.png) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 County results Pardee: 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% Lane: 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
The1902 California gubernatorial election was held on November 4, 1902, to elect thegovernor of California.George Pardee won the election with 48.06% percent of the popular vote and was the Governor of California until 1907. This was the first time since1863 that the Republican Party retained control of the governorship in California.
At the beginning of the year 1902,Henry Gage the 20th governor was still favored to be re-elected, if not at least re-nominated.[1] However, he and his administration were embroiled in a series of issues, the most prominent of which was theSan Francisco plague of 1900–1904. His poor handling of the situation, alongside accusations of being a pawn of theSouthern Pacific Railroad Company, led to a steep decline in his popularity.[2] Despite this unpopularity, Gage still held a significant amount of power within the State Republican Party, and observers noted that he might force his way through to the Republican Party nomination.[3]
George Pardee sent out word early in the election year that he would be running for the Republican nomination.[4] He would later make his announcement official at a dinner inOakland on January 27, 1902.[5] At the time Pardee was working as aRegent of the University of California.[6] In the beginning stages of the campaign, many observers doubted the seriousness of Pardee as a candidate, with some thinking that he was astalking horse candidate, or that his infighting among those in theRepublican Party would prove too costly in the primary.[7][8]
The Republican State Convention would begin inSan Jose on April 14, 1902.[9]Governor Gage was still the favorite to win the nomination, despite his political scandals. He received several endorsements from Republican groups, and even received cheers from the crowd at the convention.[10] However, as the convention continued, Gage received more negative press and more delegates were unclear as to whether they would support his renomination.[11] While Gage lead in the initial ballots at the convention, he would steadily lose support, until the sixth and final ballot when George Pardee was nominated, with 515 votes.[12]
At the beginning of the year, the favorites for the Democratic nomination were Barney Murphy, Washington Dodge, and Franklin K. Lane.Franklin Knight Lane was theSan Francisco City Attorney at the time of his campaign announcement.[13] Despite not being favored to win the nomination at first, Lane would become the favorite to win by August 1902.[14] On September 3, 1902, Lane was officially nominated by the Democratic Party, doing so on the first ballot.[15] At the convention the Democratic Party would develop a progressive platform, which included low tariffs, the direct election of U.S. Senators, and support for the use of referendum, recall, and initiatives on the ballot in California. The party also supported the exclusion of Chinese immigration, as well as the establishment of a mine bureau, and labor bureau.[16]
In September 1902, the Socialist Campaign Committee of California nominated Gideon S. Brower forGovernor of California. Brower was born inNew York in 1849. He moved to California in 1886 and began working as a carpenter inFresno. He joined Carpenters Union, Local 701 and became a member of theSocialist Party shortly after.[17]
On August 28, 1902, theProhibition Party nominated Theodore D. Kanouse as their candidate for governor.[18] Kanouse was a formerCivil War veteran, who served as a musician in the6th Wisconsin Infantry Regiment and in the 3rd Wisconsin Light Artillery Regiment. After the war he retired to California, where he was active in the temperance movement.[19]
In September 1902, the United Labor Party nominatedCarl Browne, a former leader in theWorkingmen's Party of California andCoxey's Army, for governor.[20] The following month, secretary of stateCharles F. Curry denied Browne and his party a place on the November ballot on the grounds that their name was too similar to the preexistingUnion Labor Party (who supported Lane) and that the signatures the party collected were invalid.[21]
After both parties selected their nominees, newspapers around the State of California stated that Pardee was likely to win. TheSanta Cruz Sentinel stated,"Pardee's majority over Lane will be nearer 40,000 than 20,000. This is a Republican year on the Pacific Coast."[22] George Pardee opened his general election campaign with a speech inOakland, where he stated,
I am glad whenever labor adds another cent to its daily wages, and I rejoice when the laboring man is able to cut off another hour from the time that he spends at his daily toil. I am glad and I rejoice over these things because I know that the more wages the laboring man gets the better citizen he will be, the more able he will be to send his children to school and to our university, and to make of them our future great men. For it is a fact that our greatest men have sprung from the common people. And I rejoice when the hours of labor are shortened because I know that with shorter hours the workingman will have more time to give to his wife and his children. And I know, from my own experience, that the more time a man can give to his wife and children the better man he is. And I believe that shorter hours and higher, wages will give us better citizens and make us all more prosperous. And I am convinced that there is but one way for the working people to gain their ends, and that is by a wise, intelligent and firm organization. There never was a better exemplification of the motto "United we stand, divided we fall" than in the case of the working people.
