| 2011 GermanyE. coli O104:H4 outbreak | |
|---|---|
 Schistocytes seen in a person withhemolytic-uremic syndrome | |
 Map of cases and restrictions in relation to the outbreak (click for key and enlarged version) | |
| Bacteria strain | Escherichia coliO104:H4 |
| Source | Contaminatedorganicfenugreek sprouts |
| Location | Western andNorthern Europe, theUnited States andCanada |
| First outbreak | Aachen,Germany |
| Date | 1 May–21 July 2011 |
| Confirmed cases | 3,950 |
| Severe cases | 800 |
Deaths | 53 |
A novel strain ofEscherichia coli O104:H4 bacteria caused a serious outbreak offoodborne illness focused in northern Germany in May through June 2011. The illness was characterized by bloodydiarrhea, with a high frequency of serious complications, includinghemolytic–uremic syndrome (HUS), a condition that requires urgent treatment. The outbreak was originally thought to have been caused by anenterohemorrhagic (EHEC) strain ofE. coli, but it was later shown to have been caused by anenteroaggregativeE. coli (EAEC) strain that had acquired the genes to produceShiga toxins, present inorganicfenugreek sprouts.
Epidemiological fieldwork suggested fresh vegetables were the source of infection. The agriculture minister ofLower Saxony identified anorganic farm[1] inBienenbüttel, Lower Saxony, Germany, which produces a variety of sprouted foods, as the likely source of theE. coli outbreak.[2] The farm was shut down.[2] Although laboratories in Lower Saxony did not detect the bacterium in produce, a laboratory inNorth Rhine-Westphalia later found the outbreak strain in a discarded package of sprouts from the suspect farm.[3] A control investigation confirmed the farm as the source of the outbreak.[4] On 30 June 2011, the GermanBundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR) (Federal Institute for Risk Assessment), an institute of the GermanFederal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, announced that seeds of organic[5]fenugreek imported fromEgypt were likely the source of the outbreak.[6]
In all, 3,950 people were affected and 53 died, 51 of whom were in Germany.[7] 800 people suffered hemolytic–uremic syndrome (HUS), which can lead to kidney failure.[8] A handful of cases were reported in several other countries includingSwitzerland,[9]Poland,[9] theNetherlands,[9]Sweden,[9]Denmark,[9] the UK,[9][10] Canada and the USA.[11] Essentially all affected people had been in Germany or France shortly before becoming ill.
Initially, German officials made incorrect statements on the likely origin and strain ofEscherichia coli.[12][13][14][15] The German health authorities, without results of ongoing tests, incorrectly linked the O104 serotype tocucumbers imported from Spain.[16] Later, they recognised that Spanishgreenhouses were not the source of theE. coli and cucumbersamples did not contain the specificE. coli variant causing the outbreak.[17][18] Spain consequently expressed anger about having its produce linked with the deadlyE. coli outbreak, which cost Spanish exporters US$200 million per week.[19] Russia banned the import of all fresh vegetables from the European Union from early June until 22 June 2011.[20]
EnterohemorrhagicE. coli has been linked to foodborne outbreaks of bloody diarrhea and hemolytic–uremic syndrome around the world since at least the early 1980s.[21] The majority of disease has been attributed toE. coli with theserotypeO157:H7; however, over 100E. coli serotypes have been associated with human diarrheal disease.[22]
In the five years before the outbreak (2006 to 2010) Germany experienced anaverage of 218 cases of EHEC gastroenteritis and 13 cases of hemolytic–uremic syndrome each year.[23] According to the German National Reference Centre forSalmonella and Other Enteric Pathogens, the most common serotypes in those years were O157, O26, O103, and O91.[24] Serotype O104 was relatively rare in Europe in the years preceding the outbreak, with just 11 reported cases in the EU and Norway between 2004 and 2009.[25]
