"7/7" and "2005 London bombings" redirect here. For the calendar date, see7 July. For the bombings that happened two weeks later, see21 July 2005 London bombings.
The7 July 2005 London bombings, also referred to as7/7, were a series of four co-ordinated suicide attacks carried out byIslamist terrorists that targeted commuters travelling onLondon's public transport during the morning rush hour.
Apart from the bombers, 52 people of 18 different nationalities were killed and nearly 800 were injured in the attacks. It was the UK's deadliest terrorist incident since the 1988 bombing ofPan Am Flight 103 nearLockerbie, and the UK's first Islamist suicide attack.
The explosions were caused byimprovised explosive devices made from concentrated hydrogen peroxide and pepper,[2] packed into backpacks. The bombings were followed two weeks later bya series of attempted attacks that failed to cause injury or damage.
At 8:49a.m. on Thursday 7 July 2005, three bombs were detonated on London Underground (LU) trains within 50seconds of each other:
The first bomb exploded on a six-car London UndergroundCircle Line train, number 204, travelling eastbound betweenLiverpool Street andAldgate. At the time of the explosion, the train's third car was approximately 100yards (90m) along the tunnel from Liverpool Street. The parallel track of theHammersmith & City Line between Liverpool Street andAldgate East was also damaged in the blast.
The second bomb exploded in the second car of another six-car London Underground Circle Line train, number 216, which had just leftEdgware Road and was travelling westbound towardsPaddington. An eastbound Circle Line train that was passing next to the bombed train was also damaged,[3] as was a wall that later collapsed.
A third bomb was detonated on a six-car London UndergroundPiccadilly Line train, number 311, travelling southbound fromKing's Cross St Pancras tube station toRussell Square. The device exploded approximately one minute after the service departed King's Cross, by which time it had travelled about 500yards (450m). The explosion occurred at the rear of the first car of the train, causing severe damage to the rear of that car as well as the front of the second one.[4] The surrounding tunnel also sustained damage.
It was originally thought that there had been six, rather than three, explosions on the Underground network. The bus bombing brought the reported total to seven; this was clarified later in the day. The incorrect reports were later attributed to the fact that the blasts occurred on trains that were between stations, causing wounded passengers to emerge from both stations, giving the impression that there was an incident at each. Police also revised the timings of the tube blasts: initial reports had indicated that they occurred during a period of almost half an hour. This was due to initial confusion at London Underground, where the explosions were originally believed to have been caused bypower surges. An early report, made in the minutes after the explosions, involved a person under a train, while another described a derailment (both of which did occur, but only as a result of the explosions). A code amber alert was declared by LU at 9:19a.m., and LU began to close operations by ordering trains to continue to the next station and, to remain at that station and detrain passengers.[5]
The effects of the explosions varied due to the differing characteristics of the tunnels in which each occurred:[6]
The Circle Line is a "cut and cover" sub-surface tunnel, about 7 m (23 ft) deep. As the tunnel contains two parallel tracks, it is relatively wide. The two explosions on the Circle line were probably able to vent their force into the tunnel, reducing their destructive force.
The Piccadilly Line is a deep-level tunnel, up to 30m (100ft) below the surface and with narrow (3.56m, or 11ft8+1⁄4in) single-track tubes and just 15cm (6in) clearances. This confined space reflected the blast force, concentrating its effect.
The bus left Marble Arch at 9:00a.m. and arrived atEuston bus station at 9:35a.m., where crowds of people had been evacuated from the tube and boarded buses as an alternative method of transport.[7]
Locations of the bombings on a Central London tube map
The explosion at 9:47a.m. in Tavistock Square ripped off the roof and destroyed the rear portion of the bus. The blast took place near BMA House, the headquarters of theBritish Medical Association, onUpper Woburn Place. A number of doctors and medical staff in or near that building were able to provide immediate emergency assistance.[8]
Witnesses reported seeing "papers and half a bus flying through the air".[9] Two injured bus passengers said that they saw a man exploding in the bus.[10]
The location of the bomb inside the bus meant the front of the vehicle remained mostly intact. Most of the passengers at the front of the top deck survived, as did those near the front of the lower deck, including the driver, but those at the rear of the bus suffered more serious injuries, with several individuals being blown from the bus. The extent of the damage caused to the victims' bodies resulted in a lengthy delay in announcing the death toll from the bombing while the police determined how many bodies were present and whether the bomber was one of them. Several passers-by were also injured by the explosion and surrounding buildings were damaged by debris.[8]
The bombed bus was subsequently covered with tarpaulin and removed for forensic examination at a secureMinistry of Defence site. A replacement bus was namedSpirit of London.[11]
The 52 victims were of diverse backgrounds. All were UK residents, including exchange students. The majority lived in or near London. Their ages ranged from 20 to 60 years old, with an average age of 34.
