Members of thefar-right and a number of mainstreamconservatives, mostly in the United States, have used the term "groomer" to falsely accuse LGBTQ people, as well as their allies andprogressives in general, of systematically using LGBTQ sex education and campaigns for LGBTQ rights as a method ofchild grooming and enablingpedophilia. Usage of this term increased in the 2020s.[16] In the United States, the popularization of the term was linked toChristopher Rufo andJames A. Lindsay in August 2021.[17][18] Following theWi Spa controversy in July 2021,Julia Serano said a rise in false accusations of grooming directed towards transgender people was a movement to "lay the foundation for just smearing all trans people aschild sexual predators".[19] Teachers and parents have also been accused of being or enabling groomers.[20][21][22]
The conspiracy theory moved into the American conservative mainstream in spring 2022, including its use by members of theRepublican Party,[23][20]the Heritage Foundation,[24] andfar-right extremists and conspiracy theorists.[25] This has been described as a moral panic and a smear.[26][27][24] In April 2022, the left-leaning mediawatchdogMedia Matters published a study stating that within a three-week period spanning from March 17 to April 6,Fox News ran 170 segments on trans people, throughout which the network "repeatedly invoked the long-debunked myth that trans people pose a threat to minors and seek to groom them".[28]
In July 2022, a wave of anti-LGBTQ curriculum resurgence saw ten such laws beginning to take effect in six different states: Florida, Indiana, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Alabama. Some states enacting these new laws appear to have mirrored similar laws from other states.[29]
InFlorida, theParental Rights in Education law andFlorida Board of Education policy bans education on "sexual orientation" or "gender identity" unless it is mandated under state academic standards or as part of an optional reproductive health course or lesson.[30][31][32] In August 2023, the state of Florida droppedAP Psychology as a course offering, due to a required section on sexual orientation and gender identity.[33] The same month,Tampa-area schools announced they would restrict the teaching ofWilliam Shakespeare's works in order to comply with the Parental Rights in Education law.[34][35]
Alabama bans LGBTQ topics for kindergarten to grade 5, except for instruction deemed "age or developmentally appropriate".[36][37] Five other states (Montana,Arizona,Arkansas,Tennessee and Florida) require parental notification of instruction on LGBTQ issues and allows parents to opt-out of such instruction.[38]
InCalifornia (wherestate law requires students to learn about the "role and contributions" of LGBTQ people in history), multiple protests against the inclusion of LGBTQ-friendly curriculum resulted in violence.[39][40] At a June 2023 protest inGlendale, individuals seen protesting LGBTQ curriculum were identified as members ofhate groups, such as theProud Boys.[41]
Policies regarding trans students
Local K-12 school boards across the country have adopted a variety of policies regarding trans students, including allowing fully equal rights and non-discrimination for trans students; requiring trans students to submit to a criminal background check to be allowed to use the bathroom consistent with their gender identity; implementing full bans on expressing one's self-declared gender at all, including bans on chosen pronouns and pride flags and even bans on mentioning the very existence of trans people.[42][43][44][45] State and local officials in the South used indecency and obscenity laws to ban books from school libraries.[46]
Rollback of discrimination protections
In June 2021, theBiden administration reinforced thatTitle IX protected LGBTQ students from discrimination by including sexual orientation and gender identity in its list of protections.[47]
In August 2021, Tennessee and nineteen other states sued the Department of Education inTennessee v. Department of Education, alleging that the new Title IX governance constitutes government overreach.[48] A preliminary injunction was granted by a Tennessee judge in July 2022, blocking enforcement of the new guidance.[49][50] In December 2022, the Department of Education appealed the decision, which is still pending.[51]
The new guidance was rejected by theFlorida Department of Education, calling the guidance a "sexual ideology" that risks the "health, safety, and welfare of Florida students".[52][53]
Anti-trans laws (pre-2025)
Gender transition
Students inDes Moines protesting an anti-trans law signed by Republican GovernorKim Reynolds in 2022
ManyRepublican legislators across the country are increasingly proposing legislation that would restrict gender-affirming care for adults or make such treatments harder to access. However, unlike for minors, no states have fully banned gender-affirming care for adults. Efforts to restrict adults' access to healthcare rely heavily on claims from self-described "gender-critical" organizations such asGenspect that young people should not be recognized as adults until they turn 25.[55][56][57]
As of January 2024, seven states limit access to gender-affirming care for adults in some way without banning it, such as allowing private health plans, Medicaid, and correctional facilities to exclude all coverage for gender-affirming care, prohibiting the use of federal funds for gender-affirming care or requiring informed consent practices beyond those typically required in medical practice.[58][needs update?]
In January 2024, some Republican legislators in Ohio and Michigan expressed their desire to ban gender-affirming healthcare altogether, saying their 'endgame' was to ban it completely for people of all ages.[59][60]
In July 2025,Puerto Rico became the first place in the United States to pass a ban on gender-affirming care for people over 18, banning it for anyone under 21 years of age. Puerto Rico's LGBTQ+ Federation immediately announced plans to challenge the ban in court.[61][62]
These states have policies making it easier for trans adults to sue their doctors:
Utah: In January 2023, Utah stripped liability protections from any doctor who treats a trans person under the age of 25, and allowing any trans person under 25 to retroactively "disaffirm" consent and sue the doctor for providing care they had at the time consented to.[63][64][65][66]
South Dakota: In February 2023, South Dakota passed a similar law as Utah's, but without any age limit.[67]
Arkansas: On March 13, 2023, GovernorSarah Huckabee Sanders signed a bill giving adults 15 years to file malpractice lawsuits for gender-affirming care they received as minors, whereas for other types of care (under pre-existing law) a malpractice lawsuit must generally be filed within two years.[68]
These states have policies that restrict treatment for trans adults, as well as younger people:
Florida: In August 2022, the state of Florida voted to require any trans adult seeking gender affirming healthcare to receive approval from the Florida Board of Medicine at least 24 hours in advance.[69] On May 17, 2023, DeSantis signed a law[70] banning insurance providers from covering gender-affirming care for adults, as well as banning nurse practitioners and physicians' assistants (estimated to make up 80% of gender affirming care providers) from administering it, and banning it from being offered via telehealth. The Florida state legislature had passed the bill the previous month.[71][72] In June 2024, a judge permanently blocked the law from taking effect.[73] In August 2024, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the permanent injunction while the matter is appealed.[74]
Missouri: In April 2023, the state attorney general issued an emergency order instituting a three-year waiting period of continuous documented dysphoria before qualifying for gender-affirming care, disqualifying people if they have untreateddepression oranxiety, mandates a screening forautism, and mandating regular screenings for "social contagion".[75][76][77] This has been characterized by many as a de facto ban on trans healthcare for adults, since depression and anxiety are common symptoms of gender dysphoria.[78][79][80] A judge temporarily blocked enforcement of the order and scheduled a hearing for May 11.[81] The attorney general withdrew this order on May 16 after the state legislature passed two bills restricting gender-affirming care for trans youth.[82][83] On June 7, 2023, Governor Mike Parson signed a bill that contained a provision banning gender-affirming care for prisoners, which took effect on August 28.
Puerto Rico: In July, 2025, Puerto Rico implemented a ban on gender affirming care for anyone under 21 years of age. Puerto Rico's LGBTQ+ Federation immediately announced plans to challenge the ban in court.[61][62]
Treatment for minors
Gender-affirming care for minors has been available in the U.S. for more than a decade and is endorsed by major medical associations, but it has increasingly come under attack in many conservative legislatures.[84] According to the ACLU, in 2023 alone, over 500 anti-LGBTQ bills were submitted in the US, over 130 of which were about healthcare.[85] Efforts to prohibit gender-affirming care for minors had begun several years earlier, but did not receive much attention from state legislatures until more recently.[86] The conservative organizationDo No Harm was influential in developing model legislation that appeared starting in 2022 in Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, and West Virginia legislatures.[87][88]
In February 2024, theAmerican Psychological Association approved a policy statement supporting unobstructed access to health care and evidence-based clinical care for transgender, gender-diverse, and nonbinary children, adolescents, and adults, as well as opposing state bans and policies intended to limit access to such care.[89][90]
As of June 2025, 27 states had enacted some form of ban on gender-affirming care for minors, 19 of which were enacted in 2023.[91][92][93] However, 16 of these bans are being challenged in court as of January 2024.[58] Furthermore, only 21 of the 27 states have complete bans which are fully in effect. Four states have only partial bans and two are currently blocked from taking effect. While some states have banned all forms of medical transition, others such as Arizona, Nebraska and Georgia have banned only specific types such as hormone therapy or surgery. Seven states have exceptions which allow minors who were already receiving gender affirming care prior to the ban to continue their treatments.[58] Currently, all 27 states make exceptions for puberty blockers, hormones and surgery for cisgender and intersex children.[58] Only one state, West Virginia, makes exceptions in cases of "severe dysphoria". There is also currently only one state, Missouri, that has a ban which is set to expire after a certain period of time. Nearly all states with restrictions include specific provisions with penalties for providers and 4 states include provisions directed at parents or guardians.[58] An additional 4 states include laws/policies that impact school officials such as teachers and counselors, among others.[58]
Many Democratic states have gone in the opposite direction and enacted laws protecting access to gender affirming care for minors and adults. These laws, often called "shield" laws, often explicitly combine protections for gender-affirming care and abortion and cover a variety of protections including protecting both providers and patients from being punished, mandating insurance providers to cover the procedures and acting as "sanctuary states" that protect patients traveling to the state from other states that have banned such treatments among other things.[94] As of June 2025, 17 states and the District of Columbia have enacted "shield" laws.
Of the approximately 1.6 million Americans who are transgender, about 300,000 are under the age of 18.[95] As of October 2023, approximately 105,200 transgender youth aged 13 to 17 lived in states where gender affirming care is banned for minors. However, around 26,000 of those youth are currently still able to access care in their state due to court orders that prohibit enforcement of the laws. Conversely, around 146,700 transgender youth live in states that have passed gender-affirming care "shield" laws that support access to care by protecting doctors and parents who prescribe or seek access to medical care for youth.[92] An analysis fromKFF in late January 2024 estimated that 38% of trans youth between the ages of 13–17 in the United States lived in states with laws limiting youth access to gender-affirming care.[58]
Bans on gender-affirming care have been criticized as governments interfering with the patient-doctor relationship and taking away healthcare decisions from parents and families for their children.[96][97] State level bans on gender-affirming care in the United States have led some families with transgender children to move out of their states.[98][99][100]
On October 17, 2024, Texas attorney generalKen Paxton filed suit against a doctor who allegedly provided gender-affirming care to 21 minors after the treatments had been banned for minors in Texas, the first time that such a suit has been brought in the U.S.[101]
Bans for minors
Laws which are currently unenforceable due to a court injunction
Laws which only partially ban gender affirming care for minors
Bans of gender-affirming healthcare for people under 18
On April 6, 2021, the legislature—overriding GovernorAsa Hutchinson's veto ona bill that banned puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery for minors and from referring them to other providers.[86] However, courts temporarily[102] and then permanently blocked the law.[103]
In February 2022, the state Attorney General ordered a ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth, with criminal penalties for failing to report suspected violations.[104][105] However, the order is currently blocked by injunction.[106]
In June 2023, the governor signed a law to ban this care for minors.[107] On August 25, 2023, a district court judge blocked the law from taking effect. In response, the Attorney General's office filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court, a move that automatically pauses the judge's injunction and allowed the law to go into effect on September 1, 2023, as originally planned.[108] On June 28, 2024, the Texas Supreme Court upheld the law.[109]
It is a felony for a medical provider to give gender-affirming healthcare to transgender people under 19 (the age of majority in Alabama). In May 2022, a federal judge ruled that the ban on surgery was enforceable. However, the ban on puberty blockers and hormones was not enforceable while the law is challenged in court.[112] In August 2023, the11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, allowing the ban on puberty blockers and hormones to take effect.[113]
The state board of medicine rule took effect on March 16, 2023.[121][122] Additionally, on May 17, 2023, Governor DeSantis signeda ban into law, and it took effect immediately. It applies only to new patients, not those who were already receiving gender-affirming care.[123] However, on June 6, 2023, a court temporarily blocked enforcement of both the board rule and the law.[124] In June 2024, a judge permanently blocked the law from taking effect.[73] In August 2024, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the permanent injunction while the matter is appealed.[74]
Bans hormones and surgery while continuing to allow puberty blockers. Minors who began hormones prior to July 1, 2023, are allowed to continue treatment.[127][128]
The bill made exceptions for minors who have received parental consent and are diagnosed with "severe gender dysphoria" by two doctors. Due to this exception, experts did not expect the ban to have much of an impact.[130] In May 2025, GovernorPatrick Morrisey signed a bill ending this exception.[131]
The legislature overrode GovernorAndy Beshear's veto, banning gender-affirming healthcare for trans minors.[132] Federal appeals judges allowed the ban to remain in effect during legal challenges to overturn it.[133][134]
Bans gender-affirming surgery for minors, but not hormones and puberty blockers. The bill also makes some exceptions, including in the case of someone born intersex.[135][136] In mid 2023, a new Governor,Katie Hobbs reversed course by signing a series of executive orders which include shield-style protections for gender-affirming care, ensuring that it remains legal in Arizona. It also bans conversion therapy, requires insurance plans to cover gender-affirming care and bars state agencies from cooperating with civil and criminal cases in states where gender-affirming health care is illegal.[137]
It would also make it a felony for any medical practitioner to help a minor seek gender-affirming treatment. On December 27, 2023, a federal judge blocked the law from taking effect.[140] On April 15, 2024, theUS Supreme Court responded to an emergency request filed in February by temporarily allowing the ban to go into effect while further legal challenges to it play out in the lower courts. The ruling did not resolve the underlying legal challenges raised by the case nor did the justices rule on the larger issue of bans on gender-affirming treatment for minors. The ruling also does not apply to the two plaintiffs in the lawsuit.[141][142]
On June 16, 2023, a federal judge temporarily blocked the law from taking effect.[144] On February 27, 2024, the7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision allowing the ban to take effect.[145]
On April 20, 2023, North Dakota GovernorDoug Burgum signed a law criminalizing trans health care for minors. However, the law notably makes exceptions for medication treatment for "rare circumstances with parental consent". The law also allows medication treatment for early onset puberty and minors who were already receiving gender-affirming care will still be able to receive treatment.[146]
On September 27, 2023, a Montana District Court judge prevented it from taking effect.[148] On December 11, 2024, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision, suggesting the ban is likely unconstitutional, and sent it back to the district court for trial. If the ban does take effect, some treatments would remain legal for minors who are not suffering from gender dysphoria.[149]
Ban on gender-affirming care, such as hormones, puberty blockers, and surgery, for minors. The ban only applies to transgender children and still allows such treatments for intersex and cisgender children. The ban also only applies to new patients. Transgender children who started treatment prior to August 1, 2023, will be allowed to continue receiving treatment.[150] GovernorRoy Cooper vetoed the bill on July 5, 2023,[151] but the state legislature overruled his veto on August 17, therefore making the bill law.[152]
People receiving puberty blockers or hormones before the ban went into effect may continue taking them. Otherwise, blockers and hormones are banned until 2027. Surgery is also banned.
On May 1, 2023, GovernorKevin Stitt signed a bill that makes it a felony for doctors to provide gender-transition medical care for anyone under the age of 18.[153] In October 2023, a judge declined to stop the law from taking effect.[154]
On October 2, 2023, the state Department of Health and Human Services announced that Republican GovernorJim Pillen had approved emergency regulations banning gender affirming surgeries for minors. Puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors still remain legal, however applicants must now wait seven days and undergo at least 40 hours of "clinically neutral" therapy before starting them. The new regulations went into effect immediately.[155]
On January 5, 2024, GovernorMike DeWine signed an executive order banning gender-affirming surgeries for minors.[156] Previously, on December 29, 2023, he had vetoed theSaving Adolescents from Experimentation (SAFE) Act (HB68) passed (mostly along party lines) by theOhio Legislature on December 13 which banned gender-affirming surgeries as well as hormones and puberty blockers for minors. The bill includes exceptions for this kind of care for non-transgender youth, and it allows children who were already receiving gender-affirming care in Ohio to continue their treatment.[157] On January 24, 2024, the legislature overrode DeWine's veto thereby making HB68 law.[158] On April 16, 2024, a judge temporarily blocked the ban from taking effect.[159] On August 6, 2024, a judge overturned the injunction and allowed the law to take effect immediately.[160] On March 18, 2025, the state's 10th District Court of Appeale reversed the judge's decision and reinstated the injunction.[161] On April 30, 2025, theSupreme Court of Ohio ruled 4-3 that the ban could take effect while further court battles play out.[162]
On May 21, 2024, South Carolina GovernorHenry McMaster signed a law banning trans health care for minors. The law, which went into effect immediately, also requires principals, teachers and other school staff members to tell parents when their children want to use a name other than their legal one, or pronouns that do not match their sex assigned at birth. It also bars adults under 26 from using Medicaid to cover the costs for trans health care.[164] This part of the bill is in direct opposition to a4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling from the month prior which ruled that state Medicaid bans on gender-affirming care in the 4th Circuit, which includes South Carolina, are unconstitutional.[165]
Governor Kelly Ayotte (puberty blockers, hormones and other surgeries)
July 19, 2024 (genital surgeries)
August 1, 2025 (puberty blockers, hormones and other surgeries)
January 1, 2025 (genital surgeries)
January 1, 2026 (puberty blockers, hormones and other surgeries)
On July 19, 2024, New Hampshire GovernorChris Sununu signed a law banning gender-affirming genital surgeries for minors. However, puberty blockers, hormones and non-genital surgeries such as mastectomies remained legal for trans youth.[166][167] On August 1, 2025, GovernorKelly Ayotte signed a bill ending puberty blockers, hormones and non-genital surgeries for minors in the state too. However, the bill contains an exception which allows minors already receiving care to continue it.[168]
On February 18, 2025, the Kansas state legislature overrode GovernorLaura Kelly's veto of Senate Bill 63 which bans gender-affirming care for minors. Children already receiving gender-affirming care in Kansas must stop receiving it by December 31, 2025.[169][170]
On July 17, 2025, Puerto Rico GovernorJenniffer González-Colón signed Senate Bill 350 which bans on gender-affirming care for anyone under 21 years of age. It also bars public funding for gender-affirming care and threatens doctors who violate the ban with up to 15 years in prison, a $50,000 fine, and the permanent loss of their licenses. Puerto Rico's LGBTQ+ Federation immediately announced plans to challenge the ban in court.[62][61]
Protections for minors
"Shield" laws protecting access to gender-affirming healthcare for people under 18
On May 5, 2022, Governor Ned Lamont signed House Bill 5414, a shield law that designates Connecticut as a "safe harbor" which protects people who provide abortions and gender affirming care in the state, as well as legal protections for people seeking abortions and gender-affirming health care from out-of-state.[171][172]
On September 30, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 107, a shield law which designates California as a "sanctuary state" for trans youth and their families who are fleeing from other states that have banned the practice.[174]
On November 21, 2022, Mayor Muriel Bowser signed into law D.C. ACT 24-646, the Human Rights Sanctuary Amendment Act of 2022, which protects the right to bodily autonomy and of those seeking care for abortion, contraception, sexual conduct, intimate relationships, and gender affirmation.[175]
On January 13, 2023, Governor JB Pritzker signed into law HB4664, a reproductive rights and gender affirming care omnibus bill that protects health care providers and their patients from legal attacks by neighboring states and expands reproductive and gender affirming health care access and options across the state. The bill takes historic action to protect Illinois providers and their patients, thousands of whom have traveled to Illinois to access essential care now banned in their home states.
On March 16, 2023, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham signed into law House Bill 7, the Reproductive and Gender-Affirming Health Care Act, which prohibits public bodies, including local municipalities, from denying, restricting, or discriminating against an individual's right to use or refuse reproductive health care or health care related to gender.[177]
On March 29, 2023, Governor Phil Scott signed into law House Bill 89 and Senate Bill 37, which establish a slate of protections for both providers and seekers of gender affirming health care, as well as those seeking or administering abortions.[178]
On April 4, 2023, Governor Phil Murphy signed Executive Order No. 326 establishing New Jersey as a safe haven for gender-affirming health care by directing all state departments and agencies to protect all persons, including health care professionals and patients, against potential repercussions resulting from providing, receiving, assisting in providing or receiving, seeking, or traveling to New Jersey to obtain gender-affirming health care services.[179]
On April 14, 2023, Governor Jared Polis signed into law a trio of health care bills enshrining access to abortion and gender-affirming procedures and medications in Colorado. These bills ensure people in surrounding states and beyond can go to Colorado to have an abortion, begin puberty blockers or receive gender-affirming surgery without fear of prosecution.[180]
On June 6, 2023, Governor Wes Moore signed an executive order to protect gender affirming health care in Maryland. The order will protect those seeking, receiving, or providing gender affirming care in Maryland from attempts at legal punishment by other states.[183] The executive order was codified into law by the Trans Shield Act, which Moore signed into law on May 16, 2024.[184]
On June 26, 2023, Governor Kathy Hochul signed a shield law designating New York as a "sanctuary state" for trans youth. This law protects access to transition-related medical care for transgender minors and bars state courts from enforcing the laws of other states that might authorize a child to be taken away if the parents provide gender-affirming medical care, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy. It also prohibits New York courts from considering transition-related care for minors as child abuse and bars state and local authorities from cooperating with out-of-state agencies regarding the provision of lawful gender-affirming care in New York.[185]
On March 30, 2022, GovernorDoug Ducey signed a bill banning gender-affirming surgery for minors, but not hormones and puberty blockers. The bill also makes some exceptions, including in the case of someone born intersex.[135] On June 28, 2023, a new Governor,Katie Hobbs reversed course by signing a series of executive orders which include shield-style protections for gender-affirming care, ensuring that it remains legal in Arizona. It also bans conversion therapy, requires insurance plans to cover gender-affirming care and bars state agencies from cooperating with civil and criminal cases in states where gender-affirming health care is illegal.[137]
On May 9, 2023, Governor Tina Kotek signed a law protecting access to abortion and gender affirming care for trans youth. Minors between the ages of 15 and 17 can receive gender affirming care without parental permission, whereas youth ages 14 and under must have parental permission.[186]
On April 23, 2024, GovernorJanet Mills signed a shield law designating Maine as a "sanctuary state" for gender-affirming care and abortion providers and makes access to such treatments "legal rights" in Maine. It states that criminal and civil actions against providers and patients are not enforceable if the access to that care occurred in Maine. Additionally, the bill prevents cooperation with out-of-state arrest warrants for gender-affirming care and abortion that happen within the state. It also protects doctors who provide gender-affirming care and abortion from actions by medical boards, malpractice insurance, and other regulating entities that seek to economically harm them or dissuade them from providing care. The bill also explicitly enshrinesWPATH'sStandards of Care into state law for the coverage of transgender healthcare.[187][188]
On June 25, 2024, GovernorDaniel McKee signed a shield law designating Rhode Island as a "sanctuary state" for gender-affirming care and abortion providers and makes access to such treatments "legal rights" in Rhode Island. The bill also protects providers from being sued for providing care.[189]
On June 20, 2025, GovernorMatt Meyer signed Executive Order No. 11 establishing Delaware as a "sanctuary state" for gender-affirming care by protecting patients and providers from bans and restrictions in other states. It also forbids state agencies from giving up "medical records, data or billing information, or utilize state resources that could help any criminal or civil investigation against someone receiving or providing gender-affirming care" and prohibits the state professional regulations board from disbarring healthcare providers because they provide gender-affirming care.[190][191]
Legal documents
While all 50 states had previously allowed transgender people to change their legal names and documented genders, many states in the 2020s implemented restrictions.[192] These restrictions ranged from requiring sterilization to obtain amended documents, to making it a criminal offense to carry a state ID not matching one's assigned gender at birth.[193][194]
State laws which ban transgender athletes from participating in the sport of their gender identity, as of June 2023:
Law enacted which bans trans athletes from participating in sports based on their gender identity; enforces gender classifications in sports based on registered biological sex
Law preventing trans athletes from participating in sport in their gender identity enacted, but currently blocked from enforcement via court order[195][196]
Some U.S. states passed legislation restricting the participation oftransgender youth in high school sports or of trans women and girls in women's sports.[197]
Twenty-six U.S. States have banned transgender people from sports under their gender identity in various capacities. These states include Texas,[198] Arkansas,[199] Florida,[200] Alabama,[201] Oklahoma,[202] Kentucky,[203] Mississippi,[204] Tennessee,[205] West Virginia,[206] South Carolina,[207] Utah,[208] South Dakota,[209] Montana,[210] Iowa,[211] Arizona,[212] Idaho,[213] Wyoming,[214] Indiana,[215] Louisiana,[216] Kansas, Georgia,[217] North Dakota,[218] New Hampshire,[167] North Carolina,[219] Alaska[220] and Ohio.[221] The passage of legislation against transgender youth has seen increases in calls toTrans Lifeline, a suicide crisis hotline run by and for transgender people.[222] Some of these bans only apply to school sports and some only apply to transgender women, but not transgender men. TheUS Department of Education has said transgender students are protected under Title IX.[223]
InIndiana, schools rely on anatomical sex, requiring gender reassignment surgery for trans athletes to participate in the sport of their identified gender.[224]
Nebraska has formed a Gender Identity Eligibility Committee that decides on a case-by-case basis of how each transgender athlete can participate as their self-identified gender.[224]
Maine gives approval for students to choose which team they wish to play on, approving based on safety and fairness.[225]
New Jersey andNew Mexico require that trans athletes provide evidence that they have transitioned or are transitioning.[225]
Missouri andOhio require athletes to undergo hormone treatment. Ohio requires that the athlete must have been on the hormones for at least a year prior to competing.[225]
Oregon allows those who identify as male to participate on male teams, and they are then on excluded from girls' competitions. Those transitioning from male to female must be on hormone treatment for at least a year.[225]
Iowa bans transgender girls and women from playing female sports. No such stipulation applies to transgender boys and men with regard to male sports.[227]
Oklahoma requires that any student participating in sports must submit a notarized affidavit of gender assigned at birth, under penalty of perjury.[228]
States and counties in the United States which have enacted legislation on restrooms, locker rooms, and other sex-segregated public accommodations, in regard to their access from those who are transgender, or have gender dysphoria as of March 2023:
State, city, or county mandates single-user unisex restrooms in all public buildings
State explicitly prohibits discrimination in restrooms on the basis of gender identity
State legislation or school guidelines currentlyallow students to use restrooms that correspond with gender identity
State legislation or school guidelines currentlyprohibit students from using restrooms that differ from biological sex
Currently considering state legislation or school guidelines that would prohibit students from using restrooms that differ from biological sex
State indecent exposure law may be construed tocriminalize trans people from undressing in locker rooms or using restrooms that do not match their biological sex
Currently considering bills that maycriminalize trans people from undressing in locker rooms or using restrooms that do not match their biological sex
In an early example of an anti-trans bathroom bill, thePublic Facilities Privacy & Security Act inNorth Carolina, was approved as a law in 2016. The bill, however, sparked widespread condemnation and threats of boycotts, and portions of the measure were repealed in 2017 as part of a compromise between the Democratic governor and Republican-controlled Legislature. In 2016, guidance was issued by the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education stating that schools which receive federal money must treat a student as their gender identity (for example, in regard to bathrooms).[229] This policy was revoked by the Trump administration in 2017.[229]
In the 2020s, bathroom bills have been proposed and debated in a number of state legislatures. According to theAmerican Civil Liberties Union, there are currently 469anti-LGBTQ bills in the US, most targeting transgender people; an example of which isKansas SB 180.[85] Several state bills are based on and closely resemble model legislation provided by the Christian legal organizationAlliance Defending Freedom (ADF).[230][231][232] The ADF's model legislation proposes giving any public school or university student the right to sue for $2,500 for each time they encountered a transgender classmate in a locker room or bathroom.[230][233]
A number of the bills put forth and passed made it some form of criminal offense, often asex offense, for a transgender person to use a bathroom, locker room, changing room, or other similar facility not corresponding with their assigned sex. The most severe of these was that of Arkansas, which made it an offense of "sexual indecency with a child" for a trans person to use any such facility if said facility contained anyone under 18 at the time of use.[234][235]
Since 2021, Alabama, Arkansas,Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Idaho have enacted bathroom bills.[236][237] State legislatures in Arizona, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas have proposed bathroom bills. TheNational Center for Transgender Equality, an LGBTQ advocacy group, calls these bills discriminatory.[238]
In 2024, Missouri implemented a law discontinuing state funding of gender-affirming care for prison inmates.[243] Florida prisons implemented a rule restricting gender-affirming care, and providing psychotherapy to treat underlying mental health issues. An attorney of theACLU likened this to conversion therapy.[244]
As part of his2024 presidential campaign,Donald Trump stated that if elected, he would sign an executive order instructing every federal agency to cease the promotion of sex or gender transition at any age as well as ask Congress to pass a bill stating that the United States will only recognize two genders as determined at birth, and promised to crackdown on gender-affirming care for all ages. Additionally, Trump stated that he would make hospitals and health care providers that provide transitional hormones or surgery no longer qualify for federal funding, including Medicare and Medicaid funding. Trump has also stated he will push to prohibit hormonal and surgical intervention for minors in all 50 states.[245][246][247][248]
On the January 20, 2025, shortly after being inaugurated, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order,[249][250] which defined sex in the eyes of the federal government as a male-female binary, with "female" and "male" defined as "a person belonging, at conception to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell" and a "person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell", respectively.[249] The order also mandated that:
Federal agencies should use "sex" instead of "gender", remove materials that "promote gender ideology", and halt "funding of gender ideology"[249]: § 3(a), 3(e)
Official government documents such aspassports and visas stop allowing self-selection of gender[249]: § 3(d)
Transgender people be barred from government-funded single-sex facilities congruent with their gender identity[249]: § 4
The attorney general provide guidance "to correct the misapplication of the Supreme Court's decision inBostock v. Clayton County (2020) to sex-based distinctions" in federal agency activities.[249]: § 3(f)
Prior policies and federal government documents that are inconsistent with this order be rescinded, including policies that require the use of names and pronouns consistent with a person's gender identity in federal workplaces.
In July 2025,The Lancet published an investigation which alleged that around half of all US health datasets were secretly and substantially altered in the two months after the executive order was signed, with the alterations being done to remove messages that "promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology".[255][256]
On January 27, 2025, Trump signed an executive order declaring that a soldier being trans “conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one's personal life” and that trans people “cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service”.[257]
On March 18, 2025, JudgeAna C. Reyes blocked the executive order, ruling that banning trans people from the military likely violated their constitutional rights.[258]
A May 15 memo later detailed how trans service members would be discharged, saying that they would be given the discharge code of "JDK", which is typically used to indicate that a soldier is considered a threat to national security, and which can prevent them from getting future jobs or security clearances.[259] An August 4United States Air Force memo announced that long-serving transgender members normally eligible for retirement benefits would be denied them.[260]
On January 28, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to "Protect Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation". The order describedgender-affirming care for minors as "chemical and surgical mutilation of children" as well as "maiming" and "sterilizing".[261] It stated "countless children" who received such care would regret a "horrifying tragedy that they will never be able to conceive children of their own or nurture their children through breastfeeding."[262] The order also described theWorld Professional Association for Transgender Health's (WPATH) guidance as "junk science".[262][261]
The order states that the US Federal Government will not "fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another."[263] The provisions include:
Told federal agencies providing federal grants to medical institutions to make sure those institutions were not carrying out any gender-related procedures;[263]
Protectswhistleblowers who report on institutions that provide gender affirming care in violation of the executive order.[264]
In response, some hospitals paused providing gender-affirming care for minors, while others continued. Attorneys general from 15 states said their states are committed to continuing to provide gender-affirming care to minors. Multiple groups filed lawsuits challenging the legality of the executive order. In response to one of the lawsuits, several federal judges issued injunctions blocking the government from withholding federal funds from hospitals that provide gender affirming care to minors.[265][254] Following the injunction, some hospitals that initially paused gender-affirming care for minors resumed the care.[266][267]
Federal funding freeze
On January 28, 2025, Trump ordered a freeze on all federal funding grants, loans, and aid while those receiving them were assessed to make sure they were not promoting "advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies".[268]
On February 5, 2025, Trump signed an executive order titled "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports", which directs federal agencies and state attorneys general to immediately enforce a prohibition of transgender girls and women from participating in women's sports.[270][271] The order does not ban transgender men athletes from playing on male sports teams.[272] As part of this order's implementation, theDepartment of Education urged high school and college athletics organizations NCAA andNFHS to revoke female transgender athletes' records and restore cisgender athletes' ones.[273][274] The State Department also announced a ban on transgender athletes from entering the United States if they attempt to compete in women's sports, and that visa applicants suspected of such would have their file marked with the letters 'SWS25' for the purposes of tracking. Visa applicants for any purpose who list a gender other than their assigned sex on their visa application will be permanently banned from entering the United States on grounds of "fraud".[275]
Foreign policy
At the United Nations, the United States under Trump routinely uses their influence action against transgender rights globally, even when unrelated to the topic of discussion. For example, in a June 2025 meeting on chemical pollution, the American delegate made a point of repeatedly disputing any gender-related language that did not explicitly “recognize women are biologically female and men are biologically male”; while in another case, the United States disapproved of a declaration supporting the rights of women and girls because it included no language to exclude trans women from its purview. Both advocates and the Trump Administration have suggested that the United States might use compliance at the UN as a metric for determining which countries receive foreign aid.[276]
Far-right anti-LGBTQ Twitter accountLibs of TikTok (logo pictured) regularly uses the term "groomers" as an insulting stereotype towardsLGBTQ people.
In mid-June 2022, Libs of TikTok condemned the upcomingCoeur d'Alene, Idaho's "Pride in the Park" festival due to a "family-friendly drag performance."[280] On June 11, 2022, during the pride event, law enforcement arrested 31 members of the white nationalist and hate groupPatriot Front, charging them with conspiracy to riot.[282] In May 2023, maskedneo-Nazi groups inOhio protested drag events inWadsworth andColumbus, carrying anti-drag andanti-trans banners, such as one that read, "There Will Be Blood."[283] A report fromGLAAD noted there were 138 documented incidents of anti-LGBTQ harassment, vandalism or assault at drag shows in the United States from June 2022 through April 2023.[284] An Institute for Strategic Dialogue report indicated that theProud Boys were the leading group spreading anti-LGBTQ sentiment.[285][286]
Laws and restrictions
On March 2, 2023,Tennessee governorBill Lee signed theAdult Entertainment Act, which prohibits drag performances for children.[287][288] This bill sparked outrage from the LGBTQ community.[289] On June 3, 2023, a federal judge ruled that the law is unconstitutional.[290] On July 18, 2024, a three judge panel on theSixth Circuit reinstated the law by ruling that the plaintiffs had lacked the standing to sue. The ruling did not address whether the law was constitutional.[291]
The states ofFlorida,Montana, andTexas have also passed laws banning public drag performances.[292][293] However, all three of these drag bans were blocked by courts from taking effect.[294][295][296][297]
In response to a concurring opinion by JusticeClarence Thomas inDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization arguing the Court should reconsiderObergefell v. Hodges, Congress passed theRespect for Marriage Act in 2022.[300][301][302] The act officially repealed theDefense of Marriage Act and required the federal government to recognize same-sex and interracial marriages, thus codifying parts ofObergefell, the 2013 ruling inUnited States v. Windsor, and the 1967 ruling inLoving v. Virginia.[303] In addition, it compelled all U.S. states and territories to recognize the validity of same-sex and interracial marriages if performed in a jurisdiction where such marriages are legally performed; however, it does not legally compel states to perform same-sex marriages ifObergefell is overturned.
On January 27, 2025, theIdaho House of Representatives voted for a resolution that calls for the Supreme Court to reconsider its 2015Obergefell v. Hodges same-sex marriage decision.[306][307][308]
Legislation was introduced or passed in at least 29 states taking aim at lessons that teach children about race and LGBTQ people, with most of the laws framed around putting a stop tocritical race theory and "gender ideology".[309][310] These laws, which use broad language prohibiting teaching about privilege related to race or sex, or systemic bias in the United States, have led to many book removals.[310][311] NBC News described the use of the term "critical race theory" in this context as "a catch-all term to refer to what schools often call equity programs, teaching about racism or LGBTQ-inclusive policies".[312]The Takeaway'sMelissa Harris-Perry cited discomfort with issues likegender identity as one of the common reasons for challenges, but that "this discomfort is likely imposed by adults onto young learners" who are otherwise more accepting and more likely to think outside traditionalgender roles.[313]
An example of such bans is that passed by Florida in March 2022, which created a list of sanctioned reading material for students in educational settings, and punished any teacher or school librarian whose classrooms or libraries contained unsanctioned books with felony charges. Sanctioned books must be reviewed by the state to be free of "prohibited material harmful to minors", which critics have said that under Florida state law includes content regarding the LGBTQ community and black history.[314]
Business
Avatar of Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh
(@MattWalshBlog)
tweeted:
The goal is to make "pride" toxic for brands. If they decide to shove this garbage in our face, they should know that they'll pay a price. It won't be worth whatever they think they'll gain. First Bud Light and now Target. Our campaign is making progress. Let's keep it going.
Conservative activists urged forboycotting any company which publicly supported, or collaborated with members of, the LGBTQ community.[316] Some of the most well-known examples included theboycott against Bud Light for a sponsorship with actress and TikTokerDylan Mulvaney,[317] and the campaign againstDisney by Florida governorRon DeSantis for publicly opposing the state's anti-LGBTQ curriculum law.[318] Other targeted companies includeNike,Adidas andFord.[316]In May 2023,Target removed several Pride Month items from stores in the Southern United States after anti-LGBTQ hate groupsthreatened violence against its employees.[319] Following the election of Donald Trump in 2024,Disney removed from several shows set to air, storylines, episodes, and lines of dialogue that involved transgender characters.[320]
According to a 2023 report by theDepartment of Homeland Security, threats of violence against the LGBT community rose in the early-2020s.[325] TheFBI also noted a sharp uptick in the number ofhate crimes committed against LGBT people, with the 54 percent increase representing the fastest rise in hate crimes of all groups in the country.[326] InNew York City, hate crimes against LGBT people doubled from 2021 to 2022, and grew by 29% in California during the same period.[327][328]
Violence has also been used against heterosexual people expressing support for LGBT rights. In August 2023,Lauri Carleton, a business owner inSouthern California, was shot and killed for keeping apride flag outside her store.[329]
Public opinion
Polls and surveys
2021-2024
An April 2021PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist poll with the question "Do you support or oppose legislation that would prohibit gender transition-related medical care for minors" found 66% of Americans would oppose a ban, including 69% of Democrats, 70% of Republicans, and 64% of Independents.[330]
A February 2022 poll byLGBTQ support serviceThe Trevor Project andMorning Consult found that 52 percent of American adults expressed some level of support for transgender minors having access to puberty blockers if it is recommended by their doctor and supported by their parents.[331][332]
A June 2022Pew Research Poll found that most Americans were uncomfortable with the speed of change on issues related to transgender people, with young adults and Democrats being the most supportive of transgender rights and Republicans and people in the 55–64 years age group being the least supportive.[333]
According to thePublic Religion Research Institute in February 2023, support for mandating that trans people use the bathroom corresponding to their gender assigned at birth rose among all religious groups, with white evangelical Protestants seeing the largest change, going from 41% in support to 72% in support between 2017 and 2021. 41% of total Americans held this stance, with 31% disagreeing, and 28% not taking either position.[334]
In a poll fromData for Progress in March 2023, respondents were asked about the more than 400 pieces of anti-trans legislation working their way through statehouses. 64 percent of respondents, including 55 percent of Republicans, agreed with the statement "This is too much legislation. Politicians are playing political theater and using these bills as a wedge issue". 25 percent agreed with the statement "This is the right amount of legislation. Politicians are dealing with a real danger that needs to be addressed." As a result, pollsters and strategists from both parties warned that Republicans' intense focus on restricting the rights and health care of about 0.6 percent of the American population could risk putting off independents and swing voters in the next election.[335]
A poll byThe Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation, conducted in November 2022, found that 68 percent of adults oppose access to puberty-blocking medication for transgender children ages 10 to 14, and 58 percent oppose access to hormonal treatments for transgender children ages 15 to 17.[336]
In a January 2023Deseret News/HarrisX poll, 55 percent of Americans supported banning gender hormone therapy for transgender minors with parental or guardian approval, while 45 percent opposed such a ban.[337]
A January 2023 poll by thePew Research Center found that black Democrats were less likely than other Democrats to believe that a person's gender can be different from their birth sex and more likely to say that their views on LGBT issues are determined by their religion.[338]
A February 2023 poll by theUniversity of Michigan measuring support for transgender athletes among 14 to 24-year-olds found that 47% believed transgender athletes should be allowed to compete on sports teams that align with their gender identity or personal preferences, whereas 35% believed transgender athletes should only compete on sports teams based on their sex assigned at birth, should compete in leagues only for transgender people or should not be able to compete in sports at all.[339]
A May 2023 poll byThe Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation found that a majority of Americans support some anti-trans policies despite also claiming to oppose discrimination for trans people.[340]
In June 2023, aGallup poll found that only 26% of Americans think trans athletes should be allowed to play on sports teams that match their gender identity.[341]
A September 2023 poll by19th News/SurveyMonkey found that 39 percent of American adults supported transgender minors having access to any kind of gender-affirming care, including puberty blockers, hormones, therapy, and surgery.[342] Another poll by The 19th/SurveyMonkey that same month found that in a survey of 20,000 American adults, 17 percent believed politicians should focus on restricting gender-affirming care, while 33 percent believed they should focus on protecting access to gender-affirming care. The rest believed politicians should not focus on trans issues at all.[343] A separate poll conducted by The 19th that month found that 7 in 10 Americans, including majorities in both major parties and independents, do not think politicians are informed enough about gender-affirming care to make fair policies on it.[344]
A September 2023 poll conducted bySurveyUSA and sponsored by the anti-trans group,Women's Declaration International, found that a majority of voters believe a person's sex is determined at birth and that sex and gender are the same thing.[345]
A February 2024 survey byYouGov found that a majority of Americans support laws and policies protecting transgender people from hate crimes and discrimination in employment, permitting transgender people to serve in the military, allowing government employees to use pronouns that match their gender identity and outlawing conversion therapy for transgender minors. However, it also found that a majority of Americans support laws and policies banning transgender women from women's sports and prisons, prohibiting minors from attending drag shows and creating a law that "defines gender as a person's sex assigned at birth". Additionally, the survey found that while 54% of Americans oppose allowing transgender minors to access gender-affirming care, only 45% support laws and policies banning the treatments for minors.[346]
AGallup Poll released in June 2024 found that over 60% of U.S. adults oppose banning gender-affirming care for minors, but also found that just 44% of U.S. adults believe that changing one's gender is morally acceptable, with 56% of 18-29 year olds saying it is morally acceptable compared to 38% of adults over age 65.[347]
A June 2024 poll by theUniversity of Chicago found that 70% of Democrats and 29% of Republicans supported laws that protect access to gender-affirming care for minors.[348]
2024 election related polls
A March 2024 poll byGLAAD found that more than half of both registered and likely voters surveyed said they would not support a candidate who "speaks frequently about restricting access to health care and participation in sports for transgender youth."[349]
A poll by Folx Health in August 2024 found that 90% of transgender Americans feared that the election would have an impact on their access to gender-affirming care.[350]
A September 2024 poll byFox News found that voters trusted Kamala Harris more than Donald Trump to handle transgender issues by a 16-point margin.[351]
An October 2024 poll by theHuman Rights Campaign found that only 5% of voters say they are concerned about gender-affirming care and 61% said they will not support candidates who support banning gender-affirming care, including 41% of Republicans. The poll also found that 70% of voters think that anti-LGBTQ+ legislation has gone too far and that politicians have targeted trans people to divide Americans and "maintain their political power."[352]
An October 2024 poll byBaldwin Wallace University in Ohio found that 60% of registered voters in Ohio supported schools teaching 6th-12th grade students about sexual orientation but only 43% supported teaching students in those same grades about gender identity. Additionally, the poll found that 51% of voters in Ohio believe parents should not have direct control over what books are in the school library and 55% believe that parents should not be able to stop schools from teaching topics that they do not like. The poll also found that 72% of voters in Ohio would oppose policies or laws allowing medical professionals to provide someone younger than 18 with medical care for a gender transition and 73% would oppose policies or laws allowing transgender athletes to play on the team that matches their gender identity and 56% would support policies or laws requiring public schools to notify parents if it is discovered that a student identifies with a gender that does not align with their biological sex.[353][354]
