California Proposition 6, also known as theSafe Neighborhoods Act andThe Runner Initiative, is a statutoryinitiative that appeared on theNovember 2008 ballot in California. This proposition was rejected by voters on November 4 of that year.
Proposition 6 would have placed additional penalties on gang related and drug crime.
Require new state spending on various criminal justice programs, as well as for increased costs for prison and parole operations. This funding is equivalent to 0.3% of California's General Fund.
Authorize prosecution as an adult (rather than in juvenile court, if a juvenile court judge consents) of any youth 14 years old or older who has been convicted of a gang-related felony.
Require that all occupants who are recipients of public housing subsidies submit to annual criminal background checks and lose housing if convicted of a recent crime in order to free up housing for non-criminals.
Increase penalties for several crimes, including violating gang injunctions, using or possessing to sell methamphetamine, or carrying loaded or concealed firearms by certain felons.
Eliminate bail for illegal immigrants charged with violent or gang-related felonies.
Establish as a crime the act of removing or disabling a monitoring device affixed as part of a criminal sentence.
Change evidence rules to allow use of certain hearsay statements as evidence when witnesses are made unavailable due to actions by the defendant.[1]
The California Legislative Analyst's Office has arrived at the following summary of Prop. 6's estimated costs:
Net state costs likely to exceed a half billion dollars annually primarily for increased funding of criminal justice programs, as well as for increased costs for prison and parole operations.
Unknown one-time state capital outlay costs potentially exceeding a half billion dollars for prison facilities.
Unknown net fiscal impact for state trial courts, county jails, and other local criminal justice agencies.[1]
Funds to pay for these costs, should Prop. 6 pass, will come from 0.3% of California's general fund.[2]
In the current California state budget, $600 million (0.6%) is set aside to assist with local law enforcement. If the initiative passes, an additional $350 million (0.3%) will be required to enforce some of its provisions.[3]
The petition drive to place the measure on the ballot was conducted byNational Petition Management, at a cost of $1.022 million.[10]
Supporters turned in over 750,000 signatures on April 25 to qualify the measure for theNovember 2008 ballot, and the measure was subsequently approved for theballot.,[11][12]
The Peace Officer Research Association, $25,000[13]
Nicholas, who was arraigned on June 16, 2008 and pleaded not guilty on charges that included drug use, security fraud and conspiracy and has withdrawn from active support of the initiative, though the campaign has stated they will not return his $1,000,000 contribution. Ironically he is also charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, meaning he himself would receive the tougher penalties of this initiative.[14][15][16][17][18]
It diverts billions from California's schools, hospitals and childcare centers by funding failed prison and policing policies, deepening the state's ongoing budget crisis.[20]
It targets youth for adult incarceration by deeming any youth 14 years or older who is convicted of a "gang-related" felony must be tried as an adult.
It targets poor people by requiring recipients of public housing subsidies to submit to annual criminal background checks and withdrawing the housing subsidies of people with recent criminal convictions.
It targets illegal aliens by denying bail to those that are charged with violent or gang-related crimes and requires local sheriffs to inform Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of the arrests.
Individuals who are not affiliated with gangs are listed in gang databases and may be falsely prosecuted under this provision.[21]
No