Thirty-two victims were British, while one victim each came from Afghanistan, France, Ghana, Grenada, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Kenya, Mauritius, New Zealand, Nigeria, Romania, Sri Lanka and Turkey. Three victims were Polish nationals, while one victim was aVietnamese born Australian and one held dualAmerican-Vietnamese citizenship.[12]
Seven of the victims were killed at Aldgate, six at Edgware Road, 26 at King's Cross and 13 at Tavistock Square.
The four suicide bombers were later identified as:
Mohammad Sidique Khan, aged 30. He lived inBeeston, Leeds, with his wife and young child, where he worked as a learning mentor at a primary school. Khan detonated his bomb on the number 216 train, killing seven people, including himself.
Shehzad Tanweer, aged 22. Also lived in Beeston, Leeds, occasionally working in his mother and father'sfish and chip shop on Lodge Lane, Beeston. He detonated his bomb on the number 204 train. Eight people, including Tanweer, were killed by the explosion. The explosion also injured future Paralympic athleteMartine Wright who was commuting to work.
Germaine Lindsay, aged 19. He lived inAylesbury, Buckinghamshire, with his pregnant wife and young son. He detonated his device on the number 311 train. The blast killed 27 people, including him.
Hasib Hussain, aged 18. He lived in Leeds with his brother and sister-in-law. Hussain detonated his bomb on a bus. Fourteen people, including him, died in the explosion in Tavistock Square.
Charles Clarke,Home Secretary when the attacks occurred, described the bombers as "cleanskins", a term describing them as previously unknown to authorities until they carried out their attacks.[14] On the day of the attacks, all four had travelled toLuton, Bedfordshire, by car, then to London by train. They were filmed on CCTV arriving atKing's Cross station at about 8:30a.m.[15]
Two of the bombers made videotapes describing their reasons for becoming what they called "soldiers". In a videotape broadcast byAl Jazeera on 1 September 2005, Mohammad Sidique Khan described his motivation. The tape had been edited and mentionedal-Qaeda membersOsama bin Laden,Ayman al-Zawahiri andAbu Musab al-Zarqawi, describing them as "today's heroes". Khan's tape said:[16]
I and thousands like me are forsaking everything for what we believe. Our drive and motivation doesn't come from tangible commodities that this world has to offer. Our religion isIslam, obedience to the one true God and following the footsteps of the final prophet messenger. Your democratically-elected governments continuously perpetuate atrocities against my people all over the world. And your support of them makes you directly responsible, just as I am directly responsible for protecting and avenging my Muslim brothers and sisters. Until we feel security you will be our targets and until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture of my people, we will not stop this fight. We are at war and I am a soldier. Now you too will taste the reality of this situation.
The tape continued:
...I myself, I myself, I makedua (pray) toAllah ... to raise me amongst those whom I love like theprophets, the messengers, the martyrs and today's heroes like our beloved Sheikh Osama Bin Laden, Dr Ayman al-Zawahri and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and all the other brothers and sisters that are fighting in the ... of this cause.
On 6 July 2006, a videotaped statement by Shehzad Tanweer was broadcast by Al-Jazeera. In the video, which may have been edited to include remarks by al-Zawahiri,[17] Tanweer said:[18]
Your government has openly supported thegenocide of over 150,000 innocent Muslims inFalluja... You have offered financial and military support to the U.S. andIsrael, in the massacre of our children inPalestine. You are directly responsible for the problems in Palestine,Afghanistan, andIraq to this day. You have openly declaredwar on Islam, and are the forerunners in thecrusade against theMuslims. ... What you have witnessed now is only the beginning of a string of attacks that will continue and become stronger until you pull your forces out of Afghanistan and Iraq. And until you stop your financial and military support to America and Israel.
