Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

600-ship Navy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from600 ship navy)
United States Cold War–era defense plan
The recommissioning ceremony forUSS New Jersey;PresidentRonald Reagan attended andgave the ship's orders.

The600-ship Navy was astrategic plan of theUnited States Navy during the 1980s to rebuild its fleet after cutbacks that followed the end of theVietnam War.[1] The plan, which originated withRepublican leaders, was an important campaignplank ofRonald Reagan in the1980 presidential election, who advocated a larger military and strategic confrontation with theSoviet Union.[2][3]

The number of ships peaked at 594 in 1987, before declining sharply after the end of theCold War in 1989–1992.[4]

The program included:

The idea was supported byJohn F. Lehman, who became Reagan'sSecretary of the Navy, andCaspar Weinberger, Reagan'sSecretary of Defense.

Background

[edit]

The idea behind the 600-ship Navy can be traced back to the Vietnam War. During the war, the armed services rapidly expanded to meet the demands placed on them.

The Soviet Union, which had been supportingNorth Vietnam, began staging their naval vessels from former U.S. ports inSouth Vietnam. Building on this gain, Soviet vessels began to sail in all seven seas with increased vigor and even ventured into theGulf of Mexico.[5] Soviet forces also stepped up infantry, armor, and air force deployments inEastern Europe.

Reagan plan

[edit]

It was against this backdrop in 1980 that the United States began an election year. President Reagan continued this in 1984, releasing a campaign commercial "Bear," which played on the use of the bear as a national symbol ofRussia in order to promote higher vigilance and defense expenditures against the Soviet Union.

The overseas strategic retaliation arm was strengthened and the development of new weaponry like theB-1B bomber, theBradley fighting vehicle, and theAbrams tank was completed and they were put into production.

Lehman attempted to "front-load" the program, by committing the Navy to the building program, but in the end the funds were not available and it fell short.[6][7]

Ships and weapons systems deployed during the plan

[edit]

The Navy saw the largest benefit of the rebuilding.[8][9] Under theReagan administration, the first of theOhio-classballistic missile submarines were completed. This class was the largest submarine ever built in the U.S. The ship carried 24Trident I nuclear-capable missiles, each one with a 4,000-mile (6,400 km) range. Construction of theNimitz class ofsupercarriers andLos Angeles-classattack submarines were dramatically stepped up. The revolutionary newAegis Combat System was installed on the upcomingTiconderoga-class ships, production of which was also stepped up. Several aircraft carriers were put through Service Life Extension Programs (SLEPs) aimed at keeping them in service longer. TheIowa-class battleships, built in the 1940s, were all recommissioned and refitted withRGM-84 Harpoon,BGM-109 Tomahawk, andPhalanx CIWS system capabilities, plus their armor plating would be more resilient againstanti-ship missiles. The first Harpoons, Tomahawks, andAGM-88 HARM missiles all debuted on the navy's ships. Naval aviation was stepped up with the introduction of theF/A-18 Hornet, along with improved versions of theEA-6 Prowler electronic countermeasure aircraft, theA-6 Intruder, and theF-14 Tomcat. In addition, the nation's strategic retaliatory arm was strengthened with advanced B-1B bombers and deployingPershing IItheater missiles to Europe. The initiative also included deployment of Abrams main battle tanks and Bradley armored fighting vehicles. U.S. Navyunclassified miscellaneous ships,auxiliary ships, andyard ships are not included in the ship count.

Build-up by year

[edit]

Aircraft carriers

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Nimitz class22333344455
USS Enterprise (CVN-65)11111111111
Kitty Hawk class44444444444
Forrestal class44444444444
Midway class22222222222
Essex class11111111111
TotalShips1414151515151616161717

Battleships

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Iowa class00012233444
TotalShips00012233444

Cruisers

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Ticonderoga class00012359111516
Virginia class44444444444
California class22222222222
USS Truxtun (CGN-35)11111111111
Belknap class99999999999
Leahy class99999999999
Long Beach class11111111111
TotalShips2626262728293135374142

Destroyers

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Kidd class03444444444
Spruance class3030303131313131313131
Charles F. Adams class2323232323232323232010
Farragut class10101010101010101087
Forrest Sherman class1818711111000
Gearing class147200000000
TotalShips9591766969696969686352

Frigates

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Oliver Hazard Perry class817263745505254545555
Knox class4646464646464646464646
Brooke class66666666100
Garcia class1111111111111111510
Bronstein class22222222222
TotalShips738291102110115117119108104103
Years19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Total major combatants active208213208214224230236242232229218

Amphibious assault ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Wasp class00000000011
Tarawa class55555555555
Iwo Jima class77777777777
TotalShips1212121212121212121313

Dock landing ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Whidbey Island class00000123345
Anchorage class55555555555
Thomaston class88864333310
Casa Grande class11111111100
TotalShips1414141210101112121010

Amphibious transport dock

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Austin class1212121212121212121212
Raleigh class33333333333
TotalShips1515151515151515151515

Amphibious cargo ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Charleston class55555555555
USS Tulare (AKA-112)11111100000
TotalShips66666655555

Tank landing ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Newport class2020202020202020202020
General Frank S. Besson class00000002444
TotalShips2020202020202022242424
Years19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Total amphibious active6767676563636366686767

Command Ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Blue Ridge class22222222222
TotalShips22222222222

Hospital ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Mercy class00000012222
TotalShips00000012222

Minesweeper

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Avenger class00000001133
Aggressive class1919191919191919191814
TotalShips1919191919191920202117

Patrol ships

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Pegasus class11266666666
Asheville class99996664444
TotalShips1010111512121210101010

Replenishment oiler

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Henry J. Kaiser class00000014689
Cimarron class03455555555
Wichita class77777777777
TotalShips710111212121316182021

Tanker

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
USNS Lawrence H. Gianella (T-AOT-1125)00000011111
SS class12222223333
TotalShips12222234444

Ammunition ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Kilauea class88888888888
Nitro class33333333333
TotalShips1111111111111111111111

Combat stores ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Mars class77777777777
Sirius class02233333333
TotalShips7991010101010101010

Fast combat support ships

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Sacramento class44444444444
TotalShips44444444444

Roll-on/roll-off

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Algol class00008888888
Cape Island class44444444444
Cape Ducato class00000555555
Cape Ducato class00000033333
TotalShips7991010101010101010

Destroyer tender

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Yellowstone class12344444444
Samuel Gompers class22222222222
Shenandoah class11000000000
TotalShips45566666666

Submarine tender

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Emory S. Land class23333333333
USS L. Y. Spear (AS-36)11111111111
TotalShips34444444444

Crane ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Keystone State class00002235577
Gopher State class11112233333
TotalShips1111446881010

Heavy-lift ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
American Cormorant[1]00000111111
TotalShips00000111111

Cable ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
USNS Zeus (T-ARC-7)00001111111
TotalShips00001111111

Rescue and salvage ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Safeguard class00011244444
Pigeon class22222222222
Bolster class66666666666
TotalShips88899101212121212

Tracking ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
USNS Observation Island (T-AGM-23)11111111111
USSRange Sentinel (AGM-22)11111111111
USNSVanguard (T-AG-194)11111111111
TotalShips33333333333

Ocean surveillance ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Stalwart class000037911131718
TotalShips000037911131718

Oceanographic research ship

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
USNS Hayes (T-AGOR-16)11111111111
TotalShips11111111111
Years19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Total auxiliary active8898100109113119128136140149147
Years19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Total surface active363378375388400412427444440445432

