Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:4u1e

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
4u1e is taking a shortwikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.
User_talk:4u1e/archive1
User_talk:4u1e/archive2
User_talk:4u1e/archive3
User_talk:4u1e/archive4
User_talk:4u1e/archive5
User_talk:4u1e/archive6
User_talk:4u1e/archive7
User_talk:4u1e/archive8

Image question

[edit]

I see thatFile:AJ Foyt dirt car 1961.jpg looks too good to be true. It was almost certainly taken by a professional photographer -- 1961 looks like the right era. I'm concerned about the likelihood offlickr washing. Have you asked if the flickr account holder if he was the photographer?Royalbroil15:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hadn't really thought about it, but I agree it could be; the resolution's quite high for a fan's snap. Although of course some professionals do put stuff on Flickr... I'll ask, but if the poster says it's their pic, and licenses it as such, it's a bit difficult for us :)4u1e (talk)21:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with everything that you replied. If the flickr contributor says they took it then it's fine to use. If not, then it can be deleted. I'll speedy delete it as a known copyright violation. I know some professionals put on flickr. A bunch of Wikipedia's NASCAR images are from the first official NASCAR photographer (of the NASCAR truck series) who I met on flickr while asking about an image. I have another flickr friend who photographed for Circle Track magazine (used to be huge here in the United States).Royalbroil03:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP Motorsport in theSignpost

[edit]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Motorsport for aSignpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk)16:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOUR RFC

[edit]

There are twoWP:RFCs atWP:FOUR. The first isto conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger(T /C /WP:FOUR /WP:CHICAGO /WP:WAWARD)06:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page appearance: Brabham BT19

[edit]

This is a note to let the main editors ofBrabham BT19 know that the article will be appearing astoday's featured article on February 19, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please askBencherlite (talk ·contribs). You can view the TFA blurb atWikipedia:Today's featured article/February 19, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions atWikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Brabham BT19

TheBrabham BT19 is aFormula One racing car designed byRon Tauranac for the BritishBrabham team. The BT19 competed in the1966 and1967 Formula One World Championships and was used by Australian driverJack Brabham to win his thirdWorld Championship in 1966. The BT19, which Brabham referred to as his "Old Nail", was the first car bearing its driver's name to win a World Championship race. The car was initially conceived in 1965 for a 1.5-litre (92-cubic inch)Coventry Climax engine, but never raced in this form. For the 1966 season theFédération Internationale de l'Automobile doubled the limit on engine capacity to 3 litres (183 cu in). Australian companyRepco developed a newV8 engine for Brabham's use in 1966, but a disagreement between Brabham and Tauranac over the latter's role in the racing team left no time to develop a new car to handle it. Instead, the existing BT19 chassis was modified for the job. Only one BT19 was built. It was bought by Repco in 2004 and put on display in theNational Sports Museum in Melbourne, Australia, in 2008. It is often demonstrated at motorsport events.(Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk)00:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moved by me from 17th to 19th to accommodate a request that the article on the 19th run on the 17th instead.BencherliteTalk00:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

[edit]

Formula One
Thank you for dedicated quality articles and contributions for project Formula One, such asBrabham BT19 andBrabham, taking care of articles on races and people, - you are anawesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)12:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 772nd recipient of myPumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk)13:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no.772 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk)09:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today'sBrabham! --Gerda Arendt (talk)12:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk)11:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scuderia Coloni

[edit]

Hi. Just letting you know the merge you commented on a few years ago at atTalk:Scuderia Coloni has finally been done. The merge brings in material fromEnzo Coloni Racing Car Systems which is now a redirect. The page move toColoni Motorsport has not been done as it is a separate issue to the merge discussion - views welcome on whether to pursue this as well.

I did the merge but make no claim to any expertise in motorsports, so apologies for any accidental inaccuracies I may have introduced. If you have a spare moment do please have a quick look atScuderia Coloni and correct any errors I've made. Regards,Euryalus (talk)06:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coloni emblem.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Coloni emblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)13:06, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

[edit]

Hi 4u1e! As aSteward I'm involved in the upcomingunification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (seem:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking atyour account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password onSpecial:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on mytalk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk)09:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofList of Formula One broadcasters for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleList of Formula One broadcasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Formula One broadcasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Tvx116:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brabham scheduled for TFA

[edit]

This is to let you know that theBrabham article has been scheduled to be rerun astoday's featured article for May 21, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so atWikipedia:Today's featured article/May 21, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks!Jimfbleak -talk to me?06:12, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, 4u1e. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, 4u1e. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, 4u1e. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)08:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brabham Featured article review

[edit]

I have nominatedBrabham for afeatured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured article criteria, or help improve the article. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regard to the article's featured status (seereview instructions).SandyGeorgia (Talk)00:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:F1 Selected Article date

[edit]

Template:F1 Selected Article date has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.* Pppery *it has begun...03:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)08:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment forFlag of convenience

[edit]

Flag of convenience has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)16:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:4u1e&oldid=1249575487"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp