This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 14, 2026.
Subject is not sufficiently notable and is only referenced in passing in the target article.42-BRT (talk)14:36, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
wikt:paxillate refers to havingwikt:paxilla, an anatomical feature of starfish. Current target is a genus of fungi.Ossicle (echinoderm) would be a potential target, but the term is not mentioned there.Plantdrew (talk)20:33, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is a{{R from move}}, but I'm not convinced it's the best solution as the given name page (correctly?) doesn't mention non-given name uses. I arrived here directly from entering the URL expecting a full disambiguation at this title or to be redirected to a full disambiguation at the base name.Mary Sue is about the stock character and has hatnotes to the given name page andThe Mary Sue (c.f.#The Mary Sue for discussion about that redirect) so a redirecting this title there wouldn't be helpful. I'm honestly not sure what is the best action here.Thryduulf (talk)12:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The target page does not sufficiently describe the subjectPetéWarrior (talk)08:28, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It was sold toGamurs in 2021, so redirecting to Dan Abrams seems weird.Both the ownership andabout section does not mention Abrams anymore, so he may not be part of the website itself.Warm Regards,Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs)08:15, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
An attempt to add this subject to the target was reverted for using an unreliable source. No other valid target can be found.Jalen Barks(Woof)07:48, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect contains "(disambiguation)" but does not target a disambiguation page. In this case, Лв does not seem to have refered to Kyrgyz som, which was in the former disambiguation page ofЛв, but there is possible ambiguity withЛВ, which redirects toSoviet locomotive class LV.Mathguy2718 (talk)06:53, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The current target is too general to be helpful for a reader specifically searching for somatic variation. I think the best thing to do isretarget toSomatic mutation, which reflects the one mention of "somatic" in theGenetics article. Though mutation is not the same thing as variation, somatic mutation is mentioned initially inHuman somatic variation.Mathguy2718 (talk)03:36, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Unmentioned; history dive indicates unmentioned upon redirect creation.𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk)02:46, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find affinity here for Japanese, perWP:RLANG. There's a potential forEugenics in Japan but given this isapparently the term for eugenics in both Japanese *and* Chinese according to the tags, this would have anWP:XY withHistory of eugenics#China, which is the target ofEugenics in China.
Notably, though, while this would of course fail theWP:RLANG affinity test forChinese as well, a quick check on Google Translate reveals that this rendering (優生学) is, in fact, specifically Japanese-- the characters herewould be correct in Chinese, except the first character is specifically the version used in Traditional (優生學), while the last character is the one from Simplified (优生学).𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk)02:22, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No clue why this targets a random disambiguation page that doesn't mention the phrase. However, it is mentioned atKavita Daswani as a publication, but the mention does not use the apostrophe ('). I am unsure whether this should be deleted or retargeted there.Thanks,1isall (talk | contribs)01:53, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Czech inflection of Brazilian name. Vanishingly unlikely search term.ArcticSeeress (talk)12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]