Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Psychedelic drug
For the book, seeThe Design of Everyday Things.

Pharmaceutical compound
2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine
Clinical data
Other namesDOET; DOEt; DOE; HECATE; Hecate; DMEA; 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine; 4-Ethyl-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine; Dimethoxyethylamphetamine; Ethyldimethoxyamphetamine
Drug classSerotonergic psychedelic;Serotonin5-HT2 receptoragonist;Antidepressant;Psychic energizer;Cognitive enhancer
ATC code
  • None
Legal status
Legal status
Pharmacokinetic data
MetabolismOxidation of the 4-positionethyl group[2][7]
Onset of action1–3 hours[2][3][4][5]
Duration of action5–20 hours[4][6]
ExcretionUrine (10–40% unchanged within 24 hours)[2][3][4]
Identifiers
  • 1-(4-Ethyl-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine
CAS Number
PubChemCID
DrugBank
ChemSpider
UNII
KEGG
ChEMBL
CompTox Dashboard(EPA)
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC13H21NO2
Molar mass223.316 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)
  • O(c1cc(c(OC)cc1CC(N)C)CC)C
  • InChI=1S/C13H21NO2/c1-5-10-7-13(16-4)11(6-9(2)14)8-12(10)15-3/h7-9H,5-6,14H2,1-4H3 checkY
  • Key:HXJKWPGVENNMCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N checkY
  (verify)

2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET) is apsychedelicdrug of thephenethylamine,amphetamine, andDOx families.[8][6][3][2] It is closely related toDOM and is asyntheticanalogue of thenaturally occurring phenethylamine psychedelicmescaline.[2][9] The drug acts as aselectiveagonist of theserotonin5-HT2 receptors, including of the serotonin5-HT2A,5-HT2B, and5-HT2C receptors.[10][11]

DOET was first discovered byAlexander Shulgin in the 1960s.[12] It was clinically studied at low and sub-hallucinogenic doses for potential use as apharmaceutical drug acting as a "psychic energizer" byDow Chemical Company in the 1960s.[12] However, its development was terminated after DOM emerged as astreet drug and caused apublic health crisis inSan Francisco in 1967.[12][13] Nonetheless, DOET's effects at low doses were extensively characterized in smallclinical trials.[2][4][14][15][5] The psychedelic effects of DOET at higher doses were subsequently described by Shulgin in his bookPiHKAL in 1991.[6]

DOET is takenby mouth.[6][3][4] It has a slowonset of 1 to 3 hours, a delayedpeak of 3 to 5 hours, and adose-dependent and potentially very longduration of 5 to 20 hours.[6][16][2][3] Effects at low doses include mildeuphoria, enhancedself-awareness, andtalkativeness, among others.[2][3][4] Mildclosed-eye visuals can also occur.[15][5] At higher doses, DOET produces psychedelic effects includingheightened emotions,sensory enhancement, rich closed-eye visuals, andopen-eye visuals, among others.[6][5] Physical effects includepupil dilation, increasedheart rate, and increasedblood pressure.[4][14][17]

Use and effects

[edit]

In a 1968clinical trial, DOET at anoral dose of 1.5 mg (as thehydrochloridesalt) produced mildeuphoria and enhancedself-awareness, but nohallucinogenic effects (in terms of perceptual distortions orhallucinations/open-eye visuals), marked behavioral changes, orintellectual impairment.[2][3][4][14][17] Other reported effects included feelinghigh, feelings ofinsight, feelings ofpleasantness,body image awareness,impatience, slightdifficulty concentrating,talkativeness,racing thoughts, mildclosed-eye visuals,time dilation in some, feelingalert, and feeling "washed out" after the drug.[2][4][14][17] Some of the effects of DOET in the study resembled those ofdextroamphetamine, including talkativeness, euphoria, and feeling alert.[4][14] The subjective effects began 1 to 1.5 hours after dosing,peaked around 3 to 4 hours after administration, and theduration was about 5 to 6 hours.[2][3][4]Pupil dilation was also observed, but there were no marked changes inheart rate orblood pressure.[4][14][17] There were also changes oncognitive tests ofassociation andserial learning.[2][4][14][17] The effects of DOET were similar to those of low doses of DOM (2.7–3.3 mg) but DOET appeared to be morepotent (with 2.0 mg DOM being indistinguishable fromplacebo).[4][14]

In a subsequent 1971 clinical trial, DOET hydrochloride at oral doses of 0.75 to 4 mg again produced pupil dilation (dose-dependent), mild euphoria, feelings of enhanced self-awareness, and many of the other effects observed in the previous trial.[2][3][15] Once again, there were no hallucinogenic effects, aside from closed-eye visuals in a minority of individuals, and there was nocognitive impairment.[2][3][15] New assessed and reported effects included feelingrelaxed, feelings ofunpleasantness in some,lightheadedness, reduceddepressive feelings, and feelinganxious orrestless.[3][15] The feelings ofnervousness and restlessness occurred more at the higher doses.[3][15] DOET appeared to show a greater apparent separation between threshold and hallucinogenic doses than had been documented for other psychedelics.[15][18] Other psychedelics likeLSD and DOM show a 2- to 3-fold separation, whereas DOET showed an at least 5-fold separation.[15][18] The lesser influence of DOET on perceptual processes than equivalent doses of DOM was in spite of the greater potency of DOET than DOM in producing subjective effects in general.[15][18]

A third and final 1974 clinical trial assessed oral doses of 1 to 4 mg (S)-(+)-DOET, 1 to 2 mg (R)-(–)-DOET, and 2 to 4 mg (RS)-(±)-DOET.[2][19][5] It was found that 1 mg (R)-(–)-DOET was equivalent to 4 mg (S)-(+)-DOET in producing psychoactive effects and hence that (R)-(–)-DOET was about 4 times as potent as (S)-(+)-DOET.[2][19][5] The onset was 1.5 to 3 hours, peak effects were at 4 to 5 hours, and the duration was 6 to 10 hours.[5] The subjective effects were similar to the earlier trials, but new reported effects includedenhanced perception of allsenses, difficult-to-describecognitive alteration, relaxedwell-being, andheightened emotions with rapidmood changes.[5] No hallucinogenic effects orvisual distortions with eyes open occurred, butvivid imagery with eyes closed could be experienced at the higher doses.[5]

Based on the preceding clinical trials, DOET does not produce clear hallucinogenic effects, aside from closed-eye visuals, at doses of up to 4 mg.[2][15][5] However,Alexander Shulgin has stated that DOET is psychedelic at doses of 3 mg and above.[8] InPiHKAL, Shulgin listed the dosage of DOET as 2 to 6 mg and its duration as 14 to 20 hours.[6][8] In experience reports of 1 to 7 mg DOET in different individuals, 1 mg produced relaxation but no psychedelic effects; 2.5 mg produced both open- and closed-eye visuals; 4 mg produced mood-energizing effects but very little or no hallucinogenic effect; 6 mg produced sensory enhancement, rich closed-eye visuals, and no open-eye visual movement; and 7 mg produced strong feelings with themes oflove,eroticism, anddivinity,openness, not much visually, closed-eye visuals, andbody load symptoms.[6] There was considerable variation in subjective effects between individuals.[6] Shulgin has described both DOET and DOM as being effectiveantidepressants at lower doses and DOET as being acognitive enhancer at modest doses.[20][6]

In line with notions that DOET is a "psychic energizer", the related psychedelicDOPR has shownpro-motivational effects in rodents at sub-hallucinogenic doses[21][22] and the related drugAriadne (4C-DOM) has reportedly shown pro-motivational effects in monkeys despite being non-hallucinogenic.[23]ASR-2001 (2CB-5PrO), a non-hallucinogenic analogue of the related psychedelic2C-B, is under development for use as astimulant-likemedication for the treatment ofpsychiatric disorders.[24][25][26][27][28]

Interactions

[edit]
See also:Psychedelic drug § Interactions, andTrip killer § Serotonergic psychedelic antidotes

Pharmacology

[edit]

Pharmacodynamics

[edit]
DOET activities
TargetAffinity (Ki, nM)
5-HT1A14.4–9,727
5-HT1B2,801
5-HT1D6,615
5-HT1E3,552
5-HT1FND
5-HT2A12–100 (Ki)
0.34–30.9 (EC50Tooltip half-maximal effective concentration)
99–112% (EmaxTooltip maximal efficacy)
5-HT2B29 (Ki)
68–110 (EC50)
73–108% (
Emax)
5-HT2C101–108 (Ki)
9.2–17.0 (EC50)
82–102% (
Emax)
5-HT3>10,000
5-HT4ND
5-HT5A>10,000
5-HT6>10,000
5-HT71,225
α1Aα1B>10,000
α1DND
α2A1,277
α2B574
α2C1,447
β15,723
β22,195
D1D5>10,000
H1H4>10,000
M1,M3,M4ND
M2,M5>10,000
TAAR1>10,000 (EC50)
I1>10,000
σ19,780
σ29,560
SERTTooltip Serotonin transporter>10,000 (Ki)
NETTooltip Norepinephrine transporter>10,000 (Ki)
DATTooltip Dopamine transporter>10,000 (Ki)
Notes: The smaller the value, the more avidly the drug binds to the site. All proteins are human unless otherwise specified.Refs:[29][30][11][10][31][32][33][34]

