User talk:HorseBro the hemionus
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, this is the talkp-age of Khan of the universe and the hoofed animals. I actually and seriously get anxious and scared when a new discussion is here and I will be terrified. So yeah please only put bad news, no good news allowed so I can scare myself somehow.— The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk)11:38, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageDzungar Khanate, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)08:07, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBarefooted Flight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKazakh.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi HorseBro the hemionus. Thank you for your work onBattle of the Bloody Hills (1637). Another editor,Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Mariamnei}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mariamnei (talk)12:13, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageTsewang Rabtan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)12:09, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk)13:37, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Turkistan (1718) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Онеми (talk)16:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 | HelloHorseBro the hemionus! The thread you created at theTeahouse, You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
 | Hello,HorseBro the hemionus!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)17:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] |
Your edit toTorghut Migration has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have addedcopyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence ofpermission from the copyright holder. If youare the copyright holder, please readWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without anappropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofcontent, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policywill beblocked from editing. SeeWikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)17:38, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
| HelloHorseBro the hemionus! The thread you created at theTeahouse, You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Hello, HorseBro the hemionus,
Thank you for creatingFourth Kazakh–Dzungar War.
I have taggedthe page as having some issues to fix, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:
I can't find any reference to a "Fourth Kazakh-Dzungar War" in any sources or books. It is important that this is not a "manufactured term" unique to Wikipedia which would beoriginal research. We must only follow what the established sources say and the terms they use. thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit theTeahouse.
Delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Aszx5000 (talk)11:00, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
When you created this article, you place 2 malformed Sfn cites in the text - Perdue 2009 & Clarke 2004. These 2 Sfn cites do not have a complete citatin such as cite book or cite web etc to link to, they are orphans. I have no idea what source these 2 Sfn cites are referring to. Please either replace the Sfn cites with a complete citation or place the complete citation within a separate reference section. Refer toHelp:Shortened footnotes.Template:Sfn, andTemplate:Sfn#Usage for instructions. Once you fix this issue the article will no longer be inCategory:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. -Shearonink (talk)23:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageKazakh–Dzungar War (1681–1686), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)14:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onBattle of Zaysan (1720) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.
John B123 (talk)20:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onInvasion of Yenisei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.
John B123 (talk)20:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onKazakh–Dzungar War (1681–1686) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.
John B123 (talk)20:31, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onKazakh-Dzungar war (1708–1712) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.
John B123 (talk)20:33, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onKazakh–Dzungar War (1731–1735) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.
John B123 (talk)20:33, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onSiege of Yamyshev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.
John B123 (talk)20:33, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedKazakh–Uzbek War (1534), a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSawran was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:53, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
signature test 1— {{flag icon|Dzungar Khanate}} The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk)09:53, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageKazakh–Dzungar War (1698–1703), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)08:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did atDraft:Lobsangsür, you may beblocked from editing. Wikipedia is a seriousencyclopedia, and contributions of this type are consideredvandalism.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)20:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Please remove alloffensive and uncivil content from your user page. This includes use ofslurs, such asretard, claims toassume bad faith, and beingevil as fuck, among others.Youshouldchooseausernamethat (Youshouldtalk)10:44, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
{{funny}} template and keep things that could be considered humorous (it would be best to remove mentions of retardation). | This page containsmaterial that is kept because it is consideredhumorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakh–Dzungar War (1731–1735) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)22:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakh–Dzungar War (1698–1703) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)23:49, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedKazakh–Dzungar War (1739–1741), a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIshim was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:54, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Campaignbox Kazakh–Dzungar War (1708–1718) has beenlisted for discussion, which may result in the template beingmerged ordeleted byconsensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)13:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, HorseBro the hemionus,
Do not create User pages for non-existent editors. They will be deleted. It's okay if you want to make user pages in your own User space but present them as if they are actually editors here when they are unregistered. If you have questions, please bring them tothe Teahouse.LizRead!Talk!06:41, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You reverted my edit on the flag of the Kazakh Khanate. As I mentioned before, the blue flag of the khanate is fictional and should not be used on wikipedia. Now, I see the tamga is included in the flag section, which is incorrect. The red flag is a more accurate representation, and I plan to draw it in the future with sources. If you prefer to use flags in the article, please use the red one, although its quality could be improved.GnuUserr (talk)18:49, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did atDraft:Kazakh–Dzungar_War_(1723–1730), you may beblocked from editing.Frimshaqi (talk)04:25, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Good job on the new page!
Earth605talk07:31, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toList of battles involving the Kazakhs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time becauseit has no sources.I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)20:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]