Tanweer argued that the non-Muslims of Britain deserve such attacks because they voted for a government which "continues to oppress our mothers, children, brothers and sisters inPalestine, Afghanistan, Iraq andChechnya."[19]
Initial reports suggested that a power surge on the Underground power grid had caused explosions in power circuits. This was later ruled out by power suppliersNational Grid. Commentators suggested that the explanation had been made because of bomb damage to power lines along the tracks; the rapid series of power failures caused by the explosions (or power being ended by means of switches at the locations to permit evacuation) looked similar, from the point of view of a control room operator, to a cascading series of circuit breaker operations that would result from a major power surge. A couple of hours after the bombings, Home SecretaryCharles Clarke confirmed the incidents were terrorist attacks.[20]
Although there were security alerts at many locations throughout the United Kingdom, no terrorist incidents occurred outside central London. Suspicious packages were destroyed in controlled explosions inEdinburgh,Brighton,Coventry,Southampton,Portsmouth,Darlington andNottingham. Security across the country was increased to thehighest alert level.
The Times reported on 17 July 2005 that police sniper units were following as many as a dozen al-Qaeda suspects in Britain. The covert armed teams were ordered to shoot to kill if surveillance suggested that a terror suspect was carrying a bomb and he refused to surrender if challenged. A member of the Metropolitan Police'sSpecialist Firearms Command said: "These units are trained to deal with any eventuality. Since the London bombs, they have been deployed to look at certain people."[21]
Vodafone reported that its mobile telephone network reached capacity at about 10a.m. on the day of the bombings, and it was forced to initiateaccess overload control to prioritise emergency calls. Othermobile phone networks also reported failures. TheBBC speculated that the telephone system was shut down by security services to prevent the possibility of mobile phones being used to trigger bombs. Although this option was considered, it became clear later that the intermittent unavailability of both mobile and landline telephone systems was due only to excessive usage.ACCOLC was activated only in a 1 km (0.6 mi) radius around Aldgate Tube Station because key emergency personnel did not have ACCOLC-enabled mobile phones.[22] The communications failures during the emergency sparked discussions to improve London'semergency communications system.[23]
Underground stations, includingCaledonian Road (pictured), were closed across London
For most of the day, central London's public transport system was largely out of service following the complete closure of the Underground, the closure of the Zone 1bus network, and the evacuation of incident sites such as Russell Square. Bus services restarted at 4:00p.m. on 7 July, and most mainline railway stations resumed service soon afterward.River vessels were pressed into service to provide a free alternative to overcrowded trains and buses. Local lifeboats were required to act as safety boats, including the Sheerness lifeboat from theIsle of Sheppey in Kent. Thousands of people chose to walk home or to the nearest Zone 2 bus or railway station. Most of the Underground, apart from the stations affected by the bombs, resumed service the next morning, though some commuters chose to stay at home. Affected stretches were also closed for police investigations.
Much of the King's Cross railway station was also closed, with the ticket hall and waiting area being used as a makeshift hospital to treat casualties. Although the station reopened later during the day, only suburban rail services were able to use it, withGreat North Eastern Railway trains terminating atPeterborough (the service was fully restored on 9 July). King's Cross St Pancras tube station remained available only toMetropolitan line services to facilitate the ongoing recovery and investigation for a week, thoughVictoria line services were restored on 15 July and theNorthern line on 18 July. All of the damaged trains were removed in stages.St Pancras station, located next to King's Cross, was shut on the afternoon of the attacks, with allMidland Mainline trains terminating atLeicester, causing disruption to services toSheffield,Nottingham andDerby.
A sign on theM25 London orbital road warns drivers to avoid the city.
On 25 July, the Hammersmith & City line was reopened from Baker Street to Barking after the affected train was cleared at Aldgate, together with the stretch from Moorgate to Aldgate of the Metropolitan Line. The Hammersmith to Paddington part of the Hammersmith & City line was a shuttle service after the bombings. On 29 July, the District line was reopened from High Street Kensington to Edgware Road, after the affected train was cleared.
On 2 August, the Hammersmith & City line resumed normal service; the Circle line was still suspended, though all Circle line stations are also served by other lines. The Piccadilly line service resumed on 4 August after the affected train was cleared on 16 July, and enhanced maintenance work was done. On 4 August, the Circle line was reopened again.
