_(St_Edwards_Crown).svg) | |
| Presented | 17 March 1998 |
|---|---|
| Parliament | 52nd |
| Party | Labour Party |
| Chancellor | Gordon Brown |
‹ 1997 1999› | |
The1998 United Kingdom budget (sometimes referred to as thePrudence with a purpose budget and officially titledNew Ambitions for Britain)[1][2] was delivered byGordon Brown, theChancellor of the Exchequer, to theHouse of Commons on 17 March 1998. It was the second budget to be presented by Brown followingLabour's1997 general election win, and sought to maintain the broad public support given to Labour in 1997 by announcing measures that would appeal to those who had voted the party into office. One of the key features of the 1998 budget was theWorking Families Tax Credit, a benefit that could be claimed by families on low income. Brown also announced tax cuts for businesses, the launch of a £50m[a] rural transport fund, and committed to taxingchild benefit at a future date.
TitledNew Ambitions for Britain,[2] and with "prudence as a purpose" as its narrative,[3] Brown's 1998 budget sought to strike a careful balance between maintaining Labour's broad appeal among theMiddle England demographic who had voted for the party the previous year, thus helpingTony Blair to become prime minister, while offering help to those on low incomes.[4] His statement set out to achieve four objectives—stability, enterprise, welfare reform and strong public services. He told the House of Commons: "For decades, under Governments of both parties, the great economic strengths of our country have been undermined by deep-seated structural weaknesses—instability, under-investment, unemployment." He hoped to address this with a long-term plan for economic growth and success.[5]
He reported that the five-year plan to reduce the UK's deficit announced in his1997 budget was being achieved at a faster rate than had been forecast, with theUK national debt having come down by £17bn,[b] or 2% of national income, since July 1997. He expressed a need for caution, and said that he would "lock in this fiscal tightening" for 1998–99. As a consequence,borrowing, which theprevious government had planned to be £19bn[c] for 1998, was now forecast to be £5bn[d] for 1998, a little under £4bn[e] for 1999, and was expected to be in balance by 2000. On economic growth, Brown said it was dependent on "what happens to wage inflation over the coming year. It would be the worst of short-termism to pay ourselves more today at the cost of higher interest rates, fewer jobs and slower growth tomorrow. All of us must therefore show greater responsibility." He suggested wage inflation would slow growth from 2.5% to 2% in 1998, and similarly predicted percentage figures of between one and three quarters and two and a quarter for 1999, and between two and a quarter and two and three quarters for 2000. "[6]
While welcoming some aspects of the budget, notably measures to cut National Insurance and the help offered to small businesses,William Hague, leader of theConservative Party, described many of the announcements as a betrayal of Britain. In particular, he cited the increase in fuel duty which would impact rural areas, and the announcement of future plans to tax child benefit which would have an impact on women and children. He also said it was now clear the government was not on the side of "the family that works hard and saves hard and tries to be independent of the state", and criticised delays in launching the 10p tax rate, which had been one of Labour's1997 election manifesto pledges.[9]Paddy Ashdown, leader of theLiberal Democrats, gave the statement a much more positive reception, saying that in the long-term it could turn out to have been "rather good", but he criticised the government's over-reliance on inflation to control theUK economy and said not enough had been done to correct several years of under-funding of public services.[9] Similar concerns were also raised byEd Davey, a Liberal DemocratTreasury spokesman, who felt investment in public services had been overlooked, and described it as "a disappointment". But he welcomed the announcement on National Insurance.[9]Iain Duncan Smith, theShadow Secretary of State for Social Security, claimed the budget was "a devastating Budget for families".Giles Radice, chairman of theHouse of Commons Treasury Committee and himself a Labour MP, welcomed the spending announced for education and health, but said the budget maintained Brown's reputation as an Iron Chancellor.[9]Unison, one of the UK's largest trade unions, described the 1998 budget as "hard-edged with some compassion".[9]
Following the budget,Pound sterling rose to its highest level since 1989, promptingEvan Davis ofBBC News to describe the statement as one "that largely ignored the macroeconomic fine-tuning of some predecessors" with consequences that "the markets take over, read it as too lax, assume interest rates have to rise, and send the pound to a nine year, unsustainable high".[10] Making reference to the "prudence with a purpose" theme, Paul Rowley, the BBC's Political Correspondent, suggested the budget had one purpose, "to win the next election. The delivery and language may have had the imprint of a dour Scot balancing the household finances. But there was the clear hand of the Prime Minister in what was a Downing Street co-production. Brown contributed the economics. Blair added the political nous".[3]
