1901 Chicago mayoral election

← 1899 April 2, 1901 1903 →
Turnout	74% 11pp[1]
Nominee Carter Harrison IV Elbridge Hanecy Party Democratic Republican Popular vote 156,766 128,413 Percentage 52.69% 43.16%
Mayor before election Carter Harrison IV Democratic Elected mayor Carter Harrison IV Democratic

In theChicago mayoral election of 1901, DemocratCarter Harrison IV was reelected to a third term, defeating Republican nomineeElbridge Hanecy by a 9.5% margin of victory.

The election took place on April 2.^[2][3][4]Until 2019,no subsequent election had more candidates running on its ballot.

Ahead of the election, there were competitive races to receive the two major party's nominations at their municipalnominating conventions. Mayor Harrison was challenged for theDemocratic Party nomination by former governorJohn Peter Altgeld. However, Altgeld was politically weaker than he once had been, and Harrison easily fended him off. In the March indirect primary to elect the delegates to the city'snominating convention, delegates supporting Harrison won a broad majority. At the convention, Harrison received the party's nomination byacclamation. TheRepublican Party had a large field of candidates seeking its nomination. Along with Hanecy (who was a judge on theCircuit Court of Cook County), the two otherfront-running contenders for the Republican nomination wereSanitary District of Chicago presidentWilliam Boldenweck and former aldermanJohn Maynard Harlan. and incumbent aldermanWalter J. Raymer. Other contenders that Henry beat were JudgeMarcus Kavanagh and aldermenWilliam Mavor andFrank T. Fowler. Additionally, AldermanWilliam Hale Thompson had initially declared his candidacy, but did not ultimately compete for the nomination at the convention.

• Carter Harrison IV, incumbent mayor
• John Peter Altgeld, former governor and third-party candidate for mayorin 1899

Incumbent mayor Carter Harrison IV was renominated by the Democratic Party.^[5] Harrison's opponent for the nomination was former governor John Peter Altgeld, who had been a third-party challenger in the previous election. Altgeld's 1901 candidacy was not considered a serious threat to Harrison, as Altgeld had lost much of his influence over the preceding two years.^[5] There had been rumors thatRoger Charles Sullivan andJohn Patrick Hopkins might recruit a candidate of their own to challenge Harrison, but this never materialized.^[5]

In the March primary to elect delegates to the citynominating convention, Harrison-supporting delegate candidates won a large majority.^[5] At the convention, Harrison was renominated byacclamation.^[5]

• William Boldenweck,^[6] board president of theChicago Sanitary District
• Frank T. Fowler^[6] alderman on the Chicago City Council
• John Maynard Harlan,^[6] former alderman on the Chicago City Council
• Elbridge Hanecy,^[5] judge of theCook County Circuit Court and candidate for governorin 1900
• Marcus Kavanagh,^[6] judge on theCook County Superior Court
• William Mavor,^[6] alderman on the Chicago City Council
• Walter J. Raymer,^[6] alderman on the Chicago City Council

Additionally, there was early speculation that Graeme Stewart (an attorney and member of theChicago Board of Education) might be a candidate.^[7] Initially, aldermanWilliam Hale Thompson declared himself a candidate,^[8] though he ultimately did not contest at the convention.

The Republican Party nominated Cook County Circuit Court judgeElbridge Hanecy at its city convention on March 2.^[5][6] He captured the nomination on the eighth round of balloting.^[5] The top three contenders for the nomination were Hanecy, Harlan, and Boldenweck.^[9]Machine Republicans largely backed Hanecy. Independent Republicans largely backed Harlan. German Republicans largely backed Boldenweck.^[9]

Hanecy had been a judge on the Cook County Circuit Court for a number of years.^[6] The previous year, Hanecy had sought the gubernatorial nomination, being defeated byRichard Yates Jr. at the state convention by a thin margin.^[6] Hanecy was politically allied withWilliam Lorimer, being Lorimer's candidate both in this mayoral election and in the previous year's gubernatorial election.^[5][10]

Despite speculation, Harlan denied any intentions of running as an independent if he lost the nomination.^[11]

Since every round of voting saw all 940 delegate votes cast, each round required candidates to win 471 votes in order to secure the majority needed for the nomination.^[12]

After the first ballot, Mavor's name was withdrawn. While Hanecy gained a sizable number of votes on the second ballot, little else changed. At the end of the ballot, the 28 votes cast for Kavanagh in the first ward were silently shifted to Hanecy, although Kavanagh's name was not withdrawn.^[12]

During the vote, sixth ward chairman declared 28 votes for Hanecy, 21 for Halan, and 2 for Boldenweck. However, this was challenged and the delegation was polled twice resulting in it casting 27 votes for Hanecy and 24 votes for Harlan.^[12]

The Prohibition Party nominated Avery E. Hoyt. Ahead of their city nominating convention (held February 21 at Willard Hall), those discussed as possible nominees included Hoyt, J. P. Tracey, and John H. Leslie.^[13]

The Social Democratic Party nominated Guy Hoyt, the Socialist Party nominatedJohn Collins, and the Socialist Labor Party nominated John R. Peptin.

The Single Tax Party nominated Thomas Rhodes. The Single Tax Party was a national organization.^[14] It championedGeorgism.

Henacy campaigned actively, delivering many speeches.^[15] Henacy aimed to present himself as a positive alternative to Harrison. He advocated changing the fee system practiced by some city officials and also proposed stronger measures to regulate the streetcar companies.^[5] However, his attempts to adopt reformist policies were weakened in their effectiveness by his association with William Lorimer.^[5] Reform-minded Republicans were upset that the seedy Lorimer managed to get his preferred candidate nominated by the Republican Party over reformist favorite John Maynard Harlan.^[5] Some Republicans unsuccessfully sought to persuade Harlan to run as an independent.^[5]

The Republican Party's platform criticized the Harrison administration as "inefficient", "notorious", "scandalous", "dishonest", and cowardly negligent in its,

manner of defending correct and dishonest damage suits against the city, its prostitution of our public schools, its pernicious effect upon the realty and industrial values whereby the property of the individual has been depreciated in value while manufacturing and other industrial interests have been driven from our city.^[16]

Thetraction issue surfaced in this election. The Democratic platform advocated formunicipal ownership of street railways.^[16] The Democratic platform did not advocate forimmediate public ownership, however, making provisions in its platform for the extension of franchises.^[16] The Democratic platform advocated for,

Twenty years as the maximum of franchises pending the final ownership by the city with the percentage of the gross receipts as compensation, lower fares in rush hours and better facilitites, and weaver of rights claimed under the 99-year act.^[16]

Not only did Henacy propose stronger measures to regulate streetcar companies,^[5] but the Republican convention had declared that,

The franchise question must be settled fairly, honestly and promptly between all parties. Long franchises will not be granted. Full and fair compensation must be paid for special privileges in all streets, alleys, and public grounds. The extension of street railway franchises and lowering of the tunnels are questions which demand the immediate attention of the city and must be promptly and fearlessly met. These question should be settled and adjusted simultaneously with each other, and all interests should receive fair and honest treatment.^[16]

The Democratic platform also advocated municipal ownership of other public utilities, including gas, electricity, and water.^[16]

Harrison took his Republican challenger serious, and campaigned vigorously against him.^[5]

By the standards of the era in Chicago politics, Harrison's margin of victory was viewed as a decisive one.^[5]

Harrison carried 26 wards while Hanecy carried the remaining nine.^[17]

In some of the most Republican parts of the city, Hanecy only managed to win a plurality of the vote, and in others he lost the vote to Harrison.^[17] However, Harrison, likewise, suffered in some of the city's Democratic strongholds.^[17]

Harrison received 72.96% of thePolish-American vote, while Hanecy received 23.54% and Collins received 2.74%.^[18]

• Mayoral elections in Chicago
• 1901 United States mayoral elections
• 1901 Illinois elections
• 1900s in Chicago
• William Hale Thompson
• April 1901 in the United States

• Articles with short description
• Short description with empty Wikidata description
• Use American English from January 2025
• All Wikipedia articles written in American English
• Use mdy dates from September 2023
• Pages using sidebar with the child parameter