The idea behind the 600-ship Navy can be traced back to the Vietnam War. During the war, the armed services rapidly expanded to meet the demands placed on them.
The Soviet Union, which had been supportingNorth Vietnam, began staging their naval vessels from former U.S. ports inSouth Vietnam. Building on this gain, Soviet vessels began to sail in all seven seas with increased vigor and even ventured into theGulf of Mexico.[5] Soviet forces also stepped up infantry, armor, and air force deployments inEastern Europe.
It was against this backdrop in 1980 that the United States began an election year. President Reagan continued this in 1984, releasing a campaign commercial "Bear," which played on the use of the bear as a national symbol ofRussia in order to promote higher vigilance and defense expenditures against the Soviet Union.
The overseas strategic retaliation arm was strengthened and the development of new weaponry like theB-1B bomber, theBradley fighting vehicle, and theAbrams tank was completed and they were put into production.
Lehman attempted to "front-load" the program, by committing the Navy to the building program, but in the end the funds were not available and it fell short.[6][7]
Ships and weapons systems deployed during the plan
The Navy saw the largest benefit of the rebuilding.[8][9] Under theReagan administration, the first of theOhio-classballistic missile submarines were completed. This class was the largest submarine ever built in the U.S. The ship carried 24Trident I nuclear-capable missiles, each one with a 4,000-mile (6,400 km) range. Construction of theNimitz class ofsupercarriers andLos Angeles-classattack submarines were dramatically stepped up. The revolutionary newAegis Combat System was installed on the upcomingTiconderoga-class ships, production of which was also stepped up. Several aircraft carriers were put through Service Life Extension Programs (SLEPs) aimed at keeping them in service longer. TheIowa-class battleships, built in the 1940s, were all recommissioned and refitted withRGM-84 Harpoon,BGM-109 Tomahawk, andPhalanx CIWS system capabilities, plus their armor plating would be more resilient againstanti-ship missiles. The first Harpoons, Tomahawks, andAGM-88 HARM missiles all debuted on the navy's ships. Naval aviation was stepped up with the introduction of theF/A-18 Hornet, along with improved versions of theEA-6 Prowler electronic countermeasure aircraft, theA-6 Intruder, and theF-14 Tomcat. In addition, the nation's strategic retaliatory arm was strengthened with advanced B-1B bombers and deployingPershing IItheater missiles to Europe. The initiative also included deployment of Abrams main battle tanks and Bradley armored fighting vehicles. U.S. Navyunclassified miscellaneous ships,auxiliary ships, andyard ships are not included in the ship count.
Eventually political pressure to reduce the nationalbudget deficit resulted in Congress reversing itself and passing a series of declining defense budgets beginning in 1986.[10][11][7] Weinberger clashed with Congress over the cuts, resigning in late 1987, and was succeeded byFrank Carlucci.[12] Furthermore, concerns were raised about how the expansion of the Navy would reduce attention and resources needed in other scenarios where the Soviets also had to be confronted such as Europe.[13]
Lehman's successor as Navy Secretary,Jim Webb, remained a fierce proponent of the expanded fleet, and disagreed with Carlucci over how to cut the Navy budget in line with other services. Webb resigned rather than endorse Carlucci's cut of 16frigates.[14] As revealed inThe Reagan Diaries, Reagan reflected about Webb's resignation on 22 February 1988: "Present Sec. Webb resigned over budget cuts. I don't think Navy was sorry to see him go."[15][16]
Following thedissolution of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s and the lack of a perceived threat against the United States, several of the Reagan administration's policies and plans, such as the "600-ship Navy", were scaled back or abandoned.[2] U.S. bases across Europe and North America were slowly decommissioned and closed, others were mothballed through theBase Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process.[6] In the Navy, this resulted in the retirement of several older carriers, the decommissioning of all four of theIowa-class battleships and the cancellation of the remainingSeawolf-class submarines.
^Marcus, Alan J. (1 December 1985).Manning the 600-ship Navy(PDF). Naval Planning, Manpower and Logistics Division (Center for Naval Analyses) (Research memorandum). Alexandria, Virginia, United States: Office of Naval Research (Department of the Navy). CRM 85-111.10.Archived(PDF) from the original on February 11, 2022 – via Defense Technical Information Center.
John B. Hattendorf. "The Evolution of the U.S. Navy's Maritime Strategy, 1977–1986" Naval War College Newport Paper 19 (2004),ISBN1-884733-32-8. Available in PDF formathere andhere