This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
| 2019 Pacific typhoon season | |
|---|---|
Season summary map | |
| Seasonal boundaries | |
| First system formed | December 31, 2018 (2018-12-31) |
| Last system dissipated | December 29, 2019 (2019-12-29) |
| Strongest storm | |
| Name | Halong |
| • Maximum winds | 215 km/h (130 mph) (10-minute sustained) |
| • Lowest pressure | 905hPa (mbar) |
| Seasonal statistics | |
| Total depressions | 49 |
| Total storms | 29 |
| Typhoons | 17 |
| Super typhoons | 5 (unofficial) |
| Total fatalities | 453 total |
| Total damage | $38.54 billion (2019USD) (Costliest Pacific typhoon season on record) |
| Related articles | |
| Pacific typhoon seasons 2017,2018,2019,2020,2021 | |
The2019 Pacific typhoon season was a devastating season that became the costliest on record, mainly due to the catastrophic damage wrought by typhoonsLekima,Faxai, andHagibis. The season was the fifth and final consecutive to have above averagetropical cyclone activity that produced a total of 29 named storms, 17 typhoons, and 5 super typhoons. The season ran throughout 2019, though most tropical cyclones typically develop between May and November. The season's first named storm,Pabuk, reached tropical storm status on January 1, becoming the earliest-forming tropical storm of the western Pacific Ocean on record, breaking the previous record that was held byTyphoon Alice in1979. The season's first typhoon,Wutip, reached typhoon status on February 20. Wutip further intensified into a super typhoon on February 23, becoming the strongest February typhoon on record,[1] and the strongest tropical cyclone recorded in February in theNorthern Hemisphere. The season's last named storm,Phanfone, dissipated on December 29 after it made landfall in thePhilippines.
In early August, Typhoon Lekima made landfall inChina'sZhejiang province as a powerful typhoon, producing extensive rainfall and landslides that warranted over $9 billion worth of damages, making it, at the time, the second-costliest storm in Chinese history. September saw Typhoon Faxai brushJapan'sKantō region as a strong typhoon, causing extensive destruction. One month later, in early October, Typhoon Hagibis made landfall just west—atShizuoka—as a large typhoon, causing extensive damages worth over $17 billion, making it, at that time, the costliest Pacific typhoon on record (unadjusted for inflation), untilTyphoon Doksuri surpassed it four years later. The Philippines saw two destructive storms wreak havoc across the nation in December.Typhoon Kammuri made landfall inBicol Region as a large, powerful Category 4-equivalent typhoon in early December, while Typhoon Phanfone made landfall in the central region of the country three weeks later, causing at least 50 deaths.
The scope of this article is limited to the Pacific Ocean to the north of theequator between100°E and180th meridian. Within the northwestern Pacific Ocean, two separate agencies assign names to tropical cyclones which can often result in a cyclone having two names. TheJapan Meteorological Agency (JMA) will name a tropical cyclone should it be judged to have 10-minutesustained wind speeds of at least 65 km/h (40 mph) anywhere in the basin, while thePhilippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) assigns names to tropical cyclones which move into or form as a tropical depression in their area of responsibility located between 135°E–115°E and between 5°N–25°N regardless of whether or not a tropical cyclone has already been given a name by the JMA. Tropical depressions that are monitored by the United States'Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) are given a number with a "W" suffix.
| TSR forecasts Date | Tropical storms | Total Typhoons | Intense TCs | ACE | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average (1965–2018) | 26 | 16 | 9 | 295 | [2] |
| May 7, 2019 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 354 | [2] |
| July 5, 2019 | 25 | 15 | 8 | 260 | [3] |
| August 7, 2019 | 26 | 16 | 8 | 270 | [4] |
| Other forecasts Date | Forecast Center | Period | Systems | Ref. | |
| February 7, 2019 | PAGASA | January–March | 1–2 tropical cyclones | [5] | |
| February 7, 2019 | PAGASA | April–June | 2–4 tropical cyclones | [5] | |
| July 15, 2019 | PAGASA | July–September | 6–9 tropical cyclones | [6] | |
| July 15, 2019 | PAGASA | October–December | 3–5 tropical cyclones | [6] | |
| 2019 season | Forecast Center | Tropical cyclones | Tropical storms | Typhoons | Ref. |
| Actual activity: | JMA | 50 | 29 | 17 | |
| Actual activity: | JTWC | 30 | 29 | 18 | |
| Actual activity: | PAGASA | 21 | 15 | 7 | |
During the year, several national meteorological services and scientific agencies forecast how many tropical cyclones, tropical storms, and typhoons will form during a season and/or how many tropical cyclones will affect a particular country. These agencies included the Tropical Storm Risk (TSR) Consortium ofUniversity College London,PAGASA and Taiwan'sCentral Weather Bureau.
The first forecast of the year was released by PAGASA on February 7, within its seasonal climate outlook for the period January–June.[5] The outlook noted that one to two tropical cyclones were expected between January and March, while two to four were expected to develop or enter thePhilippine Area of Responsibility between April and June. Moreover, PAGASA predicts an 80% chance of a weakEl Niño presence during February–March–April period.[5] On May 7, the TSR issued their first forecast for the season, predicting that the 2019 season would be a slightly above average season, producing 27 named storms, 17 typhoons, and ten intense typhoons.[2] One of the factors behind this is due to the possible development of a moderate El Niño anticipated within the third quarter of the year.[2]
On July 5, the TSR released their second forecast for the season, now lowering their numbers and predicting that the season would be a below-average season with 25 named storms, 15 typhoons, and eight intense typhoons.[3] The PAGASA issued their second forecast for the season on July 15, predicting six to nine tropical cyclones expected to develop or enter their area between July and September and about three to five tropical cyclones by September to December. The agency also predicted that the weak El Niño was expected to weaken towards neutral conditions by August and September 2019.[6] On August 7, the TSR released their final forecast for the season, predicting a near-normal season with 26 named storms, 16 typhoons and eight intense typhoons.[4]


2019 was a fairly-above average season. It featured 50 tropical cyclones, 29 named storms, 17 that became typhoons and five became super typhoons. Throughout the year, there were at least 389 deaths from several storms, making the season the least deadly since2015. A record of $34.14 billion in damages were recorded, making 2019 the costliest Pacific typhoon season on record, only surpassing with theprevious season.
| Rank | Total damages | Season |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $38.54 billion | 2019 |
| 2 | $37.83 billion | 2023 |
| 3 | $30.6 billion | 2018 |
| 4 | $29.62 billion | 2024 |
| 5 | $26.45 billion | 2013 |
| 6 | $21.05 billion | 2012 |
| 7 | $18.77 billion | 2004 |
| 8 | $17.44 billion | 1991 |
| 9 | $16.96 billion | 2016 |
| 10 | $15.1 billion | 2017 |
The first half of the season was considerably inactive, despite opening up with a developing area of low pressure which absorbed the remnants ofTropical Depression Usman from the2018 season just to the south ofVietnam. The system, shortly thereafter, strengthened intoTropical Storm Pabuk, which became the first named storm of the season. Four days later, Pabuk make landfall inThailand and exited the basin and into theBay of Bengal. In that same month, Tropical Depression 01W (Amang) affected easternPhilippines bringing torrential rainfall. The next named storm,Typhoon Wutip, strengthened into a Category 5-equivalent super typhoon and became the most powerful February typhoon on record, surpassingTyphoon Higos in 2015.[7][1] Several tropical depressions developed during the months of March and May, however none strengthened into named storms. The month of June was unusually quiet with two storms forming in total. June did include Tropical Storm Sepat, which affected mainlandJapan bringing gusty winds and atornado.[8] Tropical Storm Sepat was only classified as a subtropical storm by the JTWC.[9]
In July, four named storms developed and affected land: Mun, which affectedSouth China,Danas andNari, which affected mainlandJapan, andWipha which also affected South China. None of the storms, however, reached typhoon intensity, which is very rare for the month of July. By August, tropical activity began to increase with the development of three simultaneous typhoons.Typhoon Francisco affected Japan and theKorean Peninsula.Typhoon Lekima reached Category 4-equivalent super typhoon intensity east ofTaiwan and made landfall inZhejiang of easternChina. Lekima brought total damages of $9.28 billion, making it the fifth costliest typhoon and the costliest typhoon in China.[10] Typhoon Krosa formed as a Category 3 typhoon and made landfall in Japan as a severe tropical storm. Tropical Storms Bailu and Podul impactedTaiwan and thePhilippines respectively as well as southernChina but caused minimal damage.

