.jpg)
Theyouth rights movement (also known asyouth liberation) seeks to grant therights toyoung people that are traditionally reserved foradults. This is closely akin to the notion ofevolving capacities within thechildren's rights movement, but the youth rights movement differs from the children's rights movement in that the latter places emphasis on the welfare and protection of children through the actions and decisions of adults, while the youth rights movement seeks to grant youth the liberty to make their own decisions autonomously in the ways adults are permitted to, or to abolish the legal minimum ages at which such rights are acquired, such as theage of majority and thevoting age.[1]
Codified youth rights constitute one aspect of how youth are treated in society. Other aspects include social questions of how adults see and treat youth, and how open a society is toyouth participation.[2]
Of primary importance to advocates of youth rights are historical perceptions of young people, considered to beoppressive and informed bypaternalism,adultism andageism in general, as well as fears ofchildren andyouth. Several of these perceptions include the ignorant assumption that young people are incapable of making crucial decisions and need protecting from their tendency to act impulsively or irrationally.[3]
Such perceptions can informlaws throughout society, includingvoting age,child labor laws,the right to work,curfews,drinking age,smoking age,gambling age,age of consent,driving age,voting age,emancipation, medical autonomy,closed adoption,corporal punishment, theage of majority, andmandatory military conscription. Restrictions on young people that aren't applied to adults may be called status offenses and viewed as a form of unjustifieddiscrimination.[4]
There are specific sets of issues addressing the rights of youth in schools, includingzero tolerance, "gulag schools",In loco parentis, andstudent rights in general.Homeschooling,unschooling, andalternative schools are popular youth rights issues.A long-standing effort within the youth rights movements has focused oncivic engagement. Other issues include mandatoryallowance[5] andnon-authoritarian parenting.[6] There have been a number of historical campaigns to increaseyouth voting rights by lowering thevoting age and theage of candidacy. There are also efforts to get young people elected to prominent positions in local communities, including as members ofcity councils and as mayors. For example, in the2011 Raleigh mayoral election 17-year-old Seth Keel launched a campaign for Mayor despite the age requirement of 21.[7]Strategies for gaining youth rights that are frequently utilized by their advocates include developingyouth programs andorganizations that promoteyouth activism,youth participation,youth empowerment,youth voice,youth/adult partnerships,intergenerational equity andcivil disobedience between young people and adults.
There are social taboos for teensdating each other and havingsexual relations, including small age gaps of 3 years maximum. Youth rights adresses this and advocates for its full acceptance both legally and socially. This matter also includes the 18 minimum ages topornography which youth rights opposes in favor of allowing teens to view such content. Both of the matters above are logically justified due to their scientifically proven[by whom?]sexual maturity,mental maturity, and overallbiology and theirright to free will.[citation needed]
First emerging as a distinct movement in the 1930s, youth rights have long been concerned withcivil rights andintergenerational equity. Tracing its roots toyouth activists during theGreat Depression, youth rights has influenced thecivil rights movement,opposition to the Vietnam War, and many other movements. Since the advent of theInternet, the youth rights movement has been gaining predominance again.[citation needed]
Some youth rights advocates use the argument offallibility against the belief that others can know what is best or worst for an individual, and criticize the children's rights movement for assuming that exterior legislators, parents, authorities and so on can know what is for a minor's own good. These thinkers argue that the ability to correct what others think about one's ownwelfare in afalsificationist (as opposed topostmodernist) manner constitutes a non-arbitrary mental threshold at which an individual can speak for his or herself independently of exterior assumptions, as opposed to arbitrary chronological minimum ages in legislation. They also criticize the carte blanche for arbitrary definitions of "maturity" implicit in children's rights laws such as "with rising age and maturity" for being part of the problem, and suggest the absolute threshold of conceptual after-correcture to remedy it.[8]
These views are often supported by people with experience of the belief in absolutely gradual mental development being abused as an argument for "necessity" of arbitrary distinctions such asage of majority which they perceive as oppressive (either currently oppressing or having formerly oppressed them, depending on age and jurisdiction), and instead cite types ofconnectionism that allows forcritical phenomena that encompasses the entirebrain. These thinkers tend to stress that different individuals reach the critical threshold at somewhat different ages with no more than one in 365 (one in 366 in the case of leap years) chance of coinciding with a birthday, and that the relevant difference that it is acceptable to base different treatment on is only between individuals and not between jurisdictions. Generally, the importance of judging each individual by observable relevant behaviors and not by birth date is stressed by advocates of these views.[9]
Children's rights cover all rights belonging to children. When individuals grow up, they are granted new rights (such as voting, consent, and driving) and duties (such as criminal responsibility and draft eligibility). There are differentminimum limits of age at whichyouth are, situationally, not independent or deemed legally competent to make certain decisions or take certain actions. Some rights and responsibilities that legally come with age are:
After youth reach these limits they are free tovote, buy or consumealcohol beverages, and drivecars, among other acts.
The "youth rights movement", also described as "youth liberation", is a nascentgrass-roots movement whose aim is to fight againstageism and for thecivil rights of young people – those "under the age of majority", which is 18 in most countries. Some groups combatpedophobia andephebiphobia throughout society by promotingyouth voice,youth empowerment and ultimately,intergenerational equity throughyouth/adult partnerships.[10]Many advocates of youth rights distinguish their movement from thechildren's rights movement, which they argue advocates changes that are often restrictive towards children and youth.[11]
International Youth Rights (IYR) is a student-run youth rights organization in China, with regional chapters across the country and abroad. Its aim is to make voices of youth be heard across the world and give opportunities for youths to carry out their own creative solutions to world issues in real life.
TheEuropean Youth Forum (YFJ, from Youth Forum Jeunesse) is the platform of the National Youth Council and International Non-Governmental Youth Organisations in Europe. It strives for youth rights in International Institutions such as the European Union, the Council of Europe and the United Nations.The European Youth Forum works in the fields of youth policy and youth work development. It focuses its work on European youth policy matters, whilst through engagement on the global level it is enhancing the capacities of its members and promoting global interdependence. In its daily work the European Youth Forum represents the views and opinions of youth organisations in all relevant policy areas and promotes the cross-sectoral nature of youth policy towards a variety of institutional actors. The principles of equality and sustainable development are mainstreamed in the work of the European Youth Forum.Other International youth rights organizations includeArticle 12 in Scotland and K.R.A.T.Z.A. in Germany.
InMalta, the voting age has been lowered to 16 in 2018 to vote in national and European Parliament elections.[12]
TheEuropean Youth Portal is the starting place for the European Union's youth policy, withErasmus+ as one of its key initiatives.
TheNational Youth Rights Association is the primary youth rights organization for theyouths in the United States, with local chapters across the country. The organization known as Americans for a Society Free from Age Restrictions is also an important organization.The Freechild Project has gained a reputation for interjecting youth rights issues into organizations historically focused onyouth development andyouth service through their consulting and training activities. TheGlobal Youth Action Network engages young people around the world in advocating for youth rights, andPeacefire providestechnology-specific support for youth rights activists.
Choose Responsibility and their successor organization, theAmethyst Initiative, founded byJohn McCardell, Jr., exist to promote the discussion of the drinking age, specifically. Choose Responsibility focuses on promoting a legal drinking age of 18, but includes provisions such as education and licensing. The Amethyst Initiative, a collaboration of college presidents and other educators, focuses on discussion and examination of the drinking age, with specific attention paid to the culture of alcohol as it exists on college campuses and the negative impact of the drinking age on alcohol education and responsible drinking.
Young India Foundation (YIF) is a youth-led youth rights organization in India, based in Gurgaon with regional chapters across India. Its aim is to make voices of youth be heard across India and seek representation for the 60% of India's demographic that is below the age of 25.[13] YIF is also the organization behind the age of candidacy campaign to bring down the age when a Member of Legislative Assembly or Member of Parliament can contest.[14]
Youth rights, as a philosophy and as a movement, has been informed and is led by a variety of individuals and institutions across the United States and around the world. In the 1960s and 70sJohn Holt,Richard Farson,Paul Goodman andNeil Postman were regarded authors who spoke out about youth rights throughout society, including education, government, social services and popular citizenship.Shulamith Firestone also wrote about youth rights issues in the second-wave feminist classicThe Dialectic of Sex.Alex Koroknay-Palicz has become a vocal youth rights proponent, making regular appearances on television and in newspapers.Mike A. Males is a prominentsociologist and researcher who has published several books regarding the rights of young people across the United States.Robert Epstein is another prominent author who has called for greater rights and responsibilities for youth. Several organizational leaders, includingSarah Fitz-Claridge ofTaking Children Seriously,Bennett Haselton ofPeacefire andAdam Fletcher ofThe Freechild Project conduct local, national, and internationaloutreach for youth and adults regarding youth rights.Giuseppe Porcaro during his mandate as Secretary General of theEuropean Youth Forum edited the second edition of the volume "The International Law of Youth Rights" published byBrill Publishers.