The list below is of the emergency services, police forces and voluntary aid societies that responded to the bombings to assist with rescue, recovery, security and scene control:
Emergency medical services and voluntary aid societies
London Ambulance Service (LAS) – response included Motorcycle Response Units (MRUs) and Cycle Response Units (CRU),[24] off-duty personnel also responded.[25]
London Air Ambulance – sent crews in rapid response vehicles (RRVs), including paramedics and doctors.
British Transport Police – responded to the tube station attacks, as well as Tavistock Square and conducted mortuary, security, rescue and body recovery duties[28]
There were limited reactions to the attack in theworld economy as measured byfinancial market andexchange rate activity. The value of theBritish pound decreased 0.89cents to a 19-month low against the US dollar. TheFTSE 100 Index fell by about 200 points during the two hours after the first attack. This was its greatest decrease since theinvasion of Iraq, and it triggered theLondon Stock Exchange's 'Special Measures', restrictingpanic selling and aimed at ensuring market stability. By the time the market closed, it had recovered to only 71.3 points (1.36%) down on the previous day's three-year closing high. Markets in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain also closed about 1% down on the day.
US market indexes increased slightly, partly because the dollar index increased sharply against the pound and the euro. TheDow Jones Industrial Average gained 31.61 to 10,302.29. TheNASDAQ Composite Index increased 7.01 to 2,075.66. TheS&P 500 increased 2.93 points to 1,197.87 after decreasing as much as 1%. Every benchmark value gained 0.3%.[29]
The market values increased again on 8 July as it became clear that the damage caused by the bombings was not as great as thought initially. By end of trading the market had recovered fully to above its level at start of trading on 7 July. Insurers in the UK tend toreinsure their terrorist liabilities in excess of the first £75,000,000 withPool Re, a mutual insurer established by the government with major insurers. Pool Re has substantial reserves and newspaper reports indicated that claims would easily be funded.
On 9 July, theBank of England,HM Treasury and theFinancial Services Authority revealed that they had instigated contingency plans immediately after the attacks to ensure that the UK financial markets could keep trading. This involved the activation of a "secret chatroom" on the British government's Financial Sector Continuity website, which allowed the institutions to communicate with the country's banks and market dealers.[30]
Continuous news coverage of the attacks was broadcast throughout 7 July, by bothBBC One andITV, uninterrupted until 7:00p.m., although the BBC stuck with initial reports of a power surge on the London Underground until actual events could be corroborated.[31]Sky News did not broadcast any advertisements for 24 hours.ITN confirmed later that its coverage on ITV was its longest uninterrupted on-air news broadcast of its 50-year history.[citation needed] Television coverage was notable for the use of mobile telephone footage sent in by members of the public and live pictures from trafficCCTV cameras.
TheBBC Online website recorded an all-timebandwidth peak of 11Gb/s at midday on 7 July.BBC News received some 1billion total accesses throughout the course of the day (including all images, text and HTML), serving some 5.5terabytes of data. At peak times during the day there were 40,000-page requests per second for the BBC News website. The previous day's announcement of the2012 Summer Olympics being awarded to London resulted in up to 5Gb/s. The previous all-time maximum for the website followed the announcement of theMichael Jackson verdict, which used 7.2Gb/s.[32]
On 12 July, it was reported that theBritish National Party released leaflets showing images of the 'No. 30 bus' after it was destroyed. The slogan, "Maybe now it's time to start listening to the BNP" was printed beside the photo. Home Secretary Charles Clarke described it as an attempt by the BNP to "cynically exploit the current tragic events in London to further their spread of hatred".[33]
Some media outside the UK complained that successive British governments had been unduly tolerant towards radicalIslamist militants, so long as they were involved in activities outside the UK.[34] Britain's alleged reluctance to extradite or prosecute terrorist suspects resulted in London being dubbed "Londonistan" by French law enforcement in the mid 1990s,[35] the term was popularised by in the UK by columnistMelanie Phillips.[36]
Even before the identity of the bombers became known, former Metropolitan Police commissionerLord Stevens said he believed they were almost certainly born or based in Britain, and would not "fit the caricature al-Qaeda fanatic from some backward village in Algeria or Afghanistan".[37] The attacks would have required extensive preparation and prior reconnaissance efforts, and a familiarity with bomb-making and the London transport network as well as access to significant amounts of bomb-making equipment and chemicals.
