Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:No episcopal threats

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromWikipedia:NOBISHOPS)
"Wikipedia:NOGOD" redirects here. For the project dedicated to articles about atheism, seeWikipedia:Atheism.
Humorous Wikipedia page
This page containsmaterial that is kept because it is consideredhumorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
This page in a nutshell: When the editing takes a turn out of your favor, don't get the bishops involved. Whatever you do,please just don't get the bishops involved!
Johann Otto von Gemmingen,Prince-Bishop of Augsburg in Bavaria (1591–1598). Aside from being dead for several centuries, he's not going to help you with any disputes on Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia,it is inevitable: a change you make gets reverted, a piece of content you've added is contested, or really any mishap involving your contributions happens. In any case, it's of paramount importance that youstay cool, becivil, and conduct yourself properly in order to resolve the issue in the right fashion. Among the ways to bungle this orderly process are bymaking personal attacks,casting aspersions, and beingjust tone-deaf to the consensus.

There is one action of misconduct that takes the cake from anything else. It is wholly unacceptable on theEnglish Wikipedia(and onMulberry Street, to think that you'd see it there) toget thebishops involved. For goodness' sake, if the bishops get involved, the world may implode. The apocalypse is liable to start.McDonald's ice cream machines may start functioning properly.Dr. Doofenshmirtz may finallytake over the tri-state AREA!!!!!!!

    Themere thought of getting the bishops involved is just too much to bear.

If the bishops are unrighteously invoked in any event or process on Wikipedia, sheer chaos is bound to ensue. Let's just not invoke them,m'kay?

List

[edit]

There are a few ways that bishops may serve as a detriment to Wikipedia when unduly called upon, so in a flagrantmiddle-finger toWikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose, a list is provided below which details the many ways that getting the bishops involved on Wikipedia can (and will) go wrong.

  • Contacting the bishop of a Wikipedia editor who happens to be a member of the clergy, in order to rat them out for nominating your favoriteYouTuber's article for deletion. This is like to just make the YouTuber look bad, and will end you up banned from theirTwitch chat when they livestream.
  • The bishops are called asartillery offences to support anAfD vote. (keep that weird,maybe-notable-if-we-did-a-Google-search article out of sight from the internet-connected anglosphere!)
  • A newKeanu Reeves movie has come out, and you've caught your Wikipedia editor-niece editing his page. Disapproving of hisviolent action franchise, you have enlisted a bishop and theirdiocese to mediate her activities on-wiki. This is only going to waste the church's time and make your niece hate you.
  • A bishop is asked to perform a technical change, such as page and file moving. A high percentage of bishops of theCatholic Church haven't the slightest idea of what to do, and may be baffled to the point of transforming to aflightless bird, most commonly anostrich orpenguin.
  • Ric Flair has had his umpteenth "final match".Vandals are drawn by the media attention and are vandalising his page. You decide to enlist aneparchy led by a bishop to bless Flair's page. This is not like to actually help any vandalism-combative efforts—this blessing may actually be misdirected at the vandals, and we don't want that. If this happens, even if unintentionally; the user, the bishop and his participating unit will be sentenced to57 slaps with a wet trout each, and an evening in thevillage stocks.


No bishops acting asHowitzers, no bishops advocating againstviolence in film, and no bishops blessingpro wrestlers. For the latter, keep that activity off-wiki.


Other direct nuisances

[edit]
  • No bishops acting asmeatpuppets of an editor who is on the losing side of a discussion.Deus videt peccata tua (no relation toHawk Tuah).
  • No bishops are to be summoned to weigh in on incidents involving members of theirparish at theAdministrators' noticeboard. That constitutes aconflict of interest.
  • No bishops are to register on Wikipedia for the sole purpose of removing white spaces at the end of paragraphs in articles.
  • No bishops are to aidPOV-pushers on articles such asJesus cloth andFreddy's. They must notespecially go near the article for the place with thesteakburgers.
A sticker of Pascal on a post near Puebla Cathedral in Puebla de Zaragoza, Mexico
Once, a bishop attempted to butt intoPedro Pascal's Good Article review. ACommons user ended up capturing the result posted on a pole nearPuebla Cathedral inPuebla de Zaragoza, Mexico.

Glossary of bishops (& how to avoid their insanity)

[edit]
Okay, now things have gotten a bit weird.

A user who involves two bishops is said to have thebishop pair. Two bishops are considered to have an advantage over twoSysops, or a Sysop and a bishop (as if a bishop would join forces with a Sysop). Two Sysops may have the ability todelete the main page, which may be undone, but two bishops can annihilate the main page to a point beyond recovery. If this happens, ask aglobal renamer orsteward with avanishing request tocourtesy vanish your account.

When two bishops unite, they are able to perform disruptive actions on Wikipedia. The most pressing of these activities would be performing aDJ set of "Music Sounds Better with You" (1998), "Lady (Hear Me Tonight)" (2000), and "So Much Love to Give" (2002). Each classics ofdance music, they would definitely leave the crowd rolling in the morning. However, as one bishop performs the set, another takes anillegal recording and attempts to upload the set toWikimedia Commons, constituting acopyright violation. This usually only occurs onApril Fools' Day ofleap years, but it is a worrisome occurrence enough. When two bishops unite, they are able to transform theteahouse intothe Nether fromMinecraft. The lava alone is tedious and dangerous to remove from the page, so caution is advised during cleanup in the event this happens.

Do not attempt to ask two bishops to fixthe village pump in the event it breaks. Chances are,they will grossly overestimate their skill in repair, causing untold shenanigans to unfold. Nor should you ask two bishops for ideas on how to re-write the first paragraph of the lede ofTaylor Swift's page, as the bishops may be tempted to write of their love forslushies instead.

Cautionary note

[edit]
St Nicholas preferring the argument of force to the force of argument

The story ofSt Nicholas punchingArius' lights out at theFirst Council of Nicaea is generally thought to be apocryphal and may not be used as precedent.

See also

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Philosophy
Article construction
Writing article content
Removing or
deleting content
The basics
Philosophy
Dos
Don'ts
WikiRelations
About essays
Policies and guidelines
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:No_episcopal_threats&oldid=1313672402"
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp