Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century | |||||||||||||||||||
| Results | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Proposition 1A (or theSafe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century) is a law that was approved byCalifornia voters in theNovember 2008 state elections. It was aballot proposition andbond measure that allocated funds for theCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority. It is now contained withinChapter 20 of Division 3 of the California Streets and Highways Code.
The proposition was put before voters by the state legislature. It was originally to appear on the2004 state election ballot, but was delayed to the2006 state election because of budgetary concerns raised byGovernorArnold Schwarzenegger. In January 2006, the Governor omitted the initial funds for the project from his $222.6 billion Public Works Bond for the next 10 years. The Governor did include $14.3 million in the 2006-07 budget for the California High-Speed Rail Authority, enough for it to begin some preliminary engineering and detailed study.[1] The proposition was delayed again from 2006 to 2008 to avoid competition with a largeinfrastructure bond, Proposition 1B, which passed in 2006.
The original proposition would have appeared in the 2008 general election as Proposition 1, but the state legislature enacted Assembly Bill 3034, which replaced that measure with an updated proposal called Proposition 1A. The updated measure included an additional funding requirement and oversight.[2]
The law allocates $9.95 billion to the California High-Speed Rail Authority. Of that sum, $9 billion will be used to construct the core segments of the rail line fromSan Francisco to theLos Angeles area and the rest will be spent on improvements to local railroad systems that will connect locations away from the high-speed rail mainline to the high-speed system. Prop 1A required the California High-Speed Rail Authority to "seek private and other public funds to cover the remaining costs."[3] The project also requires federal matching funds, since the $9.95 billion bond covers only part of the estimated cost of the initial core segment.[2] The money will be raised throughgeneral obligation bonds that are paid off over a period of 30 years.[2]
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
 Yes | 6,680,485 | 52.6 |
| No | 6,015,944 | 47.4 |
| Valid votes | 12,696,429 | 92.4 |
| Invalid or blank votes | 1,046,748 | 7.6 |
| Total votes | 13,743,177 | 100.00 |
The following people were listed in the official voter information guide[5] as supporters:
The following people were listed in the official voter information guide[5] as opponents:
bond funds may be used to provide only up to one-half of the total cost of construction of each corridor or segment of a corridor. The measure requires the authority to seek private and other public funds to cover the remaining costs
| Phase 1 stations |
|  |
|---|---|---|
| Articles related to Phase 1 route | ||
| Connecting rail systems | ||
