 | An editor has determined thatsufficient sources exist to establish the subject'snotability. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co." – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(June 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Weyerhaeuser Company v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Company | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued November 28, 2006 Decided February 20, 2007 | |
| Full case name | Weyerhaeuser Company, Petitioner v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Company, Inc. |
| Citations | 549U.S.312 (more) 127 S. Ct. 1069; 166L. Ed. 2d 911; 2007U.S. LEXIS 1333; 75 U.S.L.W. 4091; 2007-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 75,601; 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 77 |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined byunanimous |
Weyerhaeuser Company v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Company, 549 U.S. 312 (2007), is a decision of theSupreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that the Court's decision inBrooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. did not apply in predatory purchasing cases.[1]: 412
 | This article related to a case of theSupreme Court of the United States of theRoberts Court is astub. You can help Wikipedia byadding missing information. |