On 13 August, quoting police andMI5 sources,The Independent reported that the bombers acted independently of an al-Qaeda terror mastermind some place abroad.[38]
On 1 September, it was reported that al-Qaeda officially claimed responsibility for the attacks in a videotape broadcast by the Arab television network Al Jazeera. However, an official inquiry by the British government reported that the tape claiming responsibility had been edited after the attacks, and that the bombers did not have direct assistance from al-Qaeda.[39] Zabi uk-Taifi, an al-Qaeda commander arrested in Pakistan in January 2009, may have had connections to the bombings, according to Pakistani intelligence sources.[40] More recently, documents found by German authorities on a terrorist suspect arrested in Berlin in May 2011 have suggested thatRashid Rauf, a British al Qaeda operative, played a key role in planning the attacks.[41]
A second claim of responsibility was posted on the Internet by another al-Qaeda allied group,Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades. The group had, however, previously falsely claimed responsibility for events that were the result of technical problems, such as the2003 London blackout and the USNortheast blackout of 2003.[42]
Within hours of the bombings, various Islamic religious groups had condemned the attacks and distanced themselves from the perpetrators. SirIqbal Sacranie of theMuslim Council of Britain stated that the perpetrators were not true Muslims as their acts were "contrary" to Islamic beliefs.[43] On 18 July, over 500 British Muslim religious leaders issued afatwa (decree), condemning the bombings and stating that the bombings were against the teachings of Islam. Senior Muslim leaders offered support in counter-terrorism efforts, having met the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary and the Met Police Commissioner SirIan Blair.[44]
Muslim organisations in Europe also condemned the bombings. The imam of thePrague mosque called the bombers "insane" while the Union of Islamic Communities and Organisations in Italy said that "terrorism is incompatible with the doctrine, law and culture of Islam" and expressed its incontrovertible "condemnation of actions that lead to the massacre of innocent people" and its "repugnance" at the "blasphemous use of the Qu'ran".[45]
In the immediate aftermath of the bombings, there was a sharp temporary rise in faith hate crimes, directed mostly at British Muslims. There were also acts ofarson against mosques as well as Sikh temples.[43] Muslims reported that they felt more anxious about going out in public or to work, in fear of anti-Muslim reprisals by individuals.[46] A British Medical Journal psychological study found that 61 percent of Muslim commuters in London suffered "substantial stress" in the days after the attacks.[47]
According to a book by Chris Allen published in 2005, the British media had before the bombings portrayed Muslims in a highly derogatory way and failed to distinguish between mainstream Muslims and extremist groups. There had also been a growing trend in young British Muslims feeling "alienated" with the British state, fuelled especially by the UK's foreign policy regarding theIraq War.[48] A YouGov poll showed that 88% of British Muslims did not justify the bombings, while 6% did.[49]
There was also some criticism against the government. In 2006, government statements such as the Prime Minister's claim that moderate Muslims were not doing enough to tackle extremists, was met with disapproval byHammasa Kohistani, who called it a "huge stereotype of the Islamic community" that is fuelling hostility.[50]
A survey of 500 British Muslims undertaken byChannel 4 News in 2007 found that 24% believed the four bombers blamed for the attacks did not perform them.[51]
There have been variousconspiracy theories proposed about the bombings, including the suggestion that the bombers were 'patsies', based on claims about timings of the trains and the train from Luton, supposed explosions underneath the carriages, and allegations of the faking of the one time-stamped and dated photograph of the bombers at Luton station.[52][53] Claims made by one theorist in the Internet video7/7 Ripple Effect were examined by the BBC documentary seriesThe Conspiracy Files, in an episode titled "7/7" first broadcast on 30 June 2009, which debunked many of the video's claims.[54]
On the day of the bombings,Peter Power of Visor Consultants gave interviews on BBC Radio 5 Live andITV saying that he was working on a crisis management simulation drill, in theCity of London, "based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning", when he heard that an attack was going on in real life. He described this as a coincidence. He also gave an interview to theManchester Evening News where he spoke of "an exercise involving mock broadcasts when it happened for real".[55] After a few days he dismissed it as a "spooky coincidence" on Canadian TV.[56]
Alexander Litvinenko, a former officer of Russia'sFederal Security Service, was asked who he thought the culprits of the attacks were, in an interview. Litvinenko stated,[58] "You know, I have spoken about it earlier and I shall say now, that I know only one organization, which has made terrorism the main tool of solving of political problems. It is the Russian special services."[59]
Initially, there were conflicting reports as to the origin, method, and even timing of the explosions. Forensic examiners initially thought that military-gradeplastic explosives had been used, and, as the blasts were thought to have been simultaneous, that synchronised timed detonators had been employed.[citation needed] These hypotheses changed as more information became available. The explosive was initially identified astriacetone triperoxide,[60] According to a May 2006 report from the British government'sIntelligence and Security Committee, home-made organic peroxide-based devices were used,[61] which was described at the coroner's inquest as an "entirely unique" mixture of concentrated hydrogen peroxide and pepper.[2]
Fifty-six people, including the four suicide bombers, were killed by the attacks[62] and about 700 were injured, of whom about 100 were hospitalised for at least one night. The incident was the deadliest single act of terrorism in the United Kingdom since the 1988 bombing ofPan Am Flight 103, which exploded over Lockerbie killing 270 people, and the deadliest bombing in London since the Second World War.[63]
Police examined about 2,500 items of CCTV footage andforensic evidence from the scenes of the attacks. The bombs were probably placed on the floors of the trains and bus. Investigators identified four men whom they alleged had been the suicide bombers. This made the bombings the first ever suicide attack in the British Isles.[64]
Vincent Cannistraro, former head of theCentral Intelligence Agency's anti-terrorism centre, toldThe Guardian that "two unexploded bombs" were recovered as well as "mechanical timing devices"; this claim was explicitly rejected by London's Metropolitan Police Service.[65]
West Yorkshire Police raided six properties in the Leeds area on 12 July: two houses in Beeston, two inThornhill, one inHolbeck and one in Alexandra Grove inHyde Park. One man was arrested. Officers also raided a residential property on Northern Road in the Buckinghamshire town ofAylesbury on 13 July.
The police service say a significant amount of explosive material was found in the Leeds raids and acontrolled explosion was carried out at one of the properties. Explosives were also found in the vehicle associated with one of the bombers, Shehzad Tanweer, at Luton railway station and subjected to controlled explosion.[10][66][67][68]
There was speculation about a possible association between the bombers and another alleged Islamist cell inLuton which was ended during August 2004. The Luton group was uncovered afterMuhammad Naeem Noor Khan was arrested inLahore, Pakistan. His laptop computer was said to contain plans for tube attacks in London, as well as attacks on financial buildings in New York City and Washington, D.C. The group was subject to surveillance but on 2 August 2004The New York Times published Khan's name,[citation needed] citing Pakistani sources. The news leak forced police in Britain and Canada to make arrests before their investigations were complete.
When the Luton cell was ended, one of the London bombers, Mohammad Sidique Khan (no known relation), was scrutinised briefly by MI5 who determined that he was not a likely threat and he was not surveilled.[69]
On 22 March 2007, three people were arrested in connection with these bombings. Two were arrested at 1p.m. atManchester Airport, attempting to board a flight bound for Pakistan that afternoon. They were apprehended by undercover officers who had been following the men as part of a surveillance operation. They had not intended to arrest the men that day, but believed they could not risk letting the suspects leave the country. A third man was arrested in the Beeston area of Leeds at an address on the street where one of the suicide bombers had lived before the attacks.[70]
On 9 May 2007, police made four further arrests, three inYorkshire and one inSelly Oak, Birmingham. The widow of the presumed ringleader Mohammed Sidique Khan, was among those arrested for "commissioning, preparing or instigating acts of terrorism".[71]
Three of those arrested, including Khan's widow, were released on 15 May.[71] The fourth, Khalid Khaliq, an unemployed single father of three, was charged on 17 July 2007 with possessing an al-Qaeda training manual, but the charge was not related to the 2005 London attacks. Conviction for possession of a document containing information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism carried a maximum ten-year jail sentence.[72]
Abdullah el-Faisal was deported to Jamaica, his country of origin, from Britain on 25 May 2006 after reaching the parole date in his prison sentence. He was found guilty of three charges of soliciting the murder of Jews, Americans and Hindus and two charges of using threatening words to incite racial hatred in 2003 and, despite an appeal, was sentenced to seven years imprisonment. In 2006John Reid alleged to MPs that el-Faisal had influenced Jamaican-born Briton Germaine Lindsay into participating in the 7/7 bombings.[73][74]
The Guardian reported on 3 May 2007 that police had investigated Mohammad Sidique Khan twice during 2005. The newspaper said it "learned that on 27 January 2005, police took a statement from the manager of a garage in Leeds which had loaned Khan a courtesy car while his vehicle was being repaired." It also said that "on the afternoon of 3 February an officer fromScotland Yard's anti-terrorism branch carried out inquiries with the company which had insured a car in which Khan was seen driving almost a year earlier". Nothing about these inquiries appeared in the report by Parliament's intelligence and security committee after it investigated the 7 July attacks. Scotland Yard described the 2005 inquiries as "routine", while security sources said they were related to the fertiliser bomb plot.[75]
While no warnings before 7 July bombings have been documented officially or acknowledged, the following are sometimes quoted as indications either of the events to come or of some foreknowledge.
