Thishelp request has been answered. If you need more help, you canask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on theiruser talk page, or consider visiting theTeahouse.

Please help me with...Hoi, how can I check if sombody else is making a draft with the same title as me ? How can it be avoided that 2 persons making a draft in parallel ?Klutserke (talk)15:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When creating your draft, if another draft already exists with that title, you will be shown that draft. For example, if you went to createDraft:Example you would notice that that draft already exists and you don't need to create a new one. If you think someone may have created a draft under another name, you can search for that as well, typingDraft: and then that title into the search box. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ;16:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clear, thanks !Klutserke (talk)17:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Convoy RS 3, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦09:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you made a bit of a mess with yourshortened footnotes (sfn) in some articles, so I fixed it. You may benefit from studying my edits to see how this template works:German battleship Bismarck andLast battle of Bismarck. In short: if there are two sources by the same author from 1980, just use 1980a and 1980b instead of messing around with{{sfnref}}. See also:Template:Harvard citation documentation § More than one work in a year.Jay D. Easy (t)21:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi, thx for pointing that out. On the other hand I'm not sure whether the 'von' needs capitals. In the book it's written without capital everywhere and if I remember well, germans do make a point of writing it without capital as well. Let's wait and see what other people think of it.Obviously , spelling is not my cup of tea :-)Klutserke (talk)22:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point! In fact it seems preferable to drop 'von' entirely – which I did instead.Jay D. Easy (t)18:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here for how I fixed the references you added toGerman auxiliary cruiser Atlantis.DuncanHill (talk)23:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Klutserke - regardingthis edit, can you confirm the name of the British ship in Gibraltar in May 1937?HMS Aurora (12) did not commission until November 1937. Prager seems to have something wrong.Parsecboy (talk)00:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prager writes on pp. 108-109 that Vice-admiral Cunningham shifted his flag temporarely ( from the Hood ) to the cruiser Aurora, and that with this cruiser the British participated in exercises. Indeed the name of the cruiser must be wrong. The name of the italian cruiser participating in the exercises is not known, I'll erase the name and just mention then a British and Italian cruiser.

Thanks for the - as always - careful review of my edits.Klutserke (talk)08:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder what ship it was;HMS Arethusa (26) would be a possibility, as she was in the Mediterranean Fleet at the time withHood, and it seems that none of theLeanders were in the Mediterranean in 1937 (onlyHMAS Sydney (D48) served in the unit, and she had been sent to Australia in 1936). There were several Counties in the Mediterranean and took part in patrols off Spain in 1937, but it seems less likely that Prager would mistake one of the 10,000-ton heavy cruisers for a 5,000-ton light cruiser. Unfortunately, I don't have many good resources on British light cruisers, so I can't confirm whether it was in factArethusa (which seems most likely).Parsecboy (talk)17:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have done a very good job of improving this article. Please add one or more citations to the next to the last paragraph of the article, including one at the end. Also, please add a citation to the last sentence in the article. These are needed to bring the article to B class. In the alternative, you could delete that content but I suspect you probably have or can easily find citations for it. Thanks.Donner60 (talk)07:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I reduced the paragraph a bit according to the refs I founds for the related topics. Could you review if it meets standards now ?Klutserke (talk)18:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleHMS Sheffield (C24) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)09:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Klutserke, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on thisseasonal occasion. Spread theWikiLove by wishing another user aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk)21:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk)21:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Barnstar You have been selected as a runner-up for theMilitary History Newcomer of the Year by a popular vote of your peers in recognition of your contributions to the English Wikipedia's coverage of military history. On behalf of thecoordinators ofWikiProject Military history, please accept this token of gratitude and appreciation on behalf of the project; we hope to see more of you in the years to come.Hawkeye7(discuss)01:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleHMS Sheffield (C24) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:HMS Sheffield (C24) for comments about the article, andTalk:HMS Sheffield (C24)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)01:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission ofHMS Sheffield (C24) at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs}15:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi, i think I've addressed the concerns, could you review ? Thx !Klutserke (talk)21:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On18 June 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleHMS Sheffield (C24), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatHMS Sheffield earned twelvebattle honours during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/HMS Sheffield (C24). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,HMS Sheffield (C24)), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk)12:03, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toFlak Trap. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Onel5969^{TT me}17:15, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleType VII submarine isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)00:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between July and September 2025.Donner60 (talk) viaMilHistBot (talk)03:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Yourgood article nomination of the articleType VII submarine has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)14:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleType VII submarine haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)13:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between October and December 2025.Hawkeye7 (talk) viaMilHistBot (talk)00:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Hello, Klutserke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Flak Trap, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)18:08, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]