Cases began as early as 1 May 2011 with a man inAachen reporting bloody diarrhea.[23] Cases then rapidly increased, with over 100 cases of EHEC gastroenteritis and/or HUS were being reported each day by 16 May.[23] The outbreak centered on the five northern German states of Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Bremen, Lower Saxony, and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.[23] Cases would eventually be reported in all 16 German states; however most cases outside of the northern states were linked to travel in northern Germany.[26] Additionally, a small number of cases were reported from other countries, although most of those ill had previously travelled to Germany. The most substantial outbreak outside of Germany was in Bordeaux, France where 15 cases of EHEC gastroenteritis were associated with the same strain ofE. coli which caused the outbreak in Germany. The French cases had not previously travelled to Germany, suggesting they acquired the bacteria from contaminated sprouts grown in France.[23] Cases of EHEC HUS and gastroenteritis peaked on 21 and 22 May respectively.[26] Cases then slowly decreased over the following month, with cases reported throughout the month of June and ending during July 2011. German authorities deemed the outbreak over in early July 2011.[23]
The outbreak disproportionately affected adults and the elderly. 88% of hemolytic–uremic syndrome patients were over 17 years of age, and the median age of hemolytic–uremic syndrome patients was 42 years.[26] The median age of patients who died of gastroenteritis was 82 years, while the median age of patients who died from hemolytic–uremic syndrome was 74 years.[26]
Most or all victims were believed to have become infected in Germany or France. Confirmed cases are listed below according to their location when diagnosed.
| Country | Non-HUS cases | HUS cases | Deaths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Canada | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Czech Republic | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Denmark | 16 | 10 | 0 |
| France | 4 | 9 | 0 |
| Germany | 2947 | 818 | 51 |
| Greece | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Netherlands | 7 | 4 | 0 |
| Norway | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Poland | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Sweden | 35 | 18 | 1 |
| Switzerland | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| United States | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 2987 | 855 | 53 |
The investigation into the cause of the outbreak officially began with the notification of theRobert Koch Institute on 19 May concerning three cases of HUS in children in Hamburg.[26] On 26 May, German health officials hastily and prematurely announced that cucumbers from Spain were identified as a source of theE. coli outbreak in Germany,[27] when in fact the source were Egyptian sprouts. On 27 May 2011, German officials issued an alert distributed to nearby countries, identifying organic cucumbers from Spain and withdrawing them from the market.[14] The European Commission on 27 May said the two Spanish greenhouses suspected to be the sources had been closed, and were being investigated.[28][29] The investigation included analyzing soil and water samples from the greenhouses in question, located in theAndalusia region, with results expected by 1 June.[30] Cucumber samples from the Andalusian greenhouses did not showE. coli contamination,[31][32][33] but cross-contamination duringtransport in Germany and distribution inHamburg are not discounted; in fact, the most probable cause is cross-contamination inside Germany.[34] TheRobert Koch Institute advises against eating raw tomatoes, cucumbers, and lettuces in Germany to prevent further cases.[35]
On 31 May, an EU official said the transport chain was so long, the cucumbers from Spain could have been contaminated at any point along the transit route.[36] Spanish officials said before, there was no proof that the outbreak originated in Spain; Spanish Secretary of State for European AffairsDiego López Garrido said, "you can't attribute the origin of this sickness to Spain."[29]
On Tuesday 31 May, lab tests showed two of the four cucumbers examined did contain toxin-producingE. coli strains,[34] but not the O104 strain found in patients. The bacteria in the other two cucumbers have not yet been identified.[citation needed]
Genomic sequencing byBGI Shenzhen confirm a 2001 finding that the O104:H4 serotype has someenteroaggregativeE. coli (EAEC or EAggEC) properties, presumably acquired byhorizontal gene transfer.[37][38][39]
The only previous documented case of EHEC O104:H4 was inSouth Korea in 2005, and researchers pointed at contaminatedhamburgers as a possible cause.[40]
On 4 June, German and EU officials had allegedly been examining data that indicated an open catering event at a restaurant inLübeck, Germany, was a possible starting point of the ongoing deadlyE. coli outbreak in Europe.[41][42] German hospitals were nearly overwhelmed by the number ofE. coli victims.[43]
A spokesman for the agriculture ministry inLower Saxony, warned people on 5 June to stop eating localbean sprouts, as they had become the latest suspected cause of theE. coli outbreak.[44] A farm inBienenbuettel, Lower Saxony, was announced as the probable source,[45][46] but on 6 June, officials said this could not be substantiated by tests. Of the 40 samples from the farm that were being examined, 23 had tested negative.[47] But on 10 June, the head of the Robert Koch Institute confirmed the sprouts were the source of the outbreak, and people who ate the sprouts were nine times more likely to have bloody diarrhea.[48][49]TheWHO have confirmed on 10 June this statement on the update 13 of the EHEC outbreak.[50]
According to the head of the nationalE. coli lab at the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, the strain responsible for the outbreak has been circulating in Germany for 10 years, and in humans not cattle. He said it is likely to have gotten into food via human feces.[51]
A joint risk-assessment byEFSA/ECDC, issued 29 June 2011, made a connection between the German outbreak and a HUS outbreak in theBordeaux area of France, first reported on 24 June, in which infection withE. coli O104:H4 has been confirmed in several patients.[52] The assessment implicatedfenugreek seeds imported fromEgypt in 2009 and 2010, from which sprouts were grown, as a common source of both outbreaks, but cautioned, "there is still much uncertainty about whether this is truly the common cause of the infections", as tests on the seeds had not yet found anyE. coli bacteria of the O104:H4 strain.[53][54] The potentially contaminated seeds were widely distributed in Europe.[55] Egypt, for its part, steadfastly denied it may have been the source of deadlyE. coli strain, with the Minister of Agriculture calling speculations to that effect "sheer lies".[56]
Using epidemiological methods the outbreaks in 2011 were traced to a shipment of seeds from Egypt that arrived in Germany in December 2009.[5][8]
On 22 May, Health CommissionerJohn Dalli of theEuropean Commission declared the issue to be an 'absolute priority', saying the commission is working with member states, particularly Germany, to identify the source of the outbreak.[57] Speaking again on 1 June, Commissioner Dalli noted the outbreaks have been limited in origin to the greater Hamburg area and declared any product ban would be disproportionate. He also said he is working with Agriculture CommissionerDacian Cioloş "to address the hardship faced by this group of our citizens that has also been hit hard by theE. coli outbreak".[58] He also said, "In the future, we need to see how the timing of the alerts can be closer to the actual scientific basis and proof."[59]
By 7 June, EU Ministers held an emergency meeting inLuxembourg to discuss the growing crisis, which had left 23 people dead, and more than 2,000 ill so far.[59][60] Germany's Federal Agriculture Minister,Ilse Aigner, repeated her warnings to EU consumers to avoid eating any bean sprouts, cucumbers, tomatoes, andsalads.[60]
The United StatesCenter for Disease Control and theUnited States Department of Agriculture has long been concerned regarding risks involving theE. coli risk in raw bean sprout production.[59][failed verification]
Apart from the German government, which warned against the consumption of all raw cucumbers, tomatoes, and lettuce,[61] several countries implemented restrictions or bans on the import of produce.
Many other European countries took restrictive actions or lost sales of produce, including Albania, Croatia,[62] and Russia.
The ban on EU vegetables was lifted on 10 June, but stiff safety measures remained in place.[63]
Many countries took restrictive action. Egypt was a focus of the epidemiological investigation because the fenugreek seeds were imported into Germany from Egypt.[citation needed]
Egypt's Minister of Health Ashraf Hatem denied his nation had any patients infected with the newE. coli strain, due to the strict precautions brought in to test overseas tourists entering the country on 2 June.[64][65]
Responding to claims that Egyptian fenugreek seeds were the cause of theE. coli outbreak, Egyptian Minister of Agriculture Ayman Abu-Hadid told the Egyptian press the problem had nothing to do with Egypt and instead asserted, "Israel is waging a commercial war against Egyptian exports."[66]
Canada and the United States reported cases ofE. coli infection that had been acquired in Europe.[citation needed]
On 2 June, Canada brought in stricter antiE. coli-related food inspections,[67] and by 3 June thePublic Health Agency of Canada said no Canadians had been reported sick with the strain as of that date. The Canadian government also brought in heavier import and hygiene restrictions on EU cucumbers, lettuces, and tomatoes.[68]
TheUnited States Department of Agriculture and theFood and Drug Administration (FDA) stated that emerging strains ofE. coli are a significant problem, but regulatory bodies in the US have concentrated on the more infamousE. coli O157 serotype.[69][70]
The FDA noted nearly all of America's fresh produce is grown in the US and areas of Central America, and the EU has not been a significant source of fresh produce for the US.[71]
Other countries, including Nigeria, Hong Kong, and Thailand, expressed concern regarding imported produce.[citation needed]
By 1 June, Italian, Austrian, and French cucumber sales had begun to decline sharply, but the Austrian Health Ministry official, Dr. Pamela Rendi-Wagner, claimed Austrian customers were still safe.[72]
On 3 June, the governments of Spain, Portugal, and Germany said they would formally request EU agricultural aid for farmers affected by the outbreak.[73] That day, Russia also set up plans for new imports of cucumbers from Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Egypt, and Turkey.[74][75]
By 7 June, the EU's farmers had reported they had lost millions of dollars in exports during the outbreak, with Fepex, Spain's fruit and vegetable industry group, saying its growers had $256,000,000 in turnover.[60] French, Swiss, Bulgarian, German, Dutch, Belgian, and Portuguese producers have also been similarly affected.[60]
That day, the EU proposed issuing £135,000,000 in agricultural compensation to its farmers. The EU agriculture commissioner said the EU's farmers could get back up to 30% of the cost of vegetables they were unable to sell.[76] The EU's health commissioner, John Dalli, had formally criticised Germany earlier that day for rushing out "premature conclusions" about the source of an outbreak, and only helped to spread alarm among the public and farmers and untimely leading to the damaging the EU's agriculture sector.[77] John Dalli also told the EU parliament in Strasbourg that claims had to be scientifically sound, unbiased, and fool-proof in nature before it was publicised in future.[78]
Spain then rejected theEuropean Commission's €150,000,000/£135,000,000 compensation deal for their farmers who were hit by theE. coli outbreak, on 8 June, saying it was too small.[79] France, the European Union's largest agricultural grower, said it would support the plan to compensate producers hurt by the outbreak, according to the French Agriculture MinisterBruno Le Maire.[46]
Ministers from both EU and Russia were scheduled to meet on 8 June over Russia's earlier decision to ban all its vegetable imports from the EU.[80]
On 8 June, the EU'sE. coli O104:H4 outbreak was estimated to have cost $2,840,000,000 in human losses (such as sick leave), regardless of material losses (such as dumped cucumbers).[81]
Consumers across Europe were shunning fruit and vegetablesen masse by 8 June, as the German government's edict against eating raw cucumbers, tomatoes, lettuce and sprouts remained in place. EU farmers claimed to have losses up to C$417,000,000 a week as ripe vegetables rotted in their fields and warehouses.[82] On 8 June, The EU Farm Commissioner Dacian Cioloş said the EU had increased its offer of compensation to farmers for the losses caused by theE. coli outbreak to C$210,000,000.[82]
The outbreak was caused by a strain ofE. coli of the serotype O104:H4, that was unusual for having characteristics of both enteroaggregativeE. coli and enterohemorrhagicE. coli.[83] The strain has a number of virulence genes typical of enteroaggregativeE. coli, includingattA,aggR,aap,aggA, andaggC, in addition to theShiga toxin variant 2.[26] All bacteria isolated from patients in this outbreak were resistant tobeta-lactam antibiotics, third-generationcephalosporins, and partially resistant tonalidixic acid, but susceptible tocarbapenems andciprofloxacin.[26]
there were 53 confirmed deaths.
Egypt on Friday dismissed as untrue European reports that fenugreek seeds from Egypt were a suspected source of a deadly E coli outbreak.
