To calculate theseeding for the2006 FIFA World Cup, FIFA used theFIFA World Rankings in combination with performances of national teams in the two previous World Cups.^[1]

Points were allocated on the basis of 32 for the best achieving of the 32 qualifiers for2006 FIFA World Cup in each of the five fields considered, down to one for the lowest ranking.

The seedings table uses these points obtained from the1998 FIFA World Cup and the2002 FIFA World Cup averaged in a 1:2 ratio respectively, added to the average number of points derived from the World Rankings at three given dates (at ratio 1:1:1), December 2003, December 2004, and November 2005. This generates a view of how well the teams have performed over the last ten years (since the rankings in 2003 include results from eight years prior to that) with a specific focus on how the teams have performed in the FIFA World Cup on previous occasions. Significant differences between this ranking of the teams and the official FIFA rankings at the time of the draw can be seen forCzech Republic,Germany andSouth Korea (ρ=0.87).

Seed	Country	1. FIFA World Cup Finals					2. FIFA World Rankings							Total Points
		France 1998 (33.3%)		Korea Japan 2002 (66.7%)		Avg. Points	Dec 2003 (33.3%)		Dec 2004 (33.3%)		Nov 2005 (33.3%)		Avg. Points
		Rk	Pt.	Rk	Pt.		Rk	Pt.	Rk	Pt.	Rk	Pt.
1	Brazil	2	31	1	32	31.7	1	32	1	32	1	32	32.0	63.7
2	England	9	24	6	27	26.0	8	25	8	25	9	24	24.7	50.7
3	Spain	17	9	5	28	21.7	3	30	5	28	6	27	28.3	50.0
4	Germany	7	26	2	31	29.3	12	22	19	19	16	19	20.0	49.3
5	Mexico	13	20	11	22	21.3	7	26	7	26	7	26	26.0	47.3
6	France	1	32	28	8	16.0	2	31	2	31	5	28	30.0	46.0
7	Italy	5	28	15	18	21.3	10	24	10	23	12	22	23.0	44.3
8	Argentina	6	27	18	9	15.0	5	28	3	30	4	29	29.0	44.0
9	United States	32	8	8	25	19.3	11	23	11	22	8	25	23.3	42.7
10	Netherlands	4	29	-	0	9.7	4	29	6	27	3	30	28.7	38.3
11	South Korea	30	8	4	29	22.0	22	16	22	17	29	13	15.3	37.3
12	Japan	31	8	9	24	18.7	29	12	17	20	15	20	17.3	36.0
13	Sweden	-	0	13	20	13.3	19	19	13	21	14	21	20.3	33.7
14	Croatia	3	30	23	9	16.0	20	18	23	16	20	17	17.0	33.0
15	Paraguay	14	19	16	17	17.7	22	17	30	12	30	12	13.7	31.3
16	Czech Republic	-	0	-	0	0.0	6	27	4	29	2	31	29.0	29.0
17	Portugal	-	0	21	9	6.0	17	21	9	24	10	23	22.7	28.7
18	Costa Rica	-	0	19	9	6.0	17	20	27	14	21	16	16.7	22.7
19	Saudi Arabia	28	8	32	8	8.0	26	14	28	13	32	11	12.7	20.7
20	Poland	-	0	25	8	5.3	25	15	25	15	23	15	15.0	20.3
21	Iran	20	9	-	0	3.0	28	13	20	18	19	18	16.3	19.3
22	Tunisia	26	8	29	8	8.0	45	8	35	11	28	14	11.0	19.0
23	Ecuador	-	0	24	9	6.0	37	11	39	10	37	9	10.0	16.0
24	Serbia and Montenegro	10	23	-	0	7.7	41	10	46	8	47	6	8.0	15.7
25	Switzerland	-	0	-	0	0.0	44	9	51	7	36	10	8.7	8.7
26	Ukraine	-	0	-	0	0.0	60	7	57	6	40	8	7.0	7.0
27	Ivory Coast	-	0	-	0	0.0	70	5	40	9	41	7	7.0	7.0
28	Australia	-	0	-	0	0.0	82	3	58	5	49	5	4.3	4.3
29	Trinidad and Tobago	-	0	-	0	0.0	70	6	63	4	51	3	4.3	4.3
30	Ghana	-	0	-	0	0.0	78	4	77	2	50	4	3.3	3.3
31	Angola	-	0	-	0	0.0	83	2	72	3	62	1	2.0	2.0
32	Togo	-	0	-	0	0.0	94	1	89	1	56	2	1.3	1.3
Seed	Country	Rk	Pt.	Rk	Pt.	Avg. Points	Rk	Pt.	Rk	Pt.	Rk	Pt.	Avg. Points	Total Points
		France 1998 (33.3%)		Korea Japan 2002 (66.7%)			Dec 2003 (33.3%)		Dec 2004 (33.3%)		Nov 2005 (33.3%)
		1. FIFA World Cup Finals					2. FIFA World Rankings

Unlike the2002 FIFA World Cup seeding system which used performances of national teams in the three previous World Cups, this seeding system only used the last two. Had Denmark notfailed to qualify, they would have been seeded at the expense of Argentina.^[2]

All 8 seeded teams qualified for the knockout stages of the tournament, butFrance andMexico failed to win their groups, and so had to play other seeded teams in the second round. Mexico lost toArgentina, and France beatSpain, so while Spain and Mexico were eliminated earlier than the seedings would have predicted,Ukraine andPortugal went further than the seedings predicted, Portugal going on to reach the semi-finals.

• The formula was disregarded in deciding which European team should go in the special pot for the draw (necessary to avoid three UEFA teams in one group).Serbia and Montenegro were picked purely because they were the lowest in theFIFA World Rankings at the time of the draw, despite the World Cup seeding formula placing Ukraine and Switzerland lower.
• Some controversy arose when the Netherlands were left unseeded, leading some to believe that the ranking system overly penalises teams that miss out on qualification for previous World Cups.
• Each monthly FIFA World Ranking at that time included eight years' worth of matches, so by combining the three rankings (December 2003, December 2004, and November 2005), the seeding was most heavily impacted by matches occurring in 2003.^[3]

• 2006 FIFA World Cup
• FIFA World Cup seeding

• Webarchive template wayback links
• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata
• Use dmy dates from December 2023