All 105 seats in theUnited States House of Representatives 53 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results: Pro-Administration hold Pro-Administration gain Anti-Administration hold Anti-Administration gain Undistricted territory | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The1792–93 United States House of Representatives elections were held on various dates in various states between August 27, 1792, and September 6, 1793. Each state set its own date for its elections to theHouse of Representatives before the first session of the3rd United States Congress convened on December 2, 1793. With the addition of the new state of Kentucky's representatives, and thecongressional reapportionment based on the1790 United States census, the size of the House increased to 105 seats.
They coincided with the re-election ofPresidentGeorge Washington. While Washington ran for president as an independent, his followers (more specifically, the supporters ofAlexander Hamilton) formed the nation's first organized political party, theFederalist Party, whose members and sympathizers are identified as pro-Administration on this page. In response, followers ofThomas Jefferson andJames Madison created the oppositionDemocratic-Republican Party, who are identified as anti-Administration on this page. The Federalists promoted urbanization, industrialization,mercantilism, centralized government, and a broad interpretation of the United States Constitution. In contrast, Democratic-Republicans supported the ideal of an agrarian republic made up of self-sufficient farmers and small, localized governments with limited power.
Despite nearly unanimous support for Washington as a presidential candidate, Jeffersonian ideas edged out Hamiltonian principles at the ballot box for congressional candidates, with the Democratic-Republicans taking 24 seats more than they had prior to the organization of their political movement. Most of the increase was due to the addition of new seats in Western regions as a result of the 1790 census. Dominated by agrarian culture, these Western territories offered strong support to Democratic-Republican congressional candidates. As a result, they secured a thin majority in the legislature.
In this period, each state fixed its own date for its congressional election as early as August 1792 (in New Hampshire and Rhode Island) and as late as September 1793 (in Kentucky). In some states, the congressional delegation was not elected until after the legal start of the Congress (on the 4th day of March in the odd-numbered year), but as the first session of Congress typically began in November or December, the elections took place before Congress actually met. The 3rd Congress first met on December 2, 1793.
These were the first elections held afterreapportionment following thefirst census. Thirty-six new seats were added,[4] with 1 state losing 1 seat, 3 states having no change, and the remaining 11 states gaining between 1 and 9 seats. This was the first apportionment based on actual census data, the apportionment for the 1st and 2nd Congresses being setby the Constitution using estimated populations.

| 54 | 51 |
| Anti-Administration | Pro-Administration |
| State | Type | Date | Total seats | Anti- Administration | Pro-Administration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seats | Change | Seats | Change | Seats | Change | |||
| General elections | ||||||||
| New Hampshire | At-large | August 27, 1792 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Rhode Island | At-large | August 28, 1792 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |||
| Connecticut | At-large | September 17, 1792 | 7 | 0 | 7 | |||
| Georgia | At-large | October 1, 1792 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
| Maryland | Districts | October 1, 1792 | 8 | 4 | 4 | |||
| Delaware | At-large | October 2, 1792 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||
| New Jersey | At-large | October 9, 1792 | 5 | 0 | 5 | |||
| Pennsylvania | At-large | October 9, 1792 | 13 | 8 | 5 | |||
| Massachusetts | Mixed | November 2, 1792[b] | 14 | 3 | 11 | |||
| New York | Districts | January 2, 1793 | 10 | 3 | 7 | |||
| Vermont | Districts | January 7, 1793[c] | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
| South Carolina | Districts | February 5, 1793 | 6 | 5 | 1 | |||
| North Carolina | Districts | February 15, 1793 | 10 | 9 | 1 | |||
| Late elections(after the March 4, 1793 beginning of the3rd Congress) | ||||||||
| Virginia | Districts | March 18, 1793 | 19 | 15 | 4 | |||
| Kentucky | Districts | September 6, 1793 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
| Total | 105 | 54 51.4% | 51 48.6% | |||||
| Anti-Admin | 51.43% | |||
| Pro-Admin | 48.57% | |||
With new seats, due to reapportionment, outlined.
| A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | ||||
| A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | V | P | P | P |
| Majority → | P | ||||||||||||||||||
| P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
| P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||
| A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | ||||||||
| A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| Majority → | A | ||||||||||||||||||
| P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | A | A |
| P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
| P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||||||
| Key: |
|
|---|
There were special elections in 1792 and 1793 during the2nd and3rd United States Congresses.
Elections are sorted here by state then district.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Kentucky 1 "Southern District" | Kentucky admitted June 1, 1792. | New memberelected September 7, 1792 and seated November 9, 1792.[5] Anti-Administration gain. Winner was later re-elected to the next term; see below. |
| ||
| Kentucky 2 "Northern District" | Kentucky admitted June 1, 1792. | New memberelected September 7, 1792 and seated November 8, 1792.[5]. Anti-Administration gain. Winner was later re-elected to the next term; see below. |
| ||
| Georgia 1 | Anthony Wayne | Anti- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent disqualified March 21, 1792. New memberelected July 9, 1792. Anti-Administration hold. Winner later lost re-election to the next term; see below. |
|
| Maryland 2 | Joshua Seney | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent resigned December 6, 1792 to become Chief Justice of Maryland's 3rd Judicial District. New memberelected January 7–10, 1793. Pro-Administration gain. Winner was already elected to the next term; see below. |
|
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Connecticut at-large | Jonathan Sturges | Pro- Administration | 1788 | Incumbent resigned to become Associate Justice of theConnecticut Supreme Court. New memberelected April 8, 1793.[e] Pro-Administration hold. |
|
| Connecticut at-large | Benjamin Huntington | Pro- Administration | 1788 | Representative-elect resigned. New memberelected September 16, 1793. Pro-Administration hold. |
|
| Connecticut at-large | Jonathan Ingersoll | Pro- Administration | 1793(special) | Representative-elect Ingersoll declined the seat and Representative-elect Mitchell resigned to becomeU.S. Senator. Two new memberselected on a general ticket November 11, 1793. Two Pro-Administration holds. |
|
| Stephen M. Mitchell | Pro- Administration | 1792 | |||
Connecticut gained two seats in reapportionment following the1790 census.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Connecticut at-large 7 seats on ageneral ticket | James Hillhouse | Pro-Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Amasa Learned | Pro-Administration | 1791(special) | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| Jonathan Sturges | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| Jonathan Trumbull Jr. | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| Jeremiah Wadsworth | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. | ||||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. | ||||
Three special elections followed the 1792 elections in Connecticut after Representatives-elect Sturges and Huntington resigned before the start of Congress and Mitchell was elected to the Senate.
Delaware's apportionment did not change following the1790 census. As in the1st and2nd Congresses, each voter cast votes for two separate candidates, at least one of whom had to be from a different county as the voter.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Delaware at-large | John M. Vining | Pro- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent lost re-election. Anti-Administration gain. Election was later challenged and overturned.[1] |
|
Following the1790 census, Georgia's apportionment was decreased from 3 seats to 2 (the only state whose representation decreased after the census). Georgia switched from separate districts to at-large seats.[9]
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Georgia at-large 2 seats on ageneral ticket | Abraham Baldwin Redistricted from the2nd district | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| John Milledge Redistricted from the1st district | Anti- Administration | 1792(special) | Incumbent lost re-election. Anti-Administration hold. | ||
| Francis Willis Redistricted from the3rd district | Anti- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent lost re-election. Anti-Administration loss. | ||
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Kentucky 1 "Southern district" | Christopher Greenup | Anti- Administration | 1792(new state) | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Kentucky 2 "Northern district" | Alexander D. Orr | Anti- Administration | 1792(new state) | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
Maryland increased from 6 to 8 representatives after the1790 census. The previous mixed district/at-large system was replaced with a conventional district system.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Maryland 1 | Philip Key | Pro- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent lost re-election. Pro-Administration hold. |
|
| Maryland 2 | John Francis Mercer Redistricted from the3rd district | Anti- Administration | 1791(special) | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Maryland 3 | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Maryland 4 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Maryland 5 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Maryland 6 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Maryland 7 | Joshua Seney Redistricted from the2nd district | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent retired. Pro-Administration gain. Incumbent resigned December 6, 1792 to become Chief Justice of Maryland's 3rd Judicial District. Winner was also elected to finish the term; see above. |
|
| Maryland 8 | William V. Murray Redistricted from the5th district | Pro- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
Following the1790 census, Massachusetts's representation increased from eight to fourteen Representatives and was redistricted into fourplural districts, plus a singleat-large district. The4th district covered theDistrict of Maine (the modern-day State ofMaine). The plural districts were concurrent tickets rather than a singlegeneral ticket, though the1st and2nd districts appeared to have also had a general ticket alongside the more specific tickets.
As before, a majority was required for election, in those districts where a majority was not achieved, additional ballots were required.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Massachusetts 1 (4 seats) Seat A: At-large | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. | First ballot(November 2, 1792)
Second ballot(January 14, 1793)
| ||
| Massachusetts 1 (4 seats) Seat B:Essex County | Benjamin Goodhue Redistricted from the2nd district | Pro- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Massachusetts 1 (4 seats) Seat C:Middlesex County | Elbridge Gerry Redistricted from the3rd district | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent lost re-election. Pro-Administration gain. |
|
| Massachusetts 1 (4 seats) Seat D:Suffolk County | Fisher Ames | Pro- Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Massachusetts 2 (4 seats) Seat A: At-large | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. | First ballot(November 2, 1792)
Second ballot(January 14, 1793)
| ||
| Massachusetts 2 (4 seats) Seat B:Berkshire County | Theodore Sedgwick Redistricted from the4th district | Pro- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Massachusetts 2 (4 seats) Seat C:Hampshire County | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. | First ballot(November 2, 1792)
Second ballot(January 14, 1793)
| ||
| Massachusetts 2 (4 seats) Seat D:Worcester County | Artemas Ward Redistricted from the7th district | Pro- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Massachusetts 3 (2 seats) Seat A:Barnstable,Dukes, &Nantucket Counties | George Leonard Redistricted from the6th district | Pro- Administration | 1788 | Incumbent lost re-election. Pro-Administration hold. |
|
| Massachusetts 3 (2 seats) Seat B:Bristol &Plymouth Counties | Shearjashub Bourne Redistricted from the5th district | Pro- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. | First ballot(November 2, 1792)
|
| Massachusetts 4 (3 seats) District of Maine Seat A:Cumberland County | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. | First ballot(November 2, 1792)
Second ballot(January 14, 1793)
| ||
| Massachusetts 4 (3 seats) District of Maine Seat B:Lincoln,Hancock, &Washington Counties | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. | First ballot(November 2, 1792)
| ||
| Massachusetts 4 (3 seats) District of Maine Seat C:York County | George Thatcher Redistricted from the8th district | Pro- Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Massachusetts at-large | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. |
| ||
New Hampshire increased from 3 seats to 4 seats after the1790 census.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| New Hampshire at-large 4 seats on ageneral ticket | Jeremiah Smith | Pro-Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Samuel Livermore | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Incumbent retired. Anti-Administration gain. | ||
| Nicholas Gilman | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. | ||||
Following the1790 census, New Jersey's apportionment increased from 4 to 5 seats.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates[g] | |
| New Jersey at-large 5 seats on ageneral ticket | Elias Boudinot | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Abraham Clark | Pro-Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| Jonathan Dayton | Pro-Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| Aaron Kitchell | Pro-Administration | 1791 | Incumbent lost re-election. Pro-Administration hold. | ||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. | ||||
Due to re-apportionment following the1790 census, New York's congressional delegation grew from 6 to 10. Three incumbents ran for re-election, two of whom won, and the other three incumbents retired. With the increase following re-apportionment, this left seven open seats.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| New York 1 | Thomas Tredwell | Anti- Administration | 1791(Special) | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| New York 2 | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. |
| ||
| New York 3 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| New York 4 | Cornelius C. Schoonmaker | Anti- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent lost re-election. Pro-Administration gain. |
|
| New York 5 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| New York 6 | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. |
| ||
| New York 7 | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. |
| ||
| New York 8 | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. |
| ||
| New York 9 | James Gordon Redistricted from the6th district | Pro- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| New York 10 | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. |
| ||
Following the1790 census, North Carolina's apportionment increased from 5 to 10 seats.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| North Carolina 1 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| North Carolina 2 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| North Carolina 3 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| North Carolina 4 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| North Carolina 5 | Nathaniel Macon Redistricted from the2nd district | Anti- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| North Carolina 6 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| North Carolina 7 | William B. Grove Redistricted from the5th district | Pro- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| North Carolina 8 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| North Carolina 9 | John B. Ashe Redistricted from the3rd district | Anti- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent lost re-election. Anti-Administration hold. |
|
| North Carolina 10 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
Pennsylvania switched from using districts to electing its representatives on an at-large basis for the 3rd Congress, just as it had done for the 1st Congress. This would be the last time that Pennsylvania would elect all of its Representatives at-large. Due to re-apportionment following the1790 census, Pennsylvania's delegation increased from 8 representatives to 13.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates[11] | |
| Pennsylvania at-large 13 seats on ageneral ticket | Thomas Fitzsimons Redistricted from the1st district | Pro- Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Frederick Muhlenberg Redistricted from the2nd district | Anti- Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| Israel Jacobs Redistricted from the3rd district | Pro- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent lost re-election. Pro-Administration hold. | ||
| Daniel Hiester Redistricted from the4th district | Anti- Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| John W. Kittera Redistricted from the5th district | Pro- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| Andrew Gregg Redistricted from the6th district | Anti- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| Thomas Hartley Redistricted from the7th district | Pro- Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| William Findley Redistricted from the8th district | Anti- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. | ||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. | ||||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. | ||||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. | ||||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. | ||||
| None (new seat) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. | ||||
Rhode Island gained a second representative from the results of the1790 census. Rhode Island did not divide itself into districts, but elected two at-large representatives.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| Rhode Island at-large 2 seats elected at-large on a general ticket | Benjamin Bourne | Pro-Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| None (new seat) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. | ||||
South Carolina gained one representative as a result of the1790 census, increasing from 5 to 6.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates | |
| South Carolina 1 | William L. Smith | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Thomas Tudor Tucker Redistricted from the5th district | Anti-Administration | 1788 | Incumbent lost re-election. Anti-Administration loss. | ||
| South Carolina 2 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| South Carolina 3 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| South Carolina 4 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| South Carolina 5 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| South Carolina 6 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
Vermont had no apportionment in the House of Representatives before1790 census because it was not admitted to the Union until 1791. Vermont's election laws at the time required a majority to win election to the House of Representatives. If no candidate won a majority, a runoff election was held, which happened in the1st district.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates[g] | |
| Vermont 1 "Western district" | Israel Smith | Anti- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. | First ballot(January 7, 1793)
|
| Vermont 2 "Eastern district" | Nathaniel Niles | Anti- Administration | 1791 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
Virginia gained nine representatives from the1790 census, and in addition, the old2nd district was lost after its territory became the new State ofKentucky. There were, therefore, ten new districts created for the 3rd Congress.
| District | Incumbent | This race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member | Party | First elected | Results | Candidates[13] | |
| Virginia 1 | Alexander White | Pro- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent lost re-election. Anti-Administration gain. |
|
| Virginia 2 | Andrew Moore Redistricted from the3rd district | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Virginia 3 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Virginia 4 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. Results subsequently challenged but upheld. |
| ||
| Virginia 5 | None (new district) | New seat. Pro-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Virginia 6 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Virginia 7 | Abraham B. Venable Redistricted from the6th district | Anti- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Virginia 8 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Virginia 9 | William B. Giles | Anti- Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Virginia 10 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Virginia 11 | Josiah Parker Redistricted from the8th district | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected as Pro-Administration. Pro-Administration gain. |
|
| Virginia 12 | John Page Redistricted from the7th district | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Virginia 13 | Samuel Griffin Redistricted from the10th district | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected as Pro-Administration. Pro-Administration gain. |
|
| Virginia 14 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Virginia 15 | James Madison Redistricted from the5th district | Anti- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Virginia 16 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Virginia 17 | Richard Bland Lee Redistricted from the4th district | Pro- Administration | 1789 | Incumbent re-elected. |
|
| Virginia 18 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||
| Virginia 19 | None (new district) | New seat. Anti-Administration gain. |
| ||