Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's sport
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject Women's sport and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:30 days  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports) |
|---|
 |
| Key project pages |
| Guidelines and Tips |
Naming conventions |
Categorization |
Assessment |
| Related projects |
Having worked for 2 years editing articles for Women In Red, a group of organizers have concluded that sourcing is one of the biggest hurdles in creating articles on women and non-binary genders. Though it is true that a lot of sourcing simply doesn’t exist, it is also true that there are sources, but we have no access to them. As these groups did not typically become subjects for academic study until the 1970s, many of the sources are not on line or are behind paywalls. Failure to include women and non-binary people in the encyclopedia presents a one-dimensional view of society and history. To address those issues, we are forming a new User Group aimed at referencing and support for like-minded groups and would appreciate your input or input from your supporters in our organizational process. See link:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Women_in_RedMauraWen (talk) 09:29 10 July 2018 (UTC)
For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, thebanners for talk pages usually say something like:
There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners.Stefen 𝕋owerHuddle •Handiwerk19:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)[reply]
 
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk)23:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Throughout the whole of 2026, Women in red is focusing onwomen in sport. This provides opportunities for creating biographies of notable women in a wide variety of sports, not forgetting those competing in the Winter Olympics and Paralypics early in the year. If you are not already a member of Women in Red, feel free to join up under "New registrations"here.--Ipigott (talk)09:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Svetlana Kuznetsova has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)22:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Erica Wheeler (basketball)#Requested move 10 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.Vestrian24Bio04:27, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Anky van Grunsven has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)15:55, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Netball has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)16:02, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk22:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Sherri Martel has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)04:28, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