In November 2024, polls in five battleground states conducted byThe New York Times/Siena College found a majority of Americans think society should accept transgender people's gender identities.[352]
2025-
In January 2025, a poll byThe New York Times/Ipsos showed 71% of Americans believed that no trans person under 18 should have access to gender-affirming care and 79% of respondents supported a ban on transgender athletes from women's sports. Additionally, 49% said that society had gone too far in accommodating the rights of trans people.[355]
A February 2025Gallup Poll found that 58% of Americans supported allowing openly transgender people to serve in the military, which was a decrease from 2021 when 66% of Americans supported it. The decrease was largely caused by a massive decrease in support among Republicans. Support among Democrats and Independents between 2021 and 2025 remained mostly steady.[356]
A March 2025 survey byPublic Religion Research Institute/Ipsos found that 70% of Democrats and 30% of Republicans opposed legislation that would ban minors from accessing gender-affirming care. Additionally, 60% of Democrats and 14% of Republicans opposed legislation that would mandate that a transgender person's driver's license or ID match their sex at birth.[357]
An April 2025 poll by19th News/SurveyMonkey found that 49% of Americans do not want politicians focusing on transgender issues, a rise from 43% in 2024 and 44% in 2023. The poll also found that 59% of Americans support transgender adults being able to access gender-affirming care. And while only 43% supported trans youth being able to access gender-affirming care, 55% opposed laws that would restrict gender-affirming care for minors.[358]
An April 2025 survey by CNN/SSRS found that 51% of Americans, including 16% of Democrats/Liberals, 48% of Independents/Moderates and 90% of Republicans, but only 79% of Conservatives, approved of Donald Trump's handling of transgender issues.[359]
Election campaigning and results
2024 presidential election
During the2024 presidential election, anti-trans advertisements became commonplace, with the Republican Party making trans issues a top issue in their campaign, spending over $215 million on anti-trans ads and more than on ads regarding housing, immigration, and the economy combined.[360] According toNOTUS in 2025, it was theAmerican Principles Project who had originally convinced the Donald Trump and the Republican Party to begin its extensive campaign against trans rights.[361] In contrast, Democrats largely avoided discussing transgender issues during the election campaign period.[362][363][364] The ads became especially common during the closing days of the race, often pushingdisparaging claims about transgender healthcare, existence in society, and participation in sports.[365][366] Democrats did not formally respond to the ads during the campaign period. Former PresidentBill Clinton privately expressed concern about the ads and encouraged the Harris campaign to respond to it. However, he was told by the campaign that the ads "were not necessarily having an impact" and never addressed his concerns publicly. The Harris campaign had originally planned to release an ad responding, but the ad ended up performing poorly in internal tests and was ultimately never run.[367]
According to an analysis byFuture Forward, the political slogan "Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you" was ranked as one of the Trump campaign's most effective 30-second attack ads, shifting the race 2.7 percentage points in favor of Trump after viewers watched it.[367] On the contrary, an analysis byChange Research studying the effects of the ads found that they did not sway swing voters.[368] A study by Ground Media also found that the ads did not sway voters into supporting Republicans, but they did succeed at slightly eroding public support for trans people in general.[369] David Rochkind, the CEO of Ground Media, gave a press release saying "What this demonstrates is that attacking the trans community isn't just a weak and feckless political strategy — it's a deeply cynical one. ... These ads weaponize trans-identity to sow fear and division, making our country less safe for everyone."[370] A poll by Blueprint surveyed the most important issues to voters and found that trans issues ranked second to last among young men.[371] An October 2024 poll byData for Progress found that a majority of voters from both major parties believe the government should stop involving themselves in the lives of trans people and that politicians should focus less on transgender issues and more on other issues like the economy. It also found that a majority of voters from both major parties believe Republicans leaning so heavily on anti-trans ads is "sad and shameful".[372][373][374] An October 2024Gallup Poll surveying the most important issues to registered voters ahead of the 2024 presidential election found that of the 22 issues voters were asked about, transgender issues ranked last with only 18 percent of voters describing it as "extremely important". Democrats were also more likely than Republicans to say transgender issues were extremely important to them, 25% to 12%.[375] Another poll byData for Progress found that a majority of voters from all parties agree with the statement "the government should be less involved in regulating what transgender people are allowed to do, including the health care they can receive." Additionally, it found that 80% of voters agreed with the statement "both Democrats and Republicans should spend less time talking about transgender issues and more time talking about voters' priority issues like the economy and inflation." It also found that a majority of voters trust Democrats more than Republicans to handle transgender issues 52% to 29% and that a majority of voters, including a majority of Independent voters, believe Republicans have a more extreme stance of transgender issues than Democrats.[376]
A post-election poll by theHuman Rights Campaign found that the anti-trans ads were largely ineffective as only 4% of voters said opposing transgender surgeries and transgender women's participation in sports motivated their vote, and voters ranked these issues last on a list of the most important issues to them. The poll showed that voter's discontent with the Biden administration, the economy and immigration were the main factors that led to Trump's victory.[377][378]
Vox Media said that anti-trans ads have "no impact on whether people are likely to vote" and compared them to the "rising tide of fascism in the United States".[379] Kelley Robinson, the president of theHuman Rights Campaign, called the ads "desperate" and accused Republicans of focusing on "sowing fear and chaos" instead of talking about other issues like the economy. Jay Brown, chief of staff at the Human Rights Campaign said that the ads have had a negative impact on the mental health of trans people due to it being "in their faces all the time."LGBTQ Nation called the ads "wildly unpopular" among voters and said "there is a solid chance that the fate of transgender rights could mirror that of gay rights, becoming a sport of "political albatross" that instantly kills support for candidates. As politicians become more anti-trans, some members of their base oppose them more — likely due to people perceiving this issue as irrelevant and mean-spirited."[372]
These ads led two Democratic politicians,Sherrod Brown andColin Allred, to capitulate, ceding the issue at least partially to the Republican position.[380][381] After Donald Trump won the 2024 election, two other Democrat politicians,Tom Suozzi andSeth Moulton, partially blamed their party's loss on their support for trans issues. Other Democrat politicians and human rights organizations disputed these claims, arguing polls showed that trans issues were not important to most voters and that voters were instead mobilized to vote for Trump due to other issues like inflation and the economy.[382][383] Texas Democratic Party Chair,Gilberto Hinojosa also expressed anti-transgender sentiments following the 2024 election. Hinojosa subsequently apologized for his comments and resigned from his position after receiving backlash from other Democrats and LGBTQ advocacy groups. The Harris campaign's LGBTQ engagement director, Sam Alleman, urged voters not to blame trans people for Harris' loss in the election saying "Please do not blame trans issues or trans people for why we lost. ... No exit polling or data is showing this as a significant decision point for voters."[362]
A widely cited post-election poll by the polling firm, Blueprint, showed that one of the top reasons swing voters pivoted to Donald Trump was the belief that "Kamala Harris is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class." This poll led many people, including Democratic representative,Seth Moulton, to blame transgender issues for Trump's victory and Democrats' loss of control of Congress. However, Blueprint's lead pollster, Evan Roth Smith, said in an interview that with theRolling Stone that people were misunderstanding the poll, saying that other issues like the economy and immigration ranked as much bigger priorities to swing voters. Smith clarified that "I don't even see [the poll as indicating transgender issues were the reason Democrats lost]. I know there's some people who look at the Blueprint data and see that. Democrats lost this election on the economy and also some immigration stuff... it was almost incidental that the way the Republicans exploited [the Democrat's] failure was with the trans issue."[384][385]
AnNBC News exit poll for the 2024 election found thatKamala Harris garnered more support from LGBTQ voters than any other presidential candidate in history, with 86% of LGBTQ voters backing Harris and 12% backing Donald Trump - a margin 15% larger thanJoe Biden's margin over Trump in 2020.[386]
2026 midterm elections
In March 2025, Trump indicated that attacking trans rights would be a large part of Republicans' main talking points in the 2026 midterm elections, saying that he had told Republicans, "Don't bring that subject up, because there's no election right now. But about a week before the election, bring it up, because you can't lose."[387]
Democratic strategist Matt Angle suggested that in 2026, Democrats should adopt a strategy of showing voters that Republicans are exploiting transgender issues to cover up their failures on other issues like healthcare. Political scientist and pollster Mark Jones said it may be difficult for Republicans to attack trans rights in 2026 "because you're not going to have a Biden administration that included transgender as a protection under Title IX, or where the Department of Justice or the Department of Education are aggressively enforcing transgender rights across the country. You won't be able to have that foil to campaign against the same way that Republicans did in 2024 and 2022."[388]
Attacks on gay rights
Beginning in 2025, gay rights, specifically gay marriage, increasingly became under attack by Republican politicians and state legislatures. By February 2025, nine states had introduced legislation intended to chip away at gay marriage. Five of the measures introduced in Michigan, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota specifically urged the Supreme Court to overturn its 2015 ruling,Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized gay marriage nationwide. The other four introduced in Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas would create a category for marriage called "covenant marriage" that would be only for one man and one woman.[389]
In October 2025, theTexas Supreme Court issued a ruling allowing Texas judges to refuse to officiate same-sex weddings based on their "sincerely held religious beliefs."[390]
In November 2025, the Supreme Court weighed whether to revisit theObergefell ruling when they considered whether to hear an appeal toErmold v. Davis brought byKim Davis, a Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples following Obergefell ruling in 2015. The appeal specifically asked the court to overturn Obergefell.[391] The Supreme Court declined the appeal on November 10.[392]
Media coverage
Scholars have argued that the media has contributed to increasing marginalization of LGBTQ+ people, especially in its coverage of trans people. Since 2015, anti-trans media coverage has increasingly focused on trans youth and trans athletes.[393]Teen Vogue news and politics editor Lexi McMenamin said publications such asThe New York Times,The Atlantic, theWashington Post, andThe Guardian had published articles with an anti-trans bias.[394] Holger B. Elischberger suggests that the U.S. should implement media policy reforms to protect trans people from disinformation.[395]
In 2022,The New York Times' reporting ontransgender issues was criticized by theWorld Professional Association for Transgender Health, especially in regards to treatments for trans children.[396] On February 15, 2023, two open letters were published, accusing theTimes of publishing biased and misleading articles about trans people.[397][398][399] These were signed by almost 1,200 past and current contributors,[400][401][402] tens of thousands of readers and subscribers,[401] and over 100 LGBTQ and civil rights groups—includingGLAAD, theHuman Rights Campaign andPFLAG.[398]
The letters said the paper had published articles biased against transgender, non-binary, and gender nonconforming people,[400][397] including "fringe theories", "dangerous inaccuracies", "pseudoscience" and "euphemistic, charged language".[403][404] The letters also noted that the coverage was cited in anamicus brief in support of an anti-trans law in Alabama.[397][401][398] In response to the letters, theTimes said it was proud of its coverage, and issued an internal memo, saying: "We do not welcome, and will not tolerate, participation byTimes journalists in protests organized by advocacy groups or attacks on colleagues on social media and other public forums."[405][406][407]
Responses
Domestic
Relocation
Some trans people and their families have fled[408][409][410] to other US states or countries, including the families of those who actively advocated against anti-trans laws in their states.[411][412] Many families cite increasing social pressure and restrictions on gender-affirming care as reasons for moving.[413][414]
A 2023 poll byData for Progress found that 8 percent of transgender adults and 8 percent of LGBT 18-to-24-year-olds had moved out of their state as a result of anti-LGBT legislation.[415] A 2025 report byThe Trevor Project estimates 266,000 young people and their family members had moved to other states because of anti-LGBT policies.[416][417]
Several states passed legislation preventing trans people and their families, as well as their healthcare providers relocating from other states, from being extradited. In 2022, Connecticut became the first state to implement such a law, alongside similar protections for reproductive healthcare providers and recipients.[418] Massachusetts, California, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, Maryland, and Washington, D.C. have passed similar laws.[419]
Some trans Americans have consideredclaiming asylum in other countries, including European countries or Canada. However, some political analysts note that asylum applications will likely be denied, as no federal law exists restricting LGBT safety and because transgender individuals can likely move to a safer state in their own country.[420][421][422] Others worry that potential asylum applications could overwhelm immigration systems and prevent asylum access for those from more dangerous territory.[423]
Self-defense
The increased targeting of LGBT people by right-wing militia groups such as theProud Boys and theOath Keepers has led some LGBT people, particularly in conservative states such as Texas, to stockpile and train to use weapons and gear, includingAR-15 rifles and modern body armor.[424]
After a ten-day tour in which he met with State officials in Alabama, Florida, and California in August 2022,Victor Madrigal-Borloz, aUnited Nations Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination, warned about the erosion of LGBT rights in the United States.[426] Madrigal-Borloz stated: "I am deeply alarmed by a widespread, profoundly negative riptide created by deliberate actions to roll back the human rights of LGBT people at state level. The evidence shows that, without exception, these actions rely on prejudiced and stigmatising views of LGBT persons, in particular transgender children and youth, and seek to leverage their lives as props for political profit."[426]
In August 2023, theGovernment of Canada issued atravel warning for LGBT visitors to the United States, advising citizens to check their destination's local laws before traveling.[427][428]
^While anti-LGBTQ sentiment existed before 2021, a notable uptick in anti-LGBTQ laws, legislation, and protests began in 2021. Notable events include theWi Spa controversy and the passing of Arkansas'Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act, one of the first bills prohibiting child transgender healthcare.
^General Assembly of North Carolina (2023)."House Bill 808"(PDF).ncleg.gov.Archived(PDF) from the original on January 11, 2024. RetrievedAugust 26, 2023.
^"House Bill 808 / SL 2023-111 (=S639)" [Veto of House Bill 808].North Carolina General Assembly. August 16, 2023.Archived from the original on October 4, 2025. RetrievedNovember 20, 2025.
^Migdon, Brooke (March 24, 2023)."Idaho governor signs transgender bathroom bill".The Hill.Archived from the original on April 22, 2023. RetrievedApril 22, 2023.At least three other states — Alabama, Oklahoma and Tennessee — have enacted so-called bathroom bills since 2021.
^"Act 619".arkleg.state.ar.us. April 11, 2023.Archived from the original on April 22, 2023. RetrievedApril 22, 2023.
^National Center for Transgender Equality. "Take Action Against Anti-Trans Legislation Now!" Retrieved from"Take Action Against Anti-Trans Legislation Now!". January 23, 2016.Archived from the original on November 21, 2016. RetrievedMarch 22, 2016.
^Quinan, C. (2025). From criminalization to erasure: Project 2025 and anti-trans legislation in the US. Crime, Media, Culture, 0(0).https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590241312149. Quote: "After searching for a fresh cause capable of uniting their base and garnering national attention, the issue of trans identity, especially among children, gained significant traction. This legislative push started with a focus on what has since become a cause célèbre for conservative politicians: trans girls’ participation in youth sports. Against a backdrop of right-wing media that seemed obsessed with trans children (or rather the fear that children were being exposed to the instability of gender categories), they then turned their attention to fervently introducing state bills prohibiting access to gender-affirming care, including puberty blockers (Nagourney and Peters, 2023). [...] Despite their very small number, trans athletes have been victim to an outsized proportion of media interest, debate, and legislation. Often taken up as a fight to 'protect' girls and women, this approach has been successful in rallying conservatives, many of whom have questionable records when it actually comes to advancing girls' and women's rights. Girls' rights and gender parity, hence, become a convenient cover for anti-trans rhetoric and policies."
.jpg)
.jpg)
Media from Commons
Quotations from Wikiquote