In September, five tropical cyclones formed, includingTyphoon Faxai, which made landfall in Japan as a Category 4-equivalent typhoon on September 8 causing landslides and damage that left a total of $10 billion in damages and three fatalities.Typhoon Tapah killed three people in Japan, and damage left behind in South Korea reached a total of₩2.96 billion (US$2.48 million) and Japan's agricultural damage was amounted to be¥583 million (US$5.42 million).Typhoon Mitag caused havoc in Western China and Taiwan, claiming three lives. Mitag also caused fourteen fatalities as it impacted the Korean Peninsula. The typhoon caused a total of $816 million in damages. During October, four cyclones formed, including thefourth-strongest tropical cyclone worldwide in 2019,Typhoon Hagibis, formed on October 4 near theMarshall Islands, and soon became the second-strongest tropical cyclone of the season when itexplosively intensified into a Category 5-equivalent super typhoon. Hagibis made landfall in Japan as a Category 2 typhoon, causing major damage in the country, killing 98 people and causing a total $18 billion in damage, becoming the costliest Pacific typhoon on record.
In the month of November, six named storms were recorded, including the most intense tropical cyclone of the season, Halong, formed on November 1 and became a Category 5 super typhoon four days later with 10-minute sustained winds of 215 km/h (134 mph) and with a minimum pressure of 905 millibars. In late-November,Kammuri formed and became a Category 4 typhoon on theSaffir-Simpson Wind Scale, and made landfall in thePhilippines on November 30 causing 17 fatalities and dealing $130 million in damages. The month of December was quiet, however, another typhoon,Phanfone, formed on December 19. Phanfone made landfall in the Philippines on December 25 onChristmas Day as a Category 2 typhoon, the first storm to do so sinceTyphoon Nock-ten in2016. Phanfone dissipated on December 29 after striking the Philippines, leaving a total of 50 people dead and causing $67.2 million in damages.
The Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) index for the 2019 Pacific typhoon season as calculated by Colorado State University using data from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center was 276.8 units.[11] Broadly speaking, ACE is a measure of the power of a tropical or subtropical storm multiplied by the length of time it existed. It is only calculated for full advisories on specific tropical and subtropical systems reaching or exceeding wind speeds of 39 miles per hour (63 km/h).
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | December 31, 2018 – January 4, 2019 (Exited basin) |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 85 km/h (50 mph)(10-min); 996 hPa (mbar) |
A tropical disturbance formed over the southern portion of theSouth China Sea on December 28, 2018,[12] which absorbed the remnants ofTropical Depression 35W (Usman) on December 30.[13] Under high verticalwind shear, the low-pressure area remained disorganized until December 31 when it was upgraded to a tropical depression by both the JMA and the JTWC.[14] As it was designated36W by the JTWC, it was unofficially the last system of the2018 typhoon season.[15] At around 06:00 UTC on January 1, 2019, the system was upgraded to the first tropical storm of the 2019 typhoon season and namedPabuk by the JMA, surpassingTyphoon Alice in1979 to become the earliest-forming tropical storm in the northwest Pacific Ocean on record.[16] At that time, Pabuk was about 650 km (400 mi) southeast ofHo Chi Minh City,Vietnam and drifted westward slowly with a partially exposed low-level circulation center.[17]
Under marginal conditions including warmsea surface temperatures, excellent polewardoutflow but strong verticalwind shear, Pabuk struggled to intensify further for over two days until it accelerated west-northwestward and entered theGulf of Thailand on January 3, where vertical wind shear was slightly weaker. It became the first tropical storm over the gulf sinceMuifa in2004.[18] Moreover, it tried to form aneye revealed bymicrowave imagery.[19] On January 4, theThai Meteorological Department reported that Pabuk had made landfall overPak Phanang,Nakhon Si Thammarat at 12:45ICT (05:45 UTC), although other agencies indicated a landfall at peak intensity between 06:00 and 12:00 UTC.[20] Pabuk became the first tropical storm to make landfall oversouthern Thailand sinceLinda in1997. Shortly after 12:00 UTC, the JMA issued the last full advisory for Pabuk as itexited the basin into the North Indian Ocean.[21][22]
In Vietnam, Pabuk caused one death,[23] and the losses were estimated at₫27.87 billion (US$1.2 million).[24] Eight people in Thailand were killed,[25][26] and the losses in the country were estimated to be 3 billionbahts (US$93.8 million).[27] Pabuk also killed one person in Malaysia.[28]
| Tropical depression (JMA) | |
| Tropical depression (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | January 4 – January 22 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 55 km/h (35 mph)(10-min); 1004 hPa (mbar) |
The JTWC upgraded a disturbance north ofBairiki to a tropical depression with the designation01W late on January 4 and expected some intensification,[29] but it failed to develop and the JTWC downgraded it back to a disturbance on January 6.[30] The system continued drifting westwards for two weeks without development. On January 19, the JMA upgraded the low-pressure area to a tropical depression when it was already located about 200 km (120 mi) west ofPalau.[31] The tropical depression entered thePhilippine Area of Responsibility, being given the nameAmang byPAGASA.[32] Amang moved west-northwestward until it made landfall overSiargao at 11:00Philippine Standard Time (PST), January 20.[33] Amang changed course after the landfall, turning northward the next day until weakening overSamar the same day.[34] Amang then weakened into a low pressure area before dissipating shortly afterwards, which thenPAGASA issued their final advisories.[35]
The depression indirectly triggered landslides and flash floods inDavao Oriental andAgusan del Norte, killing 10 people.[36] Damage in Davao were at₱318.99 million (US$6.04 million).[34][37][38]
| Violent typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 5 super typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | February 18 – March 2 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 195 km/h (120 mph)(10-min); 920 hPa (mbar) |
A low-pressure area south of theFederated States of Micronesia intensified into Tropical Depression 02W on February 18.[39] The system was later upgraded to a tropical storm the following day after improving its deep rainbands, earning the nameWutip.[40] On February 20, its convection rapidly deepened,[41] attaining severe tropical storm status from the JMA,[42] before strengthening further into a typhoon the next day.[43] It formed acentral dense overcast,[43] and an eye was detected on satellite imagery shortly thereafter on February 22.[44] By the next day, Wutip underwentrapid intensification,[45] reaching 1-minute winds of 270 km/h (165 mph),[46] becoming the most powerful February typhoon on record, surpassingTyphoon Higos of 2015.[7] Shortly afterward, aneyewall replacement cycle occurred, weakening the storm.[47] Upon completion on February 24,[48] Wutip again rapidly intensified into a Category 5-equivalent super typhoon on February 25.[49] Wutip entered a hostile environment with increasedwind shear and began to weaken, concurrently making another turn westward.[50] On February 28, Wutip weakened into a tropical depression and lost most of its convection,[51] and was given the name "Betty" by the PAGASA as the storm entered the Philippine Sea.[52] The storm rapidly weakened until it dissipated on March 2.[53]
In Chuuk and Yap States, Wutip produced inundation and powerful winds that destroyed crops and damaged around 160 houses, leaving 165 people homeless.[54] On February 23, as Wutip was approaching Guam, power outages were reported across the island,[55] and heavy damage was dealt to infrastructure, adding to the total of over $3.3 million (2019 USD) in damages.[56][57] TheNorthern Mariana Islands received minor impact, and there were no casualties reported in the affected areas nonetheless.[58][59][60]
| Tropical depression (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | March 14 – March 19 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | <55 km/h (35 mph)(10-min); 1006 hPa (mbar) |
On March 14, Tropical Depression 03W formed over theFederated States of Micronesia. Over the next couple of days, the system drifted westward, while gradually organizing. Early on March 17, the tropical depression entered the PAGASA's area of responsibility in the Philippine Sea, and consequently, the agency assigned the nameChedeng to the storm, shortly before it made landfall onPalau. A few hours after the landfall in Palau, Chedeng intensified into a tropical storm; operationally, Chedeng maintained only tropical depression status by theJTWC.[61] It then weakened due to unfavorable conditions and at 5:30PST on March 19, Chedeng made landfall onMalita,Davao Occidental.[62] Chedeng rapidly weakened after making landfall in the Philippines, degenerating into a remnant low on March 19. Chedeng's remnants continued weakening while moving westward, dissipating over the southernSulu Sea on March 20.[63]
Infrastructural damage inDavao Region were atPhp1.2 million (US$23,000).[64]
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Subtropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | June 24 – June 28 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 75 km/h (45 mph)(10-min); 994 hPa (mbar) |
On June 24, the JMA began monitoring on a tropical depression that had formed well to the east ofLuzon from the remnants of a separate system. On June 25, the system began curving towards the northeast; the PAGASA also began to issue warnings on the formative disturbance.[65] Rounding the periphery of asubtropical ridge of high pressure, the depression tracked towards the east-northeast through theEast China Sea, intensifying some as it encountered an area of high sea surface temperatures and low wind shear.[66][67] On June 26, the cyclone left the PAGASA's area of responsibility.[68] Curved banding developed later that day as the center passed east ofOkinawa.[69] Tracing the northwestern periphery of the ridge, the system curved towards the east-northeast, paralleling the southern coast of the main Japanese islands. Supported by favorable sea surface temperatures andoutflow, the system was upgraded to a tropical storm at 09:00 UTC on June 27, gaining the nameSepat.[70] A peak intensity with 75 km/h (47 mph) 10-minute sustained winds was attained later that day while Sepat began to acquire extratropical characteristics.[71][72] The next day, the storm fully transitioned into an extratropical system while accelerating eastward 580 km (360 mi) east ofHitachinaka, Japan.[73] Sepat's extratropical remnants continued accelerating towards the northeast, moving into the westernBering Sea on July 1, before eventually dissipating over theArctic Ocean early on July 5.[74]
This system was not tracked by the JTWC; however, the agency classified the system as asubtropical storm, with 1-minute sustained winds at 75 km/h (47 mph).[9] Some ferry routes andbullet trains were suspended as the storm passed near Tokyo on June 28, dropping heavy rainfall.[75] Evacuations were advised for most districts inKagoshima due to an increased risk of landslides. InHioki, Kagoshima, 164 mm (6.5 in) of rain fell in a six-hour period on the morning of June 28;[76] 240 mm (9.4 in) fell inKamikatsu, Tokushima, in a 24-hour period.[77] AnEF0 tornado damaged 17 structures inGifu andGinan.[8][78]
| Tropical depression (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | June 27 – July 1 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | <55 km/h (35 mph)(10-min); 1002 hPa (mbar) |
On June 27, another tropical disturbance formed along a monsoon trough. Later that day, it was recognized as a tropical depression by theJMA, located nearYap.[79] The next day, theJTWC would release aTCFA on what was then-Invest 95W.[80] Following this, thePAGASA would also issue bulletins on this depression, which was locally known as 'Egay'.[81] On 21:00 UTC of the same day, the JTWC would then follow suit to upgrade Invest 95W into a tropical depression and designate it as '04W'. Generally moving northwestward, 04W would then intensify into a tropical storm, however, the JMA and the PAGASA remained Egay as a tropical depression. Egay gradually weakened and was last noted as a tropical depression on July 1 east ofTaiwan.[82]
Signal No. 1 warnings were hoisted at some areas in Extreme Northern Luzon as Egay neared the area. Despite it not directly affecting land, it enhanced the southwest monsoon, causing light to moderate rains at some parts of the Philippines.[83]
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | July 1 – July 4 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 65 km/h (40 mph)(10-min); 992 hPa (mbar) |
On July 1, an area of low pressure organized into a tropical depression formed in theSouth China Sea, nearHainan and theParacel Islands. The system gradually organized while drifting eastward. On the next day, the tropical depression strengthened into a tropical storm, and theJMA named the stormMun. Later that day, Tropical Storm Mun made landfall on the island of Hainan. However, the JTWC still recognized Mun as a monsoon depression and didn't upgrade it into a tropical cyclone for another day. Late on July 3, after the storm had nearly crossed theGulf of Tonkin to the coast ofVietnam, the JTWC upgraded the storm to tropical storm status and initiated advisories on the system, stating that Mun had organized enough to be considered a tropical cyclone.[citation needed] Between 4:30–5:00 a.m.ICT on July 4 (21:30–22:00 UTC on July 3), Mun made landfall inThái Bình Province in northern Vietnam.[84]Afterward, Mun moved inland while weakening, before dissipating late on July 4.[citation needed]
A bridge inTĩnh Gia District was damaged by the storm, which killed 2 people and left 3 injured. Damage of an electric pole inTrấn Yên District were at₫5.6 billion (US$240,000).[84]
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | July 14 – July 21 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 85 km/h (50 mph)(10-min); 985 hPa (mbar) |
On July 12, an area of low pressure formed near theMariana Islands. During the next couple of days, the system slowly drifted westward while gradually organizing. Early on July 14, the low-pressure area organized into a tropical depression to the southwest of the Mariana Islands. Later that day, the tropical depression entered the Philippine area of responsibility, and thePAGASA gave the system the nameFalcon. Afterward, the system continued organizing while approachingLuzon. On July 16, the tropical depression strengthened into a tropical storm, and the JMA named the systemDanas. Shortly afterward, at 12:00 UTC that day, the JTWC upgraded Danas to a tropical storm.[citation needed]
At 12:30 a.m. on July 17 (PST), PAGASA reported that Danas (Falcon) had made landfall atGattaran, Cagayan and looped over the landmass. However, after post-analysis, Danas's center of circulation didn't made landfall.[85] Northeasterly wind shear had displaced much of Danas' convection to the west, and an area of low pressure had formed to the east of Luzon. This led to the formation of another area of low pressure over the western Philippines. This low would later develop into Tropical Depression Goring. On July 19, the JMA reported that Danas has reached its peak intensity with winds of 85 km/h (53 mph). Later that day, Danas began to weaken. On July 20, around 13:00 UTC, Danas made landfall onNorth Jeolla Province, South Korea, before weakening into a tropical depression soon afterward. At 12:45 UTC on July 21, Danas transitioned into an extratropical low in theSea of Japan, and the JMA issued their final advisory on the storm.[86]
In Philippines, four people were killed after Danas triggered flooding in the country.[87] Agricultural damage inNegros Occidental were calculated at₱19 million (US$372,000),[88] while agricultural damage inLanao Norte reached₱277.8 million (US$5.44 million).[89] Danas caused stormy weather across South Korea; however, its effects were relatively minor. Heavy rains amounted to 329.5 mm (12.97 in) inGeomun-do.[90] A man died after being swept away by strong waves inGeochang County.[91] Damage inSouth Jeolla Province were atW395 million (US$336,000),[92] while damage inJeju Island up to W322 million (US$274,000).[93] Additionally, Danas also triggered flash flooding in Kyushu. An 11-year-old boy was killed.[94]
| Tropical depression (JMA) | |
| Duration | July 17 – July 19 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 55 km/h (35 mph)(10-min); 996 hPa (mbar) |
On July 17, a tropical depression formed from the western part of Tropical Storm Danas after it was battered by northeast wind shear, over the eastern part of theSouth China Sea, just off the coast of Luzon. Over the next couple of days, the system moved northeastward, and re-entered the PAGASA's Philippine Area of Responsibility, and was named Goring while the JTWC issued a Tropical Cyclone Formation Alert (TCFA) on Goring. Goring reached southern Taiwan early on July 19.[citation needed] However, the storm made landfall on Taiwan soon afterward and weakened; as a result, the JTWC cancelled the TCFA and has lowered Goring's chance for development to 'medium'.[95]Goring dissipated by 18:00 UTC on July 19 (July 20 PST), with PAGASA declaring that Goring had degenerated into a low-pressure area and discontinued advisories on the storm, and the JMA ceased advisories as well. The remnant of Goring was then merged with a new low pressure system which would eventually become a Tropical Storm Nari. Goring's outflow was then re-absorbed by Danas.[citation needed]
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | July 24 – July 27 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 65 km/h (40 mph)(10-min); 998 hPa (mbar) |
On July 21, the JTWC started tracking an area of low pressure associated with remnant of Tropical Depression Goring for the potential formation of a tropical cyclone. Under favorable conditions, the system organized itself in the next several days.At 00:00 UTC on July 24, it developed into a tropical depression to the west of theBonin Islands. The storm gradually became more organized while moving north-northwestward. Early on July 25, the JTWC initiated advisories on the storm and gave it the identification "07W". Early on July 26, the tropical depression strengthened into a tropical storm, and the JMA named itNari while it moved northwards. The storm approached southernJapan and as it moved inland, it weakened into a tropical depression. Several hours later, it degenerated into a remnant low. Thus, the JTWC and JMA issued their final advisories on the system.[citation needed]
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | July 30 – August 4 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 85 km/h (50 mph)(10-min); 985 hPa (mbar) |
On July 30, a tropical depression formed in the South China Sea near theParacel Islands andHainan. On the next day, it strengthened into a tropical storm, and the JMA named it Wipha. By July 31, the JTWC upgraded Wipha to a tropical storm. Wipha then made landfall in Vietnam on August 2, and dissipated fully the next day.[citation needed]
InVietnam, at least 27 people were killed.Thanh Hóa Province was the worst hit province within the nation, with 16 deaths alone,[96] and the losses were amounted to 1 trillionđồng (US$43.1 million).[97] Damage inSơn La Province reached 28 billion đồng (US$1.21 million).[98] Damage inHainan andGuangxi valued at¥83.6 million (US$12 million).[99][100]
| Typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 1 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | August 1 – August 8 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 130 km/h (80 mph)(10-min); 970 hPa (mbar) |
On August 1, a tropical depression formed to the east ofMariana Islands. By midnight on August 1, the depression rapidly intensified to be Tropical Storm Francisco. Over the next few days, Francisco gradually strengthened and became a severe tropical storm on August 3. It then became a typhoon 12 hours later. It made landfall in southern Japan and it weakened to tropical storm, then later to tropical depression as it began curving north-eastward. It later transitioned into an extratropical storm as it crossed over north Japan.[citation needed]
In anticipation ofcoastal flooding, 20,020 people were evacuated fromKokuraminami-ku andMoji-ku.[101] Transportation in the affected region was disrupted, with 130 flights cancelled and theKyushu Railway Company suspending train service.[102] Striking Kyushu as a typhoon, Francisco brought heavy rain and strong winds to much of the island. Rainfall accumulations exceeded 120 mm (4.7 in) inNobeoka and 110 mm (4.3 in) inSaiki.[103] Nobeoka observed a local hourly rainfall record of 95.5 mm (3.76 in).[102] A maximumwind gust of 143 km/h (89 mph) was observed atMiyazaki Airport,[104] the highest August wind gust on record for the city. One person drowned in a flooded river inKokonoe.[102] Two people suffered injury after being knocked over by strong winds.[101]
| Violent typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 4 super typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | August 2 – August 13 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 195 km/h (120 mph)(10-min); 925 hPa (mbar) |
On August 2, the JMA began monitoring a tropical depression that had developed in thePhilippine Sea. It was namedHanna byPAGASA. Tropical Depression Hanna strengthened into a tropical storm a day later, and was given the international name Lekima. Lekima soon started to intensify as it moves west-northwestwards, becoming a severe tropical storm on August 4, and rapidly intensifying in the favorable waters, which allowed Lekima reach Category 3-equivalent typhoon intensity on August 7, and the storm underwentrapid intensification, and soon becoming a Category 4-equivalent super typhoon within just 2 hours.[citation needed]
The typhoon underwent aneyewall replacement cycle by the following morning, and began to weaken as it did so, as theSouth China Sea was not favorable for further intensification. Lekima made landfall inWenling, Zhejiang at 12:30 a.m.CST August 10 (16:30 UTC August 9).[citation needed]
The system continued to weaken as it moved inland. Lekima then changed its trajectory from west-northwest to north, batteringEast China. The system kept moving inland and weakened to a tropical depression.[citation needed] Soon afterward, Lekima started to undergo anextratropical transition, with the JTWC discontinuing advisories on the storm.[105] The remnants of Lekima made their way to theKorean Peninsula as an extratropical storm.[106]
Though Lekima, known as Hanna in thePhilippines, did not directly affect thePhilippines, the storm enhanced the southwest monsoon, which caused heavy rain in the nation. Three boats sank inGuimaras Strait; 31 people died and three were missing.[107]
InChina, Lekima was the 2nd costliest storm in Chinese history, only behindFitow of 2013, as flooding from Lekima washed away farms and houses in mainland China after its landfall, as it still was a Category 3 by its landfall.[citation needed]
| Typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 3 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | August 5 – August 16 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 140 km/h (85 mph)(10-min); 965 hPa (mbar) |
A tropical depression formed nearMariana Islands on August 5. By August 6, it intensified into a tropical storm, and was named Krosa by the JMA. Tropical Storm Krosa soon became a typhoon, and rapidly intensified to become a category 3-equivalent typhoon on August 8. Upwelling of cooler waters induced weakening thereafter; by August 13, Krosa weakened below typhoon intensity. Krosa continued moving, albeit slowly, towards Japan with little change in intensity. On August 11 Krosa expanded into 950-mile (1,530 km) in diameter giant storm. Moderately conducive conditions were unable to aid Krosa in strengthening, and it stayed the same intensity before landfall in Japan. On August 14, Krosa emerged in theSea of Japan and a few days later on August 16 Krosa transitioned into an extratropical low.[citation needed]
The typhoon brought torrential rain to parts of Shikoku and Honshu, with accumulations peaking at 869.5 mm (34.23 in) at Yanase inKochi Prefecture. Wind gusts reached 151 km/h (94 mph) inMuroto. Rough seas produced by the storm killed two people while flooding killed one other.[108] Fifty-five people were injured in various incidents.[109] Damage in Japan amounted to be¥2.177 billion (US$20.5 million).[110]
| Severe tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | August 19 – August 26 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 95 km/h (60 mph)(10-min); 985 hPa (mbar) |
On August 20, a tropical depression formed to the west ofMariana Islands. ThePAGASA later upgraded the system to Tropical DepressionIneng. On the next day, the JMA designated Tropical Depression Ineng as Tropical Storm Bailu, and the JTWC classified the system as Tropical Depression 12W. Bailu gradually intensified over thePhilippine Sea, and later intensifying into a Severe Tropical Storm.[citation needed] At 13:00 TST (05:00 UTC) on August 24, Bailu made landfall overManzhou Township,Pingtung County,Taiwan.[111]Bailu weakened a little before making landfall inFujian, China and dissipating late on August 26.[citation needed]
Although Bailu did not make landfall in the Philippines, two people were killed and astate of calamity was declared inIlocos Norte due to flooding.[112] It also caused Php1.1 billion (US$21 million) damage in the province.[113] Bailu killed one person, and injured nine others in Taiwan.[114] Institutional damages were calculated to beTWD 2.31 million (US$74,000),[115] while agricultural damage reached TWD 175 million (US$5.63 million).[116] Damage inFujian reached¥10.49 million (US$1.5 million).[117]
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | August 24 – August 31 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 75 km/h (45 mph)(10-min); 992 hPa (mbar) |
On August 25, theJapan Meteorological Agency began to track a tropical depression nearIfalik. On the next day,PAGASA named the stormJenny, and theJoint Typhoon Warning Center designated the storm as13W. On August 27, the system intensified to become a tropical storm, and was given the namePodul.[citation needed] Podul made landfall inCasiguran, Aurora at 10:40 p.m.PST (14:40 UTC).[118]It then emerged over the South China Sea, intensifying slightly, before making landfall on Vietnam.[citation needed]
In the Philippines, Podul left 2 dead and a damage of₱240 million (US$4.59 million).[119] Podul triggered tornado inHainan, which killed eight people and left two others injured.[120] Damage of this tornado reached¥16.22 million (US$2.27 million).[121] InVietnam, the storm left six dead and two missing.[122] Losses inSơn La Province exceeds 1.8 billionđồng (US$77,000).[123]
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | August 30 – September 6 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 65 km/h (40 mph)(10-min); 996 hPa (mbar) |
On August 30, a tropical depression formed to the east ofLuzon. On the same day, it briefly weakened into a low pressure area and regenerated six hours later into a tropical depression at midnight on August 31.[citation needed] It passed through theBatanes Islands, andPAGASA upgraded the system to a tropical depression, naming itKabayan;[124] however, the system exited their area of responsibility shortly thereafter.[125] In the same time theJoint Typhoon Warning Center issued aTropical Cyclone Formation Alert (TCFA) for Kabayan.[126]Kabayan made landfall inHainan by September 1, and re-emerged over theSouth China Sea later, and was upgraded by the JTWC to a monsoon depression. By late September 2, the JTWC began issuing advisories on the system, giving the identifier16W, while the JMA upgraded the system to a tropical storm, naming itKajiki. Shortly thereafter, Kajiki made landfall overVietnam. Kajiki then re-emerged on theSouth China Sea, interacting with a weak tropical depression inHainan, and then exhibiting to re-intensify once more, as it was absorbing the tropical depression to its northeast. However, Kajiki remained its intensity as a weak tropical depression after it had recurved backed over open waters. The system meandered in a slow northeastward direction until it had weakened and was last noticed on September 7.[citation needed]
Because of the slow movement overVietnam, Kajiki brought heavy rains and triggered flooding. Rainfall were recorded to as high as 530 mm within the regions. At least six people died and nine others remained missing.[127] Agricultural losses were estimated to be₫300 billion (US$76.2 million).[128]
| Very strong typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 4 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | August 31 – September 7 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 175 km/h (110 mph)(10-min); 940 hPa (mbar) |
On August 31, three tropical depressions formed, one of which was east ofMindanao. TheJoint Typhoon Warning Center then issued aTropical Cyclone Formation Alert for the system.[129] On September 1, thePhilippines agencyPAGASA upgraded the system and named itLiwayway.[130]TheJoint Typhoon Warning Center then gave Liwayway the designation15W. Liwayway then began to organize itself while in the Philippine Sea. Early on September 2, theJapan Meteorological Agency reported that Liwayway intensified into a tropical storm, and named the systemLingling (1913). Lingling then continued to organize itself, and soon later, the JTWC upgraded Lingling to a tropical storm. Lingling then formed an eye, as the JMA upgraded it to a severe tropical storm. Lingling then became a Category 1 typhoon late on September 3. Typhoon Lingling (Liwayway) then strengthened piece-by-piece, and the eye began to slowly consolidate around the center of the eye. Despite being away from the Philippines, it was enhancing theSouthwest Monsoon, and causing rains in many parts of the country, while floods in other areas have still not subsided from the previous storms that passed theExtreme Northern Luzon area. Lingling then underwent rapid intensification from favorable conditions near theSouth China Sea and soon became a Category 2, and later a Category 4 on theSaffir–Simpson scale, as it was east ofTaiwan. The eye became clear and wide as Lingling intensified even further. Lingling, moved out of thePhilippine Area of Responsibility, and PAGASA issued its final advisory on Lingling. Lingling then made landfall as a Category 4 onMiyako-jima, then continued to intensify, and reaching its peak intensity as a super typhoon, sinceLekima a month earlier. It gradually weakened as it was east ofChina.[citation needed] At 2:30 p.m.KST (05:30 UTC), Lingling made landfall inSouth Hwanghae Province, North Korea with winds of 130 km/h (81 mph),[131] becoming the first typhoon and the strongest storm to strike the country.[132]On September 8, Lingling weakened to a minimal tropical storm. It moved away from North Korea and the center moved toRussia, weakening even further.[citation needed]
Passing east of thePhilippines, Lingling caused flooding inLuzon. Agricultural damage inPampanga were amounted to₱5.65 million (US$108,000).[133] Economic loss inOkinawa Prefecture were atJP¥533 million (US$4.98 million).[134][135] Passing west ofSouth Korea, Lingling killed three people and injured ten others. Wind gusts reached 196 km/h (122 mph) inHeuksando, the strongest wind observed in the country sinceMaemi in 2003. About 161,000 households had experienced power outages.[136] Damage nationwide were amounted to₩28.76 billion (US$24.1 million).[137] InNorth Korea, five people were dead with three others injured. The typhoon damaged 475 houses and buildings, as well as 46,200 ha (114,000 acres) of farmland.[138] Lingling also passed through theNortheast China, damage were calculated atCN¥930 million (US$131 million).[139] Moreover, Lingling's extratropical remnants caused flooding in theRussian Far East, with damage in theJewish Autonomous Oblast amounting to₽2 billion (US$30.4 million).[140]
| Very strong typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 4 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | September 2 – September 9 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 155 km/h (100 mph)(10-min); 955 hPa (mbar) |
At 18:00 UTC on August 29, a tropical depression formed just east of theInternational Date Line. It moved west across the Pacific Ocean the next day. It was then designated14W by theJoint Typhoon Warning Center after they initiated advisories. By September 2, the JTWC upgraded 14W to a tropical storm, and maintained its intensity for a couple of days. Three days later, theJapan Meteorological Agency finally upgraded the system to a tropical storm, and named itFaxai. Faxai gradually intensified, reaching typhoon status on September 6. Faxai rapidly intensified into a Category 4 equivalent storm on September 8 and reaching its peak intensity.[citation needed] Faxai weakened slightly before making landfall inChiba City shortly before 5:00 a.m.JST September 9.[141]
Faxai was the first storm to strike theKantō region sinceMindulle in 2016, and the strongest storm to hit the region sinceMa-on in 2004. Three people were killed and 147 others were injured. More than 390,000 people were urged to be evacuated. Faxai left 934,000 households without power.[citation needed] Trains service inJR East were cancelled due to the storm.[142] Two people died from heatstroke because of the power outage.[143] Damage in Japan reached US$10 billion.[144]
The name Faxai was retired and was replaced withNongfa.
| Tropical depression (JMA) | |
| Monsoon depression | |
| Duration | September 10 – September 13 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 55 km/h (35 mph)(10-min); 996 hPa (mbar) |
A new low pressure system formed west ofGuam on September 10 in thePhilippine Sea. TheJapan Meteorological Agency upgraded the system to a tropical depression. The system gradually developed by the next day. On the same day, the JTWC upgraded the system into a monsoon depression, due to the broad and disorganized nature of the system. JMA also raised a gale warning for the depression around the same time. By September 12, the depression entered the Philippine Area of Responsibility, and was named Marilyn.[citation needed]
Later that day, JMA cancelled the gale warning.[145] By the next day, the JTWC issued aTropical Cyclone Formation Alert on the system, which will later cancel the next day.[146]Marilyn then dissipated as it exited the Philippine Area of Responsibility, and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center cancelled the Tropical Cyclone Formation Alert for Marilyn. The remnants of Marilyn drifted northeast, then southwest, back into the Philippine Area of Responsibility from an interaction with nearby Tropical Storm Peipah. However due to its "monsoonal gyre" structure, the system produced a new vortex that soon developed into another tropical depression, which eventually developed into Tropical Storm Tapah, while the main circulation of Marilyn interacted with another non-warning tropical depression southeast ofJapan. The JTWC, however, treated them as the same system.[citation needed]
High surf from Tropical Depression Marilyn inPuerto Princesa capsized 6 boats at sea.[147]
| Tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | September 12 – September 16 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 65 km/h (40 mph)(10-min); 1000 hPa (mbar) |
On September 14, a tropical depression formed. The Joint Typhoon Warning Center later issued a Tropical Cyclone Formation Alert and as it gradually developed, it was given the designation17W. Despite the high wind shear, the depression soon intensified to a tropical storm and was named Peipah. Peipah sustained itself for 12 hours before weakening again into a tropical depression according to the Joint Typhoon Warning Center. Tropical Storm Peipah later succumbed to the wind shear, weakening into a remnant low.[citation needed]
| Typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 1 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | September 17 – September 22 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 120 km/h (75 mph)(10-min); 970 hPa (mbar) |
On September 17, a tropical depression formed from the remnants ofTropical Depression Marilyn east ofBatanes.[citation needed]PAGASA later named the tropical cyclone as "Nimfa", as the JTWC issued a medium warning for Nimfa.[148]Tropical Depression Nimfa was later given aTropical Cyclone Formation Alert but still classified it as a monsoon depression by JTWC. The JTWC later designated Nimfa as 18W. Tropical Depression Nimfa was upgraded by theJapan Meteorological Agency into a tropical storm, and was named Tapah.[citation needed] A non-warning tropical depression in theSouth China Sea merged with the circulation of Tapah on Thursday, September 19.[149]Tapah still had a disorganized and mostly exposed center on September 19. Tapah later re-organized itself, and further intensified into a severe tropical storm.[citation needed]
Early morning on September 21 (PST), Tapah exited the PAR, and then thePAGASA gave its last advisory on it. It even intensified further as it passed theRyukyu Islands. Tapah then intensified into a typhoon as per the JMA, Tapah weakened into a severe tropical storm, as its diameter explosively expanded. Tapah then rapidly weakened into an extratropical storm on 00:00 UTC of September 23.[citation needed]
During the passage of Tapah, three people were killed in Japan,[150][151][152] and the agricultural damage were amounted to be ¥583 million (US$5.42 million).[153][154] Damage in South Korea were at₩2.96 billion (US$2.48 million).[155][156] Though three deaths were reported during the storm, officials said that they were not related to Tapah.[157]
| Typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 2 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | September 24 – October 3 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 140 km/h (85 mph)(10-min); 965 hPa (mbar) |
A new low pressure system formed in the outer parts of the Western Pacific near theMicronesia Islands near-mid September. The system gradually organized and theJapan Meteorological Agency upgraded it to a tropical depression on September 25. TheJoint Typhoon Warning Center then issued aTropical Cyclone Formation Alert on it. The JTWC later upgraded the system to a tropical depression and designated it19W.[citation needed] ThePAGASA named the system "Onyok" as it entered the Philippine Area of Responsibility,[158]and theJoint Typhoon Warning Center upgraded it to Tropical Storm Onyok. On September 28, theJapan Meteorological Agency upgraded Onyok to a tropical storm, and named itMitag. Mitag began to organize itself, clearly forming a visible circulation while it was east of Luzon. Later that day the JMA upgraded Mitag to a severe tropical storm. Mitag further strengthened into a typhoon by September 29.[citation needed]
Mitag then further intensified, becoming a Category 2 typhoon by evening on September 30, with a small eye developed. On October 1, Mitag weakened below typhoon intensity, before making landfall inZhoushan, Zhejiang at 20:30CST (12:30 UTC). On the next day, the storm made landfall onSouth Korea.[citation needed]
In Taiwan, 12 people were injured during the typhoon.[159] TheNanfang'ao Bridge collapsed following the passage of Mitag, leaving six dead and 12 injured; the specific cause of the collapse is still being investigated.[160] Agricultural damage inYaeyama Islands were at JP¥84.41 million (US$781,000).[161] InZhoushan, three people were killed, and the economic loss reachedCN¥1.856 billion (US$260 million).[162] Mitag also killed 13 people and left 2 missing in South Korea.[163] Damage nationwide were amounted to be₩181.9 billion (US$151 million).[164][165]
| Violent typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 5 super typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | October 4 – October 13 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 195 km/h (120 mph)(10-min); 915 hPa (mbar) |
On October 2, the Joint Typhoon Warning Center began monitoring a tropical disturbance that was situated north of theMarshall Islands. On the next day, the JTWC issued aTropical Cyclone Formation Alert. On October 4, both the JTWC and the Japan Meteorological Agency began issuing advisories on Tropical Depression 20W.[citation needed]
On October 5, the depressionrapidly intensified into a tropical storm, and was issued the name "Hagibis" by the JMA. Sea surface temperatures and low wind shear allowed Hagibis to strengthen further, and on October 6, Hagibis became a severe tropical storm. On October 7, while continuing to move west, Hagibis explosively intensified and became a super typhoon in the space of only a few hours, developing a pinholeeye. As it approached the uninhabited areas of the Mariana Islands, strong convective activity as a result of extremely favourable conditions saw Hagibis became a very powerful Category 5-equivalent super typhoon on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale, with one-minute sustained wind speeds of 295 km/h (185 mph).[citation needed] TheNational Weather Service also began issuing advisories for its areas of responsibility, with a typhoon warning issued forSaipan andTinian, and tropical storm advisories issued forSinapalo andHagåtña.[166] Hagibis passed over the Mariana Islands at 15:30 UTC on October 7 at peak intensity, with 10-minute sustained winds of 195 km/h (120 mph) and a central pressure of 915hPa (27.02inHg).
After passing the Mariana Islands, Hagibis began aneyewall replacement cycle, which caused the rapid intensification phase to end. As the primary eyewall began to erode,[167] the typhoon weakened to a high-end Category 4-equivalent super typhoon at 00:00 UTC on October 8. Several hours later, Hagibis re-intensified into a Category 5-equivalent system upon completing the eyewall replacement cycle. Hagibis began to weaken on October 10. Hagibis madelandfall on theIzu Peninsula of southeasternHonshu just after 09:00 UTC on October 12. Upon crossing the coast, the system had 10-minute sustained winds of 150 km/h (90 mph) and one-minute sustained winds of 155 km/h (100 mph), equivalent to a Category 2 hurricane.[168][169]
By 13:30 UTC on October 10, the expected impacts in parts of Japan were such that the organisers of the2019 Rugby World Cup decided to cancel at least two matches scheduled to be played over the weekend. On October 12 a third match was cancelled[170]Japan Rail,Japan Airlines, andAll Nippon Airways all announced suspended services.[171]
On October 11,Formula One announced that they are cancelling all Saturday planned events that were initially scheduled as part of the2019 Japanese Grand Prix. This includes the third practice session and qualifying, the latter of which was rescheduled to take place on Sunday morning, a few hours before the race.[172] TheF4 Japanese Championship had previously announced the previous day that they will be cancelling the double header round atSuzuka that was initially scheduled to take place as a supporting event for the Japanese Grand Prix.[173]
The name Hagibis was retired and was replaced withRagasa.
| Typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 2 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | October 15 – October 21 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 140 km/h (85 mph)(10-min); 970 hPa (mbar) |
On October 15, a tropical depression formed in the West Pacific. The depression slowly intensified and was eventually given the name Perla by PAGASA. The depression strengthened into Tropical Storm Neoguri, late on October 17.[174] By 12:00 UTC on October 19, Neoguri became a typhoon as it neared theRyukyu Islands of Japan.[175] Just 5 hours later, Neoguri reached its peak intensity as it began to pull to the northeast. Neoguri began to quickly weaken and made a transition into anextratropical cyclone to the south ofJapan on October 21.[176]
As Neoguri strengthened, it brought light rainstorms to theBatanes andCagayan in thePhilippines. As Neoguri brushed Japan, it dumped up to 9 inches of rainfall in theTokyo Metro Area, which had already been drenched byTyphoon Hagibis earlier that month andTyphoon Faxai the month before.[177]
| Very strong typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 5 super typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | October 18 – October 25 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 185 km/h (115 mph)(10-min); 935 hPa (mbar) |
On October 17, the Joint Typhoon Warning Center began monitoring a disturbance situated a couple hundred miles east of the Marshall Islands, and on October 19, the disturbance quickly organised into Tropical Depression 22W. Advisories began to be issued on the system as a conducive environment with very warm sea surface temperatures and lowwind shear allowed 22W to strengthen. By October 19, it became Tropical Storm Bualoi and on the next day, it entered a period ofrapid intensification. Bualoi quickly became a severe tropical storm and then a typhoon soon afterwards. The rate of strengthening slowed until October 21, at which point Bualoi became a Category 2-equivalent typhoon on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale. The system then recommenced its rapid intensification, strengthening to Category 3 six hours later, and proceeded to steadily intensify further to Category 4 later the same day. Bualoi reached its peak intensity on October 22, with 10-minute sustained winds of 185 km/h (115 mph) and one-minute sustained winds of 260 km/h (160 mph), equivalent to a Category 5 major hurricane. The system began to rapidly weaken the following day, dropping to a category 3-equivalent typhoon.[178]
| Severe tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Tropical storm (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | October 28 – October 31 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 95 km/h (60 mph)(10-min); 992 hPa (mbar) |
A tropical depression formed near Palau on October 28 and made landfall in Vietnam on October 30 as it intensified to a tropical storm and was named "Matmo".[179] The storm brought rainfall to Cambodia and Thailand, while the heaviest rainfall occurred inVietnam, causing flooding and road closures.[180][181] The storm quickly weakened to tropical depression status and dissipated, with its remnants later emerging into the North Indian Ocean on November 2.[182] The remnants soon redeveloped into a depression on November 5, which later becameCyclone Bulbul.[183]
Matmo destroyed 2,700 houses and 35 schools, causing 3.8 billionVND (US$165 million) in damage inVietnam, with majority of losses in two provinces:Quảng Ngãi andBình Định.[184] The storm also killed two people in the country.[185]
| Violent typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 5 super typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | November 1 – November 8 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 215 km/h (130 mph)(10-min); 905 hPa (mbar) |
On November 2, a well-organized low pressure system rapidly organized into a tropical depression several hundred miles east of theNorthern Mariana Islands. The depression strengthened quickly and was upgraded to Tropical Storm Halong the same day. The storm continued strengthening over the open waters, reaching typhoon status. As Halong cleared out its eye,explosive intensification ensued on November 4, and Halong became a Category 5-equivalent super typhoon on November 5. Halong reached its peak intensity as the strongest storm of the 2019 season, with the JTWC estimating 1-minute sustained winds of 305 km/h (190 mph), the highestglobally in 2019 and a minimum pressure of 888 hPa (mbar). On November 6, Halong began to undergo aneyewall replacement cycle and decreasing sea surface temperatures coupled with dry air intrusion began to take its toll on the system, and its circulation was heavily affected and it weakened to a Category 4-equivalent typhoon on 18:00 UTC.[186]On November 8, Halong dropped below typhoon intensity, and finally became extratropical on the following day.[citation needed]
| Typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 1 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | November 4 – November 11 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 120 km/h (75 mph)(10-min); 975 hPa (mbar) |
On November 5, a depression off the coast of thePhilippines developed into Tropical Depression Quiel. Quiel intensified to become the twenty-fourth tropical storm of the season and was named Nakri by JMA. Original forecasts showed it hittingVietnam as a minor tropical storm, or a depression. However, on November 7, unexpected strengthening occurred, and the storm intensified into a typhoon. On November 9, Nakri began to weaken as it dropped below typhoon intensity because of the strongwind shear.[citation needed]
InLuzon, the combined effects of Nakri and a cold front produced widespread heavy rain. The resulting floods and landslides killed 24 people and left 13 others missing.[187] Cagayan Province alone suffered ₱1.8 billion (US$49.4 million) in damage.[188]
| Very strong typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 4 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | November 9 – November 17 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 155 km/h (100 mph)(10-min); 965 hPa (mbar) |
On November 9, the Joint Typhoon Warning Center began monitoring a disturbance located in the open waters of the Western Pacific, several hundred miles east of the Mariana Islands. On November 10 the JTWC issued a tropical cyclone formation alert, and later that day, it developed into a tropical depression, prompting the JMA to give it the name "Fengshen". On November 12, the system slowly developed into a tropical storm as it continued to move westward. Over the next three days, Fengshen strengthened into a category 4 typhoon and showed a formative eye feature as it passed over the uninhabited area of the Marshall Islands, but on November 16, Fengshen began to be offset by vertical wind shear as it gained latitude and it began rapidly weakening.[citation needed]
| Typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 2 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | November 9 – November 22 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 130 km/h (80 mph)(10-min); 975 hPa (mbar) |
On November 11, the Joint Typhoon Warning Center began monitoring a disturbance situated only a couple hundred miles off the coast of thePhilippines. Despite initial models suggesting it would be short lived and move towards land, it quickly organized as sea surface temperatures became very conducive for development, and the JTWC issued a tropical cyclone formation alert late on November 11. Later, it developed into Tropical Depression 27W, and subsequently issued the nameRamon.[189] Ramon intensified into a tropical storm by November 13, and was given the nameKalmaegi by the JMA. Up until November 16, Ramon appeared very disorganised as its low-level circulation center was exposed to high amounts of wind shear and dry air intrusion restricted any strengthening.[190] On November 17, Kalmaegi entered favorable waters and then intensified into a severe tropical storm. By the next day, Kalmaegi intensified into a Category 1 typhoon, forecasted to hit the Ilocos region. On November 20, it hitSanta Ana, Cagayan instead of the Ilocos Region, and rapidly dissipated inland.[191]
Across Cagayan Province, the storm caused ₱618.7 million (US$12.4 million) in damage.[192]
| Severe tropical storm (JMA) | |
| Category 1 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | November 17 – November 23 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 100 km/h (65 mph)(10-min); 990 hPa (mbar) |
A short-lived tropical cyclone was started as a tropical depression formed in November 18 from the Pacific waters off the Federated States of Micronesia as the Joint Typhoon Warning Center issued a TCFA for the system, designated asTropical Depression 28W. By the next day, it entered thePhilippine Area of Responsibility, assigned the PAGASA to name the storm asSarah. On November 19, Sarah intensified into a tropical storm, and was given the international name ofFung-wong (1927).[193] Fung-wong then strengthened into a severe tropical storm east ofLuzon the following day. The JTWC upgraded Fung-wong into a minimal Category 1 typhoon at 08:00 UTC. Soon, Fung-wong was hindered by northeasterly wind shear, and began to weaken rapidly while moving northeast, and dissipated into a remnant Low Pressure Area (LPA) west ofOkinawa, Japan.
| Very strong typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 4 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | November 24 – December 6 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 165 km/h (105 mph)(10-min); 950 hPa (mbar) |
On November 23, a low pressure system developed to the southeast of Guam. It then began to show signs of development and earned a defined circulation, developing into a tropical depression on 25 November, with the JTWC assigning it as29W. The depression then began to develop banding features to the northeast of its center. The storm then intensified slightly, earning the nameKammuri, which is theJapanese word for theconstellationCorona Borealis. Kammuri then passed south of Guam, and further intensified into a severe tropical storm on November 27, and then into a typhoon the next day.[194]Upwelling of itself due to its quasi-stationary movement combined with moderate wind shear hindered significant intensification of Kammuri over the next three days as it moved into the Philippine Area of Responsibility, withPAGASA subsequently assigning the typhoon the nameTisoy.[195] Kammuri began to show signs of rapid intensification again on December 1, ultimately intensifying to a Category 4 typhoon the next day. It made landfall at peak intensity on that day in theBicol Region and began to weaken, weakening to a Category 3 typhoon that evening. On November 30, Kammuri produced possibly the record lowest known cloud top temperature at −109.4 °C (−164.9 °F).[196]
As of January 22, 2020, 17 people have been found dead while 318 were injured.[197] Estimated damages across the central Philippines have been atPhp6.65 billion (US$130 million), according from the NDRRMC.[198]
Both International and local names are retired. Kammuri was retired and replaced with Koto. The name Tisoy was also retired and replaced with Tamaraw for the 2023 season.
| Typhoon (JMA) | |
| Category 3 typhoon (SSHWS) | |
| Duration | December 19 – December 29 |
|---|---|
| Peak intensity | 150 km/h (90 mph)(10-min); 970 hPa (mbar) |
On December 19, the Joint Typhoon Warning Center began monitoring a low pressure system to the southeast ofMicronesia. The next day, the JTWC issued an orange alert in terms of its chance of development, and on the next day, they subsequently followed with a tropical cyclone formation alert. On that same day, as the formation alert was issued, the Japanese Meteorological Agency (JMA) issued its first advisory on the system as a tropical depression. It was given the identifier '30W' on late December 21. The JMA then upgraded the system to a tropical storm 6 hours later and issued the namePhanfone, but the JTWC still classified the system as a tropical depression.[citation needed] The system proceeded to move into thePhilippine Area of Responsibility on December 23, 5:00 amPST, and was namedUrsula by thePAGASA.[199] On the same day, the JTWC finally upgraded the system to a tropical storm. Owing to favorable conditions, Phanfone intensified into a severe tropical storm on December 23, and further intensified into a Category 2 typhoon shortly before making landfall nearSalcedo inEastern Samar, causing drasticflooding and mudslides in the region weeks afterTyphoon Kammuri.[200] The total reported damages of the typhoon is at$67.2 million (or₱3.44 billion) and the total fatalities is 50 deaths (with 55 missing).
The names Phanfone and Ursula were both retired. They were replaced by Nokaen and Ugong, respectively.
Many of the tropical depressions of the season failed to intensify into tropical storms, or even be numbered.

Within the Northwest Pacific Ocean, both theJapan Meteorological Agency (JMA) and thePhilippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) assign names to tropical cyclones that develop in the Western Pacific, which can result in a tropical cyclone having two names.[205] The Japan Meteorological Agency's RSMC Tokyo — Typhoon Center assigns international names to tropical cyclones on behalf of theWorld Meteorological Organization's Typhoon Committee, should they be judged to have 10-minute sustained windspeeds of 65 km/h (40 mph).[206] PAGASA names to tropical cyclones which move into or form as a tropical depression in their area of responsibility located between 135°E and 115°E and between 5°N and 25°N even if the cyclone has had an international name assigned to it.[205] The names of significant tropical cyclones are retired, by bothPAGASA and theTyphoon Committee.[206] Should the list of names for the Philippine region be exhausted then names will be taken from an auxiliary list of which the first ten are published each season. Unused names are marked ingray.
During the season 29 tropical storms developed in the Western Pacific and each one was named by the JMA, when the system was judged to have 10-minute sustained windspeeds of 65 km/h (40 mph). The JMA selected the names from a list of 140 names, that had been developed by the 14 members nations and territories of theESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee. During the season, the namesMun,Bailu andBualoi were used for the first time, after they replaced the namesFitow,Haiyan andRammasun which were retired after the2013 and2014 seasons, respectively.
| Pabuk | Wutip | Sepat | Mun | Danas | Nari | Wipha | Francisco | Lekima | Krosa | Bailu | Podul | Lingling | Kajiki | Faxai |
| Peipah | Tapah | Mitag | Hagibis | Neoguri | Bualoi | Matmo | Halong | Nakri | Fengshen | Kalmaegi | Fung-wong | Kammuri | Phanfone |
After the season, the Typhoon Committee announced that the namesLekima,Faxai,Hagibis,Kammuri, andPhanfone would be removed from the naming lists due to the damages and deaths it caused in their respective onslaughts, and they will never be used again for another typhoon name.[207] In 2021, they were replaced byCo-may,Nongfa,Ragasa,Koto, andNokaen, respectively. With five retired names, this season was tied with the2006 and2020 seasons for the highest number of retired storm names after a single typhoon season, a record it jointly held until it was surpassed by the2022 season which had six retired names but later that record was eventually surpassed by the2024 season, which had nine names retired.
| Amang | Betty | Chedeng | Dodong | Egay |
| Falcon | Goring | Hanna | Ineng | Jenny |
| Kabayan | Liwayway | Marilyn | Nimfa | Onyok |
| Perla | Quiel | Ramon | Sarah | Tisoy |
| Ursula | Viring (unused) | Weng (unused) | Yoyoy (unused) | Zigzag (unused) |
| Auxiliary list | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abe (unused) | Berto (unused) | Charo (unused) | Dado (unused) | Estoy (unused) |
| Felion (unused) | Gening (unused) | Herman (unused) | Irma (unused) | Jaime (unused) |
During the season PAGASA used its own naming scheme for the 21 tropical cyclones, that either developed within or moved into their self-defined area of responsibility.[208][209] This was the same list used during the2015 season, except for the namesLiwayway andNimfa, which replaced the namesLando andNona, respectively. Both names were used for the first time this season, as well asPerla andSarah after replacingPedring andSendong in 2011 but were not utilized in 2015.[208]
After the season,PAGASA had announced that the namesTisoy andUrsula would be eliminated from their naming lists after these typhoons caused a combined total of₱11 billion damages both in Infrastructure and Agriculture on their respective onslaught in thecountry. In January 2020, the PAGASA chose the namesTamaraw andUgong to replaceTisoy andUrsula for the2023 season.[210][211]
This table summarizes all the systems that developed within or moved into the North Pacific Ocean, to the west of the International Date Line during 2019. The tables also provide an overview of a systems intensity, duration, land areas affected and any deaths or damages associated with the system.
| Name | Dates | Peak intensity | Areas affected | Damage (USD) | Deaths | Refs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Wind speed | Pressure | ||||||
| Pabuk | December 31, 2018 – January 4, 2019 | Tropical storm | 85 km/h (55 mph) | 996 hPa (29.4 inHg) | Natuna Islands,Vietnam,Malaysia,Thailand,Myanmar | $95.1 million | 10 | [23][25][26][28] |
| 01W (Amang) | January 4 – 22 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 1,004 hPa (29.6 inHg) | Kiribati,Marshall Islands,Caroline Islands,Philippines | $580,000 | 10 | [36][38] |
| Wutip (Betty) | February 18 – March 2 | Violent typhoon | 195 km/h (120 mph) | 920 hPa (27 inHg) | Caroline Islands,Mariana Islands | $3.3 million | None | |
| 03W (Chedeng) | March 14 – 19 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,006 hPa (29.7 inHg) | Caroline Islands, Philippines | $23,000 | None | [64] |
| TD | May 7 – 8 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,004 hPa (29.6 inHg) | Yap,Palau | None | None | |
| TD | May 7 – 15 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,006 hPa (29.7 inHg) | Caroline Islands | None | None | |
| Sepat (Dodong) | June 24 – 28 | Tropical storm | 75 km/h (45 mph) | 994 hPa (29.4 inHg) | Japan,Aleutian Islands,Russian Far East | None | None | |
| TD | June 26 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 1,002 hPa (29.6 inHg) | Japan,Korean Peninsula | None | None | |
| 04W (Egay) | June 27 – July 1 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,002 hPa (29.6 inHg) | Yap, Philippines,Taiwan,East China | None | None | |
| Mun | July 1 – 4 | Tropical storm | 65 km/h (40 mph) | 992 hPa (29.3 inHg) | South China,Vietnam,Laos | $4.25 million | 2 | [84][212] |
| Danas (Falcon) | July 14 – 21 | Tropical storm | 85 km/h (55 mph) | 985 hPa (29.1 inHg) | Yap, Philippines, Taiwan, East China, Japan, Korean Peninsula, Russian Far East | $6.42 million | 6 | |
| Goring | July 17 – 19 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 996 hPa (29.4 inHg) | Philippines, Taiwan, Ryukyu Islands | None | None | |
| Nari | July 24 – 27 | Tropical storm | 65 km/h (40 mph) | 998 hPa (29.5 inHg) | Japan | None | None | |
| Wipha | July 30 – August 4 | Tropical storm | 85 km/h (55 mph) | 985 hPa (29.1 inHg) | South China, Vietnam, Laos | $76.8 million | 27 | [213][212] |
| Francisco | August 1 – 8 | Strong typhoon | 130 km/h (80 mph) | 970 hPa (29 inHg) | Japan, Korean Peninsula | Unknown | 1 | [102] |
| Lekima (Hanna) | August 2 – 13 | Violent typhoon | 195 km/h (120 mph) | 925 hPa (27.3 inHg) | Caroline Islands, Philippines, Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan, South Korea,China | $9.28 billion | 105 | [214][215][216][217] |
| Krosa | August 5 – 16 | Strong typhoon | 140 km/h (85 mph) | 965 hPa (28.5 inHg) | Mariana Islands, Japan, Korean Peninsula, Russian Far East | $20.5 million | 3 | |
| TD | August 6 – 8 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 994 hPa (29.4 inHg) | Philippines | None | None | |
| TD | August 17 – 18 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,006 hPa (29.7 inHg) | None | None | None | |
| TD | August 19 – 21 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,004 hPa (29.6 inHg) | Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan, East China | None | None | |
| Bailu (Ineng) | August 19 – 26 | Severe tropical storm | 95 km/h (60 mph) | 985 hPa (29.1 inHg) | Philippines, Taiwan, South China | $28.2 million | 3 | |
| Podul (Jenny) | August 24 – 31 | Tropical storm | 75 km/h (45 mph) | 992 hPa (29.3 inHg) | Yap, Philippines, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand,Cambodia | $19.2 million | 14 | [212] |
| Kajiki (Kabayan) | August 30 – September 6 | Tropical storm | 65 km/h (40 mph) | 996 hPa (29.4 inHg) | Philippines, South China, Vietnam, Laos | $76.2 million | 10 | [212] |
| Lingling (Liwayway) | August 31 – September 7 | Very strong typhoon | 175 km/h (110 mph) | 940 hPa (28 inHg) | Philippines, Ryukyu Islands, Korean Peninsula, Northeast China, Russian Far East | $300 million | 8 | |
| TD | September 1 – 2 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 1,000 hPa (30 inHg) | Philippines | None | None | |
| Faxai | September 2 – 9 | Very strong typhoon | 155 km/h (95 mph) | 955 hPa (28.2 inHg) | Japan | $10 billion | 3 | [218] |
| TD | September 4 – 5 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,006 hPa (29.7 inHg) | Caroline Islands | None | None | |
| TD | September 7 – 10 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 1,000 hPa (30 inHg) | Ryukyu Islands, Korean Peninsula | None | None | |
| Marilyn | September 10 – 13 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 996 hPa (29.4 inHg) | None | None | None | |
| Peipah | September 12 – 16 | Tropical storm | 65 km/h (40 mph) | 1,000 hPa (30 inHg) | Mariana Islands,Bonin Islands | None | None | |
| TD | September 15 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 996 hPa (29.4 inHg) | Japan | None | None | |
| Tapah (Nimfa) | September 17 – 22 | Strong typhoon | 120 km/h (75 mph) | 970 hPa (29 inHg) | Taiwan, East China, Japan, South Korea | $7.9 million | 3 | |
| TD | September 17 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,004 hPa (29.6 inHg) | Philippines | None | None | |
| Mitag (Onyok) | September 24 – October 3 | Strong typhoon | 140 km/h (85 mph) | 965 hPa (28.5 inHg) | Mariana Islands, Taiwan, Japan, East China, South Korea | >$816 million | 22 | [219] |
| TD | October 1 – 3 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,008 hPa (29.8 inHg) | None | None | None | |
| Hagibis | October 4 – 13 | Violent typhoon | 195 km/h (120 mph) | 915 hPa (27.0 inHg) | Mariana Islands, Japan, South Korea, Russian Far East, Aleutian Islands,Alaska | >$17.3 billion | 121 | [220] |
| Neoguri (Perla) | October 15 – 21 | Strong typhoon | 140 km/h (85 mph) | 970 hPa (29 inHg) | Japan | None | None | |
| Bualoi | October 18 – 25 | Very strong typhoon | 185 km/h (115 mph) | 935 hPa (27.6 inHg) | Caroline Islands, Mariana Islands | $200 million | 13 | |
| TD | October 21 – 22 | Tropical depression | Not specified | 1,008 hPa (29.8 inHg) | None | None | None | |
| Matmo | October 28 – 31 | Severe tropical storm | 95 km/h (60 mph) | 992 hPa (29.3 inHg) | Philippines,Vietnam,Cambodia,Laos,Thailand | $39.4 million | 2 | [212] |
| Halong | November 1 – 8 | Violent typhoon | 215 km/h (130 mph) | 905 hPa (26.7 inHg) | None | None | None | |
| Nakri (Quiel) | November 4 – 11 | Strong typhoon | 120 km/h (75 mph) | 975 hPa (28.8 inHg) | Philippines, Vietnam | $49.4 million | 24 | [188][221][212] |
| Fengshen | November 9 – 17 | Very strong typhoon | 155 km/h (95 mph) | 965 hPa (28.5 inHg) | Marshall Islands, Marianas Islands | None | None | |
| Kalmaegi (Ramon) | November 9 – 22 | Strong typhoon | 130 km/h (80 mph) | 975 hPa (28.8 inHg) | Philippines, Taiwan | $12.4 million | None | |
| Fung-wong (Sarah) | November 17 – 23 | Severe tropical storm | 100 km/h (60 mph) | 990 hPa (29 inHg) | Philippines, Taiwan, Ryukyu Islands | None | None | |
| Kammuri (Tisoy) | November 24 – December 6 | Very strong typhoon | 165 km/h (105 mph) | 950 hPa (28 inHg) | Caroline Islands, Mariana Islands, Philippines | $130 million | 17 | |
| TD | November 26 – 28 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 1,002 hPa (29.6 inHg) | Mariana Islands | None | None | |
| TD | November 28 – December 1 | Tropical depression | 55 km/h (35 mph) | 1,002 hPa (29.6 inHg) | Caroline Islands | None | None | |
| Phanfone (Ursula) | December 19 – 29 | Strong typhoon | 150 km/h (95 mph) | 970 hPa (29 inHg) | Caroline Islands, Philippines | $67.2 million | 50 | [222][223] |
| Season aggregates | ||||||||
| 50 systems | December 31, 2018 – December 29, 2019 | 215 km/h (130 mph) | 905 hPa (26.7 inHg) | $38.5 billion | 453 | |||
According to Mark Lander (University of Guam), this appears to be the only cloud-top temperature on record known to exceed by a wide margin the world record reported by Elizabeth Ebert and Greg Holland in 1992 of −102.2 °C (−152.0 °F) [sic] from Tropical Cyclone Hilda east of Australia in 1990.