| ||||||||||||||||||||||
It is proposed to alter the Constitution so as to provide for retiring ages for judges of federal courts. Do you approve of the proposed law? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
TheConstitution Alteration (Retirement of Judges) Bill 1977 was a successful proposal to alter theAustralian Constitution to introduce a retirement age of 70 for federal judges.[1] It was put to voters for approval in areferendum held on 21 May 1977. After being approved in the referendum, it received theroyal assent and became law on 29 July 1977.[2]
As of 2025 it is the most recent referendum in Australia that has led to the successful modification of the Constitution.
It is proposed to alter the Constitution so as to provide for retiring ages for judges of federal courts.
Do you approve the proposed law?
The proposal was to add the following paragraphs at the end ofsection 72.
| State | Electoral roll | Ballots issued | For | Against | Informal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vote | % | Vote | % | |||||
| New South Wales | 3,007,511 | 2,774,388 | 2,316,999 | 84.84 | 414,070 | 15.16 | 43,319 | |
| Victoria | 2,252,831 | 2,083,136 | 1,659,273 | 81.43 | 378,505 | 18.57 | 45,358 | |
| Queensland | 1,241,426 | 1,138,842 | 734,183 | 65.24 | 391,227 | 34.76 | 13,432 | |
| South Australia | 799,243 | 745,990 | 622,760 | 85.57 | 104,987 | 14.43 | 18,243 | |
| Western Australia | 682,291 | 617,463 | 472,228 | 78.37 | 130,307 | 21.63 | 14,928 | |
| Tasmania | 259,081 | 246,063 | 174,951 | 72.46 | 66,478 | 27.54 | 4,634 | |
| Total for Commonwealth | 8,242,383 | 7,605,882 | 5,980,394 | 80.10 | 1,485,574 | 19.90 | 139,914 | |
| Results | Obtained majority in all six States and an overall majority of 4,494,820 votes.Carried | |||||||
In October 1976 the Senate Standing Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs recommended a retiring age for all federal judges. This recommendation was based on
The committee's view was accepted by the Australian Constitutional Convention soon thereafter.
The amendment introduced in the following year sought to provide for a retiring age of 70 for all federal court judges, including those on the High Court. The issue was not controversial, despite SirRobert Menzies' description of the change as 'superficial and ill-considered'. Over 80 per cent of voters supported the amendment.
The amendment applied prospectively, meaning the tenure of those High Court and Federal judges appointed prior to the referendum were unaffected. Of the serving High Court judges, only SirGarfield Barwick made use of his original tenure, retiring in 1981 at the age of 77. The remaining judges either retired, resigned, or died, with the exception of SirHarry Gibbs and SirAnthony Mason, who were appointed Chief Justice and thus lost their right to the original life tenure. Several Federal judges made use of their original tenure, with judges of theAustralian Industrial CourtSir Percy Joske retiring on 31 December 1977 aged 82,[5] andEdward Dunphy retiring on 31 December 1982 aged 75. Five Federal Court judges did not retire at age 70,Sir Nigel Bowen (1990), aged 79,Sir John Nimmo (1980) aged 71,Sir Reginald Smithers (1986) aged 83,Charles Sweeney (1995) aged 80 andRay Northrop (1998) aged 73.
| Amendments to theConstitution of Australia | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5th amendment (1910) | Senate Vacancies Amendment Referendum amendment Retirement of Judges amendment 1977 | Most recent amendments |