DOET acts as aselectiveserotonin5-HT2 receptoragonist, including of the serotonin5-HT2A,5-HT2B, and5-HT2C receptors.[10][11][35] In one study, itsaffinities (Ki) were 12 nM for the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor, 108 nM for the serotonin 5-HT2C receptor (9-fold lower than for 5-HT2A), and 9,727 nM for the serotonin5-HT1A receptor (811-fold lower than for 5-HT2A).[10] The drug'sEC50Tooltip half-maximal effective concentration for activation of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor was 1.7 to 8.1 nM depending on theintracellular signaling cascade, while itsEmaxTooltip maximal efficacy was 99%.[10] At the serotonin 5-HT2B receptor, itsEC50 was 68 nM (8- to 40-fold lower than for 5-HT2A) and itsEmax was 73%.[10] DOET is afull agonist of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor and a high-efficacypartial agonist of the serotonin 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C receptors.[10][11] The drug is a very weak or inactive agonist of the humantrace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and is inactive at therhesus monkey TAAR1.[31][10] In contrast to many other amphetamines, but like otherDOx drugs, DOET does not bind to themonoamine transporters.[10][11]

DOET produces thehead-twitch response (HTR), a behavioral proxy of psychedelic effects, in rodents.[36] As with other psychedelics, DOET shows a biphasic orinverted U-shapeddose–response curve for production of the HTR.[36] The drug induces the HTR to a similar maximal extent as other related psychedelics likeDOM andDOI.[36] DOET substitutes for thephenethylamine psychedelicsmescaline and DOM, partially substitutes for thetryptamine psychedelic5-MeO-DMT, and does not substitute for thepsychostimulantdextroamphetamine in animaldrug discrimination tests.[37][38][39][40] DOET produceshyperlocomotion in mice.[41][42][43] However, like other psychedelics, it shows a biphasic or inverted U-shaped dose–response curve, increasinglocomotor activity at low to moderate doses and reducing it at high doses.[41][42][43] DOET producesserotonin receptor-dependentpressor andhyperthermic effects in rodents.[43]

Pharmacokinetics

[edit]

In terms of effects in humans, theonset of lower doses of DOET and its individualenantiomers (0.75–4 mg) is 1 to 3 hours,peak effects occur after 3 to 5 hours, and theduration is 5 to 10 hours.[2][3][4][14][15][5] At higher doses of DOET (2 to 6 mg), the duration was reported to be 14 to 20 hours.[6][8] DOET, like otherDOx drugs, has an unusually slow onset and long duration.[16] In rodents, DOET ismetabolized byoxidation of theethyl group at the 4 position.[2][7] It appears to be metabolized more quickly thanDOM.[2] In humans, DOET isexcreted 10 to 40% inurine unchanged within 24 hours.[2][3][4] The greatest excretion rate occurred between 3 and 6 hours.[2][4]

Chemistry

[edit]

DOET, also known as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine or as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-α-methylphenethylamine, is asubstituted phenethylamine andamphetamine and is a member of theDOx group of drugs.[8][6][3][2] It isstructurally related to thenaturally occurring phenethylamine psychedelicmescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine).[2][9]Analogues of DOET include otherDOx drugs such asDOM,DOPR,DOBU,DOAM,DOB, andDOI.[2] The α-desmethyl or phenethylamine analogue of DOET is2C-E.[8][6]Ariadne is the α-ethyl orphenylisobutylamine analogue of DOM.[44][6]

History

[edit]
See also:DOx § History

DOET was discovered byAlexander Shulgin in the 1960s.[12] He assessed DOET aftersynthesizing DOM in 1963 and discovering DOM'spsychedelic effects in 1964.[12][45][46][8] Shulgin found that DOET was a remarkable "psychic energizer" at low doses without producing psychedelic effects at these doses.[12] The effects that he experienced includedpositive mood,talkativeness, anddisinhibition that lasted the whole day.[12] In contrast to Shulgin however, a friend and colleague of Shulgin's that he had try DOET a month later only experienced intenselethargy followed by profounddepression after taking the drug.[12] Nonetheless, Shulgin's enthusiasm was not dissuaded, and he felt that the drug should be exploited.[12] Shulgin was working atDow Chemical Company at the time, and he pitched DOET to the company.[12] They selected DOET as a promising compound and decided to move forward withclinical trials for potential use as apharmaceutical drug.[12] Shulgin and the company filed apatent for DOET in 1966, which was published in 1970.[12][45][8][47] Dow Chemical Company taskedneuroscientistSolomon H. Snyder atJohns Hopkins University with clinically studying DOET.[12]

In 1967,DOM emerged as astreet drug andLSD replacement with the name "STP" inSan Francisco and caused apublic health crisis.[12][13] This occurred after LSD distributorOwsley Stanley learned of DOM from Shulgin and began distributing very-high-dose DOMtablets for free.[12][13] LSD had become illegal inCalifornia in 1966 and an alternative had been sought by Stanley.[12] The DOET tablets he distributed could have very longdurations (up to 3–4 days) and resulted in intense experiences, worrying physicalside effects, andhospitalizations.[12] DOM was first described in the media andscientific literature in 1967 as a result of the crisis.[12][48][4] The drug became illegal in theUnited States in 1968.[12] It is unclear why Shulgin told Stanley about DOM and risked his professional career as well as the DOETclinical development.[12][13] However, it might have been because Shulgin felt that DOM was a promising compound but was not being further pursued by Dow Chemical Company and would otherwise be forgotten.[12][13]

Dow Chemical Company terminated its clinical research program on DOET due to the DOM public health crisis.[12] DOET was subsequently first described in the scientific literature by Snyder and colleagues in 1968.[4] Snyder continued to be interested in DOET as a potential medicine, but it was never further developed.[4] Snyder conducted and published a series of threeclinical trials of low-dose DOET between 1968 and 1974.[4][14][17][15][5] In these trials, he compared DOET with DOM,dextroamphetamine, andplacebo.[4][14][15][5] As with Shulgin, he found DOET to produceamphetamine-like mildeuphoria and talkativeness, among other effects, without producing significanthallucinogenic effects at the assessed doses.[4][14][15] Snyder also studied the individualenantiomers of DOET.[2][19][5] Shulgin first discussed DOET in publications in 1969 and 1970.[45][12][49][50] DOET became aSchedule Icontrolled substance in theUnited States in February 1973.[51]

Ariadne (4C-D, 4C-DOM, BL-3912, Dimoxamine), the α-ethyl orphenylisobutylamineanalogue of DOM, was developed by Shulgin in the 1970s.[44][6] He found it to bepsychoactive and to produce "the alert of a psychedelic, with none of the rest of the package".[6][44] This threshold psychoactivity without psychedelic effects was reminiscent of low doses of DOET.[6][44] However, in contrast to DOET and otherDOx drugs like DOM, Ariadne remained completely non-hallucinogenic even at very high doses, showing a hardceiling to its psychoactive effects and a lack ofrecreational potential.[6][44] Ariadne was patented and developed by Shulgin andBristol Laboratories for potential use as anantidepressant and for a variety of other clinical indications in the 1970s.[8][44][6] (R)-Ariadne (BL-3912A) completedphase 2 clinical trials and showed promising initial clinical benefits.[44] However, further clinical development was halted for strategic economic reasons.[44] In 2023, Ariadne was found to exhibit reduced-efficacypartial agonism of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor compared to DOM, and this was considered to account for its dramatically reduced hallucinogenic potential.[44]

Shulgin first synthesized2C-E, the α-desmethyl orphenethylamine analogue of DOET, in 1977.[52][53] Shulgin first published reports describing the psychedelic effects of higher doses of DOET inPiHKAL in 1991.[6] Prior to this, no reports had clearly been published of hallucinogenic effects of DOET, although Snyder had observed some closed-eye visuals with low-dose DOET in his clinical trials.[2][4][14][5] Shulgin also described 2C-E as producing robust psychedelic effects in PiHKAL, though with much higher doses required than DOET.[6]

Society and culture

[edit]

Names

[edit]

DOET was originally named DOE byAlexander Shulgin.[6][8] However, he subsequently recalled that this was also an acronym fordesoxyephedrine (methamphetamine).[6] As a result, he changed his name for the drug from DOE to DOET or DOEt.[6][8] Other names that Shulgin has given DOET have included HECATE or Hecate (after theGreek goddess) and DMEA (short for dimethoxyethylamphetamine).[6][8]

Legal status

[edit]

Internationally, DOET is a Schedule I controlled drug; under theConvention on Psychotropic Substances, it is legal only for medical uses or scientific research.[54]

United States

[edit]

DOET is classified as aSchedule I substance in the United States and is similarly controlled in other parts of the world.[51][54]

Australia

[edit]

DOET is considered a Schedule 9 prohibited substance in Australia under thePoisons Standard (October 2015).[55] A Schedule 9 substance is a substance which may be abused or misused, the manufacture, possession, sale or use of which should be prohibited by law except when required for medical or scientific research, or for analytical, teaching or training purposes with approval of Commonwealth and/or State or Territory Health Authorities.[55]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Anvisa (2023-07-24)."RDC Nº 804 - Listas de Substâncias Entorpecentes, Psicotrópicas, Precursoras e Outras sob Controle Especial" [Collegiate Board Resolution No. 804 - Lists of Narcotic, Psychotropic, Precursor, and Other Substances under Special Control] (in Brazilian Portuguese).Diário Oficial da União (published 2023-07-25).Archived from the original on 2023-08-27. Retrieved2023-08-27.
  2. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaShulgin AT (1978)."Psychotomimetic Drugs: Structure-Activity Relationships". In Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds.).Stimulants. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp. 243–333.doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0510-2_6.ISBN 978-1-4757-0512-6.
  3. ^abcdefghijklmnoWills B, Erickson T (9 March 2012). "Psychoactive Phenethylamine, Piperazine, and Pyrrolidinophenone Derivatives". In Barceloux DG (ed.).Medical Toxicology of Drug Abuse: Synthesized Chemicals and Psychoactive Plants. Wiley. pp. 156–192.doi:10.1002/9781118105955.ch10.ISBN 978-0-471-72760-6.
  4. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxSnyder SH, Faillace LA, Weingartner H (September 1968). "DOM (STP), a new hallucinogenic drug, and DOET: effects in normal subjects".Am J Psychiatry.125 (3):113–120.doi:10.1176/ajp.125.3.357.PMID 4385937.
  5. ^abcdefghijklmnoSnyder SH, Unger S, Blatchley R, Barfknecht CF (July 1974). "Stereospecific actions of DOET (2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine) in man".Arch Gen Psychiatry.31 (1):103–106.doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760130079013.PMID 4599412.
  6. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyShulgin A, Shulgin A (September 1991).PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story. United States: Transform Press. p. 978.ISBN 0-9630096-0-5.
  7. ^abTansey LW, Estevez VS, Ho BT (1975). "Metabolic study of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET) in rats".Proc West Pharmacol Soc.18: 362.PMID 1182040.
  8. ^abcdefghijklShulgin A, Manning T, Daley PF (2011)."#56. DOET (2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine)".The Shulgin Index, Volume One: Psychedelic Phenethylamines and Related Compounds. Vol. 1. Berkeley: Transform Press. pp. 106–110.ISBN 978-0-9630096-3-0.
  9. ^abHassan Z, Bosch OG, Singh D, Narayanan S, Kasinather BV, Seifritz E, et al. (2017)."Novel Psychoactive Substances-Recent Progress on Neuropharmacological Mechanisms of Action for Selected Drugs".Front Psychiatry.8 152.doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00152.PMC 5563308.PMID 28868040.The next, even though less accidental, producer of NPS hallucinogens was Alexander T. Shulgin, who synthesized hundreds of novel hallucinogenic tryptamines and phenylethylamines in his home laboratory. He described the synthesis of these compounds and also their psychotomimetic effects experienced in self-experiments in detail in his books PIHKAL and TIHKAL (199, 200). He created several dimethoxy-substituted phenylethylamines, such as DOM, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine (DOB), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), which all display strong hallucinogenic properties. These drugs usually have much longer durations of action (12–30 h) and are much more potent agonists at 5-HT2A-Rs (50- to 175-fold) compared to their related phenylethylamine derivative mescaline (duration of action: 4–8 h) (189, 199, 200).
  10. ^abcdefghiLuethi D, Rudin D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME (2022)."Monoamine Receptor and Transporter Interaction Profiles of 4-Alkyl-Substituted 2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamines".The FASEB Journal.36 (S1) fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2691.doi:10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2691.ISSN 0892-6638.
  11. ^abcdeRay TS (February 2010)."Psychedelics and the human receptorome".PLOS ONE.5 (2) e9019.Bibcode:2010PLoSO...5.9019R.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009019.PMC 2814854.PMID 20126400.
  12. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwBaggott MJ (1 October 2023)."Learning about STP: A Forgotten Psychedelic from the Summer of Love"(PDF).History of Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals.65 (1):93–116.doi:10.3368/hopp.65.1.93.ISSN 2694-3034. Retrieved26 January 2025.
  13. ^abcdeTrout K, Daley PF (December 2024)."The origin of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM, STP)"(PDF).Drug Test Anal.16 (12):1496–1508.doi:10.1002/dta.3667.PMID 38419183.
  14. ^abcdefghijklmSnyder SH, Faillace LA, Weingartner H (July 1969). "A new psychotropic agent. Psychological and physiological effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethyl amphetamine (DOET) in man".Arch Gen Psychiatry.21 (1):95–101.doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1969.01740190097014.PMID 4389442.
  15. ^abcdefghijklmnSnyder SH, Weingartner H, Faillace LA (January 1971). "DOET (2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine), a new psychotropic drug. Effects of varying doses in man".Arch Gen Psychiatry.24 (1):50–55.doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1971.01750070052006.PMID 4923215.
  16. ^abKatherine R. Bonson (9 September 2005). "Hallucinogenic Drugs".Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Wiley. pp. 294–307.doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0000166.pub2.ISBN 978-0-470-01617-6.In the mid-1960s, structure–activity relationship investigations led to the synthesis of a new phenethylamine hallucinogen, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM). [...] A threshold dose of DOM ranges from 3 to 10 mg orally. An extensive family of DOM derivatives have been synthesised, including DOB (substituting bromine at the 4-position), DOI (substituting an iodine group at the 4-position), and DOET (substituting an ethyl group at the 4-position) (Shulgin and Shulgin, 1991a,1991b). These drugs have a long onset time (up to 2 h) and their effects can persist for 15–20 h. The unusually long duration is related to their chemical structure. The presence of an alpha-methyl group on the phenethylamine physically prevents enzymatic degradation of the drug, extending the time the drug acts in the body.
  17. ^abcdefWeingartner H, Snyder SH, Faillace LA, Markley H (1970). "Altered free associations: Some cognitive effects of DOET (2, 5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine)".Behavioral Science.15 (4):297–303.doi:10.1002/bs.3830150402.
  18. ^abcStandridge RT, Howell HG, Gylys JA, Partyka RA, Shulgin AT (December 1976)."Phenylakylamines with potential psychotherapeutic utility. 1. 2-Amino-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)butane"(PDF).J Med Chem.19 (12):1400–1404.doi:10.1021/jm00234a010.PMID 1003425.Interestingly, DOM and DOET both produced subjective effects of mild euphoria and enhanced self-awareness; however, DOM demonstrated clear-cut psychotomimetic-hallucinogenic effects at twice the minimal detectable dose, while DOET exhibited none of these at five times the minimal dosage. Shulgin and co-workers had noted similar potential with low dosages of DOB14 and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine.15
  19. ^abcAnderson GM, Braun G, Braun U, Nichols DE, Shulgin AT (1978)."Absolute configuration and psychotomimetic activity".NIDA Research Monograph (22):8–15.PMID 101890.
  20. ^Shulgin AT (1972)."Hallucinogens, CNS Stimulants, And Cannabis". In Mulé, SJ, Brill H (eds.).Chemical and Biological Aspects of Drug Dependence. CRC Press. pp. 163–176.doi:10.1201/9780429260629-16.ISBN 978-0-87819-011-9.
  21. ^Noback M, Kenton JA, Klein AK, Hughes ZA, Kruegel AC, Schmid Y, et al. (February 2025)."Low (micro)doses of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylamphetamine (DOPR) increase effortful motivation in low-performing mice".Neuropharmacology.268 110334.doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110334.PMID 39900138.
  22. ^Noback M, Kenton J, Klein A, Hughes Z, Kruegel A, Young J (December 2022)."ACNP 61st Annual Meeting: Poster Abstracts P541 - P809: P572. 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-Propylamphetamine (DOPR) Increased Effortful Motivation in Mice".Neuropsychopharmacology.47 (Suppl 1): 371–520 (390–390).doi:10.1038/s41386-022-01486-z.PMC 9714408.PMID 36456695.
  23. ^Alexander T. Shulgin,Ann Shulgin (1991)."#8 ARIADNE; 4C-DOM; BL-3912; DIMOXAMINE; 1-(2,5- DIMETHOXY-4-METHYLPHENYL)-2-AMINOBUTANE; 2,5- DIMETHOXY-a-ETHYL-4-METHYLPHENETHYLAMINE".PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story (1st ed.). Berkeley, CA: Transform Press. pp. 475–480.ISBN 978-0-9630096-0-9.OCLC 25627628.His company did many animal tests, one of which showed that it was not hallucinogenic (a cat whose tail erected dramatically with DOM did nothing with ARIADNE) and another that showed re-motivation (some old maze-running monkeys who had decided not to run any more mazes changed their minds with ARIADNE).
  24. ^Busby M (2 November 2023)."The Heirs to a Vault of Novel Psychedelics Take a Trip Into the Unknown".DoubleBlind Mag. Retrieved19 April 2025.
  25. ^Busby M (30 March 2025)."What Happens When You Inherit 500 Psychedelic Compounds?".DoubleBlind Mag. Retrieved19 April 2025.
  26. ^Kargbo RB (April 2025). "Innovative Approaches in Psychedelics, AI, and Communication: A Multi-Domain Perspective".ACS Med Chem Lett.16 (4):514–516.doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5c00114.PMC 11995231.PMID 40236531.
  27. ^Goldstein L (10 July 2023)."Pioneering Psychedelics Scientist Alexander "Sasha" Shulgin's Legacy Lives On Via New Compounds And Research".Benzinga. Retrieved19 April 2025.
  28. ^WO patent 2024243599A1, Mark J. Martini; Nicholas V. Cozzi & Paul F. Daley et al., "Asymmetric phenylalkylamines", published 28 November 2024, assigned toAlexander Shulgin Research Institute 
  29. ^"PDSP Database".UNC (in Zulu). Retrieved27 January 2025.
  30. ^Liu T."BindingDB BDBM81965 1-(4-ethyl-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine::CAS_62066::CHEMBL8224::DOET,(-)::NSC_62066".BindingDB. Retrieved5 November 2024.
  31. ^abLewin AH, Miller GM, Gilmour B (December 2011)."Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class".Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry.19 (23):7044–7048.doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2011.10.007.PMC 3236098.PMID 22037049.
  32. ^Åstrand A, Guerrieri D, Vikingsson S, Kronstrand R, Green H (December 2020)."In vitro characterization of new psychoactive substances at the μ-opioid, CB1, 5HT1A, and 5-HT2A receptors-On-target receptor potency and efficacy, and off-target effects".Forensic Science International.317 110553.doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110553.PMID 33160102.
  33. ^van Wijngaarden I, Soudijn W (1997). "5-HT2A, 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C receptor ligands".Pharmacochemistry Library. Vol. 27. Elsevier. pp. 161–197.doi:10.1016/s0165-7208(97)80013-x.ISBN 978-0-444-82041-9.
  34. ^Wallach J, Cao AB, Calkins MM, Heim AJ, Lanham JK, Bonniwell EM, et al. (December 2023)."Identification of 5-HT2A receptor signaling pathways associated with psychedelic potential".Nat Commun.14 (1) 8221.Bibcode:2023NatCo..14.8221W.doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44016-1.PMC 10724237.PMID 38102107.
  35. ^Glennon RA (January 1987). "Central serotonin receptors as targets for drug research".J Med Chem.30 (1):1–12.doi:10.1021/jm00384a001.PMID 3543362.Table II. Affinities of Selected Phenalkylamines for 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 Binding Sites
  36. ^abcHalberstadt AL, Chatha M, Klein AK, Wallach J, Brandt SD (May 2020)."Correlation between the potency of hallucinogens in the mouse head-twitch response assay and their behavioral and subjective effects in other species".Neuropharmacology.167 107933.doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107933.PMC 9191653.PMID 31917152.
  37. ^Winter JC (October 1975). "The effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), d-amphetamine, and cocaine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus".Psychopharmacologia.44 (1):29–32.doi:10.1007/BF00421179.PMID 1197576.
  38. ^Silverman PB, Ho BT (1980). "The discriminative stimulus properties of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM): differentiation from amphetamine".Psychopharmacology (Berl).68 (3):209–215.doi:10.1007/BF00428105.PMID 6771804.
  39. ^Glennon RA, Doot DL, Young R (March 1981). "DOM and related 2,5-dimethoxy-4-alkylphenylisopropylamines: behavioral and serotonin receptor properties".Pharmacol Biochem Behav.14 (3):287–292.doi:10.1016/0091-3057(81)90392-0.PMID 7232455.
  40. ^Glennon RA, Young R, Rosecrans JA (April 1982). "A comparison of the behavioral effects of DOM homologs".Pharmacol Biochem Behav.16 (4):557–559.doi:10.1016/0091-3057(82)90414-2.PMID 7071089.
  41. ^abHalberstadt AL, Geyer MA (2018). "Effect of Hallucinogens on Unconditioned Behavior".Behavioral Neurobiology of Psychedelic Drugs. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Vol. 36. pp. 159–199.doi:10.1007/7854_2016_466.ISBN 978-3-662-55878-2.PMC 5787039.PMID 28224459.
  42. ^abHalberstadt AL, Powell SB, Geyer MA (July 2013)."Role of the 5-HT₂A receptor in the locomotor hyperactivity produced by phenylalkylamine hallucinogens in mice".Neuropharmacology.70:218–227.doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.01.014.PMC 3934507.PMID 23376711.
  43. ^abcHuang J, Ho BT (January 1975). "Some pharmacological actions of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET) in rats and mice".J Pharm Pharmacol.27 (1):18–22.doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.1975.tb09372.x.PMID 235610.
  44. ^abcdefghiCunningham MJ, Bock HA, Serrano IC, Bechand B, Vidyadhara DJ, Bonniwell EM, et al. (January 2023)."Pharmacological Mechanism of the Non-hallucinogenic 5-HT2A Agonist Ariadne and Analogs".ACS Chemical Neuroscience.14 (1):119–135.doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00597.PMC 10147382.PMID 36521179.
  45. ^abcCanal CE, Morgan D (2012)."Head-twitch response in rodents induced by the hallucinogen 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine: a comprehensive history, a re-evaluation of mechanisms, and its utility as a model".Drug Test Anal.4 (7–8):556–576.doi:10.1002/dta.1333.PMC 3722587.PMID 22517680.
  46. ^"Alexander Theodore Shulgin (1925-2014)".openDemocracy. 9 June 2014. Retrieved26 January 2025.[Shulgin's] attention was drawn to the 4-position after he conceived of and synthesized the compound DOM, which he bioassayed on January 4, 1964 and discovered to be surprisingly potent: it was psychoactive at the 1 mg dose.
  47. ^"phenethylamines and their pharmacologically-acceptable salts".Google Patents. 1970. Retrieved26 January 2025.
  48. ^Snyder SH, Faillace L, Hollister L (November 1967). "2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyl-amphetamine (STP): a new hallucinogenic drug".Science.158 (3801):669–670.Bibcode:1967Sci...158..669S.doi:10.1126/science.158.3801.669.PMID 4860952.
  49. ^Shulgin AT (1969). "Psychotomimetic Agents Related to the Catecholamines".Journal of Psychedelic Drugs.2 (2):14–19.doi:10.1080/02791072.1969.10524409.ISSN 0022-393X.
  50. ^Alexander Shulgin (1970). "Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationships of the Psychotomimetics". In D. H. Efron (ed.).Psychotomimetic Drugs(PDF). New York: Raven Press. pp. 21–41.
  51. ^abShulgin AT (2003)."Basic Pharmacology and Effects". In Laing RR (ed.).Hallucinogens: A Forensic Drug Handbook. Forensic Drug Handbook Series. Elsevier Science. pp. 67–137.ISBN 978-0-12-433951-4. Retrieved1 February 2025.
  52. ^Darie IF, Praisler M, Negoita C (12 November 2021)."2C-x and DOx hallucinogens: A systematic review".Annals of the "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati Fascicle II Mathematics Physics Theoretical Mechanics.44 (1):46–52.doi:10.35219/ann-ugal-math-phys-mec.2021.1.07.ISSN 2668-7151. Retrieved26 January 2025.
  53. ^Alexander Shulgin (1980).Pharmacology Notes II (The Shulgin Lab Books)(PDF). Lafayette, CA, USA: Erowid. p. 236.
  54. ^abhttps://web.archive.org/web/20070302130637/http://www.incb.org/pdf/e/list/green.pdf[bare URL PDF]
  55. ^ab"Poisons Standard".Therapeutics Goods Administration. Australian Government. October 2015.

External links

[edit]
Tryptamines
No ring subs.
4-Hydroxytryptamines
5-Hydroxytryptamines
5-Methoxytryptamines
Other ring subs.
α-Alkyltryptamines
Others
Cyclized
Bioisosteres
Phenethylamines
Scalines
2C-x
3C-x
DOx
4C-x
Ψ-PEA
MDxx
FLY
25x-NB (NBOMes)
Others
Cyclized
Lysergamides
  • Bioisosteres:JRT
Others
Natural sources
5-HT1
5-HT1A
5-HT1B
5-HT1D
5-HT1E
5-HT1F
5-HT2
5-HT2A
5-HT2B
5-HT2C
5-HT37
5-HT3
5-HT4
5-HT5A
5-HT6
5-HT7
TAAR1Tooltip Trace amine-associated receptor 1
Agonists
Endogenous
Exogenous
Antagonists
Inverse agonists
TAAR5Tooltip Trace amine-associated receptor 5
Agonists
Inverse agonists
Notes: (1) TAAR1 activity of ligands varies significantly between species. Some agents that are TAAR1 ligands in some species are not in other species. This navbox includes all TAAR1 ligands regardless of species. (2) See the individual pages for references, as well as theList of trace amines,TAAR, andTAAR1 pages.
See also:Receptor/signaling modulators
Phenethylamines
Amphetamines
Phentermines
Cathinones
Phenylisobutylamines
(and further-extended)
Catecholamines
(and close relatives)
Cyclized
phenethylamines
Phenylalkylpyrrolidines
2-Benzylpiperidines
(phenidates)
Phenylmorpholines
(phenmetrazines)
Phenyloxazolamines
(aminorexes)
Isoquinolines and
tetrahydroisoquinolines
2-Aminoindanes
2-Aminotetralins
Others / unsorted
Related compounds
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine&oldid=1315690418"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp