 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Should the republic of South Ossetia retain its current status as an independent State, and be recognized by the international community? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 Results by district
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|---|
| Constitution |
|
South Ossetia, a mostly unrecognized republic in theSouth Caucasus, formerly theSouth Ossetian Autonomous Oblast within theGeorgian Soviet Socialist Republic with its capital inTskhinvali, held a referendum on independence on November 12, 2006.
The voters in the independence referendum organized byTskhinvali answered the question: "Should the republic of South Ossetia retain its current status as an independent State, and be recognized by the international community?"[1]
Parallel to the referendum and elections, theGeorgia-backedOssetian opposition movement organized its own elections inEredvi, inhabited by ethnicGeorgians, in which five Ossetian presidential candidates opposed toEduard Kokoity took part. On the alternative referendum the voters answered the following question: "Should South Ossetia engage in discussions with Tbilisi concerning a federal State uniting it with Georgia?" According to the Electoral Commission of Alternative Elections, 42,000 voters turned out for the elections held in the territories under Georgian control, but Tskhinvali claimed that the voters numbered only 14,000.Dmitry Sanakoyev was elected by 88% of voters as the alternative President of South Ossetia.[1]
On 13 November 2006, the Central Election Commission of South Ossetia announced the results of the referendum. 99% of voters supported independence,[2] with voter turnout at 95%.
| Choice | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| For | 51,565 | 99.88 | |
| Against | 60 | 0.12 | |
| Total | 51,625 | 100.00 | |
| Valid votes | 51,625 | 98.97 | |
| Invalid/blank votes | 538 | 1.03 | |
| Total votes | 52,163 | 100.00 | |
| Registered voters/turnout | 55,163 | 94.56 | |
| Source:Direct Democracy | |||
The Georgian government has declared both the election and the referendum illegal, but it was believed to support the Salvation Union of Ossetians, the organization in charge of holding the alternative elections. Kokoity thus accused Tbilisi of staging the alternative elections that aimed at "dividing the Ossetian people".[3][4][5]
On 12 September 2006, the Chairman of the RussianState Duma,Boris Gryzlov, welcomed the appointed South Ossetian referendum and announced that Russian parliamentarians would observe the voting process. On 13 September 2006, the Georgian State Minister for Conflict Resolution Issues, Merab Antadze, issued a statement, condemning Gryzlov's statement as "destructive."[6]
The European Union Special Representative to theSouth Caucasus,Peter Semneby, downplayed the forthcoming South Ossetian referendum and said in Moscow, on 13 September 2006, that the referendum would not contribute to the conflict resolution process in South Ossetia.[7]
On 13 September 2006, theCouncil of Europe (CoE) Secretary GeneralTerry Davis commented on the problem, stating that:
The secessionist authorities of the South Ossetian region of Georgia are wasting time and effort on the organisation of a "referendum on independence" in November. [...] I do not think that anyone will recognise the result of such a referendum. If the people in power in South Ossetia are genuinely committed to the interest of the people they claim to represent, they should engage in meaningful negotiations with the Georgian government in order to find a peaceful, internationally accepted outcome.[8]
The head of the Institute ofCIS Countries and the member of the Russian State Duma,Konstantin Zatulin, is quoted during his visit toArtsakh in October 2006, where he spoke only aboutArtsakh and Transnistria, as saying:
Recognition of the so-called unrecognized states is not far off. Unrecognized republics have all attributes of state system and stable democratic system.[9]
On 2 October 2006, theOrganization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Chairman-in-Office, Belgian Foreign MinisterKarel De Gucht, said during his visit to Tbilisi:
I also call the South Ossetian authorities’ intention to hold a referendum counterproductive. It will not be recognized by the international community and it will not be recognized by the OSCE and it will impede the peace process.[10]
On 11 November 2006,Secretary General of NATOJaap de Hoop Scheffer said in a statement:
On behalf of NATO, I join other international leaders in rejecting the so-called “referendum” and “elections” conducted in the South Ossetia/Tskhinvali region of Georgia. Such actions serve no purpose other than to exacerbate tensions in the South Caucasus region.[11]
On 11 November 2006, Luis Tascón, a member of theNational Assembly of Venezuela, said during a press-conference in Tskhinvali: "Those people who wish to be free, will be free."[12]He also hinted that Venezuela might eventually recognize the South Ossetian independence, claiming that presidentChávez would make a correct decision. He also noted that his presence in Tskhinvali did not guarantee the recognition the South Ossetian independence by Venezuelan Government.[13]
On 11 November 2006,Sergei Fyodorov, an observer andLatvian Parliament member of Russian nationality,[14] and a member ofSocialist Party, stated during a press-conference in Tskhinvali that all peoples had the right for self-determination, and it could not be ignored. He also made a commitment to inform the other members of the LatvianSaeima of his observations.[15]
On 13 November 2006, the European Union foreign ministers said that the vote did not contribute to conflict resolution. The OSCE and the Council of Europe reiterated that they would not recognize the referendum and condemned it as unproductive.[16] An EU statement was later joined byUkraine.[17]