Attack submarines

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Los Angeles class1016202529333537394244
Sturgeon class3737373737373737373737
Permit class131313131313131312108
Skipjack class55555544330
Barbel class33333333210
Skate class44443322100
USS Seawolf (SSN-575)11111100000
USS Darter (SS-576)11111111110
Tang class33322210000
TotalSubs7783879194989697959489

Ballistic missile submarines

Class of shipsImage19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Ohio class0123568891011
Benjamin Franklin class1212121212121212121212
James Madison class10101010101099988
Lafayette class99999988863
Ethan Allen class55533222222
George Washington class54321000000
TotalSubs4141413940393939403836
Years19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Total submarines active118124128130134137135136135132125
Years19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Total active fleet481502503518534549562580575577557

End of the plan

[edit]

Eventually political pressure to reduce the nationalbudget deficit resulted in Congress reversing itself and passing a series of declining defense budgets beginning in 1986.[10][11][7] Weinberger clashed with Congress over the cuts, resigning in late 1987, and was succeeded byFrank Carlucci.[12] Furthermore, concerns were raised about how the expansion of the Navy would reduce attention and resources needed in other scenarios where the Soviets also had to be confronted such as Europe.[13]

Lehman's successor as Navy Secretary,Jim Webb, remained a fierce proponent of the expanded fleet, and disagreed with Carlucci over how to cut the Navy budget in line with other services. Webb resigned rather than endorse Carlucci's cut of 16frigates.[14] As revealed inThe Reagan Diaries, Reagan reflected about Webb's resignation on 22 February 1988: "Present Sec. Webb resigned over budget cuts. I don't think Navy was sorry to see him go."[15][16]

Following thedissolution of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s and the lack of a perceived threat against the United States, several of the Reagan administration's policies and plans, such as the "600-ship Navy", were scaled back or abandoned.[2] U.S. bases across Europe and North America were slowly decommissioned and closed, others were mothballed through theBase Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process.[6] In the Navy, this resulted in the retirement of several older carriers, the decommissioning of all four of theIowa-class battleships and the cancellation of the remainingSeawolf-class submarines.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Hattendorf, John B. Kelleher, Catherine McArdle; Boyer, Pelham G.; Goodrich, Patricia A. (eds.).The Evolution of the U.S. Navy's Maritime Strategy, 1977-1986(PDF). Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (Center for Naval Warfare Studies) (Essay). Naval War College Newport Papers. Vol. 19. Newport, Rhode Island, United States:Naval War College.ISBN 1-884733-32-8.ISSN 1544-6824. OMB No. 0704-0188. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 27 March 2009.
  2. ^abDaniel, Donald C.F. (1 January 1991). Rhode, Benjamin (ed.)."Beyond the 600-Ship Navy: Introduction".The Adelphi Papers.31 (261). London, United Kingdom:International Institute for Strategic Studies/Taylor & Francis:3–4.doi:10.1080/05679329108457607.ISSN 1944-5571.Archived from the original on 11 February 2022. Retrieved11 February 2022.
  3. ^Armstrong, C.E.; Bottoms, Albert M. (22 June 1989). Uhlig Jr., Frank (ed.)."Command of the Seas: Building the 600 Ship Navy"(PDF).Naval War College Review.42 (3). New Port, Rhode Island, United States:Naval War College:118–122.ISSN 0028-1484.LCCN 75617787.OCLC 01779130.Archived from the original on 12 June 2021. Retrieved11 February 2022.
  4. ^"US Ship Force Levels 1886-present".Naval History and Heritage Command.Archived from the original on 5 November 2016. Retrieved2 November 2016.
  5. ^"AROUND THE NATION; Soviet Naval Vessels Found in Gulf of Mexico".The New York Times.Associated Press. 5 October 1981. p. A16.ISSN 0362-4331.OCLC 1645522.Archived from the original on 25 February 2010. Retrieved4 February 2017.
  6. ^abSpinney, Chuck (6 December 2012).Stengel, Richard (ed.)."Business as Usual Inside Obama's Pentagon".Time. Battleland: Military intelligence for the rest of us (Military Spending). New York City, New York, United States.ISSN 0040-781X.OCLC 1311479. Archived fromthe original on 4 March 2016.
  7. ^abCharles, Daniel (3 April 1987).Kohsland Jr., Daniel E. (ed.)."The Navy After Lehman: Rough Sailing Ahead?: Navy Secretary John Lehman presided over a major buildup of the fleet but critics charge that there may not be enough money to equip and operate all those new ships; dissent did not flourish in Lehman's Navy".Science.236 (4797). Washington, D.C.:American Association for the Advancement of Science:22–25.doi:10.1126/science.236.4797.22.ISSN 0036-8075.JSTOR 00368075.LCCN 17024346.OCLC 1644869.PMID 17759195.Archived from the original on 11 February 2022. Retrieved11 February 2022.
  8. ^Marcus, Alan J. (1 December 1985).Manning the 600-ship Navy(PDF). Naval Planning, Manpower and Logistics Division (Center for Naval Analyses) (Research memorandum). Alexandria, Virginia, United States: Office of Naval Research (Department of the Navy). CRM 85-111.10.Archived(PDF) from the original on February 11, 2022 – via Defense Technical Information Center.
  9. ^Angier, Bruce N. (1 December 1984).Manning the 600-Ship Navy: Analysis of Force Structure and Compensation Options for Navy Program Planning(PDF). Naval Planning, Manpower and Logistics Division (Center for Naval Analyses) (Research memorandum). Alexandria, Virginia, United States: Office of Naval Research (Department of the Navy). CRM 85-23.Archived(PDF) from the original on February 11, 2022 – via Defense Technical Information Center.
  10. ^Tarpgaard, Peter T. (1 March 1982).Building a 600-ship Navy: Costs, Timing, and Alternative Approaches.Congressional Budget Office (Congressional study).Washington, D.C.:United States Congress.Archived from the original on 27 April 2024. Retrieved15 February 2022 – viaGoogle Books.
  11. ^Tarpgaard, Peter T.; Mechanic, Robert E. (1 September 1985).Future Budget Requirements for the 600-Ship Navy(PDF).Congressional Budget Office (Congressional study).Washington, D.C.:United States Congress. OMB No. 0704-0188.Archived(PDF) from the original on February 11, 2022 – via Defense Technical Information Center.
  12. ^Church, George J. (20 June 1988). Muller, Henry (ed.)."Bringing The Pentagon to Heel".Time. New York City, New York, United States.ISSN 0040-781X.OCLC 1311479.Archived from the original on 27 December 2007.
  13. ^Mearsheimer, John J. (22 September 1986)."A Strategic Misstep: The Maritime Strategy and Deterrence in Europe".International Security.11 (2). Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States:Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs/MIT Press:3–57.doi:10.2307/2538957.ISSN 1531-4804.JSTOR 2538957.OCLC 44911437.S2CID 153456004.Archived from the original on 11 February 2022. Retrieved11 February 2022.
  14. ^Muller, Henry, ed. (7 March 1988)."The Navy: The Secretary Jumps Ship".Time. New York City, New York, United States.ISSN 0040-781X.OCLC 1311479. Archived fromthe original on 27 December 2007.
  15. ^Reagan, Ronald (2009)."Chapter Eight: 1988—1989". InBrinkley, Douglas (ed.).The Reagan Diaries. New York City, New York, United States:HarperCollins.ISBN 9780061751943.OCLC 85850929.Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved2022-02-11 – viaGoogle Books.
  16. ^Antle III, W. James (3 April 2015).Reddy, T. Venkattram (ed.)."The outsider who could beat Hillary". Oped.The Asian Age. Vol. 22, no. 46. New Delhi, India: Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. p. 7.Archived from the original on 11 February 2022. Retrieved11 February 2022 – viaPressReader.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=600-ship_Navy&oldid=1310563302"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp