Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

2024 Colorado Proposition 129

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2024 referendum
Proposition 129

November 5, 2024
Establishing Veterinary Professional Associates
Results
Choice
Votes%
Yes1,572,54552.76%
No1,407,81447.24%
Total votes2,980,359100.00%

For

  60–70%
  50–60%

Against

  60–70%
  50–60%

Elections in Colorado
Presidential elections
Presidential caucuses and primaries
Democratic
2000
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
U.S. House of Representatives elections
Local elections
Mayoral elections

2024 Colorado Proposition 129 was a successful ballot measure that appeared before voters inColorado during the2024 general election. The proposition will create a new state license for the position of veterinary professional associate. This will be a newveterinary position in between veterinarians and veterinary technician specialist.[1]

Background

[edit]

Prior to the passage of Proposition 129, Colorado had three mainveterinary positions: veterinarians, veterinary technicians, and veterinary technician specialists. All of these positions are regulated by the Colorado Board of Veterinary Medicine. Veterinary technicians must have an associate's degree and can assist veterinarians and provide treatment for minor conditions. Veterinary technician specialists must have an associate's degree in addition to at least three years of clinical training and can perform all of the responsibilities of a veterinary technician in addition to performing emergency medical and surgical assistance. Finally, veterinarians must have a doctoral degree and can perform all levels of veterinary care. The new position of veterinary professional associate created by Proposition 129 requires a master's degree and is able to perform many tasks technicians specialists are not allowed to, such as routine surgeries.

Proposition 129 was referred to the ballot via citizen petition. The group All Pets Deserve Care circulated petitions, funded mostly by theDumb Friends League. The petition began in response to a veterinarian shortage within Colorado. The new position of veterinary professional associate requires a master's degree in veterinary clinical care. This degree was not offered by any universities in Colorado at the time of the measure's passage, thoughColorado State University does have plans for its implementation.[2]

Contents

[edit]

The proposition appeared on the ballot as follows:[3]

Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes creating a new veterinary professional associate profession, and, in connection therewith, establishing qualifications including a master's degree in veterinary clinical care or the equivalent as determined by the state board of veterinary medicine to be a veterinary professional associate; requiring registration with the state board; allowing a registered veterinary professional associate to practice veterinary medicine under the supervision of a licensed veterinarian; and making it a misdemeanor to practice as a veterinary professional associate without an active registration?

Campaigns

[edit]

Support

[edit]

Support of Proposition 129 was led by the organization All Pets Deserve Vet Care. Colorado's official voter guide offered the arguments in favor of the ballot measure that creating the new veterinary professional associate position would create new career opportunities for those in the veterinary field and provide greater access to veterinary care, particularly in rural and agricultural communities.

'Yes'[4]
State officials
State senators
State representatives
  • Ryan Armagost, state representative from the 64th district (2023-2025)
Newspapers
Organizations

Opposition

[edit]

Opposition to Proposition 129 was led by the organization Keep Our Pets Safe.[5] The state's official voter guide offered the arguments against the measure that the requirements laid out by Proposition 129 are vauge and unclear, there are currently no academic programs offered for veterinary professional associates in Colorado universities, and it would increase risk for animals.

'No'[6]
State representatives
  • Karen McCormick, state representative from the 11th district (2021-present)
  • Brianna Titone, state representative from the 27th district (2019-present)
Newspapers
Organizations

Results

[edit]

Proposition 129 required a simple majority to pass. It did so with roughly 53% voting in favor of the measure.[7]

Proposition 129
ChoiceVotes%
Referendum passedYes1,572,54552.76
No1,407,81447.24
Total votes2,980,359100.00

