This articlehas an unclearcitation style. The references used may be made clearer with a different or consistent style ofcitation andfootnoting.(July 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Windows CE 5.0 | |
|---|---|
| Version of the Windows CE operating system | |
| Developer | Microsoft |
| Working state | Discontinued |
| Source model | |
| Released to manufacturing | July 9, 2004 |
| Latest release | CE 5.2.19202 |
| Kernel type | Hybrid kernel Monolithic kernel |
| License | Proprietarycommercial software |
| Preceded by | Windows CE 4.2 |
| Succeeded by | Windows Embedded CE 6.0 |
| Official website | https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms905511.aspx |
| Support status | |

Windows CE 5.0 (codenamed "Macallan")[2] is a successor toWindows CE 4.2, the third release in the Windows CE.NET family. It was first released on July 9, 2004. Like its predecessors, Windows CE 5.0 is marketed towards the embedded device market and independent device vendors. Windows CE 5.0 is billed as a low-cost, compact, fast-to-market,real-time operating system available forx86,ARM,MIPS, andSuperHmicroprocessor-based systems.
Windows CE 5.0 builds on previous Windows CE releases in its adoption ofshared source. Since 2001, Microsoft has been steadily expanding the available Windows CE source tree with embedded system developers. Windows CE 5.0 is the most open Microsoft operating system to date, though not all of the system is available under shared source agreements. Developers have the freedom to modify down to the kernel level, without the need to share their changes with Microsoft or competitors.
Windows CE 5.x is the base OS for Windows Mobile 6.0, 6.1 and 6.5. On the x86 platform, Windows CE 5.0 competes against Microsoft's other embedded operating systems,Windows XP Embedded and its predecessorWindows NT Embedded.
Platform Builder IDE for Windows CE 5.0 is the last builder tool available as standalone product.

According to Microsoft, Windows CE is preferable toWindows XP Embedded in situations where demanding wireless and multimedia requirements need to be met. The following are the primary considerations for “choosing the right version”:
There is also a difference in cost.