For this speech, Pardee was praised by standing ovation from a supportive crowd.[23]Franklin K. Lane opened his general election campaign on September 22, 1902, in the city ofSan Diego. It was there that he addressed a large crowd and stated
I am extremely pleased that I came here to open my campaign. I am pleased that I decided to begin at the bottom and work up as I have done in many other things. I am glad that I have done this because I have gained a larger conception of the state as I came down through the mountains and the valley and broke through the foothills at last onto the inimitable surf line which lands us here. My ideas have grown and I have expanded on the trip and have a larger idea of the state which I would serve. It is a wonderful state, with her high mountains, deep valleys and remarkable scenery, and I feel tonight that I would be a governor for the whole state and not for any section of it. My eye is not fixed onSan Francisco as some have said, but I have my eye looking as fromEagle Peak at theYosemite, looking broadly over the whole state. I would not be a man of the narrow kind. I would not be a governor of the narrow kind.[24]
Both candidates pledged to campaign "cleanly", with no mudslinging to occur between the two campaigns.[25] Lane and Pardee would cross the state, speaking in major cities and looking for support and endorsements from newspapers, civic groups, and labor unions across California. Towards the end of the campaign, and near the date of the general election, many papers believed that the election of George Pardee was likely if not inevitable.[26]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | George Pardee | 146,332 | 48.06% | −3.62% | |
| Democratic | Franklin Knight Lane | 143,783 | 47.22% | +2.19% | |
| Socialist | Gideon S. Brower | 9,592 | 3.15% | +3.15% | |
| Prohibition | Theodore D. Kanouse | 4,636 | 1.52% | +0.03% | |
| Scattering | 130 | 0.04% | |||
| Majority | 2,549 | 0.84% | |||
| Total votes | 304,473 | 100.00% | |||
| Republicanhold | Swing | -5.81% | |||
| County | George C. Pardee Republican | Franklin K. Lane Democratic | Gideon S. Brower Socialist | Theodore D. Kanouse Prohibition | Scattering Write-in | Margin | Total votes cast[27] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Alameda | 13,915 | 57.54% | 9,022 | 37.31% | 1,009 | 4.17% | 238 | 0.98% | 0 | 0.00% | 4,893 | 20.23% | 24,184 |
| Alpine | 87 | 61.70% | 52 | 36.88% | 1 | 0.71% | 1 | 0.71% | 0 | 0.00% | 35 | 24.82% | 141 |
| Amador | 1,376 | 50.98% | 1,290 | 47.80% | 16 | 0.59% | 17 | 0.63% | 0 | 0.00% | 86 | 3.19% | 2,699 |
| Butte | 2,271 | 49.64% | 2,171 | 47.45% | 57 | 1.25% | 76 | 1.66% | 0 | 0.00% | 100 | 2.19% | 4,575 |
| Calaveras | 1,726 | 53.47% | 1,456 | 45.11% | 35 | 1.08% | 10 | 0.31% | 1 | 0.03% | 270 | 8.36% | 3,228 |
| Colusa | 606 | 33.74% | 1,158 | 64.48% | 23 | 1.28% | 9 | 0.50% | 0 | 0.00% | -552 | -30.73% | 1,796 |
| Contra Costa | 2,122 | 49.82% | 1,950 | 45.79% | 155 | 3.64% | 31 | 0.73% | 1 | 0.02% | 172 | 4.04% | 4,259 |
| Del Norte | 368 | 50.97% | 305 | 42.24% | 43 | 5.96% | 6 | 0.83% | 0 | 0.00% | 63 | 8.73% | 722 |
| El Dorado | 1,160 | 45.53% | 1,320 | 51.81% | 49 | 1.92% | 19 | 0.75% | 0 | 0.00% | -160 | -6.28% | 2,548 |
| Fresno | 3,677 | 44.17% | 4,080 | 49.01% | 371 | 4.46% | 196 | 2.35% | 1 | 0.01% | -403 | -4.84% | 8,325 |
| Glenn | 540 | 37.60% | 880 | 61.28% | 11 | 0.77% | 5 | 0.35% | 0 | 0.00% | -340 | -23.68% | 1,436 |
| Humboldt | 3,447 | 57.54% | 2,316 | 38.66% | 135 | 2.25% | 87 | 1.45% | 6 | 0.10% | 1,131 | 18.88% | 5,991 |
| Inyo | 435 | 47.80% | 427 | 46.92% | 25 | 2.75% | 23 | 2.53% | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 0.88% | 910 |
| Kern | 1,748 | 39.92% | 2,539 | 57.98% | 66 | 1.51% | 23 | 0.53% | 3 | 0.07% | -791 | -18.06% | 4,379 |
| Kings | 956 | 46.98% | 999 | 49.09% | 51 | 2.51% | 28 | 1.38% | 1 | 0.05% | -43 | -2.11% | 2,035 |
| Lake | 636 | 43.83% | 747 | 51.48% | 32 | 2.21% | 34 | 2.34% | 2 | 0.14% | -11 | -7.65% | 1,451 |
| Lassen | 540 | 53.62% | 434 | 43.10% | 29 | 2.88% | 4 | 0.40% | 0 | 0.00% | 106 | 10.53% | 1,007 |
| Los Angeles | 17,471 | 56.07% | 11,121 | 35.69% | 1,140 | 3.66% | 1,402 | 4.50% | 26 | 0.08% | 6,350 | 20.38% | 31,160 |
| Madera | 737 | 42.63% | 929 | 53.73% | 46 | 2.66% | 16 | 0.93% | 1 | 0.06% | -192 | -11.10% | 1,729 |
| Marin | 1,646 | 57.47% | 1,168 | 40.78% | 44 | 1.54% | 6 | 0.21% | 0 | 0.00% | 478 | 16.69% | 2,864 |
| Mariposa | 526 | 38.23% | 828 | 60.17% | 15 | 1.09% | 7 | 0.51% | 0 | 0.00% | -302 | -21.95% | 1,376 |
| Mendocino | 2,129 | 46.67% | 2,340 | 51.29% | 44 | 0.96% | 49 | 1.07% | 0 | 0.00% | -211 | -4.63% | 4,562 |
| Merced | 742 | 37.16% | 1,179 | 59.04% | 55 | 2.75% | 21 | 1.05% | 0 | 0.00% | -437 | -21.88% | 1,997 |
| Modoc | 478 | 43.77% | 592 | 54.21% | 12 | 1.10% | 10 | 0.92% | 0 | 0.00% | -114 | -10.44% | 1,092 |
| Mono | 292 | 50.43% | 278 | 48.01% | 7 | 1.21% | 2 | 0.35% | 0 | 0.00% | 14 | 2.42% | 579 |
| Monterey | 1,924 | 48.03% | 1,957 | 48.85% | 36 | 0.90% | 89 | 2.22% | 0 | 0.00% | -33 | -0.82% | 4,006 |
| Napa | 1,941 | 54.08% | 1,563 | 43.55% | 45 | 1.25% | 38 | 1.06% | 2 | 0.06% | 378 | 10.53% | 3,589 |
| Nevada | 2,000 | 48.65% | 1,901 | 46.24% | 142 | 3.45% | 68 | 1.65% | 0 | 0.00% | 99 | 2.41% | 4,111 |
| Orange | 2,338 | 54.41% | 1,536 | 35.75% | 194 | 4.51% | 229 | 5.33% | 0 | 0.00% | 802 | 18.66% | 4,297 |
| Placer | 1,800 | 49.09% | 1,722 | 46.96% | 104 | 2.84% | 41 | 1.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 78 | 2.13% | 3,667 |
| Plumas | 669 | 56.89% | 498 | 42.35% | 1 | 0.09% | 7 | 0.60% | 1 | 0.09% | 171 | 14.54% | 1,176 |
| Riverside | 2,216 | 63.44% | 807 | 23.10% | 314 | 8.99% | 156 | 4.47% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,409 | 40.34% | 3,493 |
| Sacramento | 4,661 | 45.66% | 5,154 | 50.49% | 310 | 3.04% | 81 | 0.79% | 1 | 0.01% | -493 | -4.83% | 10,207 |
| San Benito | 680 | 40.84% | 945 | 56.76% | 12 | 0.72% | 28 | 1.68% | 0 | 0.00% | -265 | -15.92% | 1,665 |
| San Bernardino | 3,103 | 55.76% | 1,932 | 34.72% | 291 | 5.23% | 237 | 4.26% | 2 | 0.04% | 1,171 | 21.04% | 5,565 |
| San Diego | 3,182 | 49.26% | 2,517 | 38.97% | 657 | 10.17% | 97 | 1.50% | 6 | 0.09% | 665 | 10.30% | 6,459 |
| San Francisco | 24,106 | 40.13% | 33,743 | 56.18% | 1,993 | 3.32% | 164 | 0.27% | 61 | 0.10% | -9,637 | -16.04% | 60,067 |
| San Joaquin | 3,413 | 48.14% | 3,488 | 49.20% | 120 | 1.69% | 68 | 0.96% | 1 | 0.01% | -75 | -1.06% | 7,090 |
| San Luis Obispo | 1,628 | 43.56% | 1,972 | 52.77% | 53 | 1.42% | 84 | 2.25% | 0 | 0.00% | -344 | -9.21% | 3,737 |
| San Mateo | 1,426 | 50.25% | 1,383 | 48.73% | 28 | 0.99% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | 43 | 1.52% | 2,838 |
| Santa Barbara | 2,150 | 52.43% | 1,722 | 41.99% | 178 | 4.34% | 51 | 1.24% | 0 | 0.00% | 428 | 10.44% | 4,101 |
| Santa Clara | 6,078 | 49.40% | 5,745 | 46.70% | 209 | 1.70% | 265 | 2.15% | 6 | 0.05% | 333 | 2.71% | 12,303 |
| Santa Cruz | 1,819 | 44.84% | 2,009 | 49.52% | 127 | 3.13% | 101 | 2.49% | 1 | 0.02% | -190 | -4.68% | 4,057 |
| Shasta | 1,741 | 41.53% | 2,291 | 54.65% | 120 | 2.86% | 40 | 0.95% | 0 | 0.00% | -550 | -13.12% | 4,192 |
| Sierra | 708 | 58.03% | 506 | 41.48% | 5 | 0.41% | 1 | 0.08% | 0 | 0.00% | 202 | 16.56% | 1,220 |
| Siskiyou | 1,643 | 44.20% | 1,998 | 53.75% | 56 | 1.51% | 19 | 0.51% | 1 | 0.03% | -355 | -9.55% | 3,717 |
| Solano | 2,366 | 45.83% | 2,411 | 46.70% | 310 | 6.00% | 76 | 1.47% | 0 | 0.00% | -45 | -0.87% | 5,163 |
| Sonoma | 4,192 | 48.95% | 4,097 | 47.84% | 182 | 2.13% | 89 | 1.04% | 4 | 0.05% | 95 | 1.11% | 8,564 |
| Stanislaus | 1,069 | 40.96% | 1,458 | 55.86% | 39 | 1.49% | 44 | 1.69% | 0 | 0.00% | -389 | -14.90% | 2,610 |
| Sutter | 815 | 52.61% | 704 | 45.45% | 15 | 0.97% | 15 | 0.97% | 0 | 0.00% | 111 | 7.17% | 1,549 |
| Tehama | 1,138 | 45.98% | 1,255 | 50.71% | 45 | 1.82% | 37 | 1.49% | 0 | 0.00% | -117 | -4.73% | 2,475 |
| Trinity | 565 | 45.38% | 662 | 53.17% | 16 | 1.29% | 2 | 0.16% | 0 | 0.00% | -97 | -7.79% | 1,245 |
| Tulare | 1,683 | 38.56% | 2,397 | 54.91% | 223 | 5.11% | 62 | 1.42% | 0 | 0.00% | -714 | -16.36% | 4,365 |
| Tuolumne | 1,227 | 40.44% | 1,682 | 55.44% | 94 | 3.10% | 31 | 1.02% | 0 | 0.00% | -455 | 15.00% | 3,034 |
| Ventura | 1,844 | 54.01% | 1,405 | 41.15% | 115 | 3.37% | 49 | 1.44% | 1 | 0.03% | 439 | 12.86% | 3,414 |
| Yolo | 1,447 | 44.41% | 1,695 | 52.03% | 75 | 2.30% | 40 | 1.23% | 1 | 0.03% | -248 | -7.61% | 3,258 |
| Yuba | 1,129 | 51.46% | 1,047 | 47.72% | 12 | 0.55% | 6 | 0.27% | 0 | 0.00% | 82 | 3.74% | 2,194 |
| Total | 146,332 | 48.06% | 143,783 | 47.22% | 9,592 | 3.15% | 4,636 | 1.52% | 130 | 0.04% | 2,549 | 0.84% | 304,473 |
