7 May 1998 (1998-05-07) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Are you in favour of the Government's proposals for a Greater London Authority, made up of an elected mayor and a separately elected assembly? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Results byborough | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater London Authority (Referendum) Act 1998 | |
|---|---|
| Act of Parliament | |
| Long title | An Act to make provision for the holding of a referendum on the establishment of a Greater London Authority and for expenditure in preparation for such an Authority; and to confer additional functions on the Local Government Commission for England in connection with the establishment of such an Authority. |
| Introduced by | John Prescott,Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (Commons) Baroness Hayman (Lords) |
| Territorial extent | England |
| Dates | |
| Royal assent | 23 February 1998 |
Status:Spent | |
| Text of statute as originally enacted | |
| Text of the Greater London Authority Act 1998 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, fromlegislation.gov.uk. | |
The1998 Greater London Authority referendum was held inGreater London on 7 May 1998. The referendum asked whether there was support for creating aGreater London Authority composed of a directly electedMayor of London and aLondon Assembly to scrutinise the Mayor's actions.Voter turnout was low, at just 34.1%.[1] The referendum was held under theGreater London Authority (Referendum) Act 1998 provisions. Polling day coincided with the1998 London local elections.
Labour's1997 general election manifesto,New Labour, New Life for Britain, mentioned establishing a directly elected mayor and authority.[2]
Following a referendum to confirm popular demand, there will be a new deal for London, with a strategic authority and a mayor, each directly elected.
— New Labour, New Life for Britain
This would be the first London-wide government since the abolition of theGreater London Council.[3]
The government published a green paper with the titleNew Leadership for London in July 1997.[4] This laid out the principles of the GLA: a strong mayor and a "strategic" assembly.[4]
The full proposals were confirmed in a March 1998 white paper entitledAMayor and Assembly for London which set out the full details of the proposal.[4]
The referendum asked voters the following question:
Are you in favour of the government’s proposals for a Greater London Authority, made up of an elected mayor and a separately elected assembly?
— Form of ballot paper, Greater London Authority (Referendum) Act 1998, Schedule
Voters were permitted to select either a simpleYES orNO answer.
| Greater London Authority referendum, 1998 Result | |||
| Choice | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 1,230,739 | 72.01% | |
| No | 478,413 | 27.99% | |
| Valid votes | 1,709,172 | 98.49% | |
| Invalid or blank votes | 26,178 | 1.51% | |
| Total votes | 1,735,350 | 100.00% | |
| Registered voters and turnout | 5,016,064 | 34.60% | |
| Referendum results (excluding invalid votes) | |
|---|---|
| Yes 1,230,759 (72%) | No 478,413 (28%) |
| ▲ 50% | |
| Local authority | Votes | Proportion of votes | Turnout* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | Disagree | Agree | Disagree | ||
| City of London | 977 | 574 | 63.0 | 37.0 | 30.6 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 20,534 | 7,406 | 73.5 | 26.5 | 24.9 |
| Barnet | 55,487 | 24,210 | 69.6 | 30.4 | 35.3 |
| Bexley | 36,527 | 21,195 | 63.3 | 36.7 | 34.7 |
| Brent | 47,309 | 13,050 | 78.4 | 21.6 | 35.6 |
| Bromley | 51,410 | 38,662 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 40.2 |
| Camden | 36,007 | 8,348 | 81.2 | 18.8 | 32.8 |
| Croydon | 53,863 | 29,368 | 64.7 | 35.3 | 37.2 |
| Ealing | 52,348 | 16,092 | 76.5 | 23.5 | 37.8 |
| Enfield | 44,297 | 21,639 | 67.2 | 32.8 | 32.8 |
| Greenwich | 36,756 | 12,356 | 74.8 | 25.2 | 32.4 |
| Hackney | 31,956 | 7,195 | 81.6 | 18.4 | 33.8 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 29,171 | 8,255 | 77.9 | 22.1 | 33.6 |
| Haringey | 36,296 | 7,038 | 83.8 | 16.2 | 29.9 |
| Harrow | 38,412 | 17,407 | 68.8 | 31.2 | 36.0 |
| Havering | 36,390 | 23,788 | 60.5 | 39.5 | 33.8 |
| Hillingdon | 38,518 | 22,523 | 63.1 | 36.9 | 34.4 |
| Hounslow | 36,957 | 12,554 | 74.6 | 25.4 | 31.9 |
| Islington | 32,826 | 7,428 | 81.6 | 18.5 | 34.2 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 20,064 | 8,469 | 70.3 | 29.7 | 27.9 |
| Kingston upon Thames | 28,621 | 13,043 | 68.7 | 31.3 | 41.1 |
| Lambeth | 47,391 | 10,544 | 81.8 | 18.2 | 31.7 |
| Lewisham | 40,188 | 11,060 | 78.4 | 21.6 | 29.3 |
| Merton | 35,418 | 13,635 | 72.2 | 27.8 | 37.6 |
| Newham | 33,084 | 7,575 | 81.4 | 18.6 | 27.9 |
| Redbridge | 42,547 | 18,098 | 70.2 | 29.8 | 34.9 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 39,115 | 16,135 | 70.8 | 29.2 | 44.5 |
| Southwark | 42,196 | 10,089 | 80.7 | 19.3 | 32.7 |
| Sutton | 29,653 | 16,091 | 64.8 | 35.2 | 34.9 |
| Tower Hamlets | 32,630 | 9,467 | 77.5 | 22.5 | 34.2 |
| Waltham Forest | 38,344 | 14,090 | 73.1 | 26.9 | 33.6 |
| Wandsworth | 57,010 | 19,695 | 74.3 | 25.7 | 38.7 |
| Westminster | 28,413 | 11,334 | 71.5 | 28.5 | 31.8 |
| Totals | 1,230,759 | 478,413 | 72.01 | 27.99 | 34.1 |
The 'Yes' vote won in everyLondon Borough, though support was generally larger inInner London thanin Outer London.[5] The lowest support figures were 60.5% inHavering and 57.1% inBromley; the greatest were 83.8% inHaringey and 81.8% inLambeth.[5]The income level of boroughs was an even greater factor affecting the outcome.[citation needed][5]
The government passed theGreater London Authority Act 1999, creating theGreater London Authority. The first elections for theMayor of London and theLondon Assembly were held in May 2000.
TheConservatives criticised the referendum's low turnout, and suggested that it undermined the legitimacy of the referendum.[1] The Labour Party refuted this suggestion, by instead suggesting that many people had decided to not vote because they perceived the result as a foregone conclusion, and that there was significant enthusiasm for a "strong, independent, political voice that can speak up for Londoners".[1][6]
The establishment of directly elected mayors was suggested as possibly as constitutionally significant as Scottish devolution or Welsh devolution.[7]