "Sunday's broadcast on ABC was more like a cross between theGolden Globes and the closing-night banquet of a long, exhausting convention." He also commented, "The trade-off — whether because of the smaller crowd, the social distancing, or the sound quality in the cavernous space — was what felt like a dead room, both acoustically and emotionally. There were powerful and moving speeches, but they didn't seem to be generating much excitement, and when the people in the room aren't excited, it's hard to get excited at home."[70]Rolling Stone columnist Rob Sheffield noted, "The most flamboyantly unplanned and half-assed Oscar Night in recent history was a grind from beginning to end." He also criticized the production of the "In Memoriam" segment saying that the montage was edited at an inappropriately fast pace.[71] Kelly Lawler ofUSA Today commented, "While it was certainly challenging to stage the show safely,last month's Grammys proved that it is possible to make something entertaining and engaging amid the pandemic. Unfortunately, the Oscars producers seemingly missed that show. The Oscars were a train wreck at the train station, an excruciatingly long, boring telecast that lacked the verve of so many movies we love."[72]
Others gave a more favorable review of the show.Time columnist Judy Berman wrote that the ceremony "was more entertaining than the average pre-COVID Oscars. It started out especially strong." She also added, "Every part of this year's ceremony felt more intimate and less stuffy than just about any awards show I can remember. For once, the art and community of film seemed to take precedence over the business of film."[73]Associated Press reporter Lindsey Bahr commented, "The 93rd Academy Awards wasn't exactly a movie, but it was a show made for people who love learning about movies. And it stubbornly, defiantly wasn't trying to be anything else."[74] Darren Franich ofEntertainment Weekly gave an average review of the telecast, but singled out the winners and presenters for providing memorable moments throughout the show.[75]
The American telecast on ABC drew in an average of 10.4 million people over its length, which was a 56% decrease from theprevious year's ceremony.[76] The show also earned lowerNielsen ratings compared to the previous ceremony with 5.9% of households watching the ceremony.[7] In addition, it garnered a lower rating among viewers between ages 18–49 with a 2.1 rating among viewers in that demographic.[77] It earned the lowest viewership for an Academy Award telecast since figures were compiled beginning with the46th ceremony in 1974.[78]
The ceremony was subject to various forms of censorship in China and its territories. Due to scrutiny overNomadland directorChloé Zhao—a Chinese-American citizen who reportedly made comments critical of China in a 2013 interview withFilmmaker magazine—the ceremony telecast was pulled by its local rightsholders in the mainland, and all discussions of the ceremony werecensored from Chinese social media and news outlets.[81][82]
In addition, Hong Kong broadcasterTVB announced that the ceremony would not be shown live in the region for the first time since 1969. A TVB spokesperson toldAFP that this was a "commercial decision". It was speculated that the decision was in retaliation for the nomination ofDo Not Split, a documentary onHong Kong's pro-democracy protests in 2019, for Best Documentary Short Subject.[83]
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.svg)