Results by county

[edit]
CountyForAgainstMarginTotal votes cast
#%#%#%
Adams111,84052.12%102,73347.88%9,1074.24%214,573
Alamosa3,66751.73%3,42248.27%2453.46%7,089
Arapahoe163,99754.29%138,06945.71%25,9288.58%302,066
Archuleta4,41651.09%4,22748.91%1892.19%8,643
Baca57330.25%1,32169.75%-748-39.49%1,894
Bent1,02649.11%1,06350.89%-37-1.77%2,089
Boulder86,53247.99%93,79552.01%-7,263-4.03%180,327
Broomfield23,25053.45%20,25146.55%2,9996.89%43,501
Chaffee7,16252.91%6,37547.09%7875.81%13,537
Cheyenne36936.53%64163.47%-272-26.93%1,010
Clear Creek2,90951.31%2,76048.69%1492.63%5,669
Conejos1,76445.44%2,11854.56%-354-9.12%3,882
Costilla1,11458.69%78441.31%33017.39%1,898
Crowley84451.15%80648.85%382.30%1,650
Custer1,99354.13%1,68945.87%3048.26%3,682
Delta9,74752.42%8,84847.58%8994.83%18,595
Denver190,93657.02%143,90942.98%47,02714.04%334,845
Dolores67851.72%63348.28%453.43%1,311
Douglas125,97255.05%102,88044.95%23,09210.09%228,852
Eagle14,10555.29%11,40844.71%2,69710.57%25,513
El Paso196,50854.55%163,72845.45%32,7809.10%360,236
Elbert8,63543.95%11,01356.05%-2,378-12.10%19,648
Fremont12,97253.60%11,22946.40%1,7437.20%24,201
Garfield14,60051.30%13,85848.70%7422.61%28,458
Gilpin1,88748.38%2,01351.62%-126-3.23%3,900
Grand4,38647.03%4,93952.97%-553-5.93%9,325
Gunnison4,89948.51%5,20051.49%-301-2.98%10,099
Hinsdale30954.88%25445.12%559.77%563
Huerfano2,50559.69%1,69240.31%81319.37%4,197
Jackson30538.90%47961.10%-174-22.19%784
Jefferson178,20952.44%161,59847.56%16,6114.89%339,807
Kiowa29636.77%50963.23%-213-26.46%805
Kit Carson1,21934.67%2,29765.33%-1,078-30.66%3,516
La Plata15,99348.74%16,81751.26%-824-2.51%32,810
Lake1,92053.10%1,69646.90%2246.19%3,616
Larimer108,02151.29%102,59348.71%5,4282.58%210,614
Las Animas3,86952.64%3,48147.36%3885.28%7,350
Lincoln98939.90%1,49060.10%-501-20.21%2,479
Logan4,49346.55%5,15953.45%-666-6.90%9,652
Mesa40,97347.49%45,30652.51%-4,333-5.02%86,279
Mineral30543.26%40056.74%-95-13.48%705
Moffat2,58641.47%3,65058.53%-1,064-17.06%6,236
Montezuma7,67753.96%6,54946.04%1,1287.93%14,226
Montrose11,45547.62%12,60152.38%-1,146-4.76%24,056
Morgan5,72044.54%7,12355.46%-1,403-10.92%12,843
Otero4,46752.11%4,10647.89%3614.21%8,573
Ouray2,15356.17%1,68043.83%47312.34%3,833
Park5,51047.80%6,01752.20%-507-4.40%11,527
Phillips79736.95%1,36063.05%-563-26.10%2,157
Pitkin6,84668.56%3,13931.44%3,70737.13%9,985
Prowers2,15944.32%2,71255.68%-553-11.35%4,871
Pueblo49,16360.63%31,92739.37%17,23621.26%81,090
Rio Blanco1,34838.51%2,15261.49%-804-22.97%3,500
Rio Grande2,60343.81%3,33856.19%-735-12.37%5,941
Routt7,64549.56%7,78050.44%-135-0.88%15,425
Saguache1,61952.06%1,49147.94%1284.12%3,110
San Juan28253.31%24746.69%356.62%529
San Miguel2,64962.02%1,62237.98%1,02724.05%4,271
Sedgwick61949.68%62750.32%-8-0.64%1,246
Summit8,65753.85%7,41946.15%1,2387.70%16,076
Teller7,88550.64%7,68549.36%2001.28%15,570
Washington1,05739.19%1,64060.81%-583-21.62%2,697
Weld81,92948.63%86,53151.37%-4,602-2.73%168,460
Yuma1,53234.30%2,93565.70%-1,403-31.41%4,467
Total1,572,54552.76%1,407,81447.24%164,7315.53%2,980,359

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Jenny Brundin (October 1, 2024)."Proposition 129: Establish position of Veterinary Professional Associates, explained".Colorado Public Radio. RetrievedOctober 21, 2024.
  2. ^Kevin Simpson (October 4, 2024)."Proposition 129: Should Colorado establish a veterinary professional associate position?".Colorado Sun. RetrievedOctober 21, 2024.
  3. ^"2024 State Ballot Information Booklet"(PDF).Colorado General Assembly. September 11, 2024. RetrievedOctober 17, 2024.
  4. ^"Endorsements". All Pets Deserve Vet Care. RetrievedOctober 19, 2024.
  5. ^Jena Griswold."Amendments and Propositions on the 2024 Ballot".Colorado Secretary of State. RetrievedOctober 19, 2024.
  6. ^"Opposition to Proposition 129". Keep Our Pets Safe. RetrievedOctober 19, 2024.
  7. ^"Results".Colorado Secretary of State. RetrievedDecember 3, 2024.
U.S.
President
U.S.
Senate
U.S.
House

(election
ratings
)
Governors
Lieutenant
governors
Attorneys
general
Secretaries
of state
State
treasurers
State
auditors
Judicial
Other
statewide
elections
State
legislative
Mayors
Local
States and
territories
Ballot
measures
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Colorado_Proposition_129&oldid=1308309665"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp