Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

2009 California Proposition 1E

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposition 1E

May 19, 2009
Mental Health Service Funding. Temporary Reallocation. Helps Balance State Budget.
Results
Choice
Votes%
Yes1,597,90733.52%
No3,169,16366.48%
Total votes4,767,070100.00%

Against

  70–80%
  60–70%
  50–60%

Elections in California
U.S. President
U.S. President primary
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
Executive
Governor
Lieutenant governor
Secretary of state
Attorney general
Treasurer
Controller
Superintendent
Insurance commissioner
Board of equalization

Legislature
Senate
Assembly

Judiciary
Court of appeals

Elections by year

Proposition 1E was a defeatedCaliforniaballot proposition that appeared on the May 19, 2009special election ballot. The measure waslegislatively referred by theState Legislature. If passed Proposition 1E would have authorized a one-time reallocation of income tax revenue to help balance the state budget.

Background

[edit]

In February 2009, the State Legislature narrowly passed the2008–2009 state budget during a special session, months after it was due. As part of the plan to lower the state's annual deficits, the State Legislature ordered a special election with various budget reform ballot propositions, among them Proposition 1E.[1]

The proposition was part of Senate Bill 10 (Third Extraordinary Session), which was authored by SenatorDenise Ducheny, aDemocrat fromSan Diego.[2] The bill passed in theState Senate by a vote of 36 to 2 and in theState Assembly by a vote of 76 to 4.[2]

Proposal

[edit]

Proposition 1E would have authorized a fund-shift of approximately $230 million annually inincome tax surcharge revenue currently earmarked for specified mental health programs under the terms ofProposition 63, also known as theMental Health Services Act. For two years that revenue would have instead be used to pay for the state's share of theEarly and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment Program, a federally mandatedMedicaid program for low income persons under age 21. At the time, revenue for this program came from the state's General Fund.[3]

The earmarked Proposition 63 revenue that would be diverted comes from a 1% state income tax surcharge imposed on the portion of a taxpayer's taxable income in excess of $1 million. In the past, this surcharge has taken in between $900 million and $1.5 billion annually.[3]

Results

[edit]
Proposition 1E[4]
ChoiceVotes%
Referendum failedNo3,169,16366.48
Yes1,597,90733.52
Valid votes4,767,07097.85
Invalid or blank votes104,8752.15
Total votes4,871,945100.00
Registered voters/turnout17,153,01228.40

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Proposition 1A Analysis - Voter Information Guide 2009".California Secretary of State. Archived fromthe original on May 7, 2009. Retrieved2009-05-08.
  2. ^ab"Bill Documents: SBX3 10".California Office of the Legislative Counsel. Retrieved2009-07-14.
  3. ^ab"Proposition 1E Analysis - Voter Information Guide 2009".California Secretary of State. Archived fromthe original on July 9, 2009. Retrieved2009-07-14.
  4. ^"Statement of Vote: May 19, 2009, Statewide Special Election"(PDF).California Secretary of State. 2009-06-26. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2009-07-16. Retrieved2009-07-14.

External links

[edit]
(2008 ←) 2009 California elections (→ 2010)
May special election
Special elections
Local elections
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2009_California_Proposition_1E&oldid=1310622287"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp