 | This page has anadministrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice is automatically updated byMusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old. |
@Cypp0847 has authored 198 articles, of which only 2 have been deleted. One of these was forWP:SYNTH,the AfD having taken place during October 2022. They primarily translate articles from the Chinese Wikipedia, recent examples contain no issues that require action by an NPR. I reviewedMa Tau Wai Road building collapse and found no issues, other than adding the translation banner to thetalk page. Chinese sources vary in reliability, but based on the articles I have reviewed from @Cypp0847, the sourcing appears consistent and without issue. BLPs such asJohn Clancey are well sourced and do not leave any information uncited. A recent AfD of their articleJohn MacLennanresulted in a unanimous keep. Theirtalk page is mostly filled with automated messages regarding images, with little after April 2025. Based on what I've seen from @Cypp0847, I am quite confident the 2022 AfD SYNTH concerns were an anomaly, and doesn't appear to have been an ongoing issue, with no reoccurrences since. Thank you for your contributions and translations, @Cypp0847!11WB (talk)10:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I came across Javajourney while reviewing new pages and was impressed with their clean pages on music subjects. They have created 106 undeleted mainspace pages since late 2024. (There are three deleted articles, all from early on in their Wikipedia career, plus a recently deleted inadvertently created redirect. A number of articles created in 2024 were redirected or merged at AfD, and Javajourney appears to have takenBastun's advice to bone up on notability to heart.) I reviewed the last 10 created pages in depth. Notability is always clearly demonstrated, whether through chart performance, reviews or some otherWP:NMUSIC criterion. (NMUSIC is one of the harder SNGs to master and Javajourney appears to understand how to strongly demonstrate notability for the benefit of a reviewer.) Pages are all highly presentable, NPOV is maintained, and talk pages are created. Sourcing is strong and primary sources are used appropriately (e.g. for chart performance). At the pace Javajourney is creating new articles, granting them autopatrolled will reduce the queue for reviewers without compromising on the quality of the encyclopedia.Dclemens1971 (talk)03:36, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
I think i potentially need Autopatrolled rights to do contributions on Astronomy and Spaceflight parts of WikipediaAbdullah1099 (talk)14:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
I've been editing Wikipedia regularly for about a year now. Initially, the quality of editing was poor, but I have always tried to contribute to Wikipedia through constructive editing. In addition to this, there have been about 30,000+ edits. Most of his edits and articles are constructive, so his articles do not require initial verification. I am aware of the right to autopatrolled verification and think that having this right would reduce the workload on article examiners.Mathew D'Marco (talk)06:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I returned to Wikipedia last year after an extended break that I was forced to take for personal reasons. I used to have auto patrol, however,I lost it due to inactivity in May 2025. I'm now applying to have it reinstated. Thank you!ScottyNolan (talk)20:48, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