One of the London bombers, Mohammad Sidique Khan, was briefly scrutinised by MI5 who determined that he was not a likely threat and he was not put under surveillance.[76]
Some news stories, current a few hours after the attacks, questioned the British government's contention that there had not been any warning or prior intelligence. It was reported byCBS News that a senior Israeli official said that British police told theIsraeli embassy in London minutes before the explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the UK capital. An AP report used by a number of news sites, includingThe Guardian, attributed the initial report of a warning to an Israeli "Foreign Ministry official, speaking on condition of anonymity", but added Foreign MinisterSilvan Shalom's later denial onIsrael Defense Forces Radio: "There was no early information about terrorist attacks." A similar report on the site of right-wing Israeli paperIsrael National News/Arutz Sheva attributed the story to "Army Radio quoting unconfirmed reliable sources."[77] Although the report has been retracted, the original stories are still circulated as a result of their presence on the news websites' archives.
In an interview with the Portuguese newspaperPúblico a month after the2004 Madrid train bombings, Syrian-born clericOmar Bakri Muhammad warned that "a very well-organised" London-based group which he called "al-Qaeda Europe" was "on the verge of launching a big operation."[78] In December 2004, Bakri vowed that, if Western governments did not change their policies, Muslims would give them "a 9/11, day after day after day."[34]
According to a 17 November 2004 post on theNewsweek website, US authorities in 2004 had evidence that terrorists were planning a possible attack in London. In addition, the article stated that, "fears of terror attacks have prompted FBI agents based in theU.S. embassy in London to avoid travelling on London's popular underground railway (or tube) system."[79]
In an interview published by the German magazineBild am Sonntag dated 10 July 2005,Meir Dagan, director of the Israeli intelligence agencyMossad, said that the agency's office in London was alerted to the impending attack at 8:43a.m., six minutes before the first bomb detonated. The warning of a possible attack was a result of an investigation into an earlier terrorist bombing inTel Aviv, which may have been related to the London bombings.[80]
The Daily Telegraph reported that radical imamAnwar al-Awlaki had inspired the bombers.[81] The bombers transcribed lectures of al-Awlaki while plotting the bombings. His materials were found in the possession of accused accomplices of the suicide bombers. Al-Awlaki was killed by a US drone attack in 2011.
In 2006, the government refused to hold a public inquiry, stating that "it would be a ludicrous diversion". Prime MinisterTony Blair said an independent inquiry would "undermine support" for MI5, while the leader of the opposition,David Cameron, said only a full inquiry would "get to the truth".[82] In reaction to revelations about the extent of security service investigations into the bombers prior to the attack, theShadow Home Secretary,David Davis, said: "It is becoming more and more clear that the story presented to the public andParliament is at odds with the facts."[83]
After Cameron became Prime Minister in 2010, an independent coroner's inquest of the bombings began.[84]Lady Justice Hallett was appointed to hear the inquest, which would consider how each victim died and whether MI5, if it had worked better, could have prevented the attack, and also the emergency service response.[85]
After seven months of evidence and deliberation, the verdict of the inquiry was released and read in the Houses of Parliament on 9 May 2011. It determined that the 52 victims had been unlawfully killed; their deaths could not have been prevented, and they would probably have died "whatever time the emergency services reached and rescued them". Hallett concluded that MI5 had not made every possible improvement since the attacks but that it was not "right or fair" to say more attention should have been paid to ringleader Mohammad Sidique Khan prior to 7 July. She also decided that there should be no public inquiry.[86][87]
The report provided nine recommendations to various bodies:[88]
With reference to a photograph of Khan and Shehzad Tanweer which was so badly cropped by MI5 that the pair was virtually unrecognisable to the US authorities asked to review it, the inquiry recommended that procedures be improved so that humans asked to view photographs are shown them in best possible quality.
In relation to the suggestion that MI5 failed to realise the suspects were important quickly enough, the inquiry recommended that MI5 improves the way it records decisions relating to suspect assessment.
The inquiry recommended that 'major incident' training for all frontline staff, especially those working on the Underground, is reviewed.
With regards to the facts that London Underground (LU) is unable to declare a 'major incident' itself and that LU was not invited to an emergency meeting at Scotland Yard at 10:30a.m. on the morning of the bombings, the inquiry recommends that the wayTransport for London (TfL) and the Londonresilience team are alerted to major incidents and the way the emergency services are informed is reviewed.
Regarding the confusion on 7 July 2005 over the emergency rendezvous point, it was recommended that a common initial rendezvous point is permanently staffed and advised to emergency services;
In response to the evidence that some firefighters refused to walk on the tracks at Aldgate to reach the bombed train because they had not received confirmation that the electric current had been switched off, the inquiry recommended a review into how emergency workers confirm whether the current is off after a major incident.
A recommendation was made that TfL reviewed the provision of stretchers andfirst aid equipment at Underground stations.
Training of London Ambulance Service (LAS) staff of "multi-casualty triage" should be reviewed, following concerns in the inquest that some casualties were not actually treated by paramedics who had triaged them.
A final recommendation was made to theDepartment of Health, theMayor of London and the London resilience team to review the capability and funding of emergency medical care in the city.
It was reported in July 2011 that relatives of some of the victims of the bombings may have had their telephones accessed by theNews of the World in the aftermath of the attacks. The revelations added to an existingcontroversy over phone hacking by the tabloid newspaper.
The fathers of two victims, one in the Edgware Road blast and another at Russell Square, told the BBC that police officers investigating the alleged hacking had warned them that their contact details were found on a target list, while a former firefighter who helped injured passengers escape from Edgware Road also said he had been contacted by police who were looking into the hacking allegations.[89] A number of survivors from the bombed trains also revealed that police had warned them their phones may have been accessed and their messages intercepted, and in some cases officers advised them to change security codes andPINs.[90][91][92]
Since the bombings, the United Kingdom and other nations have honoured the victims in several ways. Most of these memorials have included moments of silence, candlelit vigils, and the laying of flowers at the attack sites. Foreign leaders have also remembered the dead by ordering their flags to be flown athalf-mast, signing books of condolences at embassies of the UK, and issuing messages of support and condolences to the British people.
A two-minute silence was held on 14 July 2005 throughout Europe.[94] Thousands attended a vigil at 6p.m. onTrafalgar Square. After an initial silence there was a series of speakers for two hours. A memorial service was held atSt Paul's Cathedral on 1 November 2005.[95] To mark the first anniversary of the attack, a two-minute silence was observed at midday across the country.[96]
Apermanent memorial was unveiled in 2009 byCharles, Prince of Wales inHyde Park to mark the fourth anniversary of the bombings.[97] On the eve of the ninth anniversary of the attacks in 2014 the memorial was defaced with messages including "Blair lied, thousands died". The graffiti was removed within hours.[98]
Flags were ordered to fly at half-mast across Australia, New Zealand[104] and Canada.[105] The Union Flag was raised to half-mast alongside theFlag of Australia onSydney Harbour Bridge as a show of "sympathy between nations".[106]
Mohammed Rehman and Sana Ahmed Khan were sentenced to life imprisonment on 29 December 2015 for preparing an act of terrorism, planning to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the 7/7 attacks.[109] They had 10kg ofurea nitrate. Rehman called himself the 'silent bomber' and asked his Twitter followers to choose betweenWestfield London or theLondon Underground for the planned suicide bomb.[110]
^Wells, Matt (12 September 2005)."Interview with Helen Boaden".The Guardian. London. Retrieved23 April 2014.Some of our competitors talked immediately of 90 dead. They talked about three bus bombs. That was off a range of various wire services and it was complete speculation and we wouldn't go with that. We would be careful – we would try to check things out.
The Jon Gaunt show originally broadcast live at 9:00a.m. on 7 July 2005 onBBC London. First mention of events at approximately 27 minutes into